Earth's energy budget
Earth's energy budget describes the balance between the sunlight our planet absorbs and the heat it radiates back into space. Get that balance wrong by even a fraction, and the climate shifts. Right now, it is wrong. Since at least 1970, Earth has been absorbing more energy than it releases, and that imbalance is measurable from orbit.
The numbers involved are staggering. Every second, the Sun delivers roughly 340 watts of energy for each square meter of Earth's surface area. Meanwhile, the planet is steadily warming at about 0.18 degrees Celsius per decade since around 1970. Those two facts are connected by a cascade of physical processes spanning the upper atmosphere down to ocean water a kilometer deep.
What keeps the books from balancing? Why do greenhouse gases matter as much as scientists say? What happens to all that extra heat once it enters the system? And what would it actually take to stop the warming? The answers lie inside the accounting.
About 340 watts per square meter of solar energy arrive at the top of Earth's atmosphere every second, averaged across the globe and across the year. Not all of it stays. Around 77 W/m2 bounces back to space from clouds and the atmosphere, and another 23 W/m2 reflects off bright surfaces like snow and ice. What remains, roughly 240 W/m2, is the absorbed solar radiation that actually drives the climate.
That reflective fraction has a name: the Bond albedo, which averages close to 0.3 for Earth as a whole. Clouds are responsible for about half of that reflectivity. They are also the single most complex variable in the energy budget, acting simultaneously as mirrors, insulators, and feedback mechanisms depending on their altitude, thickness, and location.
The Sun does not heat the planet evenly. Tropical regions receive far more direct radiation than the poles, and that gradient is what sets weather systems in motion. As the energy seeks equilibrium across latitudes, it drives the atmosphere, the oceans, ice sheets, and living ecosystems, producing what we experience as climate.
Energy that the Earth absorbs cannot stay forever; physics demands it return to space. It does so as outgoing longwave radiation, thermal energy emitted at wavelengths far longer than sunlight, in the infrared band.
The path from absorbed sunlight to escaping heat is not direct. Some of the surface's thermal emission passes straight through the atmosphere via what scientists call the atmospheric window, escaping unimpeded. The rest must travel upward through the atmosphere by other routes: evaporation carries heat away from wet surfaces as latent heat, convection and turbulence lift warm air masses, and infrared radiation passes layer by layer through the air until it can finally escape at the top.
Greenhouse gases complicate that exit route. Molecules of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and methane absorb outgoing infrared radiation and re-emit it in all directions, including back toward the surface. An increase in those gases forces a decrease in outgoing longwave radiation, producing a warming energy imbalance. Surface temperatures must then rise until enough additional heat is radiated to restore balance. The atmosphere's emissivity, a measure of how effectively it radiates, captures this effect mathematically, and the fourth-power sensitivity of thermal radiation to temperature keeps the system from running away, at least in the long run.
The top few meters of Earth's oceans hold more energy than the entire atmosphere. That single fact explains why climate change unfolds over decades rather than years.
Ocean water is an extraordinarily effective absorber of solar energy, and its sheer mass gives it a thermal inertia that dwarfs the land surface or the cryosphere. When the atmosphere receives extra heat from the greenhouse effect, most of it flows into the sea. Over 90 percent of the extra energy that has accumulated on Earth from ongoing global warming since 1970 has been stored in the ocean. About one-third of that ocean heating has reached depths below 700 meters.
The pace of ocean heat uptake has accelerated. As of 2020, the rate of growth was approaching 500 TW, equivalent to roughly 1 W/m2. That translated to about 14 zettajoules of heat gain in a single year, a figure that exceeds the total primary energy consumed by all of humanity by a factor of at least 20. Since at least 1990, ocean heat content has increased at a steady or accelerating rate, and since the year 2000 a global network of nearly 4,000 Argo robotic floats has tracked that warming in real time.
During 2005 to 2019, the Earth's energy imbalance averaged about 460 terawatts, or 0.90 watts per square meter globally. That figure is not a model projection; it is an observed measurement assembled from satellites, ocean floats, and geodetic surveys.
The NASA Earth Radiation Budget Experiment put three satellites into orbit in the mid-1980s: the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite, launched in October 1984; NOAA-9, launched in December 1984; and NOAA-10, launched in September 1986. Since March 2000, NASA's Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, or CERES, instruments have extended and refined those measurements. CERES data showed that the energy imbalance rose from roughly +0.42 W/m2 in 2005 to +1.12 W/m2 in 2019. Contributing factors included more water vapor, fewer clouds, rising greenhouse gas concentrations, and declining ice cover, partially offset by rising temperatures.
Other researchers found a radiative forcing rise of +0.53 from 2003 to 2018 using CERES, AIRS, and CloudSat data together. About 80 percent of that increase traced to reduced outgoing longwave radiation caused by growing concentrations of greenhouse gases. Estimates of the imbalance across different time periods show a clear upward trend: the 1971-2006 average was 0.50 W/m2, rising to 0.57 for 1971-2018, and then to 0.99 for the 2012-2024 window.
