Olmecs
The Olmecs were carving portraits of rulers from boulders weighing up to 55 tons more than a thousand years before the rise of the Maya. They flourished in the tropical Gulf lowlands of what is now Mexico, between roughly 1200 and 400 BC, and what they built and believed shaped virtually every civilization that came after them in Mesoamerica. Seventeen of their colossal stone heads survive. Their writing may be the oldest in the Western Hemisphere. Their ballgame, their rain deity, their practice of ritual bloodletting all traveled far beyond their heartland and took root in cultures that had never heard the Nahuatl word that translates as "rubber people." Who were they, how did they build their world, and why did it collapse? Those are the questions this documentary sets out to answer.
The name Olmec comes from a Nahuatl word composed of two parts: ōlli, meaning natural rubber, and mēcatl, meaning people. The Nahuas, including the Aztecs, applied this name to their neighbors in the Gulf lowlands because those neighbors processed rubber from the Castilla elastica tree by mixing its latex with the juice of the Ipomoea alba vine. The resulting material was used for the rubber balls at the center of the ceremonial ballgame, and that craft gave outsiders a ready label for the people who practiced it.
The problem is that the Aztecs applied this name roughly two thousand years after the ancient civilization had disappeared. When archaeologists in the early twentieth century began uncovering ruins and artifacts in the Gulf heartland, they attached the existing name "Olmec" to the rediscovered culture before it was established that the ancient builders were not the same people the Aztecs had called rubber people. The name stuck despite the confusion. What the ancient Olmec called themselves is not known; later Mesoamerican accounts sometimes refer to them as Tamoanchan, and a contemporary scholarly term for their culture is tenocelome, meaning "mouth of the jaguar."
San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan was the first major center of Olmec culture, and what made it possible was geography. The Coatzacoalcos river basin provided both transportation and alluvial soil of exceptional fertility. This environment has been compared by scholars to the Nile, Indus, Yellow River, and Mesopotamia as a productive foundation for dense settlement. That density created a surplus, and surplus created the conditions for an elite class to emerge.
The elite class drove demand for luxury artifacts, and those objects required materials that did not exist in the Gulf lowlands. Jade came from the Motagua River valley in eastern Guatemala. Obsidian was traced to sources in the Guatemala highlands, including El Chayal and San Martin Jilotepeque, and to deposits in Puebla, at distances ranging from 200 to 400 km away. Moving those raw materials required organized trade networks reaching across Mesoamerica at a remarkably early date. Pre-Olmec farming cultures in Tabasco had roots going back to roughly 5100-4600 BC, but what is recognized today as distinctively Olmec first appeared at San Lorenzo around 1400 BC, when the combination of ecology, trade, and elite demand fused into a civilization.
Around 900 BC, San Lorenzo was all but abandoned. Widespread destruction of many San Lorenzo monuments had occurred around the 950s BC, which may point to an internal uprising, though some scholars favor environmental causes, including rivers changing course. Whatever the mechanism, power shifted decisively to La Venta.
La Venta then dominated Olmec life from 900 BC until its own abandonment around 400 BC. At its heart stood the Great Pyramid, the largest Mesoamerican structure of its time. Even after roughly 2,500 years of erosion it rises 34 meters above the flat landscape around it. Beneath the surface of the site, laborers deposited a thousand tons of smooth serpentine blocks, large mosaic pavements, and at least 48 separate votive offerings, including polished jade celts, pottery, figurines, and hematite mirrors. The scale of these buried offerings speaks to a society capable of mobilizing enormous collective labor, not simply for visible monuments but for deposits that would be seen by no one after burial.
Seventeen colossal heads have been unearthed to date: ten at San Lorenzo, four at La Venta, two at Tres Zapotes, and one at Rancho La Cobata. The smallest pair, at Tres Zapotes, stand 1.47 meters tall. The Rancho La Cobata head reaches 3.4 meters. Scholars estimate that the largest weigh between 25 and 55 tons.
Every head was carved from a single block of volcanic basalt quarried in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas. Moving one of these sculptures to its final destination required an estimated 1,500 people working for three to four months, hauling or floating the stone across distances of dozens of miles. No two heads are alike; each bears a distinctive helmet-like headdress suggesting personal or group symbols, and each face carries an individuality that has led scholars to conclude these are portraits of rulers, possibly depicted as ballplayers.
