Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Suez Crisis

~11 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • On the 26th of July 1956, Gamal Abdel Nasser stood before a crowd in Alexandria and delivered a speech that would trigger one of the most consequential diplomatic disasters of the twentieth century. Buried in his remarks was a code word: the name of Ferdinand de Lesseps, the builder of the Suez Canal. The moment Egyptian officers heard that name, they seized control of the waterway. Within days, Britain, France, and Israel were secretly plotting an invasion. Within weeks, the United States and the Soviet Union were threatening the invaders. The questions that follow are not simply about a canal. They are about whether old empires could still act independently in a world reshaped by two new superpowers, and what happens when they discover the answer is no.

  • The Suez Canal opened in 1869, financed jointly by the French and Egyptian governments. By the time Britain purchased a 44% stake in the operating company from a financially distressed Egypt in 1875, paying £4 million for the shares, the canal had already become the shortest ocean link between the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean. After occupying Egypt outright in 1882, Britain effectively controlled not just the canal's operations but its finances and the surrounding territory.

    By the mid-twentieth century the canal carried a staggering volume of energy. Western Europe was importing two million barrels of oil per day from the Middle East, with roughly 1,200,000 of those barrels arriving by tanker through the canal. The alternative pipeline routes, running from Kirkuk and the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean, were prone to disruption. British leaders consistently preferred the sea route for that reason.

    In October 1951, Egypt unilaterally cancelled the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936, which had granted Britain a 20-year lease on the Suez base. Britain refused to leave. The standoff produced mounting violence. Then in January 1952, British forces tried to disarm an auxiliary police barracks in Ismailia, killing 41 Egyptians. Anti-Western riots consumed Cairo the next day, killing foreigners and destroying property. Six months later, the Free Officers Movement led by Muhammad Neguib and a young colonel named Nasser overthrew King Farouk entirely.

  • Nasser did not drift into confrontation with the West; he engineered it. The CIA offered him a $3 million bribe to join the proposed Middle East Defense Organization, a NATO-style body the Eisenhower administration hoped would contain Soviet influence. Nasser took the money and refused to join. He wanted an Egyptian-dominated Arab League as the primary defense structure in the region, one that he controlled.

    In September 1955, news broke that Egypt had purchased a large quantity of Soviet arms through Czechoslovakia. The deal had been quietly negotiated during 1954-55 as Nasser played the superpowers against each other, using the threat of Soviet arms to pressure Washington into selling him weapons. Instead of the desired American arsenal, he got something even more useful: proof that Egypt could arm itself without Western permission.

    The Israeli raid on Egyptian Army headquarters in Gaza in February 1955, which killed an Israeli civilian in its origins as a fedayeen attack, ended whatever restraint Nasser had shown on the Palestinian question. He began authorising fedayeen raids into Israel from bases not only in Gaza but also in Jordan and Lebanon. In March 1956, Nasser sponsored demonstrations in Amman that led King Hussein to dismiss John Bagot Glubb, the British commander of the Arab Legion, known to the Arabs as Glubb Pasha. That dismissal consumed British Prime Minister Anthony Eden. One British politician recalled Eden's reaction: Nasser must be destroyed.

    On the 16th of May 1956, Nasser officially recognised the People's Republic of China. Eisenhower, already irritated and persuaded that the Aswan Dam project exceeded Egypt's economic capacity, withdrew all American financial support for the dam on the 19th of July. A week later, Nasser announced the nationalisation of the canal.

  • France had been arming Israel since early 1955, partly because Nasser was funding and supplying the Algerian National Liberation Front rebels fighting French rule. By 1956 France had agreed to disregard the Tripartite Declaration entirely and send even more weapons to Israel. In August, the French government privately asked Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion whether Israel would join a joint attack on Egypt. Israel agreed and planning began.

    Britain and France pursued a parallel diplomatic track through the summer, hosting a London conference in August that brought together 22 nations who used the canal. Fifteen supported international operation of the waterway, but Nasser rejected the proposal when Australian Prime Minister Robert Menzies carried it to Cairo in September. Menzies hinted that force might follow rejection. Eisenhower publicly blocked that path, insisting the crisis had to be resolved peacefully and warning Eden that American public opinion would be outraged if all peaceful routes were not exhausted first.

