Viking program
The Viking program landed spacecraft on Mars in 1976, and for the next quarter-century it supplied nearly everything humanity knew about the red planet. Two identical probes, Viking 1 and Viking 2, each carried an orbiter and a lander, four spacecraft in total, all born from a mission effort that began in 1968 at NASA's Langley Research Center. The bill came to roughly one billion dollars in 1970s money. What the probes found when they got there changed the way scientists think about water, about soil chemistry, and about whether life might exist beyond Earth. How do you build a machine to answer a question that old? And when the results finally come in, what happens when the answer is yes and no at the same time?
Viking 1 lifted off on the 20th of August 1975, riding a Titan IIIE rocket with a Centaur upper stage. Viking 2 followed on the 9th of September 1975. Each orbiter-lander pair at launch weighed 3,527 kilograms, of which 1,445 kilograms were propellant and attitude control gas. The orbiters were based on the earlier Mariner 9 spacecraft and shaped as an octagon roughly 2.5 meters across, with four solar panel wings stretching 9.75 meters from tip to tip. Those panels held 34,800 solar cells and generated 620 watts at Mars. When the orbiter and lander separated before descent, the lander settled at around 600 kilograms and the orbiter at roughly 900 kilograms.
The landers were six-sided aluminium structures resting on three legs, each leg attached to one of the shorter sides. To shield Mars from Earth contamination, each lander was sealed inside a pressurized bioshield and then baked at 111 degrees Celsius for 40 hours before launch. The bioshield cap was jettisoned after the Centaur upper stage pushed the combination out of Earth orbit. Every significant redundancy added cost and mass, but a 1971 directive required that no single failure could halt more than one experiment on a device containing over 40,000 parts.
The landers' Guidance, Control and Sequencing Computers each used two Honeywell HDC 402 24-bit processors with 18 kilowords of plated-wire memory. Power came from two radioisotope thermoelectric generators running on plutonium-238, each 28 centimeters tall and producing 30 watts of continuous power at 4.4 volts. The scientific payload aboard each lander weighed approximately 91 kilograms and covered biology, chemistry, meteorology, seismology, and imaging.
Viking 1 reached Mars orbit on the 19th of June 1976. Viking 2 arrived on the 7th of August. Astronomer Carl Sagan helped choose the landing sites for both probes. Each orbiter circled Mars for more than a month, sending back images to help certify those sites before the landers were released.
Descending to the surface unfolded in four distinct phases. First came a deorbit burn. Then atmospheric entry, with peak heating arriving a few seconds after friction with the Martian atmosphere began. At about 6 kilometers altitude, traveling at 900 kilometers per hour, the parachute deployed and the aeroshell fell away. At about 1.5 kilometers, three retrorocket engines fired. Those engines each had 18 nozzles specifically to disperse exhaust and limit disturbance to the ground below, and they were throttleable from 276 to 2,667 newtons. The hydrazine propellant had been specially purified to avoid depositing Earth microbes on the surface.
Images from the orbiters revealed huge river valleys cutting across many areas of Mars. Floods had broken through dams, carved deep valleys, eroded grooves into bedrock, and traveled thousands of kilometers. Large areas of the southern hemisphere held branched stream networks pointing to rainfall in the distant past. Some volcanic flanks resembled those produced by rainfall on Hawaiian volcanoes. Underground volcanism may have melted frozen subsurface ice; water then drained away and the ground collapsed into what geologists call chaotic terrain. The volume of water estimated to have moved through some of those channels was ten thousand times the flow of the Mississippi River.
Many Martian craters also looked wrong. Normally, impact ejecta goes up and comes back down. On some Martian craters, material had clearly flowed outward and around obstacles, suggesting the impactor struck ground saturated with ice. The ice melted on impact, turning the soil briefly into mud. These orbiter findings drove a near-complete revision in scientific understanding of water on Mars, a revision that shaped planetary science through the late 1990s and early 2000s.
The most expensive single piece of the Viking program was the lander's life-detection unit, which cost about 60 million dollars at the time. Three separate scientific teams designed the biological experiments, under the direction of chief scientist Gerald Soffen of NASA. Each experiment tested Martian soil for signs of metabolic activity or organic chemistry.
One experiment returned a positive result for the detection of metabolism, suggesting current life. The other two experiments failed to find any organic molecules in the soil. Most scientists concluded that the positive signal likely came from non-biological chemistry driven by highly oxidizing soil conditions rather than from microbes. NASA stated during the mission that the results did not demonstrate conclusive biosignatures at the two landing sites.
The debate did not close there. The positive result came from the Labeled Release experiment, and its validity hinged on the absence of an oxidative agent in the soil. The Phoenix lander, arriving decades later, discovered perchlorate salts in 2008. Researchers found that perchlorate, when heated, destroys organic compounds and produces chloromethane and dichloromethane, which are precisely the chlorine compounds both Viking landers had detected when they ran their tests. New findings from re-examination of the Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer results were published in 2018. On the 12th of April 2012, an international team of scientists published work based on complexity analysis of the Labeled Release data suggesting possible detection of extant microbial life. The question remains unresolved.
Thomas A. Mutch, a geologist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, led the imaging team. Each lander carried two 360-degree cylindrical scan cameras. The cameras used a movable mirror to illuminate 12 photodiodes sensitive to different frequencies of light, including three narrowband diodes for color and three for infrared. The cameras scanned at five vertical lines per second, each line containing 512 pixels. A full 300-degree panorama required 9,150 lines. The scan rate was slow enough that during development testing, crew members who moved across the camera's field appeared multiple times in a single shot.
The Viking camera system cost 27.3 million dollars to develop. Finding a manufacturer capable of building such an advanced design proved difficult. Program managers were later praised for resisting pressure to adopt a simpler system, a decision that paid off when the first images of the Martian surface arrived. The program did reduce costs by cutting a planned third lander and trimming some experiments.
