Symbol

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Symbol is a word that entered English with the meaning "something which stands for something else" in 1590, when Edmund Spenser used it in his Faerie Queene. That seems like a humble origin for something that underlies all human thought. Consider: a red octagon tells a driver to stop without a word being spoken. Blue lines on a printed map stand in for rivers that may be hundreds of miles away. A red rose handed to someone says what many speakers cannot find words to say. These substitutions are so ordinary that most people never stop to wonder what they actually are, or where that capacity came from, or why a single mark can mean completely different things depending on who is reading it and where. This documentary follows the symbol from its origins in broken pieces of ancient ceramic, through the laboratories of psychoanalysts, into the language of maps, and into the philosophical argument over whether a symbol can die.

• 2. A Broken Piece of Clay

  ›

  The Latin word that gave us "symbol" traces back to the Greek symbolon, rooted in a verb meaning "put together" or "compare." The practice behind it was intensely practical. A person who needed to send a trusted message would break a piece of ceramic in two. One half went to the future messenger; the other stayed with the sender. When the messenger arrived, the two halves were pressed together. A perfect fit meant the message was genuine. This ancient system of authentication is the literal ancestor of every symbol in daily life: the idea that two separate things, joined, produce a shared meaning.

  The word moved through Latin, where symbolus and symbolum both meant "a mark or sign as a means of recognition." It then passed into late Middle French as symbole, appearing around 1380 in a theological context, where it served as a near-synonym for the Christian credo. By the early Renaissance it had acquired meanings like "a maxim" or "the external sign of a sacrament." These religious senses eventually faded in secular usage. It was in the mid-16th century that the dominant modern meaning took hold, denoting "a natural fact or object evoking by its form or its nature an association of ideas with something abstract or absent." François Rabelais used the word in this sense in Le Quart Livre, published in 1552.

• 3. Cultural Learning

  ›

  Heinrich Zimmer captured something essential when he wrote that concepts and words are symbols, just as visions, rituals, and images are, and that through all of them "a transcendent reality is mirrored." His point cuts against any assumption that symbols carry fixed meanings built into their shapes. The meaning of a symbol is not inherent in the symbol itself but is culturally learned.

  The consequences of this can be mundane and unexpectedly serious. One documented case comes from survey translation: the symbol "x" is used in English-language surveys to mean "yes" when marking a response. In Chinese convention, "x" typically means "no." The identical mark, in two different cultural contexts, produces opposite readings. Researchers studying cross-cultural communication flag this kind of confusion as a real source of error. The symbol does not carry its meaning on its face. Human cultures use symbols to express specific ideologies and social structures, which means that anyone moving between cultures is, in a sense, moving between different symbolic languages without a dictionary.

  Semiotics is the academic field built around this problem. It studies signs, symbols, and signification as communicative behavior, examining the relationship between the signifier and what is signified. Semioticians also study how a symbol acquires meaning and how it functions within a society, drawing connections to linguistics and psychology in the process.

• 4. Misuse and the Mind

  ›

  Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung drew a sharp line between a sign and a symbol. A sign, in his framework, stands for something known, the way a word stands for its referent. A symbol, by contrast, points toward something unknown and incapable of being made fully clear or precise. Jung used Christ as an example of a symbol in this sense, representing the archetype he called "the self." These ideas became the foundation of what is now called Jungian archetypes.

  Kenneth Burke took a different angle, describing Homo sapiens as a "symbol-using, symbol-making, and symbol-misusing animal." The misuse mattered to him as much as the use. He told the story of a man who nearly became sick when told he was eating whale blubber, only to discover it was actually a dumpling. The man's physical reaction was a direct consequence of the symbol "blubber" representing something inedible in his mind. The symbol had overridden the sensory reality of what he was eating.

  Burke also connected symbols to Sigmund Freud's work on condensation and displacement, arguing that substitution is a core mechanism of symbolic thought. When one word or symbol is swapped for another, the meaning shifts accordingly. Jean Dalby Clift extended this into personal life, arguing that people create what she called "core images," personal symbols that represent their own understanding of their lives. She held that working with these personal symbols can be as useful as working with dream symbols in psychoanalysis or counseling. William Indick added that archetypes such as "the hero," "the princess," and "the witch" have remained popular for centuries precisely because they fulfill psychological functions.

• 5. Living and Dead

  ›

  Paul Tillich, the theologian, made a claim that sets him apart from most thinkers on this subject: while signs are invented and then forgotten, symbols are born and die. That is not a metaphor. For Tillich, a living symbol can reveal hidden levels of meaning to an individual and open up what he called the "depth dimension of reality itself." A living symbol always "points beyond itself" to something unquantifiable and mysterious.

  But a symbol can lose that capacity. When it stops generating meaning for an individual or a culture, it becomes a dead symbol. The moment a symbol becomes so identified with the deeper reality it references that the two are collapsed together, something else happens: it becomes idolatrous. The symbol is taken for the reality itself, rather than pointing toward it. Tillich saw this as a form of confusion with serious consequences for how people navigate belief and meaning.

  Context shapes all of this. A five-pointed star on a uniform can signify a law enforcement officer or a member of the armed services, depending on the uniform it appears on. History adds another layer: symbols with emotional power carry problems analogous to false etymologies, where the perceived history of a symbol shapes how it reads, sometimes overriding its original meaning entirely. A single symbol can carry multiple distinct meanings simultaneously, providing what researchers describe as multiple types of symbolic value.

• 6. Symbols on Maps

  ›

  Cartography offers one of the most systematically organized uses of symbols anywhere in human communication. Map symbols are categorized by how they suggest a connection between a graphic mark, a concept, and a feature of the real world. Pictorial symbols look like the thing they represent, a tree icon for a forest, or green coloring to denote vegetation. Functional symbols represent what happens at a place, a tent for a campground or a skier image for a ski resort. Conceptual symbols represent an idea related to the feature, a dollar sign for an ATM or a Star of David for a Jewish synagogue.

  Conventional symbols carry none of these intuitive links. A red line on a road map represents a highway not because it resembles one but because enough map readers have learned to read it that way. An abstract or geometric symbol is even more arbitrary, a shape chosen by the cartographer to fill a gap in the legend. According to semiotics, map users "read" these symbols by making a three-way connection: the graphic mark on the page, a general concept in the mind, and a particular feature in the real world. An organized collection of map symbols forms a legend, which is itself a kind of translation guide between the world and its paper representation. The visual variables involved in producing that translation include size, shape, orientation, texture, and pattern.