    The British and French privately viewed diplomacy as time to buy while their troops moved into position. Between the 22nd and the 24th of October 1956, representatives of France, Israel, and the United Kingdom met in Sevres, France, and agreed on what became the Protocol of Sevres. Israel would attack Egypt on the 29th of October. Britain and France would then issue a joint ultimatum demanding both sides pull back ten miles from the canal. Since Israel already knew the plan, rejection by Egypt was guaranteed. On the 31st of October, British and French forces would attack. General Charles Keightley was already in place as commander of the Anglo-French force, with French Admiral Pierre Barjot as his deputy. The operation was called Musketeer.

  • Israel attacked on the 29th of October 1956, with Israeli Air Force Mustangs striking Egyptian positions across the Sinai at around 3:00 pm. Egyptian commander Field Marshal Abdel Hakim Amer initially treated the invasion reports as describing a large raid rather than a full offensive. His delay in ordering a general alert allowed Israeli forces to advance significantly before Egypt fully mobilised.

    On the ground, Israeli operations moved across multiple objectives simultaneously. The 9th Infantry Brigade captured Ras al-Naqb during the night of 29-the 30th of October; the 4th Infantry Brigade struck al-Qusaymah. Ariel Sharon's forces assaulted Themed before dawn, then attacked Egyptian positions at Jebel Heitan. The battle cost 260 Egyptian and 38 Israeli soldiers. Abu Uwayulah, defended by 3,000 Egyptians of the 17th and 18th battalions of the 3rd Infantry Division under Colonel Sami Yassa, held out from the 30th of October to the 1st of November before the defenders, running low on ammunition and water, were forced to retreat.

    The fighting at Kafr Qasim on the 29th of October produced one of the most disturbing incidents of the war. Because Israeli intelligence feared Jordan might enter the conflict, the Israel Border Police militarised the Israel-Jordan border and placed Arab villages near it under curfew. The enforcement of that curfew at the Arab village of Kafr Qasim resulted in the deaths of 48 civilians.

    At Sharm el-Sheikh, the last Israeli objective, Colonel Abraham Yoffe's 9th Infantry Brigade faced a strongly fortified position and difficult terrain with no good roads linking it to the attacking force. An attack around midnight on the 4th of November failed. On the morning of the 5th of November, a massive artillery barrage and napalm strikes preceded a renewed assault. At 9:30 am, Egyptian commander Colonel Raouf Mahfouz Zaki surrendered. The Israelis lost 10 killed and 32 wounded; the Egyptians lost around 100 killed, 31 wounded, and 864 taken prisoner.

    British and French forces entered the fight on the 31st of October, beginning with bombing campaigns from airfields in Cyprus and Malta. By the night of the 1st of November, Egypt's air force had lost 200 planes. On the 5th of November, paratroopers from the 3rd Battalion of the British Parachute Regiment dropped on El Gamil Airfield, led by Brigadier M.A.H. Butler. At the same time, French Lieutenant Colonel Pierre Chateau-Jobert landed with a force of the 2nd RPC at Raswa. At first light on the 6th of November, Royal Marines of No. 42 and 40 Commando stormed the beaches. No. 45 Commando assaulted by helicopter, the first time British forces had ever lifted men directly into a combat zone this way. Shore batteries struck several helicopters; a carrier-based Wyvern mistakenly fired on 45 Commando and headquarters, killing one Marine and wounding 15. Total Royal Marine casualties in the Port Said landings were nine killed and 60 wounded.

    Nasser responded by declaring a people's war, ordering Egyptian troops to change into civilian clothes and distributing weapons freely to civilians. This placed the British in a difficult position: treat every civilian as a potential combatant, or risk snipers attacking with near impunity. Heavy urban fighting damaged much of Port Said and killed many civilians. Egyptian total losses to both the Israeli and Anglo-French operations were estimated at 1,650-3,650 dead and roughly 4,900 wounded, with around 1,000 civilian deaths. Israeli losses were 172 dead and 817 wounded.

  • Anthony Eden announced a ceasefire on the 6th of November, without warning either France or Israel in advance. The military assessment at the time was that the Suez Canal could have been taken completely within another 24 hours. Port Said was already overrun. The ceasefire came not from military necessity but from financial reality.

