Slavery in ancient Rome

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Slavery in ancient Rome once nearly claimed one of its most famous citizens as a permanent captive. Cilician pirates seized a young Julius Caesar and, once they realized his worth, set his ransom at twenty talents. Caesar reportedly scoffed and told them to demand fifty instead. He spent thirty-eight days as their prisoner while the money was gathered, and after his release he had his former captors crucified, the punishment Roman custom reserved for slaves. Caesar's brush with captivity was only one entry point into a system that reached every level of Roman life, from field laborers with almost no hope of freedom to household accountants who might one day own property of their own. How did a society that enslaved so many also build legal paths to citizenship for freed slaves? What happened, in the eyes of Roman law, to a free citizen who fell into someone else's hands? And what did freedom actually look like once someone finally reached it?

• 2. The Father's Domain

  ›

  Pliny, writing in the 1st century AD, looked back with nostalgia on an era before Rome supposedly needed, in his words, "legions of slaves." Even in his imagined simpler past, though, he pictured a household that still relied on at least one slave. Every Roman household centered on the familia, a word that could refer narrowly to the slaves a family owned. The man at its head, the paterfamilias, held authority the philosopher Seneca said the Romans had deliberately dressed up in gentler language. Seneca claimed the early Romans coined the very term paterfamilias as a euphemism for a master's control over his slaves. That master was called dominus, a word rooted in domus, the household itself, and his power over the enslaved was dominium.

  This power extended to what Romans called vitae necisque potestas, control over life and death, applied to slaves and to a man's own children alike. The Greek historian Dionysius of Halicarnassus, writing in the 1st century AD, traced this authority back to the legendary founder Romulus. Dionysius also noted something he found remarkable: unlike Greek city-states, Rome routinely granted its freed slaves full citizenship. Rome's own foundation stories tried to account for this. The historian Livy wrote that Romulus opened a refuge that drew in, in Livy's phrase, "mostly former slaves, vagabonds, and runaways" seeking a new start as citizens, something Livy credited as a source of Roman strength. Servius Tullius, remembered as Rome's sixth king, was said to be the son of an enslaved woman.

  Rome's earliest law code, the Twelve Tables, dated to roughly 451 to 450 BC, never bothered to define slavery at all. Its existence was simply assumed. The code did, however, already refer to freedmen as cives Romani liberti, citizens who had once been slaves, meaning that by the 5th century BC the law was already grappling with a growing population of former slaves. That same legal system would soon have to answer a harder question: what happened when the captive was not a foreigner, but a Roman citizen himself.

• 3. When Citizens Became Captives

  ›

  A law passed in the late 4th century BC stopped creditors from enslaving defaulting debtors on their own authority, closing off one path by which a freeborn Roman could lose his liberty. After that, Romans of the Republic recognized only one lawful way to enslave a citizen: defeat and capture in war under the customary law of nations. The Carthaginian general Hannibal put that rule to devastating use during the Second Punic War. After the Roman defeat at the Battle of Lake Trasimene in 217 BC, Hannibal offered terms to ransom prisoners, but the Roman senate refused to pay, and the commander on the ground covered the cost himself. The following year, after the disaster at Cannae, Hannibal made the same offer again. The senate again refused, choosing to send the message that soldiers should win or die rather than surrender. Hannibal sold the unransomed men to the Greeks, and some survived as slaves for roughly twenty years, until the general Flamininus recovered 1,200 of them during the Second Macedonian War.

  Centuries later, Roman citizens fell captive again, this time to the Parthians. After Marcus Crassus was defeated at the Battle of Carrhae in 53 BC, the Parthians marched 10,000 survivors some 1,500 miles to Margiana in Bactria, where their eventual fate is unrecorded. Writing about thirty years afterward, the poet Horace imagined these men married to "barbarian" wives and serving in the Parthian army, too disgraced ever to return to Rome. Three centuries on, the emperor Valerian became the first Roman emperor captured alive, defeated by Shapur I at the Battle of Edessa in AD 260. Hostile Christian sources describe him being treated as a slave and subjected to humiliation. At the Zoroastrian site of Naqsh-e Rostam in what is now southwest Iran, carved reliefs and inscriptions still celebrate Shapur's victory, depicting Roman emperors in submission and legionaries paying tribute.

  Capture carried real legal weight. A citizen enslaved this way lost his property, saw his marriage dissolved, and had any household authority suspended. A formal process called postliminium allowed some captives to reclaim their status once they crossed back into Roman territory, though treaty terms sometimes let the enemy keep captives permanently as servi hostium, slaves of the enemy. Under the emperor Hadrian, returning soldiers even faced an investigation into whether they had been captured against their will or had simply surrendered.