The four spacecraft failed one by one over six years. The Viking 2 orbiter was the first to go, shut down on the 25th of July 1978 after a fuel leak in its propulsion system, having operated for 1 year, 11 months, and 18 days. The Viking 2 lander followed on the 11th of April 1980, lost to a battery failure after 3 years, 7 months, and 8 days. The Viking 1 orbiter was shut down on the 17th of August 1980, after attitude control fuel ran out; its orbit had been raised on the 7th of August to prevent an imminent impact with Mars, with surface impact now possible from 2019 onwards. The Viking 1 lander survived the longest. On the 13th of November 1982, a human error during a software update caused the lander's antenna to lose orientation, cutting power and communication after 6 years, 3 months, and 22 days of operation.
The Viking program was formally declared ended on the 21st of May 1983. Each lander had carried a tiny microfilm dot bearing the names of the thousands of people who worked on the mission, a practice that later probes continued; the Perseverance rover, for instance, recognized almost 11 million people who submitted their names for inclusion.
Up Next
Continue browsing
Common questions
When did the Viking program land on Mars?
Viking 1 landed on Mars on the 20th of July 1976, and Viking 2 soft-landed on the 3rd of September 1976. Both landers were launched in 1975 aboard Titan IIIE rockets and reached Mars orbit in the summer of 1976.
What did the Viking program cost NASA?
NASA spent roughly one billion dollars in 1970s money on the Viking program. The most expensive single component was the lander's life-detection unit, which cost about 60 million dollars at the time of the mission.
Did the Viking landers find life on Mars?
One Viking biological experiment returned a positive signal for metabolism, but two other experiments found no organic molecules in the soil, and most scientists attributed the positive result to non-biological chemistry. The question remains unresolved; a 2008 discovery by the Phoenix lander of perchlorate salts in Martian soil introduced new uncertainty into the original Viking results.
How long did the Viking spacecraft operate on Mars?
The Viking 1 lander operated the longest, for 6 years, 3 months, and 22 days, before a software update error caused its antenna to lose contact on the 13th of November 1982. The Viking program was officially ended on the 21st of May 1983.
What did the Viking orbiters discover about water on Mars?
Viking orbiter images revealed huge river valleys, branched stream networks in the southern hemisphere, and impact craters whose ejecta had flowed like mud, all indicating that large amounts of liquid water once existed on Mars. The estimated volume of water that carved some channels was ten thousand times the flow of the Mississippi River.
Who led the Viking lander imaging team?
Thomas A. Mutch, a geologist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, led the Viking lander imaging team. The camera system cost 27.3 million dollars to develop, and finding a manufacturer capable of building the advanced design proved difficult.
All sources
35 references cited across the entry
- 1Viking 1Jon Nelson — JPL
- 2Viking 2Jon Nelson — JPL
- 3Viking Mission to MarsDavid R. Dr. Williams — NASA — December 18, 2006
- 4NewsViking 1: First U.S. Lander on MarsElizabeth Howell — October 26, 2012
- 5The Viking ProgramThe Center for Planetary Science
- 6Viking LanderCalifornia Science Center — July 3, 2014
- 7Viking Fact SheetJet Propulsion Laboratory
- 8BookMarsUniversity of Arizona Press — 1992
- 9BookMars: Uncovering the Secrets of the Red PlanetPaul Raeburn — National Geographic Society — 1998
- 10BookThe Atlas of the Solar SystemPatrick Moore et al. — Mitchell Beazley — 1990
- 11BookMapping Mars: Science, Imagination, and the Birth of a WorldOliver Morton — Picador — 2002
- 12MagazineAmazing Search for Life On MarsHearst Magazines — Hearst Magazines — June 1976
- 13JournalThe First Viking Mission to MarsG. A. Soffen et al. — August 27, 1976
- 14Carl SaganHelge Kragh
- 15Viking
- 17JournalA Concept for NASA's Mars 2016 Astrobiology Field LaboratoryLUTHER W. BEEGLE — August 2007
- 18Perchlorate found in Martian soilJohn Johnson — August 6, 2008
- 19NewsMartian Life Or Not? NASA's Phoenix Team Analyzes ResultsAugust 6, 2008
- 20NewsReanalysis of the Viking results suggests perchlorate and organics at midlatitudes on MarsRafael Navarro–Gonzáles — December 15, 2010
- 21MagazineLife on Mars Found by NASA's Viking MissionKer Than — April 15, 2012
- 22JournalComplexity Analysis of the Viking Labeled Release ExperimentsGiorgio Bianciardi et al. — March 2012
- 23Mars Viking Robots 'Found Life'Irene Klotz — DiscoveryNews — April 12, 2012
- 26BookThe Martian LandscapeThe Viking Lander Imaging Team — NASA — 1978
- 27NewsViking Cameras Light in Weight, Use Little Power, Work SlowlyVictor K. McElheny — July 21, 1976
- 29Computers in Spaceflight: The NASA ExperienceJames Tomayko — NASA — March 1988
- 30NASA Reference Publication 1027: Viking '75 spacecraft design and test summary. Volume 1 – Lander designNeil A. Holmberg — NASA — November 1980
- 31NASA Reference Publication 1027: Viking '75 spacecraft design and test summary. Volume 2 – Orbiter designNeil A. Holmberg — NASA — November 1980
- 32BookFaster, Better, Cheaper: Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space ProgramHoward E. McCurdy — JHU Press — 2001
- 33Viking 1 Orbiter spacecraft detailsNASA — March 20, 2019
- 34MagazineProbe's powerful camera spots Vikings on MarsDavid Chandler — December 5, 2006