    Between the 30th of October and the 2nd of November, the Bank of England had lost $45 million. With Britain's oil supply cut off by the closure of the canal and an Arab oil embargo, the British government sought immediate assistance from the International Monetary Fund. The United States blocked the request. Eisenhower also ordered Treasury Secretary George M. Humphrey to prepare to sell part of the US government's sterling bond holdings. Chancellor of the Exchequer Harold Macmillan told Eden that Britain's foreign exchange reserves could not survive the resulting devaluation. Within weeks, the country would be unable to import sufficient food and energy.

    Eisenhower's position was principled but also tactical. The United States was simultaneously pressing the Soviet Union over its violent suppression of the Hungarian uprising. Vice-President Richard Nixon later explained that the United States could not credibly protest Soviet intervention in Hungary while approving of British and French intervention against Egypt. The Americans also feared that supporting an attack on an Arab country would push the entire Arab world toward the Soviet Union.

    Soviet Premier Nikolai Bulganin added his own pressure, threatening rocket attacks on Britain, France, and Israel. The West did not know at the time that the Soviets lacked the intercontinental ballistic missiles to carry out the threat. The menace was enough. The Anglo-French Task Force withdrew by the 22nd of December 1956, replaced by Danish and Colombian units of the newly created United Nations Emergency Force. The Israelis withdrew from the Sinai and Gaza in March 1957, but only after destroying roads, railways, and telephone lines and confiscating Egyptian National Railways equipment for use by Israel Railways.

  • The conflict produced a military victory for the coalition and a political victory for Egypt. Nasser kept the canal. His standing in the Arab world and across the wider developing world rose dramatically, even as his own country had been militarily defeated.

    For Britain, the damage went deeper than a lost campaign. Historians have argued the crisis marked the end of Britain's role as an independent great power. The episode confirmed that British foreign policy could not succeed without American consent, a constraint that had not visibly bound the country before. Eden resigned in January 1957, his health and reputation destroyed. Paradoxically, Harold Macmillan, whose Treasury warnings had helped force the ceasefire and who some in the Cabinet suspected had overstated the financial danger to push Eden out, succeeded him as Prime Minister.

    For the Soviet Union, the crisis was a windfall. Khrushchev publicly claimed that his threat of rocket attacks had saved Egypt, a narrative Nasser found politically useful even though he privately acknowledged it was American economic pressure that had forced the ceasefire. The first Soviet Navy warships to traverse the canal since World War I did so shortly after it reopened. Khrushchev interpreted the episode as proof that nuclear brinkmanship worked, a view that contributed to a long sequence of Cold War confrontations including the Berlin crisis beginning in November 1958 and the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.

    For France, the crisis accelerated the decision to build an independent nuclear deterrent rather than rely on American protection. For West Germany, it deepened interest in a European third force in the Cold War. The analyst's view that the crisis emboldened the USSR also connects it to the Soviet invasion of Hungary, which Moscow was able to execute with limited international consequences while Western attention focused on Egypt.

    For Canada, the outcome was a Nobel Peace Prize. External Affairs Minister Lester B. Pearson, working alongside UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold, designed the United Nations Emergency Force proposal that made a ceasefire politically viable for all sides. The canal itself reopened fully to shipping by the 24th of April 1957. Israel secured freedom of navigation through the Straits of Tiran, which had been closed since 1950, and an eleven-year period of relative quiet on its southern border. But no peace settlement followed the war, and in October 1965 Eisenhower told Republican supporter Max M. Fisher that he greatly regretted forcing Israel to withdraw from the Sinai peninsula. The unresolved tensions between Egypt and Israel that the 1956 war left behind laid the groundwork for the Six-Day War in 1967.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What caused the Suez Crisis of 1956?

The Suez Crisis was triggered by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser's nationalisation of the Suez Canal on the 26th of July 1956, announced in a speech in Alexandria. The nationalisation followed Eisenhower's withdrawal of American financial support for the Aswan High Dam project on the 19th of July, itself a response to Nasser's recognition of the People's Republic of China and his arms deal with the Soviet Union via Czechoslovakia in 1955.

Which countries invaded Egypt during the Suez Crisis?

