Frankenstein's monster
Frankenstein's monster first appeared in 1818, in a novel written by Mary Shelley when she was barely out of her teenage years. He is 8 feet tall, sensitive, vegetarian, and capable of reading French and German within 11 months of his creation. He is also, by most accounts, the most misunderstood character in the history of fiction. The world has called him "Frankenstein" for two centuries, but that is his maker's name, not his own. He has none. The questions the creature raises have never stopped being urgent. What does a being owe to the person who created it? What does a creator owe to the life it brought into existence? And when a story mutates across two hundred years of films, stage plays, comic books, and television, what survives of the original soul?
Victor Frankenstein calls his creation the "creature", the "fiend", the "spectre", the "dæmon", the "wretch", the "devil", the "thing", the "being", and the "ogre". The creature calls himself a "monster" at least once. Shelley never resolves the question of a name, and that deliberate void became one of the most generative gaps in literary history. When Shelley herself attended a London stage performance of Richard Brinsley Peake's 1823 adaptation, Presumption, she found the playbill's solution both funny and apt. The character was listed as "-------- by Mr T. Cooke". She wrote to her friend Leigh Hunt that "this nameless mode of naming the unnameable is rather good." The gap was eventually filled by accident. Within a decade of publication, audiences had simply started calling the creature "Frankenstein", after his creator. The 1927 stage adaptation by Peggy Webling made it official in the script: Webling's Victor Frankenstein does give the creature his name. Boris Karloff's 1931 film, though largely based on Webling's play, went back to anonymity, listing the character merely as "The Monster" in the opening credits, with Karloff's name replaced by a question mark. By 1935, the sequel Bride of Frankenstein had the name "Frankenstein" spoken aloud in the frame narration, and the slide was complete. Modern writers have tried other solutions. In Dean Koontz's 2004 novel, the creature is named "Deucalion", after the son of the Titan Prometheus, a deliberate echo of Shelley's subtitle. In the 2014 television series Penny Dreadful, the creature pages through a collection of Shakespeare's works and settles on "Proteus", from The Two Gentlemen of Verona, only for it to emerge that Proteus was the second creature Frankenstein had built, not the first.
Victor Frankenstein spends two years building the creature in the attic of his boarding house in Ingolstadt, using a scientific principle he discovered for creating life from non-living matter. The creature's appearance is a study in paradox. Shelley describes him as having lustrous black, flowing hair; teeth of a pearly whiteness; and limbs whose features were selected as beautiful. But his yellow skin barely covers the underlying muscles and arteries, and his eyes are watery and nearly the same color as the dun-white sockets around them. He is, as Shelley writes, a creature of hideous contrasts. His inner life is no less layered. He is a vegetarian who tells his creator, "My food is not that of man; I do not destroy the lamb and the kid to glut my appetite; acorns and berries afford me sufficient nourishment." He reads Paradise Lost, Plutarch's Lives, and The Sorrows of Young Werther. He becomes fluent in English by the novel's end, having already mastered German and French. His greatest desire is to find love and acceptance. When he introduces himself to the blind man De Lacey, who treats him with kindness, his hope is genuine. When De Lacey's family returns and drives him away, what breaks is not just his hope but his willingness to seek peaceful coexistence. The novel's Arctic climax is deliberately inconclusive. Frankenstein dies aboard the ship captained by Robert Walton. The creature boards the ship, grieves over his creator's body, and announces his intention to incinerate himself "at the Northernmost extremity of the globe." He then leaves. No one witnesses the act. The ending is an open question, deliberately left so.
Jack P. Pierce designed the most famous monster face in cinema history for the 1931 Universal film, and the origin of that design is strange. Pierce based the creature's flat-topped head on a drawing made by his own daughter, whom he reportedly feared was psychic, and who had produced the image from a dream. Universal Studios moved quickly to secure the copyright on that makeup format. Boris Karloff went on to play the monster in Bride of Frankenstein and Son of Frankenstein, establishing a physical image that would outlast his participation in the franchise. The image of Karloff's face is now owned by Karloff Enterprises, his daughter's company, which was secured in a lawsuit in which she was represented by Bela G. Lugosi, the son of Bela Lugosi, who had himself played the creature in Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man. After that lawsuit, Universal replaced Karloff's features with those of Glenn Strange in most of their marketing materials. In 1969, the New York Times ran a photograph of Strange in place of Karloff's obituary. What the Karloff template fixed in popular imagination was a creature very different from Shelley's. The stiff-legged walk, the flat angular head, the bolts in the neck as electrical connectors, the tattered dark suit with shortened coat sleeves. In the novel, the creature is described as more flexible in movement than a human. The green or gray skin tone, the stitched-together visible seams at the neck and joints, the aversion to fire: none of these come from Shelley, and the fear of fire directly contradicts her text. Lon Chaney Jr., Bela Lugosi, and Glenn Strange all wore variations of the same makeup, which had been locked in by Universal's copyright.
