Romance

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Romance names something that resists being named. The philosopher Arthur Lovejoy once wrote that "the word 'romantic' has come to mean so many things that, by itself, it means nothing." Yet the concept has shaped Western marriage, spawned literary traditions lasting centuries, and been linked to brain chemistry, evolutionary biology, and even suicide epidemics. What exactly is romantic love? Where did the idea come from? And why does pursuing it so often lead to suffering rather than the happiness it promises? The answers reach from ancient Greek dinner parties to medieval French poetry to fMRI brain scans, and none of them are as simple as the stories we tell ourselves about love.

• 2. A Word From Rome

  ›

  The word "romance" began as a geographic label, not a feeling. It derives from the Latin Romanus, meaning Rome or Roman. After the fall of the Roman Empire, a Latin adverb, Romanice, drifted into everyday speech to mean simply "in the vernacular" - identifying the languages that had descended from Latin when Latin itself was reserved for formal life. In Old French, one of those Latin derivatives, this became romans or romanz, referring both to the language and to the works composed in it. By the Middle Ages, romans had narrowed to mean specifically a type of narrative verse about chivalry and love, what scholars now call chivalric romance.

  The French poets known as troubadours shaped these early stories. They explored themes of unrequited love and elevated the worship of a remote, unattainable lady - a "cold, cruel mistress". Poets like Chretien de Troyes composed works at the invitation of royalty, particularly in Poitiers, where Andreas Capellanus also arrived to write The Art of Courtly Love. Courtly love elevated women, dramatized passionate suffering and separation, and imagined a transformation of lovers to another plane of existence. The stories it generated - Tristan and Iseult, Lancelot and Guinevere, Dante and Beatrice in La Vita Nuova, Romeo and Juliet - were predominantly tragic or unfulfilled. The cultural critic Denis de Rougemont drew the pattern plainly: "Happy love has no history - in European literature. And a love that is not mutual cannot pass for a true love."

  Not every early tale chose tragedy. Aucassin and Nicolette offered a happy ending, expressing what later scholars called an early humanistic perspective - that human love could be idealized on its own terms, against religious rules or social interference. The word romance eventually traveled from French into English. And in doing so, it carried with it the whole freight of courtly suffering, poetic devotion, and the idea that real love must overcome obstacles to count.

• 3. The Biology of Longing

  ›

  Bode and Kushnick undertook a comprehensive biological review of romantic love in 2021, proposing a formal definition: romantic love is a motivational state typically associated with a desire for long-term mating with a particular individual, occurring across the lifespan and associated with distinctive cognitive, emotional, behavioral, social, genetic, neural, and endocrine activity in both sexes. That definition captures something brain scans have confirmed. People in love show activation in dopamine-rich reward areas, the same circuits involved in motivation and wanting.

  The anthropologist Helen Fisher developed one prominent evolutionary theory: romantic love is a brain system that evolved for mate choice, focusing energy on a preferred partner. In most species, courtship attraction is brief - lasting minutes, hours, days, or weeks - but Fisher believed it became prolonged and intensified in humans over evolutionary time. A separate theory proposes that romantic love co-opted the brain systems originally built for mother-infant bonding, through a process called exaptation. Both types of love - romantic and parental - share similar features: preoccupation, exclusivity of focus, longing for reciprocity, and idealization. Brain scans show overlapping areas of activation.

  One fMRI experiment studied people in happy, long-term relationships who still described themselves as "madly" in love with their partners. These participants showed activation in dopamine-rich reward areas, interpreted as desire, and also in an area rich with opiate receptors, associated with liking. Unlike people newly in love, these long-term participants showed no activity in areas linked to anxiety or fear, and reported far fewer intrusive thoughts and mood swings. Oxytocin has also been found circulating in people experiencing romantic love. It is projected from the hypothalamus to reward areas, believed to modulate attention toward a loved one. Endogenous opioids appear connected to the hedonic, or "liking," aspect of rewarding experiences. Romantic love inside a relationship typically lasts for about a year or eighteen months before the intensity shifts.