Israel, the United Kingdom, and France invaded Egypt in 1956. Israel attacked on the 29th of October, and Britain and France joined on the 31st of October after issuing a joint ultimatum. The three countries had secretly coordinated the operation through the Protocol of Sevres, agreed between the 22nd and the 24th of October 1956.

Why did Britain and France withdraw from Egypt during the Suez Crisis?

Britain and France withdrew primarily because of US financial pressure. The Bank of England lost $45 million between the 30th of October and the 2nd of November, the United States blocked British access to IMF assistance, and Eisenhower threatened to sell US sterling bond holdings, which would have devalued the pound and left Britain unable to import food and energy. A Soviet threat of rocket attacks on the three invading nations added further pressure.

Who was Lester B. Pearson and what was his role in the Suez Crisis?

Lester B. Pearson was Canada's Secretary of External Affairs. He designed the proposal for the first United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF), working alongside UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold, which provided a face-saving mechanism for the ceasefire. For these efforts, Pearson received the Nobel Peace Prize.

What were the long-term consequences of the Suez Crisis?

The Suez Crisis confirmed that Britain and France could no longer pursue independent foreign policy without US consent, which historians argue signalled the end of Britain's role as a superpower. It strengthened Soviet influence in the Middle East and Arab world, accelerated France's decision to build its own nuclear deterrent, and laid groundwork for the Six-Day War in 1967 by leaving Egypt-Israel tensions unresolved. The canal reopened to shipping by the 24th of April 1957.

What was the Protocol of Sevres in the Suez Crisis?

The Protocol of Sevres was a secret agreement reached between France, Israel, and the United Kingdom during meetings held between the 22nd and the 24th of October 1956 in Sevres, France. Under its terms, Israel would attack Egypt on the 29th of October; Britain and France would then issue a joint ultimatum demanding withdrawal, knowing Egypt would reject it; and Anglo-French military operations would begin on the 31st of October.