Christopher Lee took the role in the 1957 Hammer Film production The Curse of Frankenstein, and the production company had a specific problem. Universal held the copyright on the Pierce makeup design, so Phil Leakey was commissioned to build an entirely new face for the creature, bearing no resemblance to the Karloff version. Lee played the character as loose-limbed and childlike, fearful and lonely, with what he described as a suggestion of being in pain. Scholar Marcus K. Harmes wrote of the performance that Lee's creature "seems more directly evil" in its actions, but that this is explained within the film as the product of psychopathic impulses caused by brain damage, not as any kind of cunning. The brain in question had belonged to Professor Bernstein, described in the film as once the "finest brain in Europe." Lee himself was annoyed when he received the script and found that the monster had no dialogue. The Hammer sequels took a notably different approach than Universal had: each film featured a fresh monster, none of them played by Lee. The Revenge of Frankenstein placed the brain of a hunchback named Karl, played by Oscar Quitak, into a new body played by Michael Gwynn. Karl's original deformities slowly returned. The Evil of Frankenstein introduced a prototype creature, played by Kiwi Kingston, who had been kept frozen and whose dormant brain was reactivated by a hypnotist named Zoltan, played by Peter Woodthorpe. The final Hammer entry in this strand, Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell, cast David Prowse as the creature, a hulking asylum inmate whose brain and eyes were replaced by Victor Frankenstein while he was already committed.
Scholars have found in Shelley's creature a figure who expands under pressure to accommodate several distinct anxieties. The most biographical reading notes that Shelley's own mother died while giving birth to her, and the creature has been read as an analogy for a motherless child abandoned at the moment of arrival. Another strand focuses on class. Shelley wrote that the creature recognized "the division of property, of immense wealth and squalid poverty." A third reading draws on Galvanism, the scientific theory that gripped Europe in the early 19th century: many scientists genuinely believed that electrical current could reanimate the dead, which meant Frankenstein's premise read less like fantasy to its first audience than it does to readers now. The most unusual proposal involves Benjamin Franklin. Some scholars have argued that Victor Frankenstein was partly modeled on the historical Franklin, who had also been called a modern Prometheus. In the novel, Frankenstein's father builds a kite with wire and string to draw down electrical fluid from the clouds, a direct echo of Franklin's famous experiment. By that reading, the monster would represent the new nation that Franklin helped to build from England's remnants. Anne Mellor has argued in the article "Frankenstein, Racial Science, and the Yellow Peril" that the creature's physical description carries racial coding, pointing to the Shelleys' friendship with William Lawrence, an early proponent of racial science whom Mary continued to consult socially until his death in 1830. John Malchow has separately argued that the creature's depiction draws on 18th-century representations of Black bodies, while being careful to note that there is no clear proof Shelley consciously intended such an allegory. Karen Lynnea Piper has proposed a third racial reading, arguing that the monster represents indigenous Inuit presence during Robert Walton's Arctic expedition.
Thomas Cooke played the nameless creature in London in 1823, the same performance Shelley herself attended. The line of portrayals since then stretches across more than 150 actors in film, television, and stage, in productions ranging from the 1910 Edison film through the 1965 Toho monster film Frankenstein vs. Baragon, in which the creature's irradiated heart grows over 20 years into a 20-metre-tall giant. The 1994 film Mary Shelley's Frankenstein cast Robert De Niro in the role, giving him the brain of a character named Doctor Waldman and a body whose stitches are explicitly bloody. The 2011 stage production Frankenstein did something few adaptations had attempted: it cast Benedict Cumberbatch and Jonny Lee Miller in alternating roles as both Victor and the creature, demanding the audience experience each perspective. The 2025 film by Guillermo del Toro, with Jacob Elordi in the role, introduced an element not present in Shelley or any previous major adaptation: a creature implied to be immortal, whose wounds heal even after exposure to bullets or dynamite. Scholar Nick Groom has observed that adaptations have become "more and more warped" over time, with the creature devolving from Shelley's articulate, suffering intelligence into what he describes as a mindless zombie. Joseph Carroll, on the other hand, has argued that the monster occupies "a border territory between the characteristics that typically define protagonists and antagonists" - a liminal quality that may explain why the character has remained generative for more than two centuries, resistant to being fixed as simply hero or villain.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is Frankenstein's monster's name in the original novel by Mary Shelley?
Mary Shelley's 1818 novel does not give the creature a specific name. Victor Frankenstein calls him the "creature", "fiend", "wretch", and several other terms; the creature refers to himself as a "monster" at least once. The name "Frankenstein" was applied to the creature by popular usage within a decade of the novel's publication, not by Shelley.
What does Frankenstein's monster look like in the original 1818 novel?
Shelley describes the creature as 8 feet tall with lustrous black flowing hair, pearly white teeth, and limbs selected for beauty. His yellow skin barely covers the muscles and arteries beneath, and his eyes are watery, nearly matching the dun-white color of the sockets around them. He is far more flexible in his movements than the stiff-legged figure shown in most films.
Who designed the iconic flat-topped look for Frankenstein's monster in the 1931 Universal film?
Makeup artist Jack P. Pierce designed the look for Boris Karloff's portrayal in the 1931 Universal film Frankenstein. Pierce based the creature's distinctive flat-topped head on a drawing made by his daughter, which she had produced from a dream. Universal secured the copyright on that makeup format, and subsequent actors in the franchise replicated Karloff's look.
