— Ch. 1 · Origins And Editorial Vision —
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.
~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
The year 1987 marked the birth of The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman stood at the helm as editors for this four-volume project. They aimed to recover the legacy of Inglis Palgrave's famous dictionary from the early twentieth century. This new work contained roughly 4,000 pages of entries across its initial run. It featured 1,300 subject entries with 4,000 cross-references alongside 655 biographies. Nine hundred twenty-seven contributors wrote these articles for a highly specialized public. Thirteen Nobel Laureates in Economics contributed to the first edition while it was being published. About fifty articles came directly from Palgrave's original Dictionary of Political Economy between 1925 and 1927. The editors deliberately excluded most subjects not on economics or closely related to its practice. Robert M. Solow reviewed the work for the New York Times in March 1988. He concluded that the book functioned as a dictionary only in a very special sense.
Evolution Of Editions
Palgrave Macmillan expanded the reference work significantly over time. The second edition under Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume doubled the volume count to eight volumes. By 2018, the third edition reached twenty volumes containing around 3,000 entries. The number of Nobel laureate contributors grew from thirteen in 1987 to thirty-six by the final print version. A hyperlinked online version became available alongside the physical books. Online content continued to be added to the 2018 edition after publication. J. Barkley Rosser Jr. served as co-editor until his untimely demise during the project's lifespan. A fourth edition is scheduled for publication in 2027 under new editorship. Jayati Ghosh, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, and Matías Vernengo will lead this upcoming release. Access to full-text articles remains available online through subscription models for organizations or individuals. Declan Trott argued in a review that the dictionary quality and depth were uneven compared to sources like Wikipedia.