Terror management theory

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Terror management theory begins with a single, uncomfortable observation: human beings are the only animals who know they are going to die. That awareness, according to the theory, shapes nearly everything we do. The theory proposes that a fundamental conflict sits at the core of human life. On one side is the instinct for self-preservation. On the other is the unavoidable knowledge that death is coming, and that no one can predict exactly when. That collision produces a kind of terror. And managing that terror, the theory argues, is what most of human culture is actually for.

  The formal name is terror management theory, or TMT. It was developed by three researchers: Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski. Their work draws on the thinking of cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker, whose 1973 book The Denial of Death won a Pulitzer Prize. Becker argued that most human action is an attempt to ignore or avoid the inevitability of death. On the grandest scale, societies build laws, religions, and belief systems to explain the significance of life. On the individual level, self-esteem buffers against the dread of annihilation.

  The theory asks us to consider that everything from national pride to religious belief to how we treat people who are different from us might trace back to one primal fact: we know we are mortal, and we cannot stand it. The questions the documentary will take up are what the research actually shows, how the theory holds up under scrutiny, and what its strange rise and quiet decline tells us about the science of the mind.

• 2. Becker's Foundation

  ›

  As far back as the 1st century CE, the Roman poet Statius wrote in his Thebaid that "fear first made gods in the world." Ernest Becker, writing nearly two thousand years later, built an entire theory of human civilization on a version of that same idea.

  Becker was a cultural anthropologist. His 1973 book argued that humans, unlike other animals, possess the cognitive capacity to understand that death is inevitable. That understanding, he wrote, creates an anxiety that is essentially unbearable. Death strikes at unexpected moments. Its nature is unknowable. So people devote enormous energy to explaining it, forestalling it, and above all avoiding thinking about it.

  Becker's intellectual project was a synthesis. He drew on Sigmund Freud, Søren Kierkegaard, Norman O. Brown, and Otto Rank. According to clinical psychiatrist Morton Levitt, what Becker did was replace Freud's preoccupation with sexuality with the fear of death as the primary driver of human behavior. That was a significant reorientation of psychoanalytic thought.

  Central to Becker's framework was the concept of heroism. He argued that people need to feel they stand out, that their lives have significance. He described society itself as a codified hero system, a living myth of the significance of human life, a defiant creation of meaning. Self-esteem, in his view, was the measure of how well a person felt they were living up to the heroic standards their culture set. It was not a luxury but a psychological necessity, a buffer against the terror of insignificance that death represents.

  Greenberg, Solomon, and Pyszczynski took Becker's ideas and subjected them to empirical testing. The result was codified in their book The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life, published in 2015.

• 3. Culture as Immortality Shield

  ›

  Religion is the most obvious example of what TMT calls a cultural anxiety buffer. Belief in an afterlife directly counters the finality of death by promising that the self continues. But TMT extends the argument far beyond religion.

  National identity, ideas about posterity, cultural attitudes toward sex, and beliefs in human superiority over other animals have all been linked in research to the management of death anxiety. The mechanism works in two ways. Either a person gains the sense of being part of something larger that will outlive them, a country, a lineage, a species, or they elevate their symbolic identity above mere biological existence. A person is a personality, the argument goes, not simply a collection of cells. That distinction, however philosophically tenuous, provides psychological relief.

  Because cultural values define what is meaningful, they also determine what counts as self-esteem. TMT describes self-esteem as a personal, subjective measure of how well someone is living up to the standards their culture has set. A person who feels they embody their culture's ideals feels more significant, and feeling significant provides insulation against the terror of death.

  A 2008 article in Psychological Review laid out a three-part model for how death awareness can paradoxically undermine health-promoting behaviors. The first proposition holds that conscious thoughts about death push people toward health-oriented responses, as a way of removing death-related thoughts from immediate awareness. The second holds that unconscious death cognition instead promotes self-oriented defenses, directing people toward maintaining a sense of meaning and self-esteem rather than their physical health. The third proposition suggests that confrontations with the physical body can undermine those symbolic defenses and create barriers to health promotion. That last point helps explain why something as beneficial as a breast self-exam might trigger avoidance rather than action.

• 4. Mortality Salience in the Lab

  ›

  The mortality salience hypothesis is the experimental core of TMT. It states that if cultural worldviews and self-esteem serve a death-denying function, then reminding people of their own death should activate defenses aimed at restoring a sense of invulnerability.

  In the lab, those reminders have taken many forms: asking participants to write about their own death, conducting experiments near funeral homes or cemeteries, having participants watch graphic depictions of death. What researchers then measure are the changes in how participants think and behave. The hypothesis has been tested in close to 200 empirical articles.

  One of the earliest studies, by Greenberg and colleagues in 1990, had Christian participants evaluate other Christian and Jewish students who were similar in most respects but differed in religious identity. After being reminded of their own death, Christian participants rated fellow Christians more positively and Jewish participants more negatively compared to the control group, who had not received a mortality reminder. The pattern is consistent with TMT's prediction: when death is on the mind, people cling more fiercely to those who share their worldview and pull away from those who do not. Bolstering self-esteem before the experiment, however, reduced those defensive responses.

  A later study by Cox and colleagues in 2009 examined suntanning decisions. Participants who received both mortality reminders and messages that pale skin was more socially attractive reduced their intentions to tan. Participants given the same mortality reminder but paired with messages that tanned skin was attractive moved in the opposite direction. The key variable was not death awareness alone but how death awareness interacted with existing cultural norms around attractiveness.

