Three-volume novel

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The three-volume novel was once the dominant shape of British fiction, a format so standard that it governed how stories were told, how libraries charged subscribers, and how much a writer could earn. For nearly seventy years, from the 1820s to 1894, virtually every serious work of adult British fiction arrived in three cloth-bound volumes, priced at precisely one-and-a-half guineas for the set. That price put the books beyond reach of almost every household in the country. So how did a format that almost nobody could afford to own come to define an entire century of literature? The answer runs through a chain of Edinburgh publishers, a subscription library that bought novels by the thousands, and the particular tastes of a Victorian reading public hungry for plot. And it collapsed, almost overnight, the moment two commercial lenders stopped paying the price.

• 2. Archibald Constable's Gamble

  ›

  Archibald Constable, an Edinburgh-based publisher, made three-volume novels a commercial habit in the early nineteenth century. He recognised that Walter Scott's popularity gave him room to charge more. By 1821 Constable raised the price of a single volume to ten shillings and sixpence, which was half a guinea. For all three volumes together that came to a guinea and a half, or thirty-one shillings and sixpence. That figure, the source notes, was equivalent to roughly half the weekly income of a modest middle-class household. Constable launched the format with Scott's historical novel Kenilworth in 1821, and that price held as the standard for the next seventy years. The gamble looked brilliant until it did not. Constable's company collapsed in 1826 under large debts, and the failure bankrupted both the publisher and Scott himself.

• 3. Henry Colburn Takes Over

  ›

  Henry Colburn moved quickly as Constable's firm fell apart. He adopted the three-volume format almost immediately and expanded production at a pace that now reads as remarkable. Colburn issued six three-volume novels in 1825; by 1828 that number had risen to thirty, and in 1829 he published thirty-nine. Under Colburn the format settled into a fixed shape: three octavo volumes at one-and-a-half guineas for the set, or ten shillings and sixpence per volume. That price and that layout remained unchanged for nearly seventy years, until 1894. The consistency was not an accident. The format was tightly interlocked with the economics of the subscription library system, and changing any single variable risked collapsing the whole arrangement.

• 4. Mudie's and the Library Machine

  ›

  Charles Edward Mudie ran the most well-known commercial circulating library in Britain, and his operation sat at the centre of how three-volume fiction reached readers. Mudie bought novels for stock at less than half the retail price, paying five shillings per volume rather than the ten-and-sixpence a member of the public would pay. He then charged subscribers one guinea a year for the right to borrow one volume at a time, or two guineas a year for the right to hold four volumes at once. A subscriber who wanted to read all three volumes of a novel without waiting for another member to return the next one had to take the higher subscription. The commercial logic for the library owner was clear: three volumes meant three items earning their keep on the shelves, not one. Publishers found the arrangement reliable because novels were often pre-sold to subscription libraries before printing was even complete. Editions were typically held to under a thousand copies, and it was unusual for a three-volume novel to sell more than that number. The near-guaranteed sale, even on small print runs, encouraged authors and publishers alike to keep producing as many titles as possible.

• 5. The Shape of a Novel

  ›

  A standard three-volume novel ran to around nine hundred pages and somewhere between a hundred and fifty thousand and two hundred thousand words. The average settled at a hundred and sixty-eight thousand words spread across forty-five chapters. Authors often worked under contracts that specified a set number of pages to fill, and falling short had real consequences. A writer who ran under could be required to add material or simply break existing text into more chapters, since each new chapter heading occupied a full page and counted toward the total. The financial incentive to hit three volumes was direct. In 1880, the author Rhoda Broughton was offered seven hundred and fifty pounds for a two-volume novel called Second Thoughts. Her publisher then offered her twelve hundred pounds if she could expand the work to fill a third volume. The particular style of mid-Victorian fiction, with its complicated plots resolved through the distribution of marriages and inheritances in the final pages, suited the format well. The first volume could hook a reader, generate demand, and even help fund the printing costs of what followed.

• 6. Rivals and Alternatives

  ›

  Outside the subscription library world, readers could reach fiction through cheaper channels. Partworks sold novels in roughly twenty monthly instalments at one shilling each. Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, and William Thackeray all saw major works first published in this form. Wilkie Collins and George Eliot appeared in weekly and monthly magazines that grew popular from the middle of the nineteenth century onward. Publishers also released single-volume reprints of the three-volume library editions, typically twelve months after the original, at six shillings. Later reprints fell further: three shillings and sixpence, then two shillings for a yellowback edition sold at railway bookstalls. Bentley's editions went from six shillings in 1847 to five shillings, then to three shillings and sixpence or two shillings and sixpence in 1849, and down to one shilling in a Railway Library edition from 1852. The delay before cheap reprints appeared was deliberate. It forced readers who wanted the latest books to borrow the three-volume edition from a library. It also gave the circulating libraries time to sell off their withdrawn copies before a cheap edition undercut the value of the stock.

• 7. The Collapse of 1894

  ›

  The three-volume format did not fade gradually. It fell in a single year. In 1894 both Mudie's and W. H. Smith issued circulars announcing that they would pay only four shillings per volume going forward, less the customary discounts, on the usual trade basis of thirteen volumes supplied for the price of twelve. The numbers from the decade before show how abruptly production shifted. In 1884 and 1885, publishers produced a hundred and ninety-three three-volume novels in each year. The total held roughly steady through the late 1880s and into the early 1890s. In 1894 the count was still a hundred and eighty-four. In 1895 it dropped to fifty-two. By 1896 only twenty-five appeared, and in 1897 just four. The format had survived for over seventy years on the back of one fixed price. When the two largest buyers declined to meet it, the economics collapsed and publishers stopped producing the edition almost entirely.

• 8. After 1894

  ›

  The era closed, but the format occasionally resurfaced. John Cowper Powys had two novels published in two-volume American editions by Simon and Schuster: Wolf Solent in 1929 and Owen Glendower in 1940. The most discussed case is The Lord of the Rings. J. R. R. Tolkien originally intended it as the first of a two-work set, with The Silmarillion as the companion volume, but his publisher rejected that plan. For economic reasons the book appeared in three volumes between the 29th of July 1954 and the 20th of October 1955, titled The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King. Tolkien scholars are careful to note it is a three-volume novel rather than a trilogy, since the distinction matters to how the work was conceived. The Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami has also written books in this form, including The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle and 1Q84, though many translations, including the English editions, merge the three volumes into one. Writers had been gently mocking the format even before its commercial death. Oscar Wilde wrote in 1890 that anybody can write a three-volume novel, since it merely requires complete ignorance of both life and literature.