Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Van Allen radiation belt

~5 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • The Van Allen radiation belt is a zone of charged particles held in place by Earth's own magnetic field, and for most of human history, no one knew it was there. James Van Allen changed that in 1958, when he published the article that first described these invisible shells wrapping around our planet. What he found was not a curiosity. It was a force that would shape the future of satellites, space exploration, and even Cold War military strategy. How does Earth's magnetic field trap particles from the sun and hold them for days, months, or more than a hundred days at a stretch? What happens when a spacecraft flies through? And why did the United States once detonate nuclear bombs inside this zone? Those are the questions this documentary will answer.

  • Earth has two main radiation belts, and they stretch from an altitude of roughly 640 to 58,000 kilometers above the surface. Most of the particles that fill them arrive from the solar wind, while others come from cosmic rays striking the upper atmosphere. The magnetic field catches these particles and sets them into a complex motion: they spiral along magnetic field lines, bounce back and forth between the poles, and drift slowly around the planet. Electrons drift eastward; protons drift westward. The inner belt sits from about 1,000 to 12,000 kilometers up, and it holds high concentrations of energetic protons, some with energies exceeding 100 MeV. The outer belt begins at roughly 3 Earth radii and extends to about 10 Earth radii, shaped almost like a donut and reaching its greatest intensity around 4 to 5 Earth radii out. Between them sits a gap, sometimes called the safe zone or safe slot, which is why medium Earth orbits cluster there. The Sun does not have radiation belts of its own, because it lacks a stable, global dipole field of the kind that makes long-term trapping possible.

  • Kristian Birkeland, Carl Størmer, Nicholas Christofilos, and Enrico Medi had already explored the idea of trapped charged particles as far back as 1895, building the theoretical foundation that made the discovery possible. The confirmation came from satellites. The second Soviet satellite, Sputnik 2, carried detectors designed by Sergei Vernov; the American satellites Explorer 1 and Explorer 3 followed in early 1958. Together they confirmed the belt's existence. Explorer 4, Pioneer 3, and Luna 1 then produced the first maps of the trapped radiation. Van Allen, working at the University of Iowa, published the article that named and described the belts that same year. The name stuck, and it has applied specifically to Earth's belts ever since, even as similar structures have been found elsewhere in the solar system.

  • In 1958, the United States detonated low-yield nuclear bombs at an altitude of 300 miles, deliberately adding electrons to the radiation belts. The tests went by the name Project Argus, and they were designed to evaluate what became known as the Christofilos effect: the idea that nuclear explosions in space could release enough electrons, trapped in Earth's magnetic field, to disable the warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles. The project was eventually shut down for two reasons. The first was the treaty banning atmospheric testing. The second was a more practical concern: the extra radiation generated by the tests might have blocked the Apollo moon missions. Project Argus is a rare instance where the structure of the radiation belts was not just observed but actively, deliberately altered.

  • Satellites passing through the Van Allen belts face real danger. Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can all be damaged by the radiation. Miniaturization has made the problem worse, because smaller circuits carry a total electric charge now comparable to the charge of incoming ions. The Chandra Space Telescope has its sensors turned off whenever it passes through the belts. The INTEGRAL space telescope was placed into an orbit specifically designed to avoid time inside them. Astronauts traveling to the Moon on the Apollo missions passed through the belts as well. Mission planners minimized exposure by routing spacecraft at high speed through the thinner upper portions of the outer belt, bypassing the inner belt entirely. The one exception was Apollo 14, whose trajectory took it through the heart of the trapped radiation. Proton fluxes inside the belts can reach 100,000 particles per square centimeter per second for protons above 20 MeV. Electrons above 1.5 MeV reach fluxes of up to a million particles per square centimeter per second.

