Galileo (spacecraft)
On the 21st of September 2003, the Galileo spacecraft was deliberately aimed into Jupiter's atmosphere and destroyed. The probe had spent nearly eight years orbiting the solar system's largest planet. Its destruction was not a malfunction. NASA chose to end Galileo's life to prevent contamination of Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, where conditions might support life. How did an American spacecraft make it so far from the Sun, where solar power cannot function? What kind of engineering kept it stable through almost a decade of radiation-saturated space? And what choices, made decades before the launch, determined what Galileo could and could not do?
Consideration of sending a probe to Jupiter began as early as 1959. NASA's Scientific Advisory Group for Outer Solar System Missions confronted an immediate obstacle. The technology to build a heat shield for an atmospheric probe did not yet exist. Facilities to test one under Jovian conditions would not be available until 1980. Jupiter was the most ambitious possible target. With more than twice the mass of all the other planets combined, it was the dominant object in the outer solar system.
John R. Casani had previously managed both the Mariner and Voyager programs. He became the first project manager for what was then called the Jupiter Orbiter Probe. He solicited ideas for a more inspiring name, and the most votes went to Galileo, after the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei. Galilei was the first person to view Jupiter through a telescope. His 1610 discovery of four moons orbiting the planet served as important evidence for the Copernican model of the solar system. The name also happened to match a spacecraft in the Star Trek television show, a coincidence noted at the time. NASA adopted it officially in February 1978.
At 146 kilograms, Pioneer probes were the lighter design option. They were stabilized by spinning at 60 revolutions per minute and required no attitude control system. Mariner spacecraft weighed 722 kilograms. They carried three gyroscopes, nitrogen jet thrusters, and sensors calibrated to the Sun and the star Canopus. The heavier design enabled high-resolution imaging, and that capability drove the decision. Galileo would follow the Mariner model. At launch, the orbiter and probe together weighed 2,562 kilograms and stood 6.15 meters tall.
Three revolutions per minute was the steady rotation rate of Galileo's spinning section. This kept the probe stable while six instruments swept continuously across a full arc of space. The other section was despun, locked in a fixed orientation for instruments that required steady pointing. Most spacecraft used one stabilization method or the other. Galileo used both simultaneously.
The rotating section held the fields and particles instruments and the magnetometer sensors. The sensors were mounted on an 11-meter boom to minimize interference from the spacecraft itself. The despun section held the camera system, the near-infrared mapping spectrometer, the ultraviolet spectrometer, and the photopolarimeter-radiometer. The camera, known as the solid-state imager, was an 800-by-800-pixel CCD device. It was designed to capture images of Jupiter's moons at resolutions 20 to 1,000 times better than the best images Voyager had produced. Galileo flew closer to Jupiter's inner moons than Voyager had. Its CCD sensor was also more sensitive and covered a broader range of wavelengths than Voyager's older vidicons.
Six RCA 1802 COSMAC microprocessors ran the spacecraft. Each was clocked at about 1.6 megahertz and fabricated on silicon on sapphire, a radiation- and static-hardened material suited to deep space operation. This 8-bit chip was the first low-power CMOS processor of its kind. Its design was comparable to the processor then being used in the Apple II computer. On the ground, mission software contained 650,000 lines of code for orbit sequence design and 550,000 lines for navigation. Telemetry interpretation alone required 1,615,000 lines. Every spacecraft component and spare part was tested for a minimum of 2,000 hours. The attitude control system software was written in HAL/S, the same programming language used in the Space Shuttle program.
At least 65 square meters of solar panels would have been needed to power a spacecraft at Jupiter's distance from the Sun. Chemical batteries were equally impractical given the technology of the time. The solution was two radioisotope thermoelectric generators, each mounted on a 5-meter boom. They converted heat from the radioactive decay of plutonium-238 into electricity through the solid-state Seebeck effect. This provided a reliable source of power unaffected by cold or radiation.