• 4. Property, Not Persons

  ›

  Cicero, writing in the 1st century BC, argued that liberty "does not consist in having a just master, but in having none." That single line captures how Roman law treated the enslaved: not as people lacking rights, but as property lacking personhood entirely. The everyday word for slave was servus, but in strict legal terms a slave was mancipium, something "taken in hand." Slaves working the land fell under a special property category called res mancipi, alongside certain farmland and farm animals, and transferring ownership of them required a formal legal ritual. Cicero drew a blunt line between a father's two kinds of dependents: children could be expected to obey willingly, he wrote, but a slave had to be "coerced and broken."

  Lacking legal personhood meant a slave could not sue, be sued, or sign a binding contract. Courts would not accept a slave's testimony unless it was extracted under torture, on the theory that a loyal slave would otherwise stay silent to protect a master, even though Romans knew testimony given under torture was unreliable. The sociologist Marcel Mauss later summed up the position bluntly: "a slave has no persona. He does not own his body; he has no ancestors, no name, no cognomen, no goods of his own."

  Over time, though, the law began to soften. The emperor Claudius decreed that a slave abandoned by his master automatically became free. Nero gave slaves standing to lodge complaints against their owners in court. Under Antoninus Pius, a master who killed a slave without just cause could be tried for homicide. And yet slaves still could not file lawsuits on their own, still had to be tortured before testifying, and could still be burned alive for testifying against a master. Centuries later, as the empire turned Christian, the emperor Constantine II, who reigned from AD 337 to 340, barred Jews from owning Christian slaves or converting them, a sign of how deeply religious identity had become entangled with the old rules of ownership.

• 5. Raising Rome's Slaves

  ›

  A slave in Roman law had no ancestors, no legal father, no kin at all, which meant he could never enter a marriage the state would recognize. Even so, slaves within a household sometimes formed lasting partnerships called contubernium, unions that owners might arrange or simply approve. Large households recorded these unions alongside births, deaths, and manumissions, treating them as a real part of family life even without legal standing. Roman jurists, weighing cases where a master's heirs threatened to break up such families, generally favored keeping them together, and the legal compendium known as the Digest preserves several rulings to that effect. Separately, a law credited to Augustus allowed a freedwoman to marry a freeborn man below senatorial rank and legitimized any children from the match, though if her manumission had come with a marriage condition attached, she needed her patron's consent to later divorce him.

  Children born to an enslaved mother within the household were called vernae, and Roman writers describe them as receiving better treatment than slaves bought on the open market. A dedication from AD 198 lists twenty-four imperial freedmen who worked as teachers, six of them identified as vernae, suggesting real opportunities for education and advancement. But the term also had a darker use. Graffiti from Pompeii advertised vernae born to enslaved brothel workers, sometimes listing a price alongside the services they provided, and of the vernae identifiable in Pompeii's inscriptions, 71% are tied to prostitution. Children brought into a household without formal adoption, called alumni, occupied similar ground; roughly a quarter of those documented can be confirmed as enslaved, and some appear in wills, including one freedman alumnus left a trust to be managed until he turned twenty-five.

  Work could start early. Children as young as five began simple tasks, and by around age ten a child slave was considered valuable enough to be traded on that basis. One case recorded in the Digest describes a metalsmith who bought a child slave, trained him, and later sold him for double the purchase price. Formal apprenticeships, running from six months to six years depending on the trade, covered work from textile production to accounting to acrobatics, and a capsarius, a child attendant, accompanied a master's own children to school carrying their belongings. Some of these trained children ended up performing, among the gymnici, acrobats and gymnasts who entertained alongside free performers in traveling troupes.

• 6. Sold Into Slavery

  ›

  Not every Roman slave was born into bondage or captured in war; some entered slavery through outright desperation. Roman law held the freeborn citizen's liberty to be, in principle, inviolable, which made self-sale technically illegal. In practice, courts mostly noticed only when someone challenged the terms afterward, usually by arguing fraud, such as proving the seller had known the person sold was actually freeborn. A father's power over his household went further still. Under the Twelve Tables, a father could legally sell his children, though a daughter only once and a son as many as three times, a repeated-sale rule tied to an old debt practice called nexum. In the mid-80s BC, parents in the province of Asia said heavy taxes imposed by the Roman official Sulla forced them to sell their own children just to pay what they owed.