All sources

259 references cited across the entry

  1. 1bookA Military History of Modern Egypt: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Ramadan War2006
  2. 3harvnbVarble (2003) p. 90Varble — 2003
  3. 6bookCauses and Consequences of the Arab–Israeli ConflictStewart Ross — Evans Brothers — 2004
  4. 7bookWriting the Arab–Israeli Conflict: Pragmatism and Historical InquiryJonathan B. Isacoff — Lexington Books — 2006
  5. 8bookFutile Diplomacy: Operation Alpha and the Failure of Anglo-American Coercive Diplomacy in the Arab–Israeli Conflict, 1954–1956Neil Caplan — Psychology Press — 1983
  6. 10bookThe Eisenhower YearsMichael S. Mayer — Infobase Publishing — 2010
  7. 11bookThe Game Player: Confessions of the CIA's Original Political OperativeMiles Copeland — Aurum Press — 1989
  8. 12book1956 Suez Crisis And The United NationsMajor Jean-Marc Pierre — Tannenberg Publishing — 15 August 2014
  9. 13journalThe Historical Place of the Czech-Egyptian Arms Deal, Fall 1955Motti Golani — 1995
  10. 14bookThe Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415–1980David Abernathy — Yale University Press — 2000
  11. 15bookSuez CrisisRoger Owen — Oxford University Press — 2001
  12. 16newsAn affair to remember27 June 2006
  13. 17bookHistorical Dictionary of Anglo-American RelationsSylvia Ellis — Scarecrow Press — 2009
  14. 18citationSuez and Britain's Decline as a World PowerG. C. Peden — December 2012
  15. 19webSuez CrisisMatt Mullen et al. — 2022-09-14
  16. 20bookReassessing Suez 1956: New perspectives on the crisis and its aftermathRoutledge — 2016
  17. 21webNATO in the Beholder's Eye: Soviet Perceptions and Policies, 1949–56Vojtech Mastny — Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars — March 2002
  18. 22bookThe 1956 Hungarian Revolution: Hungarian and Canadian PerspectivesAdam Christopher — University of Ottawa Press — 2010
  19. 23harvnbTurner (2006) p. 21–24Turner — 2006
  20. 24webSuez CanalEgyptian State Information Service
  21. 25harvnbSachar (1996)Sachar — 1996
  22. 26harvnbVarble (2003) p. 11Varble — 2003
  23. 27harvnbVarble (2003) p. 12Varble — 2003
  24. 28harvnbYergin (1991) p. 480Yergin — 1991
  25. 29harvnbDarwin (1988) p. p. 207 "Nothing could have been better calculated to lash popular Muslim feeling to new fury ... and to redouble Egyptian hostility to Britain on whose 'betrayal' of the Palestine Arabs the catastrophe could easily be blamed."Darwin — 1988
  26. 30harvnbButler (2002) p. 111Butler — 2002
  27. 31harvnbDarwin (1988) p. 208Darwin — 1988
  28. 32harvnbNeff (1981) p. 18–19, 195Neff — 1981
  29. 33harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 167Gaddis — 1998
  30. 34harvnbSayed-Ahmed (1993) p. 90Sayed-Ahmed — 1993
  31. 35harvnbBurns (1985) p. 11Burns — 1985
  32. 36harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 169Gaddis — 1998
  33. 37harvnbNeff (1981) p. 43Neff — 1981
  34. 38harvnbNeff (1981) p. 43–44Neff — 1981
  35. 39harvnbSayed-Ahmed (1993) p. 91Sayed-Ahmed — 1993
  36. 40harvnbNeff (1981) p. 44–45Neff — 1981
  37. 41harvnbThornhill (2004) p. 906–907Thornhill — 2004
  38. 42harvnbBurns (1985) p. 24Burns — 1985
  39. 43harvnbBurns (1985) p. 16–17, 18–22Burns — 1985
  40. 44harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 170–171Gaddis — 1998
  41. 45harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 171Gaddis — 1998
  42. 46harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 170–172Gaddis — 1998
  43. 47harvnbNeff (1981) p. 93–94Neff — 1981
  44. 48harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 450Adamthwaite — 1988
  45. 50journalEscalation to Suez: The Egypt-Israel Border War, 1949–56Michael B. Oren — April 1989
  46. 51harvnbVatikiotis (1978) p. 252–253Vatikiotis — 1978
  47. 53bookSoldiers, Spies and Statesmen: Egypt's Road to RevoltHazem Kandil — Verso Books — 13 November 2012
  48. 55harvnbNeff (1981) p. 160Neff — 1981
  49. 56harvnbNeff (1981) p. 160–161Neff — 1981