  • On the 28th of February 2013, NASA's Van Allen Probe team announced the discovery of a third radiation belt. It consisted of high-energy ultrarelativistic charged particles and was triggered by a coronal mass ejection from the Sun. Unlike the familiar inner and outer belts, this third belt split the outer belt on its outer side and persisted for about four weeks before merging back into the outer belt. Its unusual staying power has been traced to the extreme energy of its particles. They were too energetic to scatter into the atmosphere through interactions with atmospheric waves at low latitudes. Without that scattering mechanism, the particles simply stayed trapped until an external shock wave from the Sun finally destroyed the belt. The Van Allen Probes, which launched on the 30th of August 2012 and operated until their fuel ran out in 2019, made this detection possible.

  • In 2011, the Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics experiment, known as PAMELA, confirmed that the Van Allen belts confine antiprotons. Passing through the South Atlantic Anomaly, it detected antiproton levels far above what normal particle decays would predict. The measured energy of those antiprotons ranged from 60 to 750 MeV. Estimates suggest only about 10 micrograms of antiprotons exist across the entire belt. The extreme energy released when antimatter annihilates matter has prompted proposals to collect these antiprotons for spacecraft propulsion, though the concept depends on developing antimatter collectors and containers that do not yet exist. Separate proposals aim at draining the belts entirely. One concept, called HiVOLT, or High Voltage Orbiting Long Tether, was proposed by Russian physicist V. V. Danilov and refined by Robert P. Hoyt and Robert L. Forward. A second approach involves beaming very-low-frequency radio waves from the ground. Draining the belts around other planets has also been raised: before any mission to Europa, which orbits inside Jupiter's own radiation belt, researchers have suggested that clearing the local belt could reduce the hazard to spacecraft and instruments.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

Who discovered the Van Allen radiation belt?

The Van Allen radiation belt is named after James Van Allen of the University of Iowa, who published an article describing the belts in 1958. The existence of the belts was confirmed by the Soviet satellite Sputnik 2 and the American satellites Explorer 1 and Explorer 3 in early 1958.

How high above Earth do the Van Allen radiation belts extend?

Earth's two main Van Allen belts extend from an altitude of about 640 to 58,000 kilometers above the surface. The inner belt spans roughly 1,000 to 12,000 kilometers up, while the outer belt reaches from about 3 to 10 Earth radii.

Did the Apollo astronauts pass through the Van Allen belts?

Apollo astronauts did pass through the Van Allen belts, but received a very low and harmless dose of radiation because spacecraft traveled at high speeds through the thinner upper portions of the outer belt. The Apollo 14 mission was the exception, traveling through the heart of the trapped radiation belts.

What was Project Argus and how did it relate to the Van Allen belts?

Project Argus was a 1958 US program that detonated low-yield nuclear bombs at an altitude of 300 miles to test whether nuclear explosions in space could release enough trapped electrons to disable intercontinental ballistic missile warheads. The project was discontinued due to the atmospheric testing treaty and concerns that the added radiation could interfere with the Apollo moon missions.

Was a third Van Allen radiation belt ever discovered?

A transient third radiation belt was confirmed on the 28th of February 2013 by NASA's Van Allen Probe team. It was triggered by a coronal mass ejection from the Sun and persisted for about four weeks before merging back into the outer belt.

Do the Van Allen belts contain antimatter?

The Van Allen belts do confine antiprotons, confirmed in 2011 by the PAMELA experiment while passing through the South Atlantic Anomaly. The energy of the detected antiprotons ranged from 60 to 750 MeV, though the total quantity across the entire belt is estimated at only about 10 micrograms.