The flat-faced, thick-lipped features of the heads generated a fringe theory that the Olmec were of African origin. The vast majority of Mesoamerican researchers reject this claim. In the 1940s, the artist and art historian Miguel Covarrubias published a side-by-side comparison of Olmec artwork and the faces of modern Mexican Indians, showing very similar characteristics. Richard Diehl stated plainly that the heads depict the American Indian physical type still visible in towns such as Soteapan and Acayucan. A 2018 mitochondrial DNA study conducted at CINVESTAV on two Olmec individuals, one from San Lorenzo and one from Loma del Zapote, found in both cases the unequivocal presence of haplogroup A, a lineage characteristic of the indigenous populations of the Americas.
A dozen rubber balls dating to 1600 BC or earlier were found in the bog of El Manati, 10 km east of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, making them among the earliest physical evidence of the Mesoamerican ballgame. The Olmec are also strong candidates for having originated the Long Count calendar used by many later Mesoamerican civilizations. Three of the six artifacts bearing the earliest known Long Count dates were found within the Olmec heartland, though the Olmec civilization had ended by the fourth century BC, several centuries before the oldest known Long Count date artifact.
The zero concept is tied to the same calendar system. The Long Count required zero as a place-holder within its base-20 positional numeral system, and a shell glyph served as the zero symbol. The second oldest known use of this glyph appears on Stela C at Tres Zapotes, carrying a date of 32 BC. As for writing, symbols found in 2002 at the San Andres site date to 650 BC, and the Cascajal Block, a serpentine slab bearing 62 symbols of which 28 are unique, dates to between 1100 and 900 BC. A large number of prominent archaeologists have described the Cascajal Block as the earliest known pre-Columbian writing, though others remain skeptical because the block was removed from its original archaeological context and bears no obvious resemblance to other Mesoamerican writing systems.
Olmec-style artifacts, designs, and iconography have been recovered hundreds of kilometers outside the Gulf heartland. In the Valley of Mexico, the site of Tlatilco contained hollow baby-face figurines and ceramics with Olmec designs. Chalcatzingo in the Valley of Morelos features Olmec-style monumental and rock art. In 2007, archaeologists unearthed Zazacatla in Morelos, about 40 km south of Mexico City, an Olmec-influenced city that covered about one square mile between 800 and 500 BC. Olmec-style monumental art also appears at Teopantecuanitlan in Guerrero, and Olmec designs are visible in the Juxtlahuaca and Oxtotitlan cave paintings.
At the 1942 Tuxtla Gutierrez conference, archaeologist Alfonso Caso declared the Olmecs the "mother culture" of Mesoamerica, a phrase that ignited decades of debate. Radiocarbon dating confirmed the antiquity of Olmec civilization, but the mother culture question remained contested. Discoveries at sites such as Zohapilco, where some of the oldest ceramics in Mesoamerica date back nearly 5,000 years, and San Jose Mogote, which shows early irrigation systems predating the Olmec at their height, complicate any simple model of Olmec primacy. The generally accepted reading today is that Olmec-style artifacts became associated with elite status and were adopted by non-Olmec chieftains seeking to legitimize their authority, a process of cultural borrowing rather than simple diffusion from a single source.
Between 400 and 350 BC, the population of the eastern half of the Olmec heartland dropped sharply, and the area remained sparsely inhabited until the nineteenth century. Archaeologists have proposed that severe environmental changes made the region unsuitable for large farming populations, particularly changes to the rivers that the Olmec depended on for agriculture, transport, and hunting. Those river changes may have been triggered by tectonic upheaval, subsidence, or the silting of waterways from agricultural practices. A separate theory advanced by Santley and colleagues proposes that volcanic eruptions across the Early, Late, and Terminal Formative periods forced the Olmec to relocate rather than disappear.