• 4. Love Madness and Limerence

  ›

  Dorothy Tennov was a psychology professor who coined the term "limerence" to name a specific, intense form of infatuated love - the kind of all-absorbing preoccupation depicted in romantic literature. Limerence is usually unrequited in reality, and when it is, it turns into a lovesickness that can be debilitating and difficult to end. Tennov identified its key features: an idealization of the loved one, called the "limerent object" or LO; intrusive thoughts and constant fantasizing; and uncertain reciprocation intensifying the feeling and causing emotional volatility.

  Tennov found that limerence is normal, despite resembling a madness. She also encountered people who had never experienced it - whom she called "nonlimerent" - and who were unaware that the phenomenon the stories depicted was real. Tennov estimated limerence may be experienced by 50% of women and 35% of men. A 2025 survey found that 64% of people reported having experienced it, and 32% found it so distressing that it was hard to enjoy life. Critically, Tennov argued that obstacles are necessary for mutual limerence to intensify, citing Romeo and Juliet as the archetypal example.

  The sociologist John Alan Lee connected limerence to his concept of mania - an obsessive love style in which a person falls for someone inappropriate, often a stranger, and experiences relationship difficulties. Lee associated mania with the ideology of courtly love, arguing that Western culture came to regard mania as a legitimate basis for mate selection through the courtly and romantic traditions. This replaced an older medieval Christian doctrine that marriage should center on family values and child care. Tennov complained as recently as 2005 that scientific literature still failed to properly distinguish limerence from other states. A 2013 study found that unrequited love was four times more frequent than equal love, though little research has tried to study it directly.

• 5. Why Obstacles Intensify Passion

  ›

  Many theorists have observed, and researchers have confirmed, that adversity tends to heighten romantic passion. Rejection, parental interference, physical separation, temporary breakups, and uncertain situations all spark interest and emotional volatility. Ambivalence, in this framing, is potent fuel. The phenomenon has been called the "Romeo and Juliet effect" or "frustration attraction." Helen Fisher believed that obstacles heighten romantic ardor because dopamine neurons fire in anticipation of an expected reward that is delayed.

  Passionate love thrives particularly under intermittent reinforcement - situations with irregular meetings between lovers, or ambiguous signals about whether affection is returned. The analogy scholars have drawn is to a slot machine, where unpredictable rewards make it impossible to habituate to the experience. The exhilarating high from unexpected wins can lead to compulsive behavior. If the machine paid out on a regular, predictable interval, it would lose its pull.

  This logic has a long lineage in literary culture. Socrates advised that one must not offer love when a person has had enough, but hold back until they are as keen as possible. Ovid recommended that a man should guard his girl so that he would want her more. Andreas Capellanus wrote: "The easy attainment of love makes it of little value; difficulty of attainment makes it prized." Bertrand Russell observed that the belief in the immense value of the lady is a psychological effect of the difficulty of obtaining her. Sigmund Freud argued that romantic love was generated by suppressed sexual desire, and that without obstacles, "love became worthless and life empty." Ellen Berscheid and Elaine Hatfield noted the paradox plainly: some people seem to fall passionately in love with people who are almost guaranteed to bring them suffering.

• 6. Marriage and Its Discontents

  ›

  Marriage as a cultural practice may be only about 4,350 years old, and historically it did not exist to bind couples for love. In ancient Greece and Rome, passion was viewed as a kind of madness, and marriage served economic and political ends. Women in ancient Greece were subservient, segregated, and largely kept indoors. By the 6th century, the Catholic Church regulated marriage in all respects, declaring passionate love and sex to be mortal sin for any purpose other than procreation. Courtly love emerged in the 11th and 12th centuries to idealize a precursor to romantic love, but only when unconsummated or adulterous - not as a basis for marriage itself. At that point, marriage and love were still considered incompatible, and courtly ideals applied only to nobility.

  It was not until the 18th century that people began to marry for romance. Romanticism brought new perspectives on individuality and egalitarianism, and through the 19th century it became a cultural question whether passion and companionship could ground a marriage. During the Victorian era, romantic attitudes waned and became subdued. Puritanism also dominated post-revolutionary America, with an anti-romantic tradition. Romantic love only flourished as a basis for marriage at the end of the 19th century and into the 20th, when men and women socialized more equally and dating replaced structured courtship practices.

