Free to follow every thread. No paywall, no dead ends.
Sales tax: the story on HearLore | HearLore
Sales tax
The first known record of a sales tax dates back to 2000 BC, etched onto the walls of Egyptian tombs where officials collected duties on specific commodities like cooking oil. This ancient practice reveals that the concept of taxing a transaction is as old as civilization itself, yet the modern mechanism of collecting this revenue has evolved into a complex web of laws that governs nearly every purchase a consumer makes. In ancient Greece, the city of Athens recorded sales tax amounts in drachmas at a rate of one percent on the auction of sixteen slaves in 415 BC, while nearby Athens collected duties on imports and exports at a rate of two percent by 399 BC. These early systems relied on tax farming, where the responsibility for collection was delegated to the highest bidder rather than a government agency, a practice that highlights the enduring challenge of enforcing tax compliance across different eras. The Roman Empire later formalized these concepts when Emperor Augustus introduced a one percent general sales tax known as the centesima rerum venalium in AD 6 to fund his military aerarium. This tax was subsequently reduced to half a percent by Tiberius and eventually abolished completely by Caligula, demonstrating that even in antiquity, the political viability of such taxes was subject to the whims of leadership and public sentiment.
The American Experiment
The United States government has never implemented a general sales tax, a fact that distinguishes it from most other developed nations and creates a unique fiscal landscape where the burden of taxation falls heavily on state and local governments. The first broad-based general sales taxes in the country were enacted by Kentucky and Mississippi in 1930, though Kentucky repealed its law just six years later in 1936. The federal government did attempt to raise funds through specific excise taxes, such as the whiskey tax enacted in 1791 which sparked the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794, but these were selective rather than general. By the 1930s, twenty-two other states began imposing general sales taxes, followed by six in the 1940s and five in the 1950s, with Vermont becoming the last state to enact a sales tax law in 1969. Today, five states remain without a general sales tax: Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon, creating a patchwork of economic incentives that influences where businesses choose to locate and where consumers choose to shop. The federal government does levy specific taxes on items like gasoline, which began at one cent per gallon in 1932, and cigarettes, which have been taxed at $1.01 per package since 2009, but these remain excise taxes rather than a broad-based sales tax.
The Cascading Effect
Common questions
When was the first known record of a sales tax created?
The first known record of a sales tax dates back to 2000 BC, etched onto the walls of Egyptian tombs where officials collected duties on specific commodities like cooking oil.
Which states in the United States do not have a general sales tax?
Five states remain without a general sales tax: Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon, creating a patchwork of economic incentives that influences where businesses choose to locate and where consumers choose to shop.
What year did Vermont become the last state to enact a sales tax law?
Vermont became the last state to enact a sales tax law in 1969, following the enactment of general sales taxes by twenty-two other states in the 1930s and six more in the 1940s.
When did the United States federal government begin levying taxes on gasoline?
The federal government began levying specific taxes on gasoline at one cent per gallon in 1932, which remains an excise tax rather than a broad-based sales tax.
Which countries have the highest value-added taxes in the world?
Norway, Denmark, and Sweden have higher value-added taxes at 25 percent, while Hungary has the highest at 27 percent, though reduced rates are used in some cases for groceries, art, books, and newspapers.
When was the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement produced?
Cooperative efforts by 44 state governments and the District of Columbia produced the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement in 2010, establishing standards necessary for simplified and uniform sales tax laws.
A conventional retail sales tax is levied on the sale of a good to its final end-user and is charged every time that item is sold retail, but this system creates a distinct advantage for businesses that can avoid the tax by obtaining a resale certificate. When a purchaser is not an end-user, they are usually issued a resale certificate by the taxing authority and required to provide this certificate, or its ID number, to a seller at the point of purchase along with a statement that the item is for resale. This mechanism ensures that the tax is not charged on sales to businesses that later resell the goods, preventing the tax from being applied multiple times to the same item as it moves through the supply chain. However, gross receipts taxes, which are levied on all sales of a business, have been heavily criticized for their cascading or pyramiding effect, in which an item is taxed more than once as it makes its way from production to final retail sale. This pyramiding effect occurs because the tax is applied at every stage of production and distribution, effectively increasing the final price of the good beyond the initial tax rate. In contrast, a value-added tax avoids this issue by applying the tax only to the difference, or value added, between the price paid by the first purchaser and the price paid by each subsequent purchaser of the same item.
