Pesticide

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Pesticides are substances designed to control pests, and they touch nearly every corner of modern life. In 2023, the world applied 3.73 million tonnes of pesticide active ingredients to agricultural land alone. That figure represents a doubling from 1990 levels. Yet in the same year, application rates per hectare actually fell slightly compared with the year before. How can total use keep climbing while efficiency keeps improving? The answer pulls us into a story about chemistry, resistance, economics, and public health that plays out in corn fields in Florida, on the walls of houses in malaria zones, and in the bloodstreams of farm workers in Ethiopia and Kenya. What makes a pesticide work? Why do some become global pollutants? And why do 99 percent of pesticide-related deaths occur in countries that account for only a quarter of global use? Those are the threads this documentary will follow.

• 2. From Latin Roots to DDT

  ›

  The word pesticide comes from two Latin roots: pestis, meaning plague, and caedere, meaning kill. For most of human history, the substances bearing that legacy were borrowed from nature. From ancient times until the 1950s, pest control relied on inorganic compounds derived from copper, arsenic, mercury, and sulfur, alongside plant extracts including pyrethrum, nicotine, and rotenone. The least toxic of those early compounds are still permitted in organic farming today.

  The decisive break came in the 1940s with the introduction of two synthetic organic compounds: DDT, an insecticide, and 2,4-D, a herbicide. Both were widely used and highly profitable. They were followed through the 1950s and 1960s by wave after wave of new synthetic pesticides, and the pesticide industry grew rapidly around them. DDT in particular was sprayed broadly into the environment to combat the mosquitoes that carry malaria. But something went wrong. The compound was stable and fat-soluble, which meant it accumulated in body tissue and climbed the food chain with each predator that ate contaminated prey. It became, as the book Silent Spring documented, a global pollutant. By 1972, nineteen species of mosquito worldwide had developed resistance to DDT. That same decade, DDT was banned in several countries. Eventually, all persistent pesticides were prohibited worldwide, with one narrow exception: spraying on the interior walls of houses to fight malaria vectors, a use the World Health Organization still endorses.

• 3. The Treadmill of Resistance

  ›

  Resistance to pesticides was first observed in the 1920s, with inorganic compounds already showing signs of losing their grip on target pests. By the mid-twentieth century, researchers had concluded that resistance was not a rare accident but a predictable outcome of evolution under chemical pressure. The question shifted from whether resistance would develop to how quickly.

  In 1955, DDT resistance was identified in Africa, and the finding was early evidence of what would become a pattern across the industry. When a pesticide kills most individuals in a pest population, it leaves behind the few that carry a natural tolerance. Those survivors reproduce and pass on that tolerance. Each generation narrows the gap between the chemical's reach and the pest's defenses.

  The industry's response has unfolded along two parallel tracks. One track is the search for new active ingredients: more than 100 were introduced in the 2000s, fewer than 40 in the 2010s, a decline that reflects how much harder it has become to find genuinely novel chemistry. The other track is integrated pest management, or IPM, introduced in the 1950s and made the official policy of many governments and international organizations by the 2020s. IPM relies on careful analysis to determine when pest damage actually crosses an economic or biological threshold before any spray is applied. Where it has been implemented, in countries including Indonesia, China, Bangladesh, the United States, Australia, and Mexico, it has reduced the total amount of pesticide applied without sacrificing crop protection.

• 4. The Cost of Development

  ›

  Bringing a new pesticide to market in 2024 was estimated to cost 301 million US dollars. That figure reflects decades of regulatory tightening and the sheer complexity of modern safety testing. In the United States, pesticides used on food must pass more than 100 tests, making them among the most thoroughly tested chemicals that exist, second only to pharmaceuticals. The registration process can take several years to complete, moving through 70 distinct types of field tests, and can cost 50 to 70 million dollars for a single compound.

  That expense shapes the chemistry that companies choose to pursue. More than 25 percent of existing chemical pesticides already contain one or more chiral centers, which are points in a molecule where atoms are arranged in a mirror-image configuration. Newer pesticides, which tend to require lower application rates, are structurally more complex and therefore more likely to contain them. When the pesticidal activity of a compound turns out to reside almost entirely in one of those mirror-image forms, companies prefer to register and sell that single form rather than both. Doing so reduces the total amount applied to fields and sidesteps the more demanding environmental testing that would be required for registering both forms together.

  Biopesticides follow a shorter regulatory path. Because they are derived from natural materials such as animals, plants, bacteria, and certain minerals, authorities require less toxicological and environmental study before approval. Since 2000, the rate at which new biological products have entered the market has frequently exceeded that of conventional chemical ones. Baking soda and canola oil, for example, are both classified as biopesticides and carry pesticidal properties.

• 5. Where Herbicides Lead

  ›

  Herbicides alone account for approximately 50 percent of all pesticide use globally, making them by far the most used category. They control weeds on farms, clear brush along roadsides, and are applied to ponds and lakes to manage algae and water grasses that interfere with swimming, fishing, and water quality.

  The scale of agricultural reliance on pesticides is captured in a set of figures from a 1999 study: a ban on pesticides in the United States alone was projected to produce higher food prices, job losses, and an increase in world hunger. For every dollar spent on pesticides for crops, one study estimated that farmers recover up to four dollars in crops that would otherwise have been lost to insects, fungi, and weeds. Median yield increases range between 12 and 27 percent when pesticides are used, depending on the crop, and one study found that eliminating pesticide use altogether reduced yields by roughly 10 percent.