Who owns the rights to Boris Karloff's face as Frankenstein's monster?
The image of Boris Karloff's face as the creature is owned by Karloff Enterprises, a company belonging to Karloff's daughter. She secured ownership through a lawsuit in which she was represented by Bela G. Lugosi, the son of actor Bela Lugosi. After the lawsuit, Universal replaced Karloff's features with those of Glenn Strange in most of their marketing materials.
What kind of personality does Frankenstein's monster have in the original novel?
In Shelley's novel the creature is sensitive, articulate, and deeply emotional. He is a vegetarian, learns to read and speak French and German within 11 months, and is fluent in English by the novel's end. He reads Paradise Lost, Plutarch's Lives, and The Sorrows of Young Werther. His primary desire is love and acceptance; revenge follows only after he is rejected by everyone he encounters.
What are scholarly interpretations of what Frankenstein's monster represents?
Scholars have read the creature as an analogy for a motherless child, a symbol of an oppressed class, and a warning about uncontrolled scientific progress. Some have connected him to Benjamin Franklin as a representation of the new American nation. Researchers including Anne Mellor, John Malchow, and Karen Lynnea Piper have separately argued that the creature's physical description carries racial coding drawn from 18th and 19th century discourse on race.
All sources
41 references cited across the entry
- 1JournalFrankenstein: or, The Modern PrometheusRoss Camidge — 2007-09-22
- 2BookGraphing Jane Austen: The Evolutionary Basis of Literary MeaningJoseph Carroll et al. — Palgrave Macmillan — 2012
- 3NewsThe Pop-Culture Evolution of Frankenstein's MonsterZoë Lescaze — 2017-10-23
- 4JournalThe Psychological Appeal of Movie MonstersS. Fischoff et al. — 2005
- 5BookIn Frankenstein's shadow: myth, monstrosity, and nineteenth-century writingChris Baldick — Clarendon Press — 1987
- 6BookGothic Fiction/Gothic FormGeorge E. Haggerty — Pennsylvania State University Press — 1989
- 7BookFrankenstein: a cultural historySusan Tyler Hitchcock — W. W. Norton — 2007
- 8BookThe 1930sWilliam Young et al. — Greenwood Publishing Group — 2002
- 9BookThe Cambridge Companion to Mary ShelleyEsther Schor — Cambridge University Press — 2003
- 10BookComfortable WordsBergen Evans — Random House — 1962
- 11BookA dictionary of modern American usageBryan A. Garner — Oxford University Press — 1998
- 12Tales of Monstrous Women: "The Strange Case of the Alchemist's Daughter" and "European Travel for the Monstrous Gentlewoman" by Theodora GossIlana Teitelbaum — 13 October 2018
- 13NewsPenny Dreadful: The Most Faithful Version of the Frankenstein LegendDennis Crow — Dennis Publishing — 19 October 2016
- 15Maggie Gyllenhaal Is Determined to Give the Bride of Frankenstein Her VoiceDavid Crow — 15 January 2026
- 16BookBela Lugosi and Boris Karloff: The Expanded Story of a Haunting Collaboration, with a Complete Filmography of Their Films TogetherGregory William Mank — McFarland — 8 March 2010
- 17BookUp, Up, and Oy Vey!: how Jewish history, culture, and values shaped the comic book superheroSimcha Weinstein — Leviathan Press — 2006
- 18BookEnglish Gothic: A Century of Horror CinemaRigby, Jonathan — Reynolds & Hearn Ltd — 2000
- 19BookGood Versus Evil in the Films of Christopher LeeLegget, Paul — McFarland, Incorporated, Publishers Ltd — 2018
- 20BookThe Curse of FrankensteinHarmes, Marcus K — Columbia University Press — 2015
- 22NewsGuillermo del Toro's Frankenstein Is a Lavish Epic Decades in the MakingDana Stevens — 2025-10-16
- 25Frankenstein, or the Modern PrometheusMary Wollstonecraft Shelley — 1818
- 27BookA Vindication of Natural DietPercy Shelley — Project Gutenberg
- 28BookThe Cambridge Companion to ShelleyTimothy Morton — Cambridge University Press — 21 September 2006
- 29BookLiterature, Culture and SocietyAndrew Milner — NYU Press — 2005
- 30BookCliffsNotes on Shelley's FrankensteinJeff Coghill — Houghton Mifflin Harcourt — 2000
- 31BookBlack Frankenstein: The Making of an American MetaphorElizabeth Young — NYU Press — 2008
- 32BookFrankenstein: or 'The Modern Prometheus': The 1818 TextMary Wollstonecraft Shelley — Oxford University Press — 1 January 1818
- 33JournalInuit Diasporas: Frankenstein and the Inuit in EnglandKaren Lynnea Piper — 2007
- 37SNL Transcripts: Paul Simon: 12/19/87: Succinctly Speaking8 October 2018
- 40Trailer Park: 'Hotel Transylvania: Transformania'Jos Verboven — 17 May 2021
- 41Guillermo del Toro's Mysterious Frankenstein Movie Wraps FilmingHannah Gearan — September 30, 2024