The western edge of the heartland showed more continuity. The Tres Zapotes site continued to be occupied well past 400 BC, though without the defining marks of Olmec culture. What followed is labeled the Epi-Olmec, a post-Olmec culture with features similar to those found at Izapa, some 550 km to the southeast. Meanwhile, elements of Olmec tradition survived in successor societies across Mesoamerica: the jaguar iconography, the rain deity, the ballgame, and the calendar system all carried forward. The jade face masks that Aztec priests deliberately buried in the ceremonial precinct of Tenochtitlan were approximately two thousand years old at the time of burial, suggesting that Olmec objects were collected and venerated much as Roman antiquities were preserved in medieval Europe.
Updated
Common questions
When did the Olmec civilization exist?
The Olmec civilization flourished from roughly 1200 to 400 BC during Mesoamerica's formative period. Their earliest distinct features appeared at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan around 1400 BC, and the major centers had been abandoned by about 400 BC.
Where did the Olmecs live?
The Olmec heartland was in the Gulf lowlands of what are now the Mexican states of Veracruz and Tabasco. Their major city-temple complexes were at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, La Venta, Tres Zapotes, and Laguna de los Cerros.
What does the name Olmec mean?
Olmec derives from the Nahuatl word meaning "rubber people," composed of ōlli (natural rubber) and mēcatl (people). The Aztecs applied this name to their Gulf lowlands neighbors because those people processed rubber from the Castilla elastica tree.
How many Olmec colossal heads have been found?
Seventeen colossal heads have been unearthed: ten at San Lorenzo, four at La Venta, two at Tres Zapotes, and one at Rancho La Cobata. They range in height from 1.47 meters to 3.4 meters and are estimated to weigh between 25 and 55 tons each.
Did the Olmecs invent the Mesoamerican ballgame?
The Olmec are strong candidates for originating the Mesoamerican ballgame. A dozen rubber balls dating to 1600 BC or earlier were found at El Manati, a bog 10 km east of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, making them among the earliest physical evidence of the game.
What caused the decline of the Olmec civilization?
Scholars have not determined a definitive cause. The leading hypothesis is that severe environmental changes, including shifts in river courses possibly triggered by tectonic upheaval or agricultural siltation, made the eastern heartland unsuitable for large farming populations between 400 and 350 BC. A competing theory proposes that volcanic eruptions forced population relocation rather than outright extinction.
All sources
160 references cited across the entry
- 1BookThe Olmecs : America's First CivilizationRichard A. Diehl — Thames and Hudson — 2004
- 2BookMexico: From the Olmecs to the AztecsMichael D. Coe — Thames & Hudson — 2019
- 3Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American HistorySusan Schroeder — Oxford University Press — 2018-03-28
- 4See, as one example, Diehl, p. 11.
- 5See Diehl, p. 108 for the "ancient America" superlatives. The artist and archaeologist Miguel Covarrubias (1957) p. 50 says that Olmec pieces are among the world's masterpieces
- 7Coe (1968) p. 42
- 9Diehl, p. 14.
- 10Coe (2002) refers to an old Nahuatl poem cited by Miguel Leon-Portilla, which itself refers to a land called "Tamoanchan":in a certain erawhich no one can reckonwhich no one can rememberwhere there wa
- 11The term "tenocelome" is used as early as 1967 by George Kubler in American Anthropologist, v. 69, p. 404.
- 12Dates from Pool, p. 1. Diehl gives a slightly earlier date of 1500 BCE (p. 9), but the same end-date. Any dates for the start of the Olmec civilization or culture are problematic as its rise was a gra
- 13See Pool (2007) p. 2. Although there is wide agreement that the Olmec culture helped lay the foundations for the civilizations that followed, there is disagreement over the extent of the Olmec contrib
- 14Richard A Diehl, 2004, The Olmecs – America's First Civilization London: Thames & Hudson, pp. 25, 27.
- 15Diehl, 2004: pp. 23–24.
- 16BookWorld History: Patterns of InteractionRoger B. Beck — McDougal Littell — 1999
- 17Pool, pp. 26–27, provides a great overview of this theory, and says: "The generation of food surpluses is necessary for the development of social and political hierarchies and there is no doubt that h
- 18Pool, p. 151.
- 19Diehl, p. 132, or Pool, p. 150.
- 20Pool, p. 103.
- 21BookArchaeology of Ancient Mexico and Central America: An EncyclopediaSusan Toby Evans et al. — Taylor & Francis — 2000
- 22Diehl, p. 9.