All sources

53 references cited across the entry

  1. 3newsVan Allen Probes Spot an Impenetrable Barrier in SpaceHolly Zell — NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center — February 12, 2015
  2. 4webVan Allen Radiation BeltsDiscovery Communications, Inc. — 2009-04-23
  3. 6webTrapped Radiation—HistoryDavid P. Stern et al. — NASA/GSFC
  4. 7journalThe Vernov Radiation Belt (Almost)A. J. Dessler — 1984-11-23
  5. 8journalEarth's Van Allen Radiation Belts: From Discovery to the Van Allen Probes EraW. Li et al. — 2019
  6. 9bookIntroduction to Geomagnetically Trapped RadiationMartin Walt — Cambridge University Press — 2005
  7. 10journalDiscovering Earth's radiation beltsDaniel N. Baker et al. — 2017-12-01
  8. 11journalThe argus experiment*N. C. Christofilos — August 1959
  9. 14webConstruction Begins!The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory — January 2010
  10. 15journalNon-thermal microwave radiation from Jupiter.F. D. Drake et al. — 1959
  11. 16journalResolved imaging confirms a radiation belt around an ultracool dwarfMelodie M. Kao et al. — July 2023
  12. 17journalPossibility of the Existence of Trapped Radiation near MercuryA. T. Lukashenko et al. — 2020-11-01
  13. 19journalEmpirically Estimated Electron Lifetimes in the Earth's Radiation Belts: Van Allen Probe ObservationsS. G. Claudepierre et al. — 2020
  14. 21webSpace Environment Standard ECSS-E-ST-10-04CESA Requirements and Standards Division — November 15, 2008
  15. 22journalModeling of Low-altitude Quasi-trapped Proton Fluxes at the Equatorial Inner MagnetosphereGusev, A. A. — 2003
  16. 23bookIntroduction to the Space EnvironmentThomas F. Tascione — Krieger Publishing Co. — 2004
  17. 24webThe Van Allen BeltsNASA/GSFC
  18. 25journalRadiation Environment Measurements with the Cosmic Ray Experiments On-Board the KITSAT-1 and PoSAT-1 Micro-SatellitesUnderwood, C. — December 1994
  19. 27journalThe "zebra stripes": An effect of F region zonal plasma drifts on the longitudinal distribution of radiation belt particlesLejosne, S. — 2016
  20. 28conferenceEnhanced Radial Diffusion of Outer Zone Electrons in an Asymmetric Geomagnetic FieldS. R. Elkington et al. — American Geophysical Union — May 2001
  21. 29journalTime dependent radial diffusion modeling of relativistic electrons with realistic loss ratesY. Y. Shprits et al. — 2004
  22. 30journalWave acceleration of electrons in the Van Allen radiation beltsRichard B. Horne et al. — 2005
  23. 31journalAn impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation beltsD. N. Baker et al. — 27 November 2014
  24. 32journalSurvey of ELF-VLF plasma waves in the outer radiation belt observed by Cluster STAFF-SA experimentD. Pokhotelov et al. — 2008
  25. 33journalUnusual stable trapping of the ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation beltsYuri Y. Shprits et al. — 2013
  26. 35bookThe Van Allen Probes MissionB. H. Mauk — Springer US — 2012
  27. 36bookThe Radiation Belt and MagnetosphereWilmot N. Hess — Blaisdell Pub. Co. — 1968
  28. 37conferenceRadiation Plan for the Apollo Lunar MissionJerry L. Modisette et al. — January 20–22, 1969
  29. 40journalThe Discovery of Geomagnetically Trapped Cosmic-Ray AntiprotonsO. Adriani et al. — 2011
  30. 42webEarth's Radiation Belts with Safe Zone OrbitNASA/GSFC — 15 December 2004
  31. 43webEarth's Safe Zone Became Hot Zone During Legendary Solar StormsRachel A. Weintraub — NASA/GSFC — December 15, 2004
  32. 46webRadiation Protection and InstrumentationJ. Vernon Bailey — January 1975
  33. 47bookHow Apollo Flew to the MoonW. David Woods — Springer-Verlag — 2008
  34. 48webThe Exploration of the Earth's MagnetosphereDavid P. Stern et al. — NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center
  35. 51journalHigh-Voltage Tethers For Enhanced Particle Scattering In Van Allen BeltsVladimir Mirnov et al. — November 10–15, 1996