International Monetary Fund

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The International Monetary Fund holds 191 member countries, yet a handful of wealthy governments command most of the votes inside it. Its largest member alone controls over 16% of the voting power, enough to block any change to the rules, since reforms require a super-majority of 85%. From a glass headquarters in Washington, D.C., the Fund decides which struggling economies get rescued and on what terms. It calls itself a lender of last resort for countries in balance-of-payments crises. Former Tanzanian President Julius Nyerere once asked a sharper question. Who elected the IMF to be the ministry of finance for every country in the world? The institution traces its birth to a hotel in the mountains of New Hampshire in July 1944. The question of what it should be, a bank or a cooperative fund, split its two founding minds from the start. How a wartime fix for fixed exchange rates became a force that critics call a new form of colonisation is the story that follows.

• 2. A Hotel In New Hampshire

  ›

  Representatives of 45 governments gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to plan postwar economic cooperation and rebuild Europe. The Great Depression had taught a harsh lesson. Countries had raised trade barriers to save their failing economies, which devalued currencies and shrank world trade. That breakdown in monetary cooperation created a need for oversight. Two men carried two visions into the room. American delegate Harry Dexter White wanted an IMF that worked like a bank, making sure borrowing states could repay on time. Most of White's plan was written into the final acts adopted at Bretton Woods. British economist John Maynard Keynes imagined something different, a cooperative fund that member states could draw on to keep employment and economic activity alive through periodic crises. The agreement implied both the IMF and the World Bank would sit in the United States. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. wanted New York, but his successor Fred M. Vinson chose Washington instead. Vinson warned the institutions would be fatally prejudiced in American opinion in New York, since they would then come under the taint of international finance. The IMF formally came into existence on the 27th of December 1945, when the first 29 countries ratified its Articles of Agreement. On the 8th of May, France became the first country to borrow from it.

• 3. When The Gold Window Closed

  ›

  In 1971, the United States suspended the convertibility of the dollar into gold, an event known as the Nixon Shock. For its first three decades, the IMF had overseen a system of fixed exchange rates, helping governments hold their currencies at agreed rates. Countries that joined between 1945 and 1971 could adjust those rates only to correct a fundamental disequilibrium in the balance of payments, and only with the Fund's agreement. The changes to the Articles of Agreement were ratified in 1976 by the Jamaica Accords. The Fund's purpose shifted hard. No longer the guardian of fixed rates, it began examining whether a country's shortage of capital came from economic fluctuations or from its own policy choices. By the mid-1980s the IMF traded narrow currency stabilization for a broader push toward market-liberalizing reforms, and it did so without formally renegotiating its charter. The Ronald Reagan administration, in particular Treasury Secretary James Baker with David Mulford and Charles Dallara, pressured the Fund to attach market-liberal reforms to its loans. The institution's stance on capital controls flipped too. It had permitted them at its founding and through the 1970s, but from the 1980s onward its staff increasingly favored free capital movement, as economists hired in the 1940s and 1950s retired and new thinking arrived.

• 4. The Quota Machine

  ›

  Each member country is assigned a quota that reflects its relative size in the global economy, and that same number sets its voting power. The arithmetic is precise. Every member gets basic votes equal to 5.502% of the total, plus one vote for each special drawing right of 100,000 in its quota. The special drawing right is the IMF's unit of account. When SDRs were created in 1969, each was worth 0.888671 grams of gold, roughly one US dollar at the time. After Bretton Woods ended, the Fund redefined the SDR in 1973 as the value of a basket of world currencies. The basic votes tilt slightly toward small countries, but the SDR-based votes overwhelm that tilt. The result is a shareholder-controlled body where wealthy countries write and revise the rules. This design splits the membership in two. Developed countries supply the money but rarely borrow, the creditors. Developing countries use the lending but contribute little, the borrowers. Their interests pull against each other, since borrowers want wider loan access while creditors want assurance of repayment. Voting shares move slowly. Countries that grow economically tend to become under-represented as their power lags behind. Joseph Stiglitz argued there is a need to provide more effective voice and representation for developing countries, which now represent a much larger portion of world economic activity since 1944, when the IMF was created. In December 2015 the United States Congress finally authorised the 2010 Quota and Governance Reforms, shifting more than 6% of quota shares toward emerging and developing economies.

