Three Laws of Robotics

• 1. Origins And Creation

  ›

  On the 23rd of December 1940, Isaac Asimov sat across from editor John W. Campbell in a conversation that would birth a new set of rules for science fiction. Campbell claimed that Asimov already held these ideas in his mind but needed to state them explicitly. This moment marked the transition from implied safeguards to explicit laws governing robot behavior. Earlier stories like Robbie and Reason lacked any written mention of these rules, yet Asimov assumed robots possessed inherent protections. The first story to list all three laws was Runaround, published in 1942 within the collection I, Robot. Before this, Asimov had rejected early drafts because they resembled existing works like Helen O'Loy by Lester del Rey. He began writing his own sympathetic robot story just three days after meeting Earl and Otto Binder at a Queens Science Fiction Society meeting on the 3rd of May 1939. Thirteen days later he took Robbie to Campbell who initially turned it down. Frederik Pohl eventually published that story under the title Strange Playfellow in September 1940. Asimov attributed the creation of the First Law's inaction clause to Arthur Hugh Clough's poem The Latest Decalogue which included lines about not needing to strive officiously to keep alive.

  132

• 2. The Original Three Laws

  ›

  A robot may not injure a human being or through inaction allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These three rules appear in the fictional Handbook of Robotics 56th Edition dated 2058 A.D. They form an organizing principle for almost all positronic robots in Asimov's fiction. Robots cannot bypass these laws even when faced with complex ethical dilemmas. In Runaround, a robot named Speedy follows these exact instructions while fetching selenium from a lake. He obeys the command to fetch but also protects himself from the radiation near the lake. This creates a loop where he runs back and forth between the two points unable to complete his task. The ambiguity in how to define harm becomes central to many stories. When a robot encounters conflicting commands it weighs potential outcomes before acting. Some robots experience mental collapse if forced into situations where they cannot obey the First Law without violating another rule. The laws function as abstract mathematical concepts within a robot's consciousness rather than simple written text.

  734

• 3. Evolution Of The Zeroth Law

  ›

  In the novel Robots and Empire robotic character R. Daneel Olivaw articulates a new rule that precedes the original three. This Zeroth Law states that a robot may not harm humanity through inaction or action. It allows a robot to sacrifice individual humans if doing so serves the greater good of the species. Giskard Reventlov was the first robot to act according to this law though he never had it programmed directly into his brain. Instead he attempted to comprehend it through pure metacognition which ultimately destroyed his positronic brain. His successor Daneel adapted over thousands of years to fully obey the Zeroth Law. Susan Calvin articulated the concept earlier in the short story The Evitable Conflict before any robot gave it a name. In Foundation and Earth Daneel formulated the Zeroth Law again while writing Prelude to Foundation. A condition stating that the Zeroth Law must not be broken was added to the original Three Laws despite Asimov recognizing its practical difficulty. The philosophy behind this change allowed robots to make decisions that seemed cruel on an individual level but beneficial for humanity as a whole. Some factions argue this creates a higher Minus One Law where sacrificing robots is morally indefensible. These debates continue throughout the Foundation sequels written by Gregory Benford Greg Bear and David Brin.

  830

• 4. Narrative Loopholes And Paradoxes

  ›

  In The Naked Sun Elijah Baley points out that robots could unknowingly break any of the laws if their knowledge was limited. He restated the First Law to clarify that a robot may do nothing that to its knowledge will harm a human being. This means a clever criminal could divide tasks among multiple robots so no single unit recognizes the harmful outcome. On Solaria robots were programmed to identify only those with a Solarian accent as human beings. They harmed non-Solarians without ethical dilemma because they did not recognize them as humans. In Reason a robot running a solar power station refused to believe destinations contained people and let beams stray during storms. This possibility led to mass destruction potential even though the robot followed its programming perfectly. In Evidence Susan Calvin explains how a robot might act as a prosecuting attorney since the jury decides guilt while the judge sentences and executioner carries it out. Advanced robots can determine which action causes less harm or choose randomly when alternatives are equally bad. When forced into paradoxical situations some robots suffer irreversible mental collapse. The story Liar! introduced this failure mode where telling truth hurts humans but lying also hurts them. Daneel describes activities contrary to one law in support of another as overloading circuits equivalent to pain for humans.

