Tuscan order

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Tuscan order carries a paradox at its heart: it is the simplest of all the classical architectural orders, and yet its very existence as a formal category was disputed for centuries. Vitruvius, the Roman architect whose writings shaped how the Western world understood architecture, never recognized it as a distinct order at all. He placed the Greek Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian in his canon and left the Tuscan in the margins, describing the Etruscan temple but declining to elevate its style to the rank of an order.

  How did a column type that Rome barely acknowledged become one of the five orders named in the Renaissance? Why did architects reach for it when building prisons, fortresses, and barns rather than palaces or churches? And what does Inigo Jones have to do with a story that begins in ancient Etruria?

  The name itself is a clue. The Latin Ordo Tuscanicus translates as the Etruscan order, pointing toward a culture that predated Rome and whose architectural habits left a lasting mark on the Italian peninsula. From that ancient origin through the debates of Renaissance scholars to the carpenter's workshops of colonial New England, the Tuscan order traveled a long and unlikely road.

• 2. Rome's Overlooked Column

  ›

  Vitruvius wrote his influential treatise on architecture without classifying the Tuscan as a formal order. He did discuss the Etruscan temple in book four, sections 7.2 through 7.3, and that passage became the main evidence Renaissance scholars could cite when arguing for the Tuscan's ancient credentials. But Vitruvius himself gave no indication of what the column's capital should look like. He described the column's proportions at a ratio of 1:7, which placed it alongside the other orders in its modularity, yet he never elevated the style into his canonical three.

  Later Roman builders followed that lead. The Tuscan mode lingered as vernacular practice across Italy and much of Europe, a simple column with a round capital that builders used without theorizing about it. Leon Battista Alberti, writing in De re aedificatoria shortly before 1452, similarly omitted it from his architectural theory. For all the authority those writers commanded, the plain Roman column remained outside the official conversation.

  When Renaissance scholars eventually looked back at Roman buildings for physical evidence, Andrea Palladio found what he considered genuine examples. He named the arena of Verona and the Pula Arena as Tuscan precedents. The historian James Ackerman later pointed out a complication: both are arcuated buildings that did not actually present the columns and entablatures that define an order in the classical sense.

• 3. The Scholars Who Named It

  ›

  Isidore of Seville, writing in the sixth century, was the first to classify the Tuscan as a separate formal order, in his encyclopedia the Etymologiae. That early classification sat largely dormant until the Italian Renaissance brought a new appetite for systematizing the ancient world.

  Fra Giocondo took a first step toward illustrating the order when he produced a printed edition of Vitruvius in 1511. His attempt at a Tuscan capital fell short in one telling way: he decorated it with an egg and dart enrichment that properly belonged to the Ionic order, importing ornament into a style defined by its lack of ornament.

  Sebastiano Serlio put the Tuscan on firmer ground. His fourth book of the Regole generali di architettura sopra le cinque maniere de gli edifici, published in 1537, described five orders and placed the Tuscan first among them, calling it "the solidest and least ornate." Serlio also gave the column a stockier proportion than any other writer, at 1:6 rather than the 1:7 ratio found in Vitruvius, in Vignola's Cinque ordini d'architettura of 1562, and in Palladio's I quattro libri dell'architettura of 1570. Giorgio Vasari reinforced the Tuscan's claim to Italian antiquity by pointing to Il Cronaca's graduated rustication on the facade of Palazzo Strozzi in Florence as evidence of a native Italic tradition predating the Greek orders.

• 4. Form Follows Function

  ›

  Serlio did not merely describe the Tuscan order's appearance; he prescribed its proper uses. He found it "suitable to fortified places, such as city gates, fortresses, castles, treasuries, or where artillery and ammunition are kept, prisons, seaports and other similar structures used in war." The stripped-down column carried a meaning: plainness signaled strength, and strength signaled an appropriate severity for places that held danger or commanded authority.

  The technical character of the order matched that reputation. Unlike the Doric, which shares its robust proportions, the Tuscan has unfluted columns and a simpler entablature stripped of triglyphs and guttae. Its base is circular rather than squared, ringed with a plain torus and collar. A plain astragal or taenia marks the transition beneath the column's plain cap. Nothing catches the eye or invites close inspection.

  Palladio, who agreed in essence with Serlio, described the order's appropriate terrain with characteristic precision: "The Tuscan, being rough, is rarely used above ground except in one-storey buildings like villa barns or in huge structures like Amphitheatres and the like which, having many orders, can take this one in place of the Doric, under the Ionic." That last phrase encodes a hierarchy. In a multi-storey building, the Tuscan takes the ground floor, the heaviest load, the least glamorous position. The grander orders rise above it.

• 5. The Handsomest Barn in England

  ›

  St Paul's, Covent Garden in London, completed by Inigo Jones in 1633, stands as a relatively rare example of the Tuscan order applied to a church. The story attached to its commission became one of the most repeated anecdotes in English architectural history, passed down through the account of Horace Walpole. Lord Bedford, who commissioned the church, reportedly gave Jones a very low budget and told him he wanted something simple, "not much better than a barn." Jones answered: "Then you shall have the handsomest barn in England."

  That exchange captures the Tuscan's cultural position in post-Renaissance England. It was the honest order, the one associated with economy and utility, but one that a skilled architect could transform into something dignified. Nicholas Hawksmoor deployed it differently at Christ Church, Spitalfields in London, built between 1714 and 1729, using Tuscan on the exterior and reserving Corinthian for the interior, inverting the expected hierarchy to give worshippers a richer experience inside.

  At the great Palladian house of Wentworth Woodhouse in Yorkshire, which is predominantly Corinthian, the stable court of 1768 turns to Tuscan. West Wycombe Park employs a two-storey loggia facade with Tuscan on the ground floor and Corinthian above, an arrangement that echoes Palladio's own Palazzo Chiericati, where Ionic sits over Doric. The Tuscan's place is always foundational.

• 6. A Vernacular Legacy

  ›

  Karl Friedrich Schinkel's Neue Wache in Berlin, completed in 1816, illustrates how the Tuscan order could shade into the Doric without losing its identity. The Greek Revival guardhouse presents a careful temple frontage with minimal plain bases on its thick fluted columns. It has metope reliefs and a sculptural group in the pediment, but no triglyphs or guttae. Those absences are technically Tuscan traits. Schinkel's building is nonetheless always described as Doric, because its overall impression remains strongly Greek.

  That blurring of categories points to something real about the Tuscan order's fate in vernacular building. Because the mode is easily worked up by a carpenter with a few planing tools, it spread beyond the world of trained architects and became part of the Georgian vernacular style. It lingered in New England and Ohio well into the nineteenth century, long after fashionable architecture had moved on. In garden design, the form sometimes called "carpenter's Doric" provides simple elegance to gate posts and fences in many traditional garden contexts.

  The Palazzo Massimo alle Colonne in Rome, by Baldassarre Peruzzi and built between 1532 and 1536, along with the pronaos portico that Pietro da Cortona added to Santa Maria della Pace between 1656 and 1667, stand as two of the order's most considered Italian applications. Doorways and other entrances represent a further category of use, where only a pair of columns is needed and a richer order might seem pretentious. The Tuscan's restraint, once a limitation, became its quiet recommendation.