Biological warfare
Biological warfare is as old as the written record. Hittite texts from somewhere between 1500 and 1200 BC describe victims of a plague being driven deliberately into enemy lands to spread an epidemic. That is the earliest known documented intent to use disease as a weapon. Nearly three and a half millennia later, the technique has been refined into something almost unimaginably more powerful. What made soldiers reach for pathogens instead of blades? Why did the world eventually try to outlaw an entire category of weaponry? And how does a weapon that cannot stop an advancing army in a single day become one of the most feared tools a nation or terrorist cell can possess?
Scythian archers dipped their arrows in excrement and rotting cadavers. The result was infection by tetanus. Roman soldiers are reported to have done the same with their swords. These early practitioners did not need to understand germ theory to notice that wounded enemies sometimes died of causes beyond the wound itself.
In 1346, warriors of the Mongol Golden Horde besieging the Crimean city of Kaffa catapulted the corpses of their own plague-dead over the city walls. Specialists still debate whether this act helped spread the Black Death into Europe, the Near East, and North Africa, where roughly 25 million Europeans would eventually die.
In Africa from the sixteenth century onward, biological agents appeared in a more organized form. Poisoned arrows and powders spread on the war front were common in many regions. In Borgu specifically, trained medicine-men held exclusive rights over the preparation of mixtures intended to kill, to hypnotize, to embolden troops, or to counteract an enemy's poisons. The craft was professional, guarded, and socially sanctioned.
By the 18th century, biological sabotage had entered a new context: colonial warfare. In June 1763, during the French and Indian War, Swiss-born Captain Simeon Ecuyer was stationed at Fort Pitt, a British-held position under siege by Native Americans. Acting on orders from Colonel Henry Bouquet, Ecuyer's men retrieved smallpox-infested blankets from the infirmary and handed them to a Lenape delegation. A subsequent outbreak left as many as one hundred Native Americans dead in Ohio Country between 1763 and 1764. Whether the contaminated blankets caused that specific outbreak remains disputed, since the Delaware people experienced smallpox independently on a roughly twelve-year cycle and the same delegates who received the blankets showed no signs of infection when encountered again later.
During the American Revolutionary War, General George Washington heard a rumor from a sailor that British commander General William Howe had deliberately sent civilians out of Boston hoping to spread a smallpox epidemic to American lines. Washington wrote to the Continental Congress that he could "hardly give credit to" the claim. He had already inoculated his soldiers, limiting whatever damage the epidemic might have done.
By the time germ theory had taken hold around 1900, biological sabotage acquired scientific precision. During World War I, German agents conducted anthrax and glanders attacks against cavalry horses belonging to American and French forces, against sheep in Romania, and against livestock in Argentina intended to supply the Entente. One named participant was Anton Dilger. Germany itself was not spared: French operatives in Switzerland infected horses bound for Germany with Burkholderia.
World War II transformed these scattered operations into government-funded industrial programs. In Britain, the Ministry of Supply established a biological warfare program at Porton Down under microbiologist Paul Fildes, with active support from Winston Churchill. Researchers there successfully weaponized tularemia, anthrax, brucellosis, and botulinum toxin. Gruinard Island off Scotland was contaminated with anthrax during a series of field tests whose effects persisted for 56 years.
The United States entered the field in 1942, setting up a research and industrial complex at Fort Detrick, Maryland, under George W. Merck. Weapons were tested at the Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah. Facilities capable of mass-producing anthrax spores, brucellosis agents, and botulinum toxin came online, though the war ended before they saw significant operational use.
The most brutal program was Japan's Unit 731, based at Pingfang in Manchuria and commanded by Lieutenant General Shiro Ishii. Researchers conducted often fatal experiments on prisoners and produced weapons for actual combat deployment. In 1940, the Japanese Army Air Force dropped ceramic bombs filled with plague-carrying fleas on Ningbo. During the Zhejiang-Jiangxi Campaign in 1942, around 1,700 Japanese troops died out of roughly 10,000 who fell ill after their own biological attack rebounded on their forces. Up to 200,000 people may have died from Japanese biological weapons operations overall. In the final months of the war, Japan planned to carry plague to US civilians in San Diego under an operation called Cherry Blossoms at Night, set to launch on the 22nd of September 1945. Japan's surrender on the 15th of August 1945 made the plan moot.