  Nevertheless, the economic calculus is not uniformly favorable. A single study estimated that the human health and environmental costs of pesticide use in the United States reached 9.6 billion dollars, broken down across public health at 1.1 billion, crop losses caused by the pesticides themselves at 1.4 billion, groundwater contamination at 2.0 billion, and bird losses at 2.2 billion. Those costs were offset, in the same analysis, by roughly 40 billion dollars in increased agricultural production. World pesticide sales in 2018 were estimated at 65 billion dollars, with 88 percent going to agricultural use. Generic products made up 85 percent of sales that year.

• 6. Human Cost, Hidden and Visible

  ›

  The World Health Organization and the UN Environment Programme estimate that 3 million agricultural workers in the developing world suffer severe pesticide poisoning each year, resulting in 18,000 deaths. As many as 25 million workers in developing countries may experience milder poisoning annually. Yet 50 to 80 percent of poisoning cases go unreported, partly because workers in remote areas are less likely to reach a healthcare facility capable of tracking acute poisoning incidents.

  Organophosphates and carbamates, the most common culprits in these poisonings, work by blocking the enzyme acetylcholinesterase at the neural synapse. When that enzyme is inhibited, acetylcholine accumulates in the nervous system and produces symptoms that include muscle cramps, tremors, confusion, dizziness, and nausea. Studies of farm workers in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Zimbabwe have found measurably reduced plasma acetylcholinesterase concentrations among those regularly exposed. Other studies in Ethiopia have documented reduced respiratory function among workers who spray crops.

  The geographic imbalance is striking: 99 percent of pesticide-related deaths occur in developing countries that account for only 25 percent of global pesticide usage. In Latin America, roughly 3 billion US dollars are spent on pesticides each year, and records show an increase in the frequency of poisoning incidents over the past two decades. In East Africa, where nearly 80 percent of the population relies on agriculture for income, some governments are moving toward corporate farming arrangements that make exposure data easier to collect, though underreporting remains common in subsistence farming communities.

  Children face particular vulnerabilities. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends limiting children's exposure to pesticides. Prenatal exposure via mothers who work in agriculture, take-home residues on workers' clothing, and airborne drift from nearby spraying are all documented pathways. A 2014 epidemiological review found associations between exposure to certain pesticides and autism, though the available evidence was judged insufficient to establish a causal relationship.

• 7. Environmental Reach

  ›

  Over 98 percent of sprayed insecticides and 95 percent of herbicides reach a destination other than their intended target species, ending up in soil, water, air, and the tissues of non-target organisms. That figure sets the frame for every environmental debate surrounding pesticide use.

  Pesticide drift, the movement of particles carried by wind into unintended areas, contaminates neighboring fields and wild habitats. Pesticides contribute to water pollution, reduce invertebrate biodiversity in streams, and are linked to pollinator decline and the destruction of bird habitat. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants specifically targeted DDT and other organochlorine pesticides because they were both stable and lipophilic, meaning they dissolved readily in fat and accumulated in biological tissue. Because DDT has a half-life in soil of 2 to 15 years, residues can still be detected in humans today, at levels 5 to 10 times lower than those found in the 1970s.

  Modern regulatory frameworks now require that any new pesticide be degradable in the environment. Whether a compound breaks down quickly depends on its chemical structure and on soil conditions. Halogens within a molecule tend to slow aerobic degradation. Adsorption to soil particles can retard movement but also protect the compound from the microbes that would otherwise break it down. Bee pollinators serve as bioindicators for tracking pesticide contamination in the environment.

  The European Parliament's Environment Committee approved a decision in 2023 aiming to cut total pesticide use by 50 percent by 2030, with the most hazardous pesticides reduced by 65 percent, and to restrict pesticide application to a last-resort option wherever alternatives exist.

• 8. Alternatives Taking Hold

  ›

  Sterilizing male insects and releasing them to mate unproductively with wild females was first deployed against the screwworm fly in 1958. Since then the same technique has been applied to the medfly, the tsetse fly, and the gypsy moth. It is expensive and slow, and it only works on certain insect species, but it offers a path to suppressing pest populations without chemical residue.

  Trap crops, which attract pests away from the main crop, have successfully reduced pesticide use in some commercial agricultural systems, though they have failed to scale in others even when the approach worked in controlled experiments. A study of maize fields in northern Florida found that composted yard waste with a high carbon-to-nitrogen ratio reduced plant-parasitic nematode populations significantly while boosting crop yields by between 10 and 212 percent, with the effects often not appearing until the third growing season. Additional silicon nutrition has been shown to protect some horticultural crops against fungal diseases almost completely, while inadequate silicon can lead to severe fungal infection even when fungicides are applied.

  Genetically modified crops, introduced since the 1980s, have resulted in lower insecticide use on the fields where they are planted. Organic agriculture, which restricts pesticide use to non-synthetic compounds, represented about 1.5 percent of the world's total agricultural land in 2020. Application rates for conventional pesticides fell from 1,000-2,500 grams of active ingredient per hectare in the 1950s to 40-100 grams per hectare in the 2000s, reflecting gains in the potency of individual compounds. Insecticide use in the United States has declined by more than half since 1980, at a rate of roughly 0.6 percent per year, driven largely by the near phase-out of organophosphates and by the adoption of transgenic Bt corn, where the decline in corn fields was steeper still.