Free to follow every thread. No paywall, no dead ends.
Homophobia: the story on HearLore | HearLore
Homophobia
The word homophobia did not exist until the 1960s, yet it now defines a global struggle for human rights. Before psychologist George Weinberg coined the term in the 1960s, society lacked a specific vocabulary to describe the complex mixture of fear, hatred, and prejudice directed at gay people. Weinberg first used the word in speech, and it appeared in print for the first time on the 23rd of May 1969 in an article for the American pornographic magazine Screw. In that initial context, the word described a heterosexual man's irrational fear that others might think he was gay, rather than a hatred of gay people themselves. This linguistic shift was crucial because it reframed the issue from a moral failing of the individual to a social problem worthy of scholarly attention. By 1971, Kenneth Smith had adopted the term to describe a personality profile, and Weinberg published his seminal book Society and the Healthy Homosexual in 1972, just one year before the American Psychiatric Association voted to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. The term became a powerful tool for activists, allowing them to identify and challenge the medicalized stigma that had long plagued the community. However, the literal meaning of the word, derived from the Greek phóbos for fear, has been debated by scholars like David A. F. Haaga, who argue that contemporary usage includes a wide range of negative emotions and behaviors that do not fit the clinical definition of a phobia. Despite these semantic debates, the word homophobia remains the primary lens through which society views discrimination against LGBTQ people.
Religious Roots And State Power
The history of anti-homosexual sentiment stretches back to ancient times, but the institutionalization of this hatred reached its darkest peaks during the Medieval Inquisitions and the rise of state-sponsored persecution. In medieval Europe, homosexuality was classified as sodomy and punishable by death, with the sects of Cathars and Waldensians accused of fornication and sodomy alongside charges of Satanism. The theologian Thomas Aquinas played a pivotal role in linking the condemnation of homosexuality to the concept of natural law, arguing that sins running counter to the intercourse of male and female were peculiarly qualified as unnatural vices. This religious framework persisted into the modern era, with the Catholic Church maintaining that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and contrary to natural law. In the Islamic world, the distinction between religious homophobia and state-sponsored homophobia often blurs, as seen in countries like Afghanistan where the death penalty was carried out under Taliban rule. The 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran expanded the pressure and punishment against LGBTQ people, with the government executing more than 4,000 people charged with homosexual acts since that time. Seven countries currently carry the death penalty for homosexual activity, including Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Brunei. The Soviet Union initially decriminalized homosexuality in 1922 under Vladimir Lenin, but Joseph Stalin reversed this emancipation a decade later, keeping homosexuality illegal under Article 121 until the Yeltsin era. In Nazi Germany, gay men were persecuted, and approximately five to fifteen thousand were imprisoned in concentration camps. These historical examples demonstrate how religious doctrine and state power have combined to create systems of violence that persist in various forms today.
The word homophobia appeared in print for the first time on the 23rd of May 1969 in an article for the American pornographic magazine Screw. Psychologist George Weinberg coined the term in the 1960s before this publication date. The initial context described a heterosexual man's irrational fear that others might think he was gay rather than hatred of gay people themselves.
Which countries currently carry the death penalty for homosexual activity?
Seven countries currently carry the death penalty for homosexual activity including Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Brunei. The Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979 expanded punishment against LGBTQ people with the government executing more than 4,000 people charged with homosexual acts since that time. Afghanistan saw the death penalty carried out under Taliban rule as part of state-sponsored persecution.
What economic impact does homophobia have on countries according to 2018 studies?
A 2018 study regarding socioecological measurement of homophobia and its public health impact for 158 countries found that the prejudice against gay people has a worldwide economic cost of 119.1 billion dollars. The economic loss in Asia was 88.29 billion dollars while in Latin America and the Caribbean it was 8.04 billion dollars. A 2018 study by The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law concludes that there is a positive correlation between LGBTQ inclusion and GDP per capita.
When was the International Day Against Homophobia first celebrated?
The International Day Against Homophobia was first celebrated on the 17th of May 2005. This event has grown to include related activities in more than 40 countries. Cities across the world use crossings repainted in rainbow colors for their annual pride parades with the first permanent crossings put on roads in Lambeth, England.
Who coined the alternative terms homoerotophobia and homonegativism?
Behavioral scientist Wainwright Churchill coined the term homoerotophobia in 1967. Hudson and Ricketts coined the term homonegativism in 1980 to avoid the clinical implications of the word phobia. Gregory M. Herek a researcher at the University of California, Davis preferred the term sexual prejudice as being descriptive and free of presumptions about motivations.