Nixon's decision in 1969 to unilaterally end the offensive US biological weapons program shifted momentum toward diplomacy. Negotiations ran from 1969 to 1972 at the United Nations' Conference of the Committee on Disarmament in Geneva. Those talks produced the Biological Weapons Convention, opened for signature on the 10th of April 1972 and entering into force on the 26th of March 1975 after ratification by 22 states. As of March 2021, 183 states had become party to it, making it the first multilateral disarmament treaty to ban an entire category of weapons of mass destruction.
The Soviet Union signed and ratified the treaty. It also secretly expanded one of the largest offensive biological weapons programs in history, housed under a nominally civilian institution called Biopreparat. The scale became clear in 1979 when an anthrax leak at a military facility in Sverdlovsk killed approximately 65 to 100 people. Sheep became ill with anthrax as far as 200 kilometers from the release point. The city is now called Yekaterinburg, and parts of the facility remain off-limits to visitors.
Biopreparat's network included facilities across the Soviet Union: a weaponized plague center at the Institute of Ultra Pure Biochemical Preparations in Leningrad, a weaponized smallpox center called VECTOR in Novosibirsk, and a weaponized anthrax production center at Military Compound 19 in Sverdlovsk itself. In the 1980s, the Soviet Ministry of Agriculture developed variants of foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest for cattle, African swine fever for pigs, and psittacosis for chickens, under a secret program code-named "Ecology."
The cost of a biological weapon capable of producing comparable mass casualties to a conventional weapon has been estimated at roughly 0.05 percent of the conventional weapon's cost per square kilometer of effect. That economic reality is part of what makes these weapons attractive beyond state actors.
In 2002, when material from Al-Qaeda was reviewed, analysts found planning for ricin and cyanide attacks through a loose network of cells that had infiltrated Turkey, Italy, Spain, France, and other countries.
A newer concern is the widening access to gene-editing techniques. A method called Clustered, Regularly Interspaced, Short Palindromic Repeat technology, known as CRISPR-Cas9, has become cheap and widely available enough that scientists worry amateurs could begin experimenting with it. Unlike older techniques that might take months or years to alter a gene sequence, CRISPR compresses that timeline to weeks. Do-it-yourself biology organizations have drawn particular scrutiny because an individual researcher with no institutional oversight could theoretically attempt to build dangerous agents.
The deliberate laboratory synthesis of the Horsepox virus from commercially acquired DNA segments demonstrated what is now possible with poxviruses. That experiment showed that highly complex viruses could be engineered from purchased genetic material, which lowers the barrier to entry for acquiring dangerous pathogens considerably. In 2015, the Blue-Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense published a National Blueprint for Biodefense to address the expanding threat. A separate annual report from the Federal Select Agent Program described 233 potential exposures of select biological agents outside primary containment barriers in the United States alone.
Bacillus anthracis illustrates the medical reality defenders face. A pulmonary anthrax infection begins with symptoms resembling influenza, then progresses to a lethal hemorrhagic condition within 3-7 days, with an untreated fatality rate of 90 percent or higher. The incubation period for humans has been estimated at approximately 11.8 to 12.1 days. Models suggest that if antibiotic treatment begins within 24-36 hours of an attack, more than 80 percent of an exposed population can receive prophylaxis before becoming symptomatic, avoiding the worst mortality.
Field detection tools have advanced to try to close that window. Researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have developed a device using a sandwich immunoassay in which fluorescent dye-labeled antibodies targeting specific pathogens are attached to silver and gold nanowires. In the Netherlands, the company TNO designed a system called Bioaerosol Single Particle Recognition eQuipment, or BiosparQ, for integration into that country's national bioweapon response plan. Researchers at Ben Gurion University in Israel are developing a device called the BioPen, a lab-in-a-pen tool using fiber optics and an adaptation of the ELISA immunological technique, capable of detecting known biological agents in under 20 minutes.