The Digital Frontier
The rise of electronic commerce has created a new frontier for sales tax enforcement, where the practicality of collecting tax on cross-state border transactions is often impossible for vendors without a physical presence in the state. In the United States, every state with a sales tax law has a use tax component applying to purchases from out-of-state mail order, catalog, and e-commerce vendors, a category known as remote sales. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that uncollected use taxes on remote sales in 2003 could be as high as $20.4 billion, and this figure was projected to run as high as $54.8 billion for 2011. The Supreme Court defined the limitation on enforcing this tax in the 1967 decision on National Bellas Hess v. Illinois and again in the 1992 decision on Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, ruling that unless a vendor has a physical location, or nexus, within a state, the vendor cannot be required to collect tax for that state. This legal framework has given online retail stores a distinct advantage, as they do not have to charge a sales tax, leading many economists to examine consumer sensitivity when it comes to sales taxes. While some researchers have concluded a high elasticity of online purchase probability with respect to sales tax at around 2.3, others have found smaller figures of around 0.5, suggesting that enforcing an online sales tax would have negligible effects on aggregate sales.
The Regressive Reality
Sales taxes are generally considered regressive because the rate of a tax does not change based on a person's income or wealth, meaning that it takes a larger percentage from low-income people than from high-income people. This regressive nature hits lower-income individuals harder, as they spend a larger portion of their income on taxable goods compared to wealthier individuals who can save or invest more of their earnings. However, it has been suggested that any regressive effect of a sales tax could be mitigated by excluding rent, or by exempting necessary items such as food, clothing, and medicines. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development studied the effects of various types of taxes on the economic growth of developed nations and found that sales taxes are one of the least harmful taxes for growth. Despite this, the political debate continues over how to balance the need for revenue with the fairness of the tax burden, with some jurisdictions using higher sales taxes to relieve property taxes but only when property taxes are lowered subsequently. Studies conducted in Georgia by cities raising sales tax and lowering property taxes have shown this correlation, but the effectiveness of such measures depends on the ability of a city to import consumers to buy goods locally.
The Global Standard
Most countries in the world have sales taxes or value-added taxes at all or several of the national, state, county, or city government levels, with countries in Western Europe, especially in Scandinavia, having some of the world's highest value-added taxes. Norway, Denmark, and Sweden have higher value-added taxes at 25 percent, while Hungary has the highest at 27 percent, though reduced rates are used in some cases for groceries, art, books, and newspapers. The global trend has been for conventional sales taxes to be replaced by more broadly based value-added taxes, which provide an estimated 20 percent of worldwide tax revenue and have been adopted by more than 140 countries. Canada uses a value-added federal Goods and Services Tax with a rate of 5 percent, effective since the 1st of January 2008, while other provinces have either a Provincial Sales Tax or the Harmonized Sales Tax, which is a single, blended combination of the federal and provincial taxes. This shift toward value-added taxes reflects a global move toward more efficient and less distortionary tax systems, as value-added taxes avoid the cascading effect of conventional sales taxes and provide a more stable source of revenue for governments.
The Enforcement Dilemma
Enforcement of the tax on remote sales remains a significant challenge for state governments, as the practicality of collecting tax on purchases from out-of-state vendors is often impossible without a physical presence in the state. The Streamlined Sales Tax Project was organized in March 2000 to reduce the burden of compliance with the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions, and cooperative efforts by 44 state governments and the District of Columbia eventually produced the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement in 2010. This agreement establishes standards necessary for simplified and uniform sales tax laws, and as of December 2010, 24 states had passed legislation conforming with the agreement. However, whether the Streamlined Sales Tax can actually be applied to remote sales ultimately depends upon Congressional support, because the 1992 Quill v. North Dakota decision determined that only the U.S. Congress has the authority to enact interstate taxes. The Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998 established a commission to study the possibility of internet taxation, but the commission did not make any formal recommendations, leaving the issue of online tax collection to be resolved through future legislative action and court decisions.
The Consumer's Burden
The effect that a sales tax has on consumer and producer behavior is rather large, with the price elasticity of demand for online products being high, meaning that consumers are price sensitive and their demand will significantly change with small changes in price. This means that the tax burden lies primarily with the producer, who must either avoid the tax if possible by relocating their fulfillment centers to areas without a high sales tax or internalize the cost of the sales tax by charging consumers the same price but paying for the tax from their profits. Businesses can reduce the impact of sales tax for themselves and their customers by planning for the tax consequences of all activities, including designing invoices to reduce the taxable portion of a sale transaction and choosing delivery locations that can reduce or eliminate the sales tax liability. Periodic review of record-keeping procedures related to sales and use tax is essential, as proper supporting detail, including exemption and resale certificates, invoices, and other records must be available to defend the company in the event of a sales and use tax audit. Without proper documentation, a seller may be held liable for tax not collected from a buyer, highlighting the importance of compliance in an increasingly complex tax environment.