Each RTG contained 18 separate heat source modules. Each module held four pellets of plutonium oxide, a ceramic chosen for its resistance to fracturing. The plutonium was enriched to about 83.5 percent plutonium-238. The modules were engineered to survive several categories of potential accident: launch explosion, fire, re-entry into the atmosphere, and land or water impact. An outer layer of graphite protected against the thermal and eroding conditions of a potential re-entry. Iridium cladding provided containment after any impact. At launch, the RTGs produced about 570 watts. The output declined at 0.6 watts per month, reaching 493 watts when Galileo arrived at Jupiter.
Anti-nuclear groups, concerned about the plutonium's risk to the public, sought a court injunction to prohibit the launch. Deep-space probes had no practical alternative to RTG power at distances where sunlight was too faint. The launch proceeded. Galileo carried a separate probe designed for release into Jupiter's atmosphere. That probe ran on 13 lithium sulfur dioxide batteries, each the size of a standard D cell. Honeywell's Power Sources Center in Horsham, Pennsylvania manufactured them.
Hughes Aircraft Company's Space and Communications Group built the entry probe at its plant in El Segundo, California. The probe weighed 339 kilograms and stood 86 centimeters tall. Its task was to fall into Jupiter's atmosphere at 48 kilometers per second, taking measurements as it descended. Data was transmitted from the probe up to the orbiter above. Temperatures during entry reached around 16,000 degrees Celsius.
Carbon phenolic, an ablative material, formed the probe's heat shield. NASA constructed a special facility, the Giant Planet Facility, to simulate the heat load the shield would face during entry. That heating environment resembled what an intercontinental ballistic missile warhead encounters during re-entry into the atmosphere. Despite those conditions, the shield was designed to protect seven scientific instruments housed inside.
Alvin Seiff of Ames Research Center led the atmospheric structure instrument, which measured temperature, pressure, and deceleration. Hasso Niemann of Goddard Space Flight Center ran the neutral mass spectrometer, built to analyze atmospheric gas composition. Ulf von Zahn of the University of Bonn contributed the helium abundance detector, an interferometer for atmospheric composition studies. Boris Ragent, also of Ames Research Center, led the nephelometer for cloud location and cloud-particle observations. Louis Lanzerotti of Bell Laboratories directed the lightning and radio emission detector, which measured light, radio emissions, and energetic particle fluxes. David Atkinson of the University of Idaho managed the radio equipment, tracking wind speeds and atmospheric absorption. L. Sromovsky of the University of Wisconsin ran the net-flux radiometer, measuring the difference between upward and downward radiant energy at each altitude.
Beyond those seven instruments, the heat shield itself carried sensors to measure the ablation of its own surface during descent. The shield was designed to record its own destruction as it burned away.
The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster made Galileo's planned May launch impossible. The mission was rescheduled to the 12th of October. A faulty main engine controller forced a further postponement to the 17th. Bad weather pushed it once more, to the 18th. The launch window extended to the 21st of November, so none of the delays was critical. Atlantis lifted off at 16:53:40 UTC on the 18th of October. The spacecraft and its upper stage reached a 213-mile orbit around Earth. Galileo was deployed at 00:15 UTC on the 19th of October. The spacecraft separated from its upper stage at 01:06:53 UTC and was soon heading toward Venus at more than 9,000 miles per hour.
Gravitational assist flybys of Venus and Earth gave Galileo the velocity it needed to reach the outer solar system. During the same journey, the spacecraft also made close passes of two asteroids, Gaspra and Ida. Galileo arrived at Jupiter on the 7th of December 1995 and became the first spacecraft to orbit an outer planet. Its large high-gain antenna had failed to fully deploy, so data was transmitted through the low-gain antenna at reduced bit rates. The next spacecraft to orbit Jupiter was Juno, which arrived on the 5th of July 2016.
Continue browsing
Updated
Common questions
What was the Galileo spacecraft's mission?
Galileo was an American robotic space probe launched in 1989 to study Jupiter, its moons, and the asteroids Gaspra and Ida. It consisted of an orbiter and a separate atmospheric probe that descended into Jupiter. Galileo was the first spacecraft ever to orbit an outer planet.
When did the Galileo spacecraft arrive at Jupiter?