Epidemiological surveillance provides an earlier warning layer. Unusual disease presentations, outbreaks among animals preceding human illness, simultaneous clusters appearing in non-contiguous geographic areas, and disease in populations or age groups for whom the illness is atypical all serve as warning indicators. During the first Gulf War, the United Nations activated a biological and chemical response team called Task Force Scorpio to respond to any potential use of weapons of mass destruction against civilians. Surveillance systems linking human clinicians and veterinarians remain the first practical defense against an attack that may not be recognized until days after it begins.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is the oldest documented use of biological warfare?
The oldest documented incident is recorded in Hittite texts from 1500-1200 BC, which describe victims of an unknown plague being driven into enemy lands to cause an epidemic. The Assyrians also poisoned enemy wells with the fungus ergot in antiquity.
What did Japan's Unit 731 do during World War II?
Unit 731 was a secret Japanese Army biological warfare unit based at Pingfang in Manchuria, commanded by Lieutenant General Shiro Ishii. It conducted often fatal human experiments on prisoners and produced biological weapons for combat use, including a 1940 attack on Ningbo using ceramic bombs filled with plague-carrying fleas.
What does the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention prohibit?
The Biological Weapons Convention prohibits the development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling, and use of biological weapons. It entered into force on the 26th of March 1975 after ratification by 22 states and was the first multilateral disarmament treaty to ban an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. As of March 2021, 183 states had become party to it.
What was the Sverdlovsk anthrax leak in 1979?
The 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax leak was an accidental release of anthrax from a Soviet military facility in Sverdlovsk, now called Yekaterinburg, that killed approximately 65 to 100 people. Sheep became ill with anthrax as far as 200 kilometers from the release point. The facility was part of the Soviet Union's secret Biopreparat biological weapons network.
Why is CRISPR-Cas9 considered a bioweapon threat?
CRISPR-Cas9 is widely available and inexpensive, and it compresses gene-editing timelines from months or years down to weeks. Scientists fear that amateurs could use the technology to develop dangerous biological agents outside institutional oversight. The deliberate synthesis of the Horsepox virus from commercially acquired DNA segments demonstrated that highly complex pox viruses can be engineered, lowering the barrier to acquiring dangerous pathogens.
How much cheaper is a biological weapon compared to a conventional weapon?
The cost of a biological weapon capable of producing similar numbers of mass casualties per square kilometer has been estimated at roughly 0.05 percent the cost of a conventional weapon. Biological agents can also be produced using common technology similar to that used for vaccines, foods, and antibiotics.
All sources
121 references cited across the entry
- 1JournalToxins as biological weapons for terror-characteristics, challenges and medical countermeasures: a mini-reviewTamar Berger et al. — 2016
- 2BookBiotechnology: Applying the Genetic RevolutionDavid P. Clark et al. — Academic Cell — 2016
- 3BookThe Biological Weapons TabooMichelle Bentley — Oxford University Press — 2024
- 4The Biological Weapons TabooMichelle Bentley — 2023-10-18
- 8BookDeadly Cultures: Biological Weapons Since 1945Mark Wheelis et al. — Harvard University Press — 2006
- 9BookAnother Bloody Century: Future WarfareColin Gray — Phoenix — 2007
- 10JournalPathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological WarfareGregory Koblentz — 2003
- 12JournalHemorrhagic (Marburg, Ebola, Lassa, and Bolivian) fevers: Epidemiology, clinical pictures, and treatmentI. V. Borisevich et al. — 2006
- 13BookGreek Fire, Poison Arrows & Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient WorldAdrienne Mayor — Overlook Duckworth — 2003