  50. 57harvnbKyle (2003) p. 115Kyle — 2003
  51. 58harvnbNeff (1981) p. 162–163Neff — 1981
  52. 59harvnbNeff (1981) p. 234–236Neff — 1981
  53. 60harvnbNeff (1981) p. 235Neff — 1981
  54. 61harvnbNeff (1981) p. 130–131Neff — 1981
  55. 62harvnbAlteras (1993) p. pp. 169 "Nasser's personal security and that of his government were at stake. Several times during the conversation Nasser mentioned the murder of King Abdullah."Alteras — 1993
  56. 63harvnbNeff (1981) p. 135–136Neff — 1981
  57. 64harvnbNeff (1981) p. 168–169Neff — 1981
  58. 65harvnbAlteras (1993) p. 169Alteras — 1993
  59. 66journalCovert Diplomacy Between Israel and Egypt During Nasser Rule: 1952–1970Ido Yahel — October 2016
  60. 67harvnbVatikiotis (1978) p. 306–307Vatikiotis — 1978
  61. 68harvnbVatikiotis (1978) p. 252Vatikiotis — 1978
  62. 69harvnbKissinger (1994) p. 529Kissinger — 1994
  63. 70harvnbNeff (1981) p. 178–179Neff — 1981
  64. 71harvnbNeff (1981) p. 180Neff — 1981
  65. 72bookThe World Bank Since Bretton WoodsEdward Mason et al. — Brookings Institution — 1973
  66. 73harvnbNeff (1981) p. 182–183Neff — 1981
  67. 74bookRethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern EgyptElie Podeh et al. — University Press of Florida — 1 December 2004
  68. 75bookThe Commonwealth and Suez: A Documentary SurveyJames Eayrs — Oxford University Press — 1964
  69. 76newsWhat we failed to learn from SuezD. R. Thorpe — 1 November 2006
  70. 77citationThe 1956 Suez Crisis as a Perfect Case for Crisis ResearchBertjan Verbeek — 2020-09-28
  71. 78harvnbTurner (2006) p. 181Turner — 2006
  72. 79journalLow Conspiracy?—Government interference in the BBCPeter Goodwin — 2005
  73. 80harvnbTurner (2006) p. 231–232Turner — 2006
  74. 81harvnbTurner (2006) p. 232Turner — 2006
  75. 82harvnbKyle (2003) p. 225–226Kyle — 2003
  76. 83harvnbKyle (2003) p. 144Kyle — 2003
  77. 84harvnbKyle (2003) p. 145Kyle — 2003
  78. 85harvnbKyle (2003) p. 156Kyle — 2003
  79. 86bookSpeech is of TimeR. G. Menzies — Cassell — 1958
  80. 87magazineCompromise-Minded Conferees27 August 1956
  81. 88harvnbJames (1986) p. pp. 462–465, quote p. 472 dated 31 July 1956James — 1986
  82. 89bookA Lesson for Our Times: How America Kept the Peace in the Hungary-Suez Crisis of 1956C. Philip Skardon — 2010
  83. 90harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 86Risse-Kappen — 1997
  84. 91bookEden, Suez and the Mass Media: Propaganda and Persuasion During the Suez CrisisTony Shaw — I.B. Tauris — 1996
  85. 92bookHarold MacmillanCharles Williams — 2009
  86. 93harvnbVarble (2003) p. 21Varble — 2003
  87. 94harvnbVarble (2003) p. 26Varble — 2003
  88. 95harvnbVarble (2003) p. 22Varble — 2003
  89. 96harvnbKyle (2003) p. 176Kyle — 2003
  90. 97harvnbVarble (2003) p. 24Varble — 2003
  91. 98harvnbVarble (2003) p. 25Varble — 2003
  92. 99harvnbTurner (2006) p. 201Turner — 2006
  93. 100harvnbNeff (1981) p. 321–322Neff — 1981
  94. 101harvnbNeff (1981) p. 295–296Neff — 1981
  95. 102harvnbNeff (1981) p. 309Neff — 1981
  96. 103harvnbNeff (1981) p. 323–324Neff — 1981
  97. 104harvnbNeff (1981) p. 324Neff — 1981
  98. 105harvnbNeff (1981) p. 335–336Neff — 1981
  99. 106harvnbNeff (1981) p. 295Neff — 1981
  100. 107harvnbVarble (2003) p. 28Varble — 2003
  101. 108harvnbVarble (2003) p. 15Varble — 2003
  102. 109harvnbVarble (2003) p. 16Varble — 2003
  103. 110harvnbVarble (2003) p. 16–17Varble — 2003
  104. 111harvnbVarble (2003) p. 17Varble — 2003
  105. 112harvnbVarble (2003) p. 18Varble — 2003
  106. 113harvnbVarble (2003) p. 18–19Varble — 2003
  107. 114harvnbVarble (2003) p. 19Varble — 2003
  108. 115harvnbVarble (2003) p. 20Varble — 2003
  109. 116harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 94Risse-Kappen — 1997
  110. 117harvnbVarble (2003) p. 29Varble — 2003
  111. 118harvnbVarble (2003) p. 31Varble — 2003
  112. 119harvnbVarble (2003) p. 32Varble — 2003
  113. 120harvnbVarble (2003) p. 33Varble — 2003
  114. 121harvnbVarble (2003) p. 32–33Varble — 2003