- 23Coe (1967), p. 72. Alternatively, the mutilation of these monuments may be unrelated to the decline and abandonment of San Lorenzo. Some researchers believe that the mutilation had ritualistic aspects
- 24Pool, p. 135. Diehl, pp. 58–59, 82.
- 25Diehl, p. 9. Pool gives dates 1000 BCE – 400 BCE for La Venta.
- 26Pool, p. 157.
- 27Pool, p. 161–162.
- 28Diehl, p. 82. Nagy, p. 270, however, is more circumspect, stating that in the Grijalva river delta, on the eastern edge of the heartland, "the local population had significantly declined in apparent p
- 29Quote and analysis from Diehl, p. 82, echoed in other works such as Pool.
- 30Vanderwarker (2006) pp. 50–51
- 31Coe (2002), p. 88.
- 32Coe (2002), p. 62.
- 33Coe (2002), p. 88 and others.
- 34Pool, p. 105.
- 35Pool, p. 106. Diehl, pp. 109–115.
- 36Grove, 1973.
- 37Pool, pp. 106–108, 176.
- 38Diehl, p. 111.
- 39Pool, p. 118; Diehl, p. 112. Coe (2002), p. 69: "They wear headgear rather like American football helmets which probably served as protection in both war and in the ceremonial game played...throughout
- 40Grove, p. 55.
- 41Pool, p. 107.
- 42In particular, Williams and Heizer (p. 29) calculated the weight of San Lorenzo Colossal Head 1 at 25.3 short tons, or 23 tonnes. See Scarre. pp. 271–274 for the "55 tonnes" weight.
- 43See Williams and Heizer for more detail.
- 44Scarre. Pool, p. 129.
- 45Diehl, p. 119.
- 46NewsWhy do the Olmec colossal heads have African features?mexicanroutes.com — 2025-09-20
- 47Wiercinski, A. (1972). "Inter-and Intrapopulational Racial Differentiation of Tlatilco, Cerro de Las Mesas, Teothuacan, Monte Alban and Yucatan Maya," XXXIX Congreso Intern. de Americanistas, Lima 197
- 48Karl Taube, for one, says "There simply is no material evidence of any Pre-Hispanic contact between the Old World and Mesoamerica before the arrival of the Spanish in the sixteenth century.", p. 17. D
- 49Mexico South, Covarrubias, 1946
- 50Ortiz de Montellano, et al. 1997, p. 217
- 51Haslip-Viera, Gabriel: Bernard Ortiz de Montellano; Warren Barbour Source "Robbing Native American Cultures: Van Sertima's Afrocentricity and the Olmecs," Current Anthropology, 38 (3), (Tun., 1997), p
- 52BookThe Olmecs: America's First CivilizationRichard A. Diehl — Thames and Hudson — 2004
- 53Milliken, William M. "Pre-Columbian Jade and Hard Stone." The Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art 36, no. 4 (April 1949): 53–55. Accessed 17 March 2018.
- 54Miller, Mary Ellen. "The Art of Mesoamerica From Olmec to Aztec." Thames & Hudson; 4th edition (20 October 2006).
- 58See Pool, pp. 179–242; Diehl, pp. 126–151.
- 60For example, Diehl, p. 170 or Pool, p. 54.
- 61Flannery et al. (2005) hint that Olmec iconography was first developed in the Tlatilco culture.
- 62See for example Reilly; Stevens (2007); Rose (2007). For a full discussion, see Olmec influences on Mesoamerican cultures.
- 63See Carlson for details of the compass.
- 64Covarrubias, p. 27.
- 65Taube (2004), p. 122.
- 66As one example, see Joyce et al., "Olmec Bloodletting: An Iconographic Study".
- 67See Taube (2004), p. 122.
- 68Pool, p. 139.
- 69Ortiz et al., p. 249.
- 70Pool, p. 116. Joralemon (1996), p. 218.
- 71See Pohl et al. (2002).
- 72NewsWriting May Be Oldest in Western Hemisphere.15 September 2006
- 73News'Oldest' New World writing foundBBC — 14 September 2006
- 75Pohl et al. (2002).
- 76Skidmore. These prominent proponents include Michael D. Coe, Richard Diehl, Karl Taube, and Stephen D. Houston.