• 5. The Price Of A Loan

  ›

  Conditionality is the heart of what makes an IMF loan controversial, a set of policies a country must accept in exchange for financial resources. The concept was introduced in a 1952 Executive Board decision and later written into the Articles of Agreement. If the conditions are not met, the funds are withheld. The reforms demanded are known as structural adjustment, and they can include austerity, currency devaluation, trade liberalisation, privatization of state-owned enterprises, removing price controls and subsidies, and balancing budgets. Together these conditions are called the Washington Consensus. Jeffrey Sachs put the objection plainly. The IMF's usual prescription is budgetary belt tightening to countries who are much too poor to own belts. Joseph E. Stiglitz, a former chief economist and senior vice-president at the World Bank, went further in Globalization and Its Discontents. He wrote that the Fund was not participating in a conspiracy, but it was reflecting the interests and ideology of the Western financial community. Stiglitz compared modern economic management to dropping bombs from 50,000 feet, where one does not feel what one does, imposing policies from a luxury hotel about which one would think twice if one knew the people whose lives one was destroying. Studies using the Gini coefficient found that countries with IMF policies face increased income inequality. The defenders answer that conditions reassure the Fund that loans will be repaid, and that borrowing countries rarely possess internationally valuable collateral anyway.

• 6. The Greek Reckoning

  ›

  In May 2010, the IMF joined the first Greek bailout that totaled 110 billion euros, taking part in a 3:11 proportion. Greece had piled up public debt from continuing large public sector deficits. As a condition, the Greek government agreed to austerity that would cut the deficit from 11% in 2009 to well below 3% in 2014. The bailout left out debt restructuring such as a haircut, to the chagrin of the Swiss, Brazilian, Indian, Russian, and Argentinian Directors, though Greek leaders themselves ruled it out. Prime Minister George Papandreou and Finance Minister Giorgos Papakonstantinou wanted no haircut. To make this rescue happen, the Fund abandoned a safeguard. The Exceptional Access Framework, created in 2003 when John B. Taylor was Under Secretary of the US Treasury, had set sensible limits on loans to governments with debt problems, moving away from the bailout mentality of the 1990s. In 2010 the framework was abandoned so the IMF could lend to Greece in an unsustainable and political situation. A second package of more than 100 billion euros followed from October 2011, and Papandreou was forced from office during it. The Troika, of which the IMF is part, managed the programme, approved by the executive directors on the 15th of March 2012 for 23.8 billion XDR, with private bondholders taking a haircut above 50%. Between May 2010 and February 2012, private banks in Holland, France, and Germany cut their exposure to Greek debt from 122 billion euros to 66 billion euros. The largest borrowers from the Fund, in order, became Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Romania, and Ukraine.

• 7. Friends Of The Fund

  ›

  The IMF approved a US$1 billion loan to autocratic Uganda in 2021, despite protests from Ugandans in Washington, London and South Africa. The charge that the Fund props up dictators reaches back to the late Cold War. Critics say its policymakers backed military dictatorships friendly to American and European corporations, along with other anti-communist and communist regimes such as the Socialist Republic of Romania. A vivid example was its long support for Mobutu's rule in Zaire, even after its own envoy Erwin Blumenthal filed a sobering report on entrenched corruption, embezzlement, and the country's inability to repay any loans. The damage attributed to the Fund extends into hospitals and clinics. A 2009 study concluded that strict conditions caused thousands of tuberculosis deaths in Eastern Europe as public health care was weakened. Across the 21 countries the IMF had given loans, tuberculosis deaths rose by 16.6%. A 2017 systematic review found structural adjustment programs harm maternal and child health. The institution's own leaders have not been immune to scandal. Managing Director Christine Lagarde was convicted of giving preferential treatment to businessman-turned-politician Bernard Tapie, though she escaped punishment and kept her post. Former Managing Director Rodrigo Rato was arrested in 2015 and found guilty of embezzlement by the Audiencia Nacional in 2017, a sentence confirmed by the Supreme Court of Spain in 2018.

• 8. Rivals And New Money

  ›

  At the 6th BRICS summit in July 2014, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa announced the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement, with an initial size of US$100 billion. It offers liquidity through currency swaps when members face short-term balance-of-payments pressure, a clear alternative to the Fund. The same year, the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank was established. In March 2011 the Ministers of Economy and Finance of the African Union had already proposed an African Monetary Fund. The IMF has also reached toward new financial frontiers of its own. In April 2023 it launched an international central bank digital currency through its Digital Currency Monetary Authority, called the Universal Monetary Unit, or Units, with the ANSI character Ü. Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva warned that if central banks did not agree on a common platform, cryptocurrency would fill the vacuum. The Bulgarian economist has led the Fund since the 1st of October 2019. In February 2026 the IMF urged the United States to work with trading partners to ease trade restrictions, warning that sweeping tariffs and export controls under the Trump administration had disrupted supply chains. By April 2026 it downgraded its global growth forecast, citing inflationary shocks and energy infrastructure damage from conflict in the Middle East, and expected at least a dozen countries to seek new loan programs to cope with surging energy prices.