  The 20th century brought what sociologist Anthony Giddens called the "pure relationship": a relationship entered for its own sake based on emotional communication, continued only as long as both parties found it rewarding. A "discourse of intimacy" emerged in the 1960s and 70s, promoted through self-help books. The rise of romantic marriage coincided with a rise in divorce, driven by heightened expectations and increasing legal freedom. The clinical psychologist Frank Tallis has cited studies showing higher satisfaction among arranged marriages than marriages for love. About half of arranged couples claim to stay together for love, though probably not for romantic love. Bertrand Russell called romantic love "the source of the most intense delights that life has to offer," but also warned that in America, where the romantic view of marriage had been taken most seriously, the result had been "an extreme prevalence of divorce and extreme rarity of happy marriages."

• 7. The Romantic Movement

  ›

  Jean-Jacques Rousseau, writing in Geneva, is considered the earliest figure in the Romantic movement, important mainly for his "appeal to the heart" - then called "sensibility," meaning proneness to emotion. Rousseau was an enthusiastic proponent of romantic love and harmonious marriage. His political ideas influenced the French Revolution, and his philosophy shaped the writings on love by figures including Marquis de Sade, Stendhal, and Immanuel Kant.

  The movement gathered force in Germany with the novel The Sorrows of Young Werther, published in 1774 by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The book reprised themes of courtly love in a tragic story: Werther falls in love with Charlotte, who is engaged and later married to another man, Albert. Werther grows increasingly disturbed and eventually shoots himself with a pair of Albert's pistols. He imagines Charlotte will join him after death in a transcendent union. The book drew its power in part from Goethe's own unrequited love, though Goethe himself did not die by suicide; an acquaintance of his did. The novel inspired copycat suicides - rumored to be epidemic, though probably exaggerated. One woman drowned herself in a river behind Goethe's garden. Another killed herself with a copy of the book in her pocket.

  Romantic idealism reached its peak in the poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley. In an exemplary passage, Shelley described love as "that powerful attraction towards all that we conceive, or fear, or hope beyond ourselves, when we find within our own thoughts the chasm of an insufficient void." Yet Shelley grew pessimistic toward the end of his life, with a despair that bordered on what critics called a "love of death." Arthur Schopenhauer offered a bleaker philosophical account: passionate love is nature's reproductive device, merely deluding lovers into thinking each other unique and worthy of obsessive attention. Once coitus satisfies the need for propagation, Schopenhauer argued, the lovers' passion immediately dissipates. Frank Tallis has called Romanticism "the closest thing we have to a religious faith in a predominantly secular society."

• 8. Plato and the Origin of Desire

  ›

  The philosopher Plato, born around 428 BC, wrote the first major treatment on love in the Symposium, a dialogue in which guests at a dinner party discuss the nature of Eros. The themes he introduced went on to become pervasive in nearly all subsequent writing on love. Plato is considered the most influential of all philosophers, with Aristotle a close second, for his effect on the writings of subsequent ages.

  In a speech delivered by the comic playwright Aristophanes within the Symposium, Plato presents an early idea of merging - the notion that love is a reunion with one's "other half." In the Greek legend Aristophanes recounts, humans were originally double-headed creatures with four arms and four legs; Zeus cut them in two as punishment for pride, leaving each half yearning for the other. The speech is ironic, however. Aristophanes is not Plato's spokesperson.

  Socrates, speaking for Plato, advocates a different account: true love is the knowing of absolute beauty as a metaphysical entity, in which goodness is possessed, rather than any specific instance of beauty. Socrates explains that the goal of love is "to procreate and bring forth in beauty," related to the love of immortality. People try to achieve immortality through physical means, spiritual means, or a combination where the physical beauty of another begets spiritual beauty. Socrates defers to a woman, Diotima, as his "instructor in the art of love." Within the dialogue, the young man Alcibiades describes the pull of Socrates himself: "I had no choice but to do whatever Socrates bade me.... I was utterly disconcerted, and wandered about in a state of enslavement." This particular passage in the Symposium foreshadows courtly love directly: the troubadours, like the lovers Plato described, brought forth spiritual beauty in poetry, music, and noble deeds in service of a beloved who remained beyond reach.