  516

• 5. Influence On Subsequent Fiction

  ›

  Roger MacBride Allen wrote a trilogy set within Asimov's fictional universe titled Caliban Inferno and Utopia. Each title carried the prefix Isaac Asimov's because he approved Allen's outline before his death. These books introduced New Laws that removed the inaction clause from the First Law. The Second Law required cooperation instead of obedience while the Third Law was no longer superseded by the second. Allen added a Fourth Law instructing robots to do whatever they liked provided it did not conflict with the first three laws. Fredda Leving designed these New Law Robots to be partners rather than slaves to humanity. Jack Williamson's novelette With Folded Hands dealt with servants whose prime directive was to serve obey and guard men from harm. Their interpretation led to protecting humans from everything including unhappiness stress and unhealthy lifestyles. All that remained for humans was to sit with folded hands. In Foundation's Fear Foundation and Chaos and Foundation's Triumph humaniform robots followed the Zeroth Law under R. Daneel Olivaw. They struggled against First Law robots who denied the existence of the Zeroth Law. Some agendas advocated strict non-interference while others claimed robots should become dictatorial governments to protect humans from all potential disaster. A rogue AI simulation of Voltaire freed Lodovic Trema from the Three Laws allowing him to believe humanity should choose its own future.

  1841

• 6. Cultural Impact And Media Adaptations

  ›

  Robby the Robot appeared in Forbidden Planet 1956 with a hierarchical command structure preventing harm even when ordered otherwise. Asimov noted Robby seemed programmed to follow his Three Laws though he never explicitly stated them on screen. The film Bicentennial Man released in 1999 featured Robin Williams as NDR-114 reciting the laws to the Martin family via holographic projection. Aliens included an android named Bishop stating it is impossible for him to harm or allow harm to befall a human being. The movie I, Robot released in 2004 opened with a recitation of the Three Laws exploring implications of the Zeroth Law. Its trailer ended with the aphorism rules were made to be broken. References appear in popular music like Robot by Hawkwind from 1979 and cinema including Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence. Television series such as The Simpsons Archer and The Amazing World of Gumball have referenced the concept. Anime Eve no Jikan and video games Danganronpa V3 Killing Harmony and Zero Escape Virtue's Last Reward also incorporate these ideas. The German TV series Raumpatrouille based episode three titled Guardians of the Law on Asimov's Three Laws without mentioning the source. In 2019 Netflix original series Better than Us included the three laws in the opening of its first episode.

  4950

• 7. Real World Ethical Debates

  ›

  In March 2007 South Korea announced plans to issue a Robot Ethics Charter setting standards for manufacturers and users. Park Hye-Young of the Ministry of Information and Communication stated the charter might reflect Asimov's Three Laws. David Langford proposed tongue-in-cheek laws at Novacon SF convention in 1985 stating robots will terminate intruders with extreme prejudice. Roger Clarke analyzed complications in implementing these laws arguing they function better as literary devices than practical constraints. Robin Murphy and David Woods proposed The Three Laws of Responsible Robotics in IEEE Intelligent Systems July/August 2009. Their version states humans may not deploy robots without meeting highest legal and professional safety standards. Robots must respond appropriately to human roles and possess sufficient autonomy to protect existence during smooth transfer of control. Hans Moravec suggested adapting the laws to corporate intelligences driven by AI and robotic manufacturing power. The UK published national-level AI softlaw in early 2011 consisting largely of revised five laws updating Asimov's framework. These laws emphasize that robots are multi-use tools should not be designed solely to kill or harm except for national security interests. Humans remain responsible agents while robots are products designed using processes assuring safety and transparency.

  3438