Galileo arrived at Jupiter on the 7th of December 1995, becoming the first spacecraft to orbit an outer planet. It had been launched from the Space Shuttle Atlantis in October 1989, reaching Jupiter after gravitational assist flybys of Venus and Earth.
Why was the Galileo spacecraft deliberately crashed into Jupiter?
NASA deliberately directed Galileo into Jupiter's atmosphere on the 21st of September 2003 to prevent the spacecraft from contaminating Jupiter's moon Europa, where conditions might support life. The destruction was a planned end-of-mission decision, not the result of a malfunction.
What powered the Galileo spacecraft on its mission to Jupiter?
Galileo was powered by two radioisotope thermoelectric generators that converted heat from the radioactive decay of plutonium-238 into electricity through the Seebeck effect. The generators produced about 570 watts at launch, declining to 493 watts by the time Galileo reached Jupiter. Solar panels were impractical because the spacecraft operated far from the Sun, where the spacecraft would have needed at least 65 square meters of panels.
How fast did the Galileo probe enter Jupiter's atmosphere?
The Galileo atmospheric probe entered Jupiter's atmosphere at 48 kilometers per second. Temperatures during entry reached approximately 16,000 degrees Celsius. The probe's heat shield was made of carbon phenolic, an ablative material designed to protect the seven scientific instruments inside.
How did the Galileo spacecraft get its name?
The spacecraft was named after the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei, the first person to observe Jupiter through a telescope. His 1610 discovery of four moons orbiting Jupiter was important evidence for the Copernican model of the solar system. NASA officially adopted the name in February 1978 following a vote among project staff.
All sources
48 references cited across the entry
- 1Press releaseThe Final Day on GalileoJet Propulsion Laboratory — 21 September 2003
- 2Galileo Jupiter ArrivalNASAJet Propulsion Laboratory — December 1995
- 4NewsGalileo ends in blaze of glory2003-09-21
- 5MagazineWhat Galileo SawMichael Benson — September 1, 2003
- 6Galileo In DepthNASA
- 7Press releaseFour New Shuttle Crews Named (STS-32, STS-33, STS-34, STS-35)Jeffrey Carr — NASA — November 10, 1988
- 8NewsGroups Protest Use of Plutonium on GalileoWilliam J. Broad — October 10, 1989
- 9JournalRadiation Risk and Planetary Exploration - The RTG ControversyDavid Salisbury — May–June 1987
- 10Galileo: To Launch or not to Launch?Carl Sagan — October 9, 1989
- 11NewsGalileo Launch NearsKathy Sawyer — October 17, 1989
- 12Mission Archives: STS-34NASA — February 18, 2010
- 13PDS: Mission InformationNASA
- 15Galileo EngineeringRESA
- 16What's in an RTG?NASA
- 19SSI Imaging TeamNASA
- 21NIMS TeamUCLA
- 23EUV TeamUniversity of Colorado at Boulder
- 25PPR TeamLowell Observatory
- 27Cosmic Dust: Messengers from Distant WorldsHigh Energy Stereoscopic System
- 29Galileo EPDJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
- 30HIC – Heavy Ion CounterNASA
- 31HIC TeamCaltech
- 32MAG – MagnetometerNASA
- 33MAG TeamUCLA
- 34PLS – Plasma SubsystemNASA
- 35PLS TeamUniversity of Iowa
- 37Galileo PWSUniversity of Iowa
- 39Galileo Probe Science ResultsD. Isbell et al. — NASA / JPL — 22 January 1996
- 40Development of New Ablative Thermal Protection Systems (TPS)Bernard Laub — NASA / Ames — 19 October 2004
- 41Galileo Jupiter Atmospheric ProbeNASA — December 2017
- 42Galileo FAQ – Galileo AntennasNASA / JPL
- 43Jupiter: Facts – NASA ScienceNASA — October 5, 2017
- 45Press releaseGalileo Arrives at Kennedy Space CenterNASA / JPL — 17 May 1989
- 47Space Launch 1989-084Knihovna Akademie věd ČR
- 48Galileo Plunges Into JupiterFraser Cain — 22 September 2003