Not all of Earth's energy comes from the Sun. Geothermal heat flowing from the interior contributes an estimated 47 terawatts, split roughly equally between heat left over from the planet's formation and heat generated by radioactive decay in the crust and mantle. That translates to an average flux of 0.087 W/m2, just 0.027 percent of the solar contribution.
Human energy production in 2019 averaged about 18 TW, equivalent to roughly 160,000 TW-hours for the year. That is also small compared to solar input, but the combustion that generates most of that energy loads additional greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, producing a warming effect more than 20 times larger than the direct heat of burning.
Photosynthesis captures an estimated 140 TW of incident energy, around 0.08 percent, allowing plants to build biomass. That same energy flows back out again as heat when plants are eaten or burned. Joseph Fourier, in a paper often cited as the first scientific work on the greenhouse effect, once argued that radiation from deep space played a meaningful role in Earth's temperature; later analysis showed it was negligible compared to the processes he was among the first to recognize.
Climate scientists Kevin Trenberth, James Hansen, and colleagues have described the monitoring of Earth's energy imbalance as the most important metric for guiding climate policy. Because the ocean absorbs heat slowly and releases it just as slowly, the climate system carries changes in the pipeline that surface temperatures have not yet fully expressed. Tracking EEI lets scientists forecast how much additional warming is already locked in, regardless of current emissions.
In 2012, NASA scientists reported that halting global warming would require reducing atmospheric CO2 to 350 parts per million or below, assuming all other forcings remained fixed. By 2020, atmospheric CO2 had reached 415 ppm, and all long-lived greenhouse gases together exceeded a 500 ppm equivalent concentration.
The rate of heating from the current human-caused imbalance is, in the source's words, without precedent. Natural climate forcings, such as the changes in solar output over an 11-year solar cycle, produce swings in radiative forcing that are smaller in magnitude than the shifts caused by recent trends in greenhouse gas concentration alone. Understanding how much energy is flowing where, and how fast, is not just an academic exercise; it is the foundation for every estimate of how much warming to expect and how quickly action must be taken.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is Earth's energy budget and why does it matter?
Earth's energy budget is the balance between the solar energy the planet absorbs and the longwave radiation it releases back into space. When the two fluxes are equal, the climate is stable; a persistent imbalance drives long-term warming or cooling. Scientists identify monitoring this balance as the single most important metric for understanding climate change.
How much solar energy does Earth absorb each year?
Of the roughly 340 W/m2 of solar radiation arriving at the top of Earth's atmosphere, about 240 W/m2 is absorbed after roughly 77 W/m2 is reflected by clouds and the atmosphere and 23 W/m2 is reflected by surface albedo. This absorbed solar radiation is called ASR and drives the climate system.
What is Earth's energy imbalance and how large is it?
Earth's energy imbalance (EEI) is the difference between the solar energy absorbed and the longwave radiation released to space. During 2005 to 2019 it averaged about 460 terawatts, or 0.90 watts per square meter globally. For the 2012-2024 window it reached 0.99 W/m2, with a 90% confidence interval of 0.70 to 1.28.
Where does most of the extra heat from global warming go?
Over 90 percent of the excess energy accumulated from ongoing global warming since 1970 has been stored in the ocean. About one-third of that ocean heating has propagated to depths below 700 meters. As of 2020, the rate of ocean heat uptake was approaching 500 TW, equivalent to roughly 14 zettajoules of heat gain in a single year.
Which satellites measure Earth's energy budget?
The NASA Earth Radiation Budget Experiment used three satellites in the 1980s: the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (launched October 1984), NOAA-9 (December 1984), and NOAA-10 (September 1986). Since March 2000, NASA's CERES instruments have continued these measurements. CERES data showed EEI rising from about +0.42 W/m2 in 2005 to +1.12 W/m2 in 2019.
What CO2 level would be needed to stop global warming according to NASA scientists?
In 2012, NASA scientists reported that stopping global warming would require reducing atmospheric CO2 to 350 ppm or below, assuming all other climate forcings remained fixed. By 2020, atmospheric CO2 had reached 415 ppm, and all long-lived greenhouse gases together exceeded a 500 ppm equivalent concentration.