- 77Bruhns, et al.
- 78Diehl, p. 184.
- 79"Mesoamerican Long Count calendar & invention of the zero concept" section cited to Diehl, p. 186.
- 80Haughton, p. 153. The earliest recovered Long Count dated is from Monument 1 in the Maya site El Baúl, Guatemala, bearing a date of 37 BCE.
- 81Miller and Taube (1993) p. 42. Pool, p. 295.
- 82Ortiz C.
- 83See Filloy Nadal, p. 27, who says "If they the balls were used in the ballgame, we would be looking at the earliest evidence of this practice".
- 84Coe (1968) p. 121.
- 85Campbell & Kaufman (1976), pp. 80–89. For example, the words for "incense", "cacao", "corn", many names of various fruits, "nagual/shaman", "tobacco", "adobe", "ladder", "rubber", "corn granary", "squ
- 86Wichmann (1995).
- 87Wichmann, Beliaev & Davletshin, (in press Sep 2008).
- 88See Pool, p. 6, or Diehl, p. 85.
- 89Diehl, p. 106. See also J. E. Clark, p. 343, who says "much of the art of La Venta appears to have been dedicated to rulers who dressed as gods, or to the gods themselves".
- 90Diehl, p. 106.
- 91Diehl, pp. 103–104.
- 92See, for example, Cyphers (1996), p. 156.
- 93See Santley, et al., p.4, for a discussion of Mesoamerican centralization and decentralization. See Cyphers (1999) for a discussion of the meaning of monument placement.
- 94See Cyphers (1999) for a more detailed discussion.
- 95Serra Puche et al., p. 36, who argue that "While Olmec art sometimes represents leaders, priests, and possibly soldiers, it is difficult to imagine that such institutions as the army, priest caste, or
- 96Pool, p. 20.
- 97Pool, p. 164.
- 98Pool, p. 175.
- 100JournalEarly Olmec obsidian trade and economic organization at San LorenzoKenneth Hirth et al. — 2013
- 101Chiapa de Corzo Archaeological ProjectBrigham Young University
- 102Except where otherwise (foot)noted, this Village life and diet section is referenced to Diehl (2004), Davies, and Pope et al.
- 103Pohl.
- 104VanDerwarker, p. 195, and Lawler, Archaeology (2007), p. 23, quoting VanDerwarker.
- 105VanDerwarker, pp. 141–144.
- 106Davies, p. 39.
- 107Benson (1996) p. 263.
- 108See translated excerpt from Melgar y Serrano's original 1869 report, reprinted in Adams (1991), p. 56. See also Pool (2007), pp. 1, 35 and Stirling (1968), p. 8.
- 109Quoted in Coe (1968), p. 40.
- 110Coe (1968), pp. 42–50.
- 111"Esta gran cultura, que encontramos en niveles antiguos, es sin duda madre de otras culturas, como la maya, la teotihuacana, la zapoteca, la de El Tajín, y otras" ("This great culture, which we encoun
- 112Coe (1968), p. 50.
- 114Evans, Susan T. (2004). Ancient Mexico and Central America: Archaeology and Culture History. London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0-500-28440-7., p. 122.
- 115Marcus, Joyce; Kent V. Flannery (1996). Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in Mexico's Oaxaca Valley. London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05078-3.
- 118See Grove (1976) or Ortiz de Montellano (1997).
