Renaissance philosophy

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Renaissance philosophy stretches across a period running roughly from 1400 to 1600 in Europe, sitting at the crossroads between the medieval world and the age of Descartes. What happens when a civilization decides that the ideas it inherited are not quite enough? The thinkers of this era did not throw out the old texts. They multiplied them, translated them afresh, argued over them in new languages, and opened them to audiences who had never been invited to the conversation before. The questions they wrestled with touch on everything from whether the soul survives death to whether a gentleman may legally accept a duel. How did ancient Greek philosophy, Christian theology, and a new hunger for classical elegance collide and fuse? And what kind of world did that collision produce?

• 2. Aristotle's Long Shadow

  ›

  From the twelfth and thirteenth centuries onward, university curricula were built on a remarkable recovery of Aristotelian writings. Texts on natural philosophy, moral philosophy, and metaphysics arrived in Latin Europe and immediately organized the structure of philosophical education. Logic was treated as a training of the mind, the gateway to all the other branches of inquiry. The assumption was that the more theoretical a discipline, the more scientifically respectable it was.

  Aristotle was never quite an unquestioned oracle. He was more often a springboard, his opinions placed beside those of others and weighed against Holy Scripture. Yet his grip was remarkable for its longevity. His Nicomachean Ethics remained the main authority for ethics at Protestant universities until the late seventeenth century. More than fifty Protestant commentaries on that single text were published before 1682. Any account of Renaissance thought that overlooks this continuity risks misreading what was actually new.

• 3. Plato Returns to Florence

  ›

  Marsilio Ficino completed his Latin translation of Plato's complete works in Florence in 1484, and the effect was profound. In the Middle Ages, Plato had been known directly through only two and a half dialogues. Now the full body of his thought was available to readers across Europe. By the sixteenth century, any educated person who wished to be taken seriously read Plato alongside Aristotle.

  Ficino, who lived from 1433 to 1499, was not content merely to translate. He reinterpreted Plato through early Greek commentators and through a Christian lens. Where Plato's Symposium celebrated a form of love that troubled Christian sensibilities, Ficino redirected it toward what he called spiritual or Platonic love. Pietro Bembo and Baldassare Castiglione later extended this concept in the early sixteenth century, applying it to relations between men and women. Ficino also believed that all ancient knowledge, from Moses to the Greeks, formed a single coherent whole according to God's plan. This conviction drew him toward what was called Hermeticism, a body of hidden knowledge that he regarded as consistent with Christian truth.

• 4. The Humanist Challenge

  ›

  Francesco Petrarca, born in 1304, did not simply admire Roman poets like Virgil, Horace, and Cicero for style alone. He argued that philosophy had its priorities wrong. The theoretical branches of inquiry, which tradition ranked highest, deserved to be subordinated to practical ethics. His invective On His Own Ignorance and That of Many Others pressed the case with both force and wit. Philosophy, in his view, should be guided by rhetoric; its purpose was not to reveal truth in the abstract but to encourage people to pursue the good.

  This Italian humanist position had a radical implication: it threatened to reduce all philosophy to ethics, echoing Plato's Socrates and Cicero's Latin writings. In 1416-1417, Leonardo Bruni, chancellor of Florence and the pre-eminent humanist of his day, re-translated Aristotle's Ethics into a more flowing and idiomatic Latin. He wanted to communicate the elegance of Aristotle's Greek while making the text accessible to readers without a specialist philosophical training. Others followed his lead. Nicolò Tignosi, working in Florence around 1460, added historical examples and poetic quotations to his Aristotle commentary. Jacques Lefèvre d'Etaples in Paris in the 1490s avoided the standard scholastic format of questions entirely. The driving conviction was that removing technical jargon would open philosophy to a far wider public.

  Desiderius Erasmus, the Dutch humanist, went so far as to prepare a Greek edition of Aristotle, and eventually university professors of philosophy were expected to at least appear to know Greek.

• 5. Philosophy in the Vernacular

  ›

  For most of the fifteenth century, Italian humanists showed little enthusiasm for writing philosophy in their own spoken language. Only a handful of Italian-language dialogues or translations of Aristotle appeared during that period. The shift came when Italian was acknowledged as a language capable of carrying genuine literary and philosophical weight. From the 1540s onward, vernacular philosophical writing multiplied rapidly.

  Alessandro Piccolomini drew up an ambitious programme to translate or paraphrase the entire Aristotelian corpus into Italian. Benedetto Varchi, Bernardo Segni, and Giambattista Gelli, all active in Florence, contributed to this effort. Attempts to render Plato's doctrines in Italian followed the same current. This rise of vernacular philosophy arrived well before the Cartesian turn of the seventeenth century, and scholars are only now beginning to map its full extent. Donato Acciaiuoli's commentary on Aristotle's Ethics, first published in 1478, offers a glimpse of how the blending of Aristotelian, Platonic, and Christian traditions could achieve wide success when done with skill.

• 6. Religion, Reform, and the Limits of Secularism

  ›

  Earlier historians sometimes read the Renaissance as a drift toward secularism, pointing to Pietro Pomponazzi's argument that the immortality of the soul could not be resolved philosophically in a manner consistent with Christianity, or to Pico della Mirandola's Oration on the Dignity of Man as evidence of a new human-centered worldview. The full picture is more complicated. The most successful compendium of natural philosophy in the entire period, the Compendium philosophiae naturalis, first published in 1530, was written by Frans Titelmans, a Franciscan friar from the Low Countries whose work carries a strongly religious character.

  The sixteenth century contained both the Protestant and the Catholic reformations. Renaissance philosophy ends its span at precisely the period of the Thirty Years' War, which ran from 1618 to 1648. Erasmus and Martin Luther conducted their famous exchanges over the freedom of the will within this charged religious atmosphere. Spanish thinkers became increasingly preoccupied with questions of nobility. A large and dedicated literature emerged around the ethics of duelling, debating whether the practice was permissible. Religion was not a backdrop to Renaissance thought; it was woven into the very structure of the questions being asked. Pico della Mirandola's Disputations, for their part, drew directly on the scholastic tradition of examined positions and counter-positions, a tradition that thrived far outside university lecture halls.

• 7. A Synthesis Torn and Remade

  ›

  Thomas Aquinas and his many followers had built a careful architecture linking Christian theology, Aristotelianism, and Neoplatonism into a single system. During the Renaissance, that architecture came under sustained pressure. Thinkers disputed Aquinas's ranking of ethics beneath politics. They questioned whether the theoretical branches of philosophy deserved their privileged status. They brought in Plato, the Stoics, Pyrrhonism, and Academic Skepticism, movements from ancient philosophy that had been marginal or absent from the medieval mainstream. Michel de Montaigne drew on Pyrrhonist doubt. Justus Lipsius gave Neostoicism a wide audience through his writings.

  None of these ancient doctrines arrived without a Christian filter. They were made legitimate, as the source text notes, only by passing through that lens. What emerged was not a clean rupture with the medieval synthesis, but a new and more complicated one. It rested on more complete and varied sources, often read in the original Greek and Latin, and it addressed a broader public than scholasticism had ever imagined. The thinkers born within this span, from Coluccio Salutati in 1331 to Tommaso Campanella in 1568, carried that synthesis forward into the century of Descartes, who published his Discourse on Method in 1637, the point at which early modern philosophy conventionally begins.