  115. 122harvnbVarble (2003) p. 35-39Varble — 2003
  116. 123harvnbVarble (2003) p. 35Varble — 2003
  117. 124harvnbHerzog (1982) p. 138Herzog — 1982
  118. 125bookThe Sword And The Olive: A Critical History Of The Israeli Defense ForceMartin Van Creveld — PublicAffairs — 6 August 2008
  119. 126bookDiary of the Sinai CampaignMoshe Dayan — Harper & Row — 1966
  120. 128harvnbVarble (2003) p. 40Varble — 2003
  121. 129harvnbVarble (2003) p. 41Varble — 2003
  122. 130harvnbVarble (2003) p. 41–43Varble — 2003
  123. 131harvnbVarble (2003) p. 43Varble — 2003
  124. 134harvnbVarble (2003) p. 45Varble — 2003
  125. 135harvnbVarble (2003) p. 46Varble — 2003
  126. 138bookFootnotes in Gaza: A Graphic NovelJoe Sacco — Metropolitan Books — 2009
  127. 139harvnbVarble (2003) p. 86Varble — 2003
  128. 140harvnbVarble (2003) p. 86–87Varble — 2003
  129. 141harvnbVarble (2003) p. 48Varble — 2003
  130. 142harvnbVarble (2003) p. 49Varble — 2003
  131. 143harvnbVarble (2003) p. 91Varble — 2003
  132. 144harvnbNeff (1981) p. p. 414. Quotes UN report: "thousands of wounded and dead bodies all over Sanai (sic)". Neff estimates 4000 Egyptians wounded and 6000 captured or missing in Sinai and a further 900 wounded by the Anglo-French.Neff — 1981
  133. 145harvnbVarble (2003) p. 53Varble — 2003
  134. 146harvnbVarble (2003) p. 50Varble — 2003
  135. 147harvnbVarble (2003) p. 51Varble — 2003
  136. 148harvnbVarble (2003) p. 54Varble — 2003
  137. 149harvnbVarble (2003) p. 54–55Varble — 2003
  138. 150harvnbVarble (2003) p. 50–52Varble — 2003
  139. 151harvnbVarble (2003) p. 52Varble — 2003
  140. 152harvnbVarble (2003) p. 56Varble — 2003
  141. 153harvnbVarble (2003) p. 60Varble — 2003
  142. 155harvnbVarble (2003) p. 61Varble — 2003
  143. 156harvnbVarble (2003) p. 55Varble — 2003
  144. 157harvnbVarble (2003) p. 62Varble — 2003
  145. 158bookThe Commonwealth and Suez: A Documentary SurveyEayrs, James — Oxford University Press — 1964
  146. 159harvnbVarble (2003) p. 65Varble — 2003
  147. 160harvnbVarble (2003) p. 66Varble — 2003
  148. 161harvnbVarble (2003) p. 77Varble — 2003
  149. 162harvnbVarble (2003) p. 66–68Varble — 2003
  150. 164harvnbVarble (2003) p. 67Varble — 2003
  151. 165harvnbVarble (2003) p. 87Varble — 2003
  152. 166harvnbVarble (2003) p. 87–88Varble — 2003
  153. 167harvnbVarble (2003) p. 88Varble — 2003
  154. 168harvnbVarble (2003) p. 89–90Varble — 2003
  155. 169harvnbVarble (2003) p. 69Varble — 2003
  156. 170harvnbVarble (2003) p. 78–79Varble — 2003
  157. 171harvnbVarble (2003) p. 79Varble — 2003
  158. 172harvnbVarble (2003) p. 80Varble — 2003
  159. 173harvnbTurner (2006) p. 210Turner — 2006
  160. 174harvnbTurner (2006) p. 206–210Turner — 2006
  161. 175newsDrama sparks Suez Crisis memoriesJohn Fairhall — 30 June 2011
  162. 176bookSuez: Splitting of a NationRussell Braddon — Collins — 1973
  163. 177bookPost-War Britain: A Political HistoryAlan Sked et al. — Penguin — 1984
  164. 178webThe Suez Fiasco 1956Lynn Walsh — Socialism Today — October 2006
  165. 179harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 463Adamthwaite — 1988
  166. 180bookNever Had It So Good: A History of Britain from Suez to the BeatlesDominic Sandbrook — Abacus — 2006
  167. 181harvnbNeff (1981) p. 388–389Neff — 1981
  168. 182harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 456Adamthwaite — 1988
  169. 183harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 455–456Adamthwaite — 1988
  170. 184harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 456–457Adamthwaite — 1988
  171. 185webAneurin Bevan 19564 February 2010
  172. 186harvnbKyle (2003) p. 441Kyle — 2003
  173. 187harvnbKyle (2003) p. 441–442Kyle — 2003
  174. 188bookSeeking a Role: The United Kingdom, 1951–1970Brian Harrison — Oxford University Press — 2009
  175. 189journal'The Bitterest Enemies of Communism': Labour Revisionists, Atlanticism and the Cold WarLawrence Black — Autumn 2001
