Second World
The Second World was one of three categories that Cold War strategists used to divide all of humanity. At its core sat the Soviet Union, founded in 1922, and around it orbited states from Mongolia to Cuba, from East Germany to Angola. The question the documentary will answer is not just what the Second World was, but how it grew, fractured, shrank, and finally dissolved into something else entirely. Why did Yugoslavia leave the bloc within just a few years of joining? How did a Cold War political term survive the Cold War itself, wearing a completely different meaning? And who, today, might find themselves labeled Second World without ever having had anything to do with the Soviet Union?
Centrally planned economic systems, single-party states, and medium income levels: these were the markers that identified a country as belonging to the Second World during the Cold War. The Three Worlds Model was built to rank nations not just by wealth but by political gravity. First World countries were capitalist and industrial, retaining influence over parts of the former colonial world. The Second World mirrored them in certain structural ways, but organized production and power along socialist lines. Neither of these two blocs was neutral. Both the First World and the Second World were actively competing for political and economic influence over a third group of countries that had refused to join either side.
Mongolia's Soviet-backed People's Republic was established in 1924, making it one of the earliest states to enter the Soviet orbit. Yugoslavia followed, aligning with Moscow after World War II, though that relationship collapsed almost immediately: expelled from the Cominform in 1948 following the Tito-Stalin split, Yugoslavia became a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement instead. Bulgaria and Albania both established communist governments in 1946 under Soviet influence, while Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and East Germany joined the bloc between 1947 and 1949. Czechoslovakia's path was particularly abrupt, its communist government arriving through a coup in 1948. East Germany was established as a Soviet-backed state in 1949, its fate then tied to the Berlin Wall that fell four decades later.
Albania's break with Moscow in 1961 was a signal that Soviet loyalty was not permanent. Having established its communist government in 1946 with Soviet backing, Albania pivoted toward China during the Albanian-Soviet split. China itself followed a similar arc: the Chinese Communist Revolution had established the People's Republic in 1949 with Soviet support, but the Sino-Soviet split from the late 1950s ended that alignment by 1961. Romania chose a subtler form of independence, remaining formally in the Warsaw Pact while pursuing an increasingly independent foreign policy from the mid-1960s under Nicolae Ceausescu. North Korea managed an even more careful balance throughout the Cold War, navigating between the USSR and China without fully committing to either. Somalia's story was more dramatic: it signed a Treaty of Friendship with the Soviet Union in 1974, then expelled Soviet advisors and tore up that treaty in 1977 after Moscow backed Ethiopia in the Ogaden War.
Egypt received extensive Soviet military and economic aid from the mid-1950s, including during the construction of the Aswan Dam, but was never a Marxist-Leninist state. President Anwar Sadat ended that arrangement by expelling Soviet advisors in 1972 and realigning with the United States. In West Africa, Ahmed Sekou Toure led Guinea toward Moscow after France withdrew all support upon independence in 1958; Guinea provided the USSR with strategic airport and naval access through the mid-1970s. Cuba aligned with the Soviet Union following the Cuban Revolution in 1961 and remained aligned until the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. Afghanistan's communist government was established in the 1978 Saur Revolution; the Soviet Union invaded in 1979 and did not withdraw until 1989. Grenada's revolutionary government, established in a 1979 coup, lasted only until October 1983, when an internal power struggle preceded a United States invasion. Thomas Sankara led Burkina Faso with socialist and pan-Africanist policies from 1983 until his assassination in a 1987 coup.
By 1989, the Revolutions of that year swept away communist governments in Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, East Germany, and Czechoslovakia, the last of these in the Velvet Revolution. Romania's regime fell in the Romanian Revolution of 1989. East Germany's collapse led directly to German reunification in 1990. The Soviet Union itself dissolved in 1991, ending Soviet alignment everywhere from Vietnam to Afghanistan to Nicaragua, which had transferred power to its electoral opposition in 1990 after the Sandinista government lost the general election that year. With the Soviet Union gone, defining the Second World around Soviet influence or socialism became obsolete. The term did not disappear, however. It shifted meaning, becoming a synonym for middle-income countries, also known as newly industrialized countries. This economic redefinition would now include states such as the Russian Federation, India, Iran, Ukraine, Mexico, Brazil, and South Africa, many of which had never been part of the Soviet bloc at all.
Sociologists have criticized the three-world theory as crude and relatively outdated in its nominal ordering. Some have substituted the terms "developed", "developing", and "underdeveloped" for global stratification, though those replacements have attracted their own criticism for displaying a colonialist mindset. Despite both rounds of criticism, the three-world theory remains popular in contemporary literature and media. One consequence of that persistence is a semantic instability: the same term can describe either a region's political entities or its people, and the political meaning and the economic meaning no longer point at the same set of countries. The state of Cambodia, reconstituted in 1989 from what had been Vietnamese-backed Kampuchea, eventually came under UN administration and held free elections in 1993, a detail that captures how varied the post-Second World trajectories turned out to be.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What was the Second World during the Cold War?
The Second World referred to countries aligned with the Soviet Union and its allies in the Warsaw Pact and Eastern Bloc during the Cold War. These states generally shared centrally planned economic systems, single-party governments, and medium income levels. The term stood in direct opposition to the First World, which grouped countries aligned with the United States and NATO.
Which countries were part of the Second World?
Countries that were part of the Second World included the Soviet Union, Mongolia, Yugoslavia (briefly), Bulgaria, Albania, Poland, Romania, North Korea, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, China (until 1961), Cuba, Vietnam, and others across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The list shifted over time as alignments changed and splits occurred with Moscow.
Why did Yugoslavia leave the Second World?
Yugoslavia was expelled from the Cominform in 1948 following the Tito-Stalin split, ending its alignment with the Soviet Union only a few years after World War II. Yugoslavia subsequently became a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement rather than remaining in the Soviet bloc.
When did the Second World cease to exist?
The Second World as a political concept became obsolete in 1991, when the Soviet Union dissolved and many communist regimes had already collapsed during the Revolutions of 1989. The fall of communist governments in Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Romania, combined with the Soviet Union's dissolution, ended the basis for defining a Soviet-aligned Second World.
What does Second World mean today?
After the Cold War, the term Second World shifted from a political alignment category to an economic one, becoming a synonym for middle-income or newly industrialized countries. Under this redefinition, countries such as Russia, India, Iran, Ukraine, Mexico, Brazil, and South Africa may be labeled Second World regardless of their historical relationship to the Soviet Union.
How has the three-world theory been criticized?
Sociologists have criticized the three-world theory as crude and relatively outdated. Alternative terms such as "developed", "developing", and "underdeveloped" have been proposed, but those replacements have also been criticized for reflecting a colonialist mindset. Despite ongoing criticism, the three-world theory remains widely used in contemporary literature and media.
All sources
7 references cited across the entry
- 2journalWhat happened to the Second World? Earthquakes and postsocialism in KazakhstanGreg Bankoff et al. — 24 June 2019
- 3webWhy are countries classified as First, Second or Third World?Evan Andrews — A&E Television Networks — 2018-08-22
- 4bookSociology: Understanding a Diverse SocietyMargaret L. Andersen et al. — Thomson/Wadsworth — 2006
- 5bookThe Second World: How Emerging Powers Are Redefining Global Competition in the Twenty-first CenturyParag Khanna — Random House — 2008
- 6webIf You Shouldn't Call It The Third World, What Should You Call It?Marc Silver — 4 January 2015
- 7bookSociologyAnthony Giddens — Polity — 2006