  Nexum itself, a contract binding a free debtor as a bond slave to secure a loan, was abolished by the Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC. Roman historians remembered the abolition through a recurring story: a handsome young bondsman subjected to sexual harassment by the man holding his debt, an outrage that pushed lawmakers to draw a firmer line around a citizen's basic liberty. Even after the law changed, a debtor who defaulted could still end up bound to a creditor in a similar arrangement, though enslaving a free person outright for debt remained illegal.

  Infant exposure offered another, grimmer route into slavery. The Romans practiced this widely enough that it shaped their own founding myth, the twins Romulus and Remus left to survive or die at a she-wolf's den. Families who could not support a newborn might abandon it outdoors, and a healthy infant who survived could be picked up and reared as a slave by whoever found it. The satirist Juvenal wrote of exactly this fate, describing supposititious children scooped from the gutter and delivered, at the mercy of the goddess Fortuna, into noble houses to be raised as if born there. The emperor Constantine later formalized the outright sale of newborns in their very first hours of life, while they were still, in the era's own term, sanguinolentus, bloody from birth.

• 7. Buying Back Freedom

  ›

  Because slaves were themselves property, Roman law technically barred them from owning anything, yet many were allowed to manage a fund called a peculium as though it were their own. The 7th-century writer Isidore of Seville described a peculium as something "a father or master allows his child or slave to manage as his own." A slave's peculium might grow from savings, business profits, or gifts from third parties for services rendered, and inscriptions occasionally show slaves proudly noting they had paid for something "with their own money." A slave who built up enough of a peculium had a real shot at eventually purchasing his own freedom, though he risked a master simply reneging and reclaiming the funds.

  The formal act of release, manumissio, meant literally a "releasing from the hand." Roman law recognized three binding forms: manumissio vindicta, a staged trial performed before a magistrate; release through entry in the census rolls; and manumissio testamento, freedom granted in an owner's will, sometimes tied to a further payment. Slaves belonging to the emperor's own household, the familia Caesaris, were routinely freed between the ages of thirty and thirty-five, though this was not typical for slaves generally. In 2 BC, the lex Fufia Caninia capped how many slaves an owner's will could free relative to the size of the estate, and six years later a further law barred freeing slaves younger than thirty, with some exceptions.

  A freed slave, or libertus, gained not just freedom from ownership but the right to vote, and his former master became his patron. Some freedmen rose remarkably far. Narcissus, once a slave of the emperor Claudius, became a powerful figure within the imperial household, part of a pattern so pronounced under the Julio-Claudian emperors that Hadrian later moved to limit freedmen's influence by law. The House of the Vettii, among the grandest homes in Pompeii, is thought to have belonged to freedmen brothers who built their fortune after gaining liberty. Not every path led upward, though. Slaves whose masters had branded, tortured, or condemned them to fight as gladiators were classified as dediticii if later freed, a status the jurist Gaius called "the worst kind of freedom," barred from Roman citizenship and subject to reenslavement if they came within a hundred miles of Rome.

• 8. The Business Of Human Trade

  ›

  The Roman jurist Papinian described the slave trade plainly as "the regular, daily traffic in slaves," a business that reached every province of the empire and crossed its borders freely, with only light regulation from the state. Outside the city of Rome itself, the largest slave market was at Ephesus, alongside major centers in Italy, the north Aegean, Asia Minor, and Syria. War remained the single biggest source of new slaves through the Middle and Late Republic, and the scale could be staggering. During the Gallic Wars, Julius Caesar sold the entire population of the Aduatuci, 53,000 people, to slave dealers on the spot after their surrender. Centuries later, the historian Josephus reported that the Great Jewish Revolt, fought from AD 66 to 70, alone resulted in the enslavement of 97,000 people, part of a wave that followed the broader Jewish-Roman wars of AD 66 to 135. After the Bar Kokhba revolt was crushed in AD 137, more than 100,000 people reportedly flooded the slave market at once, so many that a Jewish slave could be bought at Hebron or Gaza for roughly the price of a horse.

  Piracy supplied a steadier, if less dramatic, stream of captives. Kidnappers generally wanted ransom money rather than a sale, since relatives who wanted a captive back would pay more than any buyer at auction. The city of Side in Pamphylia, in what is now Turkey, became a notorious center of this trade during the 2nd century BC. Pompey was credited with clearing pirates from the Mediterranean in 67 BC, though piracy against Illyrian raiders continued to draw military action as late as 31 BC. It never fully disappeared. Around AD 400, the missionary Patricius, later canonized as Saint Patrick, was kidnapped from Roman Britain and taken as a slave to Ireland, a single captivity that would eventually reshape the religious history of an entire island.