  176. 190bookThe Collapse of British PowerCorrelli Barnett — Eyre Methuen — 1972
  177. 191bookFighting All The WayBarbara Castle — Pan — 1994
  178. 193journalContainment, Rollback, Liberation or Inaction? The United States and Hungary in the 1950sLászló Borhi — 1999
  179. 194harvnbNeff (1981) p. 391Neff — 1981
  180. 195harvnbKyle (2003) p. 464Kyle — 2003
  181. 196bookEisenhower and the Cold WarRobert Divine — Oxford University Press — 1981
  182. 197bookKonrad Adenauer: A German Politician and Statesman in a Period of War, Revolution and Reconstruction, 1952–1967Hans-Peter Schwarz — Berghahn Books — 1995
  183. 198harvnbDietl (2008) p. 273Dietl — 2008
  184. 199bookEmpires at WarFrancis Pike — I.B. Tauris — 2009
  185. 200harvnbTurner (2006) p. 328Turner — 2006
  186. 201harvnbLove (1969) p. 651Love — 1969
  187. 202bookThe KingdomRobert Lacey — Avon — 1981
  188. 204harvnbLove (1969) p. 557–558Love — 1969
  189. 205bookEncyclopedia of the United NationsJohn Allphin Moore et al. — 2008
  190. 206webEmergency Special SessionsUnited Nations General Assembly
  191. 207harvnbAlteras (1993) p. 246Alteras — 1993
  192. 208bookA Restless Mind: Essays in Honor of Amos PerlmutterMichael Brecher — Psychology Press — 1996
  193. 209bookThe Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab WorldAvi Shlaim — W. W. Norton — 2001
  194. 210harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 240Gaddis — 1998
  195. 211harvnbNeff (1981) p. 403Neff — 1981
  196. 212harvnbTurner (2006) p. 368Turner — 2006
  197. 213bookThe Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954–1974Gregory W. Pedlow et al. — History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency — 1992
  198. 214webThe Suez Crisis of 1956C. N. Trueman — 25 May 2015
  199. 216bookThe Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the PalestiniansNoam Chomsky — South End Press — 1983
  200. 217bookThe Railways of Palestine and IsraelPaul Cotterell — Tourret — 1984
  201. 218webGalleryIsrael Railways
  202. 221harvnbTal (2001) p. 203Tal — 2001
  203. 222bookEye on Israel: How America Came to View the Jewish State as an AllyMichelle Mart — SUNY Press — 2006-02-09
  204. 223harvnbStewart (2013) p. 133Stewart — 2013
  205. 225harvnbKyle (2003) p. 493Kyle — 2003
  206. 226webSuez Canal CrisisC. T. Evans — 2010
  207. 227bookDivided we Stand: Britain, the US and the Suez CrisisW. Scott Lucas — Hodder — September 1991
  208. 228harvnbHerzog (1982) p. 141Herzog — 1982
  209. 229harvnbAlteras (1993)Alteras — 1993
  210. 230harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 173Gaddis — 1998
  211. 231bookWar And Peace In The Space AgeJames Maurice Gavin — Harper
  212. 233harvnbKyle (2003) p. 522Kyle — 2003
  213. 234harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 236Gaddis — 1998
  214. 235harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 236–237Gaddis — 1998
  215. 236harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 236–239Gaddis — 1998
  216. 237newsSuez: The 'betrayal' of Eden30 October 2006
  217. 238harvnbGaddis (1998) p. 174–175Gaddis — 1998
  218. 240harvnbVarble (2003) p. 84Varble — 2003
  219. 241harvnbVatikiotis (1978) p. 277Vatikiotis — 1978
  220. 242harvnbLaskier (1995) p. 579–580Laskier — 1995
  221. 243harvnbLaskier (1995) p. 581Laskier — 1995
  222. 246harvnbAdamthwaite (1988) p. 449Adamthwaite — 1988
  223. 247citationThe Oxford History of the British Empire, Vol. 4: The Twentieth Century1999
  224. 251harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 99Risse-Kappen — 1997
  225. 252harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 98Risse-Kappen — 1997
  226. 253journalTheory and Reality in the Anglo-American AllianceR. Dawson et al. — 1966
  227. 254bookGCHQRichard J. Aldrich — Harper Press — 2011
  228. 255harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 103Risse-Kappen — 1997
  229. 256harvnbRisse-Kappen (1997) p. 84Risse-Kappen — 1997
  230. 258newsThe Price of a Pearson24 November 2004