HearLore
ListenSearchLibrary

Follow the threads

Every story connects to a hundred more

Topics
  • Browse all topics
  • Featured
  • Recently added
Categories
  • Browse all categories
  • For you
Answers
  • All answer pages
Journal
  • All entries
  • RSS feed
Terms of service·Privacy policy

2026 HearLore

Preview of HearLore

Free to follow every thread. No paywall, no dead ends.

ListenSearchLibrary

Adapted from The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Modified for audio. This HearLore entry is also licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

— Ch. 1 · The 1936 Publication —

The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 5
John Maynard Keynes released The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in February 1936. This book caused a profound shift in economic thought. It gave macroeconomics a central place in economic theory. The work contributed much of its terminology to the field. Critics later called this change the "Keynesian Revolution". The text had equally powerful consequences for economic policy. It provided theoretical support for government spending in general. It also supported budgetary deficits and monetary intervention. Counter-cyclical policies found new justification within these pages. An air of mistrust pervaded the entire volume regarding free-market decision-making. Keynes denied that an economy would automatically adapt to provide full employment. He believed volatile market psychology would lead to periodic booms and crises. The book served as a sustained attack on classical economics orthodoxy.

Effective Demand And Liquidity

Chapter 8 introduced the propensity to consume as a function of income Y. Saving equals income minus consumption C(Y). Keynes regarded interest rates as complex and uncertain parameters. Chapter 10 presented the famous multiplier through specific examples. If the marginal propensity to consume is 90%, then k equals 10. Total employment from public works becomes ten times the initial jobs created. Richard Kahn introduced a similar mechanism in 1931 involving infinite series transactions. Keynes used his digging holes metaphor against laissez-faire principles. He argued filling old bottles with banknotes and burying them could create real income. The schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital determines investment levels. This schedule depends solely on the rate of interest r. Investment demand curves shift based on expectations of future returns. Liquidity preference functions mainly on income and interest rates. The quantity of money enters the economic scheme through this relationship. M equals L(r) fixes the amount of cash held by the public.

Up Next

IS–LM model

Continue Browsing

Keynesian economics1936 in economic history1936 non-fiction booksBooks by John Maynard KeynesPalgrave Macmillan books

Common questions

When was The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money released by John Maynard Keynes?

John Maynard Keynes released The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in February 1936. This book caused a profound shift in economic thought.

What specific economic concepts did Chapter 8 introduce regarding income and consumption in The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money?

Chapter 8 introduced the propensity to consume as a function of income Y where saving equals income minus consumption C(Y). Keynes regarded interest rates as complex and uncertain parameters within this framework.

How did Richard Kahn contribute to the multiplier mechanism described in The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money?

Richard Kahn introduced a similar mechanism in 1931 involving infinite series transactions that influenced Keynes work. If the marginal propensity to consume is 90% then k equals 10 and total employment from public works becomes ten times the initial jobs created.

Which economists helped develop ideas for The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money before its publication?

Keynes drew significant help from students during his progress from the Treatise on Money including members of the Cambridge Circus discussion group. Austin and Joan Robinson forwarded comments to Keynes while Roy Harrod also provided feedback during drafts submitted between 1934 and 1935.

Why was The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money considered difficult to read by many early economists?

Many economists found the book difficult to read during its early years because Étienne Mantoux called it obscure and Frank Knight deemed it hard to follow. Michel DeVroey noted many passages were almost indecipherable while Paul Samuelson called the analysis unpalatable and incomprehensible.

What modern economic consensus emerged regarding The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money after the 2007 financial crises?

The majority new consensus view before 2007 financial crises was New Keynesian economics which accepts neoclassical concept of long-run equilibrium but allows aggregate demand role. Modern macroeconomics continues to center ideas introduced by The General Theory today as almost 400 universities now teach a revised curriculum taking instability seriously.

See all questions about The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money →

In this section

Loading sources

All sources

 

The Cambridge Circus Group

Keynes drew significant help from students during his progress from the Treatise on Money. The Cambridge Circus discussion group reported directly to him through Richard Kahn. They identified a supposed fallacy in the earlier work regarding profits. The Circus disbanded in May 1931 but three members continued meeting at Robinsons house. Austin and Joan Robinson forwarded comments to Keynes from Trumpington St. A Manifesto emerged in 1932 whose ideas were taken up by Keynes lectures. Kahn and Joan Robinson understood marginalist theory better than Keynes did. During 1934 and 1935 he submitted drafts to Kahn, Robinson and Roy Harrod for comment. Schumpeter described Kahns share as not having fallen far short of co-authorship. Kahn denied this attribution later. Keynes drafted rapidly in pencil while reclining in an armchair. He sent pencil drafts straight to printers who supplied galley proofs. These proofs went to advisers and critics for amendment. Macmillan & Co acted merely as distributors receiving a commission. The retail price was set lower than standard market rates to ensure broad dissemination.

Initial Praise And Criticism

Paul Samuelson said the General Theory caught most economists under age 35 with unexpected virulence. President Richard Nixon famously declared We are all Keynesians now in 1971. This phrase originated with anti-Keynesian economist Milton Friedman. Starting with Axel Leijonhufvud, this view came under increasing challenge. Many economists found the book difficult to read during its early years. Étienne Mantoux called it obscure while Frank Knight deemed it hard to follow. Michel DeVroey noted many passages were almost indecipherable. Paul Samuelson called the analysis unpalatable and incomprehensible. Raúl Rojas dissented saying neo-classical reinterpretations were completely pointless. The success of neoclassical synthesis owed much to Alvin Hansen and John Hicks. Hansen and Samuelson offered lucid explanations using their 45° Keynesian cross diagram. Hicks created the IS-LM diagram still found in textbooks today. The fall from favor associated with stagflation of the 1970s. Post-Keynesians argue the model distorts original meaning by assuming long-term equilibrium. A minority view represents post-Keynesian economists accepting fundamental critique of neoclassical concepts.

Enduring Policy Influence

In 2011 the book appeared on Times top 100 non-fiction books since 1923. Almost 400 universities now teach a revised curriculum taking instability seriously. Keynes notion of uncertainty has become familiar as radical uncertainty. Kay and King published Radical Uncertainty: Decision-making for an unknowable future in 2020. The majority new consensus view before 2007 financial crises was New Keynesian economics. This approach accepts neoclassical concept of long-run equilibrium but allows aggregate demand role. They pride themselves providing microeconomic foundations for sticky prices and wages. Old Keynesian economics assumptions do not help further research according to some scholars. The 1970s combination of inflation and stagnating activity contradicted Phillips curve relationships. Monetarism waited in wings for this rejection to happen. Geoff Tily wrote ruefully about Samuelson and Solow incorporating the Phillips curve. Their substitution traded subtlety for immutable relationship between inflation and employment. Modern macroeconomics continues to center ideas introduced by The General Theory today.