Annals (Tacitus)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Annals by Publius Cornelius Tacitus covers the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus Caesar in AD 14 to the year AD 66, when the final surviving book cuts off mid-narrative. Tacitus was himself a senator, not just a chronicler of power but someone who sat inside it. That position gave him access to the Acta Senatus, the official records of the Roman senate, and shaped the lens through which he examined emperors, tyrants, and the slow erosion of republican freedom. The title the world now knows was never his choice. The name Annals derives simply from the year-by-year structure of the work. Tacitus himself called part of it "my annals," but the manuscript carries a different name altogether: Books of History from the Death of the Divine Augustus. What shaped the work? What survives of it, and why does so much remain lost? And what happens when later ages decide the whole thing might be a forgery?

• 2. Structure and Scope

  ›

  Tacitus wrote the Annals in at least sixteen books, organized by reign rather than by even slices of time. Six books cover Tiberius, neatly split into two groups of three that mirror the shifting political climate of his rule. The next six take on Caligula and Claudius, though books 7 through 10 have not survived. The final four deal with Nero, and book 16 stops without warning in the middle of AD 66, leaving the last two years of Nero's reign without a Tacitean account.

  The Annals did not stand alone. Together with Tacitus' earlier Histories, which covers the years AD 69 to 96 and was dedicated to a period beginning six months after Nero's death, the two works originally amounted to thirty books in total. Saint Jerome referred to all thirty. About half of them have survived. Scholars have long debated which books belong to which work, though the traditional count assigns fourteen to the Histories and sixteen to the Annals.

  Tacitus was still deep in the writing of the Annals by AD 116, though when he began is not known. His friend Pliny wrote to him about his "histories," a reminder that the works emerged from a life spent both in public service and in sustained scholarly labor.

• 3. The Emperors on the Page

  ›

  Tiberius receives the most sustained portrait in the Annals, and Tacitus builds it indirectly, layering observations and commentary across a narrative rather than stating conclusions outright. The result is a figure rendered progressively, someone Tacitus believed had once been a great man before power narrowed him.

  Nero gets no such complexity. Tacitus considers him simply despicable. The contrast between the two portraits is not accidental. Both men are presented as tyrants who created fear in their subjects, but Tacitus draws a moral distinction between a man corrupted by rule and a man who was never fit for it.

  The work also carries a thesis about power itself. As in the Histories, Tacitus argues for the necessity of the Principate, acknowledging that Augustus had secured peace after years of civil war. But he does not let that argument become flattery. He traces the cost: the steady extinction of the political freedom that the senatorial aristocracy had held under the republic. That class, which Tacitus regarded as morally decadent and servile toward the emperors, had traded liberty for survival. During Nero's reign, literary works celebrating the deaths of prominent men circulated widely, a tradition Tacitus calls the exitus illustrium virorum. He was opposed to those who chose what he saw as useless martyrdom through vain suicides.

• 4. What the Pages Record

  ›

  Book 15 of the Annals records events from AD 62 to 65, including the Great Fire of Rome and the Pisonian conspiracy against Nero. It also documents the forced suicides of Seneca and the poet Lucan. Book 15 is also the text where Tacitus mentions the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, a passage that later became one of the most debated in the entire work.

  Elsewhere the Annals traces mutinies among the Pannonian and German legions, the revolt of Tacfarinas, the treachery of Messalina, the career of Corbulo in Armenia, and the Icenian revolt in Britain under Boudicca. Book 12 records Claudius adopting Nero and the draining of Fucine Lake. The last surviving entry in book 16 records the persecution of Stoic philosophers and the murders of Thrasea Paetus and Barea Soranus.

  The portrait of Sejanus, who poisoned Drusus and rose to dangerous prominence during Tiberius' reign, runs through books 4 and 5 before his fall, covered in book 6, sets off the purges that follow. Book 5 itself survives only in part, with the section covering the fall of Sejanus in AD 31 missing.

• 5. Rediscovery and Manuscript Survival

  ›

  Annals 11 through 16 were probably first discovered at Monte Cassino by Zanobi da Strada, who died in 1361. The copies may have been moved to Florence by Giovanni Boccaccio, who lived from 1313 to 1375, a friend of da Strada and someone also credited with finding the manuscripts there. Boccaccio made use of the Annals when he wrote his Commento di Dante around 1374, drawing his account of Seneca's death directly from Tacitus' book 15. Francis Newton concluded that Annals 11 through 16 were likely at Monte Cassino during the first half of the rule of Abbot Desiderius, who governed from 1058 to 1087 and later became Pope Victor III.

  Annals 1 through 6 followed a separate path. Giovanni Angelo Arcimboldi, later Archbishop of Milan, discovered them at Corvey Abbey in Germany in 1508. They were first published in Rome in 1515 by Beroaldus, acting on the orders of Pope Leo X, who then deposited the manuscript in the Medicean Library in Florence.

  Poggio Bracciolini, the Italian scholar who lived from 1380 to 1459, had separately discovered three minor works by Tacitus at Hersfeld Abbey in Germany in 1425, well after the Monte Cassino manuscripts had already been in use.

• 6. The Forgery Debate

  ›

  Since the 18th century, at least five attempts have been made to argue that the Annals was not written by Tacitus at all. Voltaire was perhaps the first to raise doubts, though his criticism centered on Tacitus' failure, as Voltaire saw it, to meet the standards for providing a proper historical background to civilization.

  In 1878, John Wilson Ross formally proposed that the Annals had been forged. In 1890, Polydore Hochart advanced the same argument, naming Poggio Bracciolini as the forger. The case rested partly on the fact that Bracciolini had handled ancient manuscripts professionally. Robert Van Voorst called this an extreme hypothesis that never found followers among modern scholars, though he addressed Hochart's argument only partially and did not engage with Ross' claims about historical inaccuracies in the text.

  The strongest counter-evidence is Boccaccio's use of the Annals around 1374, decades before Bracciolini was born in 1380. A forger who died in 1459 cannot have produced a text that a writer who died in 1375 demonstrably read and cited.

• 7. Afterlife in Literature

  ›

  Donna Leon placed the Annals in the hands of her detective Commissario Brunetti in the 1994 novel Dressed for Death, the third book in her series. Brunetti reads Tacitus in the evenings, and references to the text run through the novel.

  Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita uses the Annals as a flashpoint for an argument about historical authenticity. The MASSOLIT editor Berlioz claims that the Annals' mention of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ was added later and is not genuinely Tacitean.

  In Jorge Luis Borges' short story The Garden of Forking Paths, a young man on a train is reading the Annals with fervor when the narrator Yu Tsun encounters him on the way to the fictitious town of Ashgrove. Ann Radcliffe also mentions Tacitus briefly in The Mysteries of Udolpho, in volume VI, chapter VIII. That the Annals surfaces across crime fiction, magical realism, and Gothic romance over two centuries says something about how deeply it has embedded itself in the literary imagination.