  A meta-analysis of the mortality salience literature was compiled by Burke and colleagues in 2010, drawing together findings from across the field.

• 5. Death Thought Accessibility

  ›

  Beyond asking what people do when reminded of death, TMT researchers developed a way to measure what death does to people's minds even when they are not consciously thinking about it. The tool is called the death thought accessibility hypothesis, introduced by Greenberg and colleagues in 1994.

  The logic draws on research by Daniel Wegner on thought suppression from 1994 and 1997. Wegner found that thoughts deliberately pushed out of conscious awareness tend to return with heightened force after a delay. TMT researchers applied that logic to death-related cognitions. They predicted that people who had suppressed thoughts of death, and then been given a delay, should show more death-related thoughts than those who had kept thinking about death the whole time, or those who suppressed the thoughts but received no delay. That is precisely what the initial studies found, though other psychologists have failed to replicate those results.

  The main experimental measure is a word fragment task. Participants are given incomplete words and asked to fill them in. The fragment coff_ _ can become coffin or coffee. The fragment sk_ _l can become skull or skill. Participants who are primed with death-related cognitions complete more fragments in the death-related direction without necessarily being aware they are doing so.

  By 2009, the death thought accessibility hypothesis had appeared in over 60 published papers, with a total of more than 90 empirical studies. The hypothesis also allowed researchers to move beyond manipulating mortality and simply watching the effects. It gave them a way to measure the death-related cognitions that result from other threats to the self, including threats to self-esteem and challenges to one's worldview, opening new areas of inquiry that earlier TMT methods could not reach.

• 6. Leadership, Religion, and Mental Health

  ›

  George W. Bush's approval rating jumped almost 50 percent following the September 11 attacks. TMT researchers point to that figure as a real-world instance of the theory at work. Forsyth, writing in 2009, argued that the attacks made Americans acutely aware of their mortality, and that Bush provided an antidote to that existential anxiety by promising justice against those responsible.

  In a controlled study, Cohen and colleagues in 2004 presented participants with three types of leaders: task-oriented, relationship-oriented, and charismatic. Participants in the mortality-salient condition, who had been asked to describe the emotions and physical reality of their own death, favored the charismatic leader and were less drawn to the relationship-oriented one. The control group, asked about an upcoming exam rather than their own death, showed a different pattern. Research by Hoyt and colleagues in 2010 found that mortality-salient individuals also prefer leaders who belong to the same group as themselves, and prefer men over women, a finding the researchers connected to social role theory.

  On religion, TMT argues that belief in an afterlife and religious commitment more broadly reduce the effects of mortality salience on worldview defense. Thoughts of death have been found to increase religious belief at a subconscious level, even among people who describe themselves as nonreligious.

  Researchers have also explored links between death anxiety and mental health conditions, using the mortality salience methodology to investigate whether reminders of death increase behaviors associated with specific disorders. Studies found that such reminders led to increases in compulsive handwashing in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder, avoidance in spider phobias and social anxiety, and anxious behaviors in panic disorder and health anxiety. The findings suggest death anxiety may play a central role in several conditions, though TMT researchers acknowledge the causal picture is not fully established.

• 7. Challenges and Collapse

  ›

  Psychologist Yoel Inbar described a period roughly from 2004 to 2008 when terror management theory seemed to dominate social psychology. He recalled that at major conferences, it seemed like half the posters were about TMT. Then, in his account, it receded, and by the time he was reflecting on it, it had become difficult to find.

  The criticisms that contributed to that decline came from several directions. One evolutionary argument holds that a mechanism to suppress anxiety and fear would reduce survival chances, making it unlikely to have evolved. TMT's proponents respond that existential anxiety is not an evolved adaptation but an unfortunate byproduct of two highly adaptive traits, the survival instinct and the intelligence that makes death awareness possible. They compare it to bipedalism: the ability to walk upright confers real advantages but also brings its own costs.

  Coalitional psychologists argued that the worldview defenses TMT describes are better explained by group dynamics. When people face danger, they build alliances and support coalitions. A large statistical study found that conservatism and related responses are connected with collective danger more than individual danger, which supporters of coalitional psychology took as evidence against TMT's framing. TMT theorists replied that their dual-process model, distinguishing proximal, conscious, pragmatic defenses from distal, symbolic, unconscious ones, already accounts for that distinction.

  The meaning maintenance model offered another challenge. It posits that people are fundamentally meaning-seeking creatures, and that disrupted meanings, not death anxiety specifically, drive the behaviors TMT attributes to mortality salience. TMT theorists argue the model cannot explain why different sets of meaning are preferred by different people or why different types of meaning have different psychological effects.

  The most damaging blow came from a large-scale replication attempt called Many Labs 4. Researchers in 21 labs across the United States re-ran a key study from Greenberg and colleagues, originally published in 1994, with a combined total of 2,200 participants. The mortality salience effect on worldview defense failed to replicate under any condition. Tom Pyszczynski, one of TMT's founders, criticized the replication for insufficient sample sizes, failure to follow researcher guidance, and deviation from the preregistered protocol. That dispute between original authors and replication teams over methodology is itself now a familiar feature of psychology's broader reckoning with its own findings.