- 119MagazineEstudios de ADN y el origen de los OlmecasEnrique Villamar Becerril — Editorial Raices
- 120BookPrehistoric MesoamericaAdams, Richard E.W. — University of Oklahoma Press — 1991
- 121BookThe Native Races of the Pacific States of North America: Primitive history. 1876Hubert Howe Bancroft — D. Appleton — 1876
- 122BookOlmec Art of Ancient MexicoBenson, Elizabeth P. — National Gallery of Art — 1996
- 123BookThe Iconography of Middle American sculptureBernal, I — The Metropolitan Museum of Art — 1973
- 124JournalDid the Olmec Know How to Write?Bruhns, Karen O. — American Association for the Advancement of Science — March 2007
- 125JournalA Linguistic Look at the OlmecsCampbell, Lyle — Society for American Archaeology — 1976
- 126BookArchaeology of Ancient Mexico and Central America: an EncyclopediaClark, John E. — Garland Publishing — 2001
- 127BookDumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec, October 28th and 29th, 1967Coe, Michael D. — Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; Trustees for Harvard University — 1967
- 128BookAmerica's First Civilization: Discovering the OlmecCoe, Michael D. — The Smithsonian Library — 1968
- 129BookMexico: from the Olmecs to the AztecsCoe, Michael D. — Thames & Hudson — 2002
- 130BookPre-Columbian Art History: Selected ReadingsCovarrubias, Miguel — Peek Publications — 1977
- 131BookIndian Art of Mexico and Central AmericaCovarrubias, Miguel — Alfred A. Knopf — 1957
- 132BookOlmec Art of Ancient MexicoCyphers, Ann — National Gallery of Art — 1996
- 133BookSocial patterns in pre-classic Mesoamerica: a symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 9 and 10 October 1993Cyphers, Ann — Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection and Trustees for Harvard University — 1999
- 134BookThe Ancient Kingdoms of MexicoDavies, Nigel — Penguin Books — 1982
- 135BookThe Olmecs: America's First CivilizationDiehl, Richard — Thames & Hudson — 2004
- 136BookThe Sport of Life and Death: The Mesoamerican BallgameFilloy Nadal, Laura — Thames & Hudson — 2001
- 137JournalImplications of new petrographic analysis for the Olmec "mother culture" modelFlannery, Kent V. — National Academy of Sciences — August 2005
- 138JournalOlmec altars and mythsGrove, David C. — 1973
- 139JournalOlmec Origins and Transpacific Diffusion: Reply to MeggersGrove, David C. — American Anthropological Association and affiliated societies — September 1976
- 140BookThe Olmec and their Neighbors: Essays in Memory of Matthew W. StirlingGrove, David C. — Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; Trustees for Harvard University — 1981
- 141JournalMexico and the early history of magnetismGuimarães, A.P. — Sociedad Mexicana de Física — June 2004
- 142BookHidden HistoryHaughton, Brian — New Page Books — 2007
- 143Olmec Bloodletting: An Iconographic StudyJoyce, Rosemary A. — University of Oklahoma Press — 1991
- 144JournalBeyond the Family FeudLawler, Andrew — 2007
- 145BookArchéologie du Mexique: les OlmèquesMagni, Caterina — Éditions Artcom' — 1999
- 146BookLes Olmèques: des origines au mytheMagni, Caterina — Éditions du Seuil — 2003
- 147JournalThey Were NOT Here before Columbus: Afrocentric Hyperdiffusionism in the 1990sOrtiz de Montellano, Bernard — Duke University Press, issued by the American Society for Ethnohistory — Spring 1997
- 148JournalOlmec Origins of Mesoamerican WritingPohl, Mary — 2002
- 149BookOlmec Archaeology and Early MesoamericaPool, Christopher A. — Cambridge University Press — 2007
- 150JournalOrigin and Environmental Setting of Ancient Agriculture in the Lowlands of MesoamericaPope, Kevin — 2001
- 151BookThe Mesoamerican BallgameSantley, Robert S. — University of Arizona Press — 1991
- 152The Cascajal Block: The Earliest Precolumbian WritingSkidmore, Joel — Mesoweb — 2006
- 153BookDumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec, October 28th and 29th, 1967Stirling, Matthew W. — Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; Trustees for Harvard University — 1968
- 154JournalPetrographic evidence shows that pottery exchange between the Olmec and their neighbors was two-wayStoltman, J.B. — 2005
- 155BookOlmec Art at Dumbarton OaksTaube, Karl — Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; Trustees of Harvard University — 2004
- 156BookOlmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlandsvon Nagy, Christopher — University of Arizona Press — 1997
- 157BookThe Relationship Among the Mixe–Zoquean Languages of MexicoWichmann, Søren — University of Utah Press — 1995
- 158JournalPosibles correlaciones lingüísticas y arqueológicas involucrando a los olmecasWichmann, Søren — September 2008
- 159JournalMother Culture, or Only a Sister?Wilford, John Noble — 15 March 2005
- 160JournalSources of Rocks Used in Olmec MonumentsWilliams, Howel — University of California Department of Anthropology — September 1965