All sources
62 references cited across the entry
- 3webACS Climate Science Toolkit – Atmospheric Warming – A Single-Layer Atmosphere ModelAmerican Chemical Society
- 4webACS Climate Science Toolkit - Radiative Forcing - How Atmospheric Warming WorksAmerican Chemical Society
- 5webOceans break heat record for third year in a rowChelsea Harvey — Scientific American — 2022-01-12
- 6webEarth's Big Heat BucketMichon Scott — NASA Earth Observatory — 2006-04-24
- 8webAir-Sea interaction: Teacher's guideAmerican Meteorological Society — 2012
- 10journalPotential Enthalpy: A Conservative Oceanic Variable for Evaluating Heat Content and Heat FluxesTrevor J. McDougall — 2003
- 11journalGlobal Direct Primary Energy ConsumptionHannah Ritchie et al. — Published online at OurWorldInData.org. — 2020
- 12bookRadiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing UncertaintiesNational Research Council — The National Academic Press — 2005
- 13webWhat Is the Sun's Role in Climate Change?NASA — 2019-09-06
- 15webClouds and Global WarmingNASA Earth Observatory — 2010-06-10
- 16journalEarth's Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent DecadesThorsten Mauritsen et al. — American Geophysical Union — 10 May 2025
- 17journalIndicators of Global Climate Change 2024: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influencePiers M. Forster et al. — 2025
- 18webDeep Argo MissionScripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego
- 20webClimate Change: Ocean Heat ContentLuAnn Dahlman and Rebecca Lindsey — NOAA — 2020-08-17
- 21webEarth Matters: Earth's Radiation Budget is Out of BalanceJoseph Atkinson — NASA Earth Observatory — 22 June 2021
- 22webUMBC's Ryan Kramer confirms human-caused climate change with direct evidence for first timeSarah Hansen — University of Maryland, Baltimore County — 12 April 2021
- 24journalGlobal sea-level budget 1993–presentWCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group — 2018
- 25journalMonitoring the ocean heat content change and the Earth energy imbalance from space altimetry and space gravimetryFlorence Marti et al. — 2021
- 26journalEarth's Energy Imbalance From the Ocean Perspective (2005–2019)M.Z. Hakuba et al. — 28 August 2021
- 27journalA perspective on climate change from Earth's energy imbalanceKevin E Trenberth et al. — 2022-09-01
- 29journalAn update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observationsGraeme L. Stephens et al. — 2012
- 30journalClimate sensitivity in the AnthropoceneM Previdi — 2013
- 31journalEarth's surface heat fluxJ. H. Davies et al. — 2010-02-22
- 32journalThe global energy balance from a surface perspectiveMartin Wild et al. — 2013
- 33journalMission to Planet Earth: Role of Clouds and Radiation in ClimateBruce A. Wielicki et al. — 1995
- 34bookEnvironmental Biology & ToxicologyP.D. Sharma — Rastogi Publications — 2008
- 36webClimate and Earth's Energy Budget2009-01-14
- 37bookGlobal Warming: Understanding the Forecast, 2nd EditionDavid Archer — John Wiley & Sons — 2012
- 39journalJoseph Fourier, the 'greenhouse effect', and the quest for a universal theory of terrestrial temperaturesJames R. Fleming — 1999
- 40webEarth's Energy ImbalanceJames Hansen et al. — NASA — January 2012
- 42webClimate and Earth's Energy Budget (Part 7-Climate Forcings and Global Warming)Rebecca Lindsey — Earth Observatory, part of the EOS Project Science Office, located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center — 2009-01-14
- 43journalThe albedo of EarthGraeme L. Stephens et al. — 2015-01-25
- 44journalEarth's albedo and its symmetryGeorge Datseris et al. — 2021-08-11
- 45journalObservation-Based Decomposition of Radiative Perturbations and Radiative KernelsTyler J. Thorsen et al. — 15 December 2018
- 46journalSatellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth's Heating RateNorman G. Loeb et al. — 15 June 2021
- 47journalAn imperative to monitor Earth's energy imbalanceK. von Schuckman et al. — 27 January 2016
- 48journalHeat stored in the Earth system 1960-2020: where does the energy go?Karina von Schuckmann et al. — 17 April 2023
- 49journalAn observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950D. M. Murphy et al. — 9 September 2009
- 50journalAnthropogenic forcing and response yield observed positive trend in Earth's energy imbalanceS. P. Raghuraman et al. — 28 July 2021
- 51journalChanges in global net radiative imbalance 1985–2012Richard P. Allan et al. — 18 July 2014
- 52journalObservational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative ForcingRyan J. Kramer et al. — 2021-03-25
- 53journalObserved changes in top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and upper-ocean heating consistent within uncertaintyNorman G. Loeb et al. — 22 January 2012
- 54journalClouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data ProductNorman G. Loeb et al. — 15 January 2018
- 55journalImproved Quantification of the Rate of Ocean WarmingLijing Cheng et al. — 2022
- 56journalA review of global ocean temperature observations: Implications for ocean heat content estimates and climate changeJ. P. Abraham et al. — 2013
- 57journalReview article: Earth's ice imbalanceThomas Slater et al. — 25 January 2021
- 58journalEarth's energy imbalance and implicationsJ. Hansen et al. — 22 December 2011
- 59journalAn imperative for climate change planning: tracking Earth's global energyKevin E. Trenberth — 1 October 2009
- 60journalInsights into Earth's Energy Imbalance from Multiple SourcesKevin E. Trenberth et al. — 2016
- 61journalVolcanic eruptions and climateAlan Robock — 2000-05-01
- 62journalWhat influence will future solar activity changes over the 21st century have on projected global near-surface temperature changes?Gareth S. Jones, Mike Lockwood, Peter A. Stott — 2012-03-16