- 14JournalThe 'Hittite plague', an epidemic of tularemia and the first record of biological warfareTrevisanato SI — 2007
- 15BookChemical and biological warfare: a comprehensive survey for the concerned citizenEric Croddy et al. — Copernicus Books — 2002
- 16JournalBiological warfare at the 1346 siege of CaffaWheelis M — September 2002
- 17JournalHistory of biological warfare and bioterrorismBarras V, Greub G — June 2014
- 19BookWarfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500-1800John K. Thornton — Routledge — November 2002
- 20JournalBiologically-Based Warfare in the Pre-Colonial Borgu Society of Nigeria and Republic of Benin1Olayemi Akinwumi — 1995
- 21BookAmerican Indian Chronology: Chronologies of the American MosaicPhillip M. White — Greenwood Publishing Group — June 2, 2011
- 22BookThe Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America (Pivotal Moments in American History)Collin G. Calloway — Oxford University Press — 2007
- 23BookRationalizing EpidemicsDavid S. Jones — Harvard University Press — 2004
- 24BookA Country Between: The Upper Ohio Valley and Its Peoples, 1724-1774Michael N. McConnel — University of Nebraska Press — 1997
- 25BookBlood and Land: The Story of Native North AmericaJ. C. H. King — Penguin UK — 2016
- 26JournalThe British, the Indians, and smallpox: what actually happened at Fort Pitt in 1763?P Ranlet — 2000
- 27BookMedical Aspects of Biological WarfareGovernment Printing Office — 2007
- 28SmallpoxMary V. Thompson — Mount Vernon Estate and Gardens
- 29Gen. George Washington - A Threat of Bioterrorism, 1775US National Archives
- 30JournalSmallpox at Sydney Cove – Who, When, WhyWarren Christopher — 2013
- 31JournalThe history of biological weapons use: what we know and what we don't.Carus WS — August 2015
- 32JournalLegal Aspects of the Geneva Protocol of 1925R. R. Baxter et al. — 28 March 2017
- 33BookBiological Agents, Volume 2Prasad SK — Discovery Publishing House — 2009
- 34BookBetrayal of Trust: The Collapse of Global Public HealthLaurie Garrett — Oxford University Press — 2003
- 35BookA History of Fort Detrick, MarylandNorman M Covert — 2000
- 36JournalScientists and the history of biological weapons. A brief historical overview of the development of biological weapons in the twentieth centuryGuillemin J — July 2006
- 37BookUnit 731: Japan's Secret Biological Warfare in World War IIPeter Williams et al. — Free Press — 1989
- 38ReportUnit 731 testimonyHal Gold — 1996
- 39BookA Plague upon HumanityDaniel Barenblatt — HarperCollins — 2004
- 40NewsUnmasking Horror -- A special report.; Japan Confronting Gruesome War AtrocityNICHOLAS D. Kristof — March 17, 1995
- 41BookThe Implementation of Legally Binding Measures to Strengthen the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, held in Budapest, Hungary, 2001Springer Science & Business Media — July 2004
- 42BookWeapons of Mass DestructionEric Croddy et al. — ABC-CLIO — 2005
- 43BookMurderous Medicine: Nazi Doctors, Human Experimentation, and TyphusNaomi Baumslag — 2005
- 44Where To Find The World's Most 'Wicked Bugs': FleasAmy Stewart — National Public Radio — 25 April 2011
- 45The trial of Unit 731Russell Working — 5 June 2001
- 46Journal'Cast thy bread': Israeli biological warfare during the 1948 WarBenny Morris et al. — 2022-01-01
- 48BookBracing for Armageddon?: The Science and Politics of Bioterrorism in AmericaWilliam R. Clark — Oxford University Press — 15 May 2008
- 50JournalThe Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979M. Meselson et al. — 1994-11-18
- 54JournalThe Shortcomings of Indeterminacy in Arms Control Regimes: The Case of the Biological Weapons ConventionJack M. Beard — April 2007
- 56JournalTwenty-first century perspectives on the Biological Weapon Convention: Continued relevance or toothless paper tigerGlenn Cross et al. — 2020-07-03
- 58BookChapter 9: The Failure of Arms Control, In Bioterror and Biowarfare: A Beginner's GuideMalcolm Dando — Oneworld — 2006
- 63Al Qaeda's Pursuit of Weapons of Mass Destruction25 January 2010
- 66JournalBiological Weapons and Virtual TerrorismDaniel Wagner — 2 October 2017
- 68BookSix-legged Soldiers: Using Insects as Weapons of WarJeffrey A. Lockwood — Oxford University Press — 2008