The psychological underpinnings of homophobia reveal a disturbing connection between the intensity of hatred and the repressed desires of the hater. A controlled study of 64 heterosexual men at the University of Georgia in 1996 found that men who were homophobic were considerably more likely to experience erectile responses when exposed to homoerotic images than non-homophobic men. Researchers Weinstein and colleagues arrived at similar results, noting that students from controlling and homophobic homes were most likely to reveal repressed homosexual attraction. This phenomenon suggests that some religious leaders who denounce homosexuality are later revealed to have secret homosexual relations, as they are at war with themselves and turning this internal conflict outward. A 2016 eye-tracking study showed that heterosexual men with high negative impulse reactions toward homosexuals gazed for longer periods at homosexual imagery than other heterosexual men, reinforcing the idea that homophobia might reflect concerns about sexuality in general rather than homosexuality in particular. Internalized homophobia affects people with same-sex attractions who turn negative stereotypes and beliefs inward, causing anxiety and a desire to change their orientation. This internal struggle can lead to clinical depression and a higher rate of suicide among LGBTQ youth, with up to 30 percent of non-heterosexual youth attempting suicide. The psychological toll is compounded by the need to conform to cultural expectations of heteronormativity, often resulting in repression and denial. While some researchers argue that homophobia is not necessarily repressed homosexuality, the evidence suggests that the intensity of the hatred often correlates with the depth of the internal conflict.
The Economic Cost Of Prejudice
Homophobia is not merely a social or psychological issue; it carries a staggering economic price tag that affects nations and their populations. At least two studies indicate that homophobia has a negative economic impact for countries where it is widespread, leading to a flight of LGBTQ populations and a loss of talent. LGBTQ tourists contribute 6.8 billion dollars every year to the Spanish economy, yet countries with high levels of homophobia lose this revenue. In India, health expenses caused by depression, suicide, and HIV treatment alone would cost the country an additional 23,100 million dollars due to homophobia. When adding costs caused by violence, workplace loss, rejection of the family, and bullying at school, the total estimated loss for 2014 in India reached up to 30,800 million dollars, or 1.7 percent of the Indian GDP. A 2018 study regarding socioecological measurement of homophobia and its public health impact for 158 countries found that the prejudice against gay people has a worldwide economic cost of 119.1 billion dollars. The economic loss in Asia was 88.29 billion dollars, while in Latin America and the Caribbean it was 8.04 billion dollars. A 2018 study by The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law concludes that there is a positive correlation between LGBTQ inclusion and GDP per capita. A one-point increase in their LGBT Global Acceptance Index showed an increase of 1,506 dollars in GDP per capita, and one additional legal right was correlated with an increase of 1,694 dollars in GDP per capita. This data suggests that a 1 percent decrease in the level of homophobia is correlated with a 10 percent increase in the gross domestic product per capita, highlighting the tangible benefits of inclusion.
Global Resistance And Legal Battles
The fight against homophobia has evolved into a global movement involving international human rights organizations, legislative changes, and grassroots activism. Since 1994, the United Nations Human Rights Committee has ruled that laws making homosexual relations between consenting adults a crime violate the right to privacy guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In 2008, the Roman Catholic Church issued a statement urging states to do away with criminal penalties against homosexual persons, although the statement was addressed to reject a resolution by the UN Assembly that would have precisely called for an end of penalties against homosexuals in the world. The International Day Against Homophobia, first celebrated on the 17th of May 2005, has grown to include related activities in more than 40 countries. Cities across the world use crossings repainted in rainbow colors for their annual pride parades, with the first permanent crossings put on roads in Lambeth, England. In the United States, the politics of don't ask, don't tell in the US Army resulted in the expulsion of about 20 Arabic translators, specifically during the years the US was involved in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, causing a delay in the translation of Arabic documents calculated to be about 120,000 hours at the time. In Russia, a federal law criminalizing the distribution of materials among minors in support of non-traditional sexual relationships was enacted in June 2013, resulting in the numerous arrests of Russian LGBTQ citizens. By 2023, the Supreme Court of Russia declared that the international LGBTQ rights movement is an extremist organization. Despite these challenges, successful preventative strategies against homophobic prejudice and bullying in schools have included teaching pupils about historical figures who were gay, or who suffered discrimination because of their sexuality.
The Language Of Hate And Acceptance
The terminology used to describe prejudice against LGBTQ people has been a subject of intense debate among researchers and activists. The word homophobia has been criticized for its pejorative nature and its implication that antigay attitudes are best understood as an irrational fear. Behavioral scientists William O'Donohue and Christine Caselles stated in 1993 that the term makes an illegitimately pejorative evaluation of certain open and debatable value positions. Alternative terms such as homoerotophobia, coined by Wainwright Churchill in 1967, and homonegativism, coined by Hudson and Ricketts in 1980, have been proposed to avoid the clinical implications of the word phobia. Gregory M. Herek, a researcher at the University of California, Davis, preferred the term sexual prejudice as being descriptive, free of presumptions about motivations, and lacking value judgments as to the irrationality or immorality of those so labeled. Despite these alternatives, the term homophobia has gained neutral use and usage over time since the 1990s. In 2017, the Associated Press Stylebook added an entry for homophobia and homophobic for the first time, after having excluded it in 2012. The entry says the terms are acceptable in broad references or in quotations to the concept of fear or hatred of gays, lesbians and bisexuals. Other specific terms have emerged to describe different forms of prejudice, such as lesbophobia for the intersection of homophobia and sexism directed against lesbians, gayphobia for the dislike or hatred of gay men, biphobia for targeting bisexuality, and transphobia for targeting transgender and transsexual people. The evolution of this language reflects the ongoing struggle to define and combat discrimination in a way that is both accurate and effective.