- 69BookSynthetic biology. The technoscience and its societal consequences.Kelle A — Springer — 2009
- 70JournalSynthetic genomics: options for governance.Garfinkel MS, Endy D, Epstein GL, Friedman RM — December 2007
- 71Addressing Biosecurity Concerns Related to Synthetic BiologyNational Security Advisory Board on Biotechnology (NSABB) — 2010
- 72The potential use of genetic engineering to enhance orthopoxviruses as bioweapons.Buller M — 21 October 2003
- 73JournalCharacterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virusTumpey TM, Basler CF, Aguilar PV, Zeng H, Solórzano A, Swayne DE, Cox NJ, Katz JM, Taubenberger JK, Palese P, García-Sastre A — October 2005
- 74JournalChemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural templateCello J, Paul AV, Wimmer E — August 2002
- 75JournalSynthetic viruses: a new opportunity to understand and prevent viral diseaseWimmer E, Mueller S, Tumpey TM, Taubenberger JK — December 2009
- 76NewsEverything you need to know about why CRISPR is such a hot technologyDominic Basulto — 2015-11-04
- 77NewsThe Crispr QuandaryJennifer Kahn — 2015-11-09
- 78JournalCRISPR, the disruptorLedford H — June 2015
- 79Evaluation of Biosafety Level 4 AssessmentKansas Committee on the Evaluation of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan — National Academies Press (US) — 2012-06-15
- 81Anthrax Facts | UPMC Center for Health SecurityUpmc-biosecurity.org
- 82JournalVaccines for the prevention of diseases caused by potential bioweaponsHassani M, Patel MC, Pirofski LA — April 2004
- 83JournalBioterrorismR.J. Bellamy et al. — Association of Physicians of Great Britain and Ireland (OUP) — 2001-04-01
- 84JournalThe U.S. Biological Warfare and Biological Defense ProgramsDavid Franz
- 85NewsVietnam's war against Agent Orange14 June 2004
- 87Biowarfare Against AgricultureFederation of American Scientists
- 88BookChemical and biological warfare: a comprehensive survey for the concerned citizenEric Croddy et al. — Copernicus Books — 2002
- 90BookBiohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World – Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran itAlibek K, Handelman S — Delta — 2000
- 91BookCommon poisonous plants of East AfricaVerdcourt B, Trump EC, Church ME — Collins — 1969
- 92Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their DestructionEuropean Union cooperative Initiatives to improve Biosafety and Biosecurity — 12 August 2010
- 93Vaccines for Military Members26 April 2021
- 94BookThe Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History. Politics & The Life SciencesGuillemin J — 2013
- 95JournalZoonoses likely to be used in bioterrorismRyan CP — 2008
- 96JournalModeling the incubation period of inhalational anthraxWilkening DA — 2008
- 97JournalQuantitative models of the dose-response and time course of inhalational anthrax in humansToth DJ, Gundlapalli AV, Schell WA, Bulmahn K, Walton TE, Woods CW, Coghill C, Gallegos F, Samore MH, Adler FR — August 2013
- 98JournalEpidemiologic clues to bioterrorismTreadwell TA, Koo D, Kuker K, Khan AS — March–April 2003
- 101BioPen Senses BioThreatsIddo Genuth et al. — 13 November 2006
- 105Dr. Ira Baldwin: Biological Weapons PioneerAmerican History — 2006-06-12
- 106BookBiologists Under HitlerUte Deichmann — Harvard University Press — 1996
- 107JournalHuman hepatitis experiments in the 2d World WarLeyendecker B, Klapp F — December 1989
- 108NewsAn American waged germ warfare against U.S. in WWIRebecca Maksel — 14 January 2007
- 109BookBiological WeaponsSharad S. Chauhan — APH Publishing — 2004
- 111NewsObituary: Vladimir Pasechnik29 November 2001
- 112NewsAnthrax attacksBBC — 14 March 2002
- 114NewsUS welcomes 'Dr Germ' captureBBC — 13 May 2003
- 115BookIntelligence and Statecraft: The Use and Limits of Intelligence in International SocietyPeter J Jackson et al. — Greenwood Publishing Group — 2005
- 117Weaponization Risks of Mirror Bacteria: Feasibility, Consequences, and Mitigation StrategiesJack Trudel — January 2025
- 119NewsSheldon Harris, 74, Historian of Japan's Biological WarfarePaul Lewis — 4 September 2002
- 120BookBiological Weapons and America's Secret WarJudith Miller — Simon & Schuster — 2001