Skip to content
— CH. 1 · SOCIAL CLASSES AND COMMERCE —

Roman commerce

~5 min read · Ch. 1 of 5
5 sections
  • A Roman senator in 218 BC faced a law that forbade him from owning a ship larger than three hundred amphorae. This legal restriction, known as the Lex Claudia, created a complex web of economic behavior for the elite. Senators and their sons were officially barred from direct trade to preserve their status, yet they found ways around it. Cicero mentioned this law while attacking Verres, proving that wealthy men still participated in commerce through loopholes. They used freedmen like Quintio to run businesses on their behalf. Plutarch described how Cato the Elder employed fifty other men to manage his commercial interests. These proxies allowed senators to diversify income without violating the letter of the law. The equestrian order, however, engaged directly in business despite their upper-class values emphasizing military pursuits. Plebeians and freedmen held shops or manned stalls at markets across the empire. Vast numbers of slaves performed the hard labor required for production and transport. Slaves themselves became subjects of commercial transactions, creating a distinct flavor for Roman commerce compared to Classical Greece. Runaways and minor uprisings added tension to an economy where human beings were treated as property.

  • The Forum Cuppedinis in ancient Rome offered general goods to citizens and travelers alike. At least four other large markets specialized in specific categories such as cattle, wine, fish, and herbs. The Roman Forum drew the bulk of traffic for these essential exchanges. New cities like Timgad followed an orthogonal grid plan designed to facilitate transportation and commerce efficiently. Navigable rivers were extensively used throughout the provinces, though canals left fewer archaeological traces than roads. Maintaining peace remained a major factor in expanding trade networks across the Mediterranean. All settlements could be located in economically rational positions thanks to this stability. Before and after the Roman Empire, hilltop defensive positions were preferred for small towns due to piracy risks. By the 1st century, provinces traded huge volumes of commodities via sea routes rather than land. Maritime fleets moved bulky, low-value commodities like grain and construction materials because sea transport cost sixty times less than overland alternatives. Staple goods including cereals for bread and papyrus scrolls arrived continuously from Ptolemaic Egypt to Italy. Harbors at Civitavecchia, Ostia, Portus, Leptis Magna, and Caesarea Maritima stood as substantial remains of this commercial infrastructure. Monte Testaccio served as a physical tribute to the scale of this maritime commerce within the city itself.

  • Sailors utilized monsoon winds to cross the Indian Ocean between Berenice and Muziris during the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. Ports on the Red Sea coast of Roman Egypt connected directly to destinations on the Malabar Coast of southern India. The Tamil dynasties of the Pandyas, Cholas, and Cheras became main trading partners for these voyages. Gold coins of Claudius excavated in South India provide tangible evidence of this long-distance exchange. Hoards of Roman currency have been found throughout southern India since the history of Roman-India trade began. Spices such as pepper, cardamom, cloves, cinnamon, sandalwood, and gems including pearls, rubies, diamonds, emeralds, and ivory flowed into Rome. In return, Romans traded silver and gold across vast distances. A Greek work called the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea offered meticulous descriptions of ports and items around the Indian Ocean. Archaeological sites like Arikamedu in Puducherry reveal Roman artifacts embedded in seaside port cities. Green Roman glass cups unearthed from Eastern Han Dynasty tombs in Guangxi demonstrate early 1st century BC contact with China. An embassy recorded in Chinese texts for the year 166 claimed to be sent by ruler An Dun to Emperor Huan of Han. These events suggest that merchants rather than official diplomats likely traveled these routes.

  • A standard amphora known as the amphora capitolina was kept in the temple of Jupiter on the Capitoline Hill for comparison purposes. The Roman system of measurement relied heavily on weight and incorporated influences from both Greece and Egypt. Distances were measured systematically and inscribed on stone by government agents. A fairly stable currency existed at least until circa 200 AD to facilitate trade throughout the empire. Egypt maintained its own currency during this period while some provincial cities issued their own coins as well. The intricate accounting of Roman trade utilized counting boards and the Roman abacus effectively. This tool used Roman numerals to count currency and tally measures accurately. Negotiatores acted partly as bankers who lent money on interest or bought staples in bulk quantities. Argentarii served as agents in public or private auctions, kept deposits, cashed cheques called prescriptiones, and functioned as moneychangers. They kept strict books called tabulae which courts treated as legal proof. Mensarii were public bankers appointed by the state who sometimes performed similar work to argentarii. Merchants and pedlars operated within a framework supported by these standardized financial instruments and weights.

  • Very exceptionally, evidence of long-distance trade exists at Berenice regarding black pepper, almonds, hazelnuts, stone pine cones, walnuts, coconuts, apricots, and peaches. Wine, olive oil, and garum trades left behind amphorae that survive better than other goods. A single reference mentions Syrian export of kipi stiff quince jam or marmalade to Rome. Most traded agricultural goods leave no direct remains due to their perishable nature. Hoards of Roman coins found in southern India suggest this region received most Chinese silk purchases. Only sixteen Roman coins from Tiberius to Aurelian have been found in China at Xi'an before 4th century Eastern Roman coins. The spice trade remained more important to the Roman economy than the silk one despite its fame. Green Roman glass cups discovered in Guangxi arrived via the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. Medallions from Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius reigns appear at Oc Eo in Vietnam. These artifacts confirm that Roman traders were present in Southeast Asia as mapped out by Ptolemy. His Geography labeled land bordering the Magnus Sinus as Sinae. The port city Cattigara likely corresponds to ancient settlements where these finds occurred.

Common questions

What law restricted Roman senators from owning ships larger than three hundred amphorae in 218 BC?

The Lex Claudia forbade Roman senators from owning a ship larger than three hundred amphorae. This legal restriction created a complex web of economic behavior for the elite while officially barring them from direct trade to preserve their status.

How did wealthy Romans participate in commerce despite being barred from direct trade by the Lex Claudia?

Senators and their sons used freedmen like Quintio or proxies such as Cato the Elder who employed fifty other men to manage commercial interests on their behalf. These arrangements allowed wealthy men to diversify income without violating the letter of the law.

Which ports served as substantial remains of Roman maritime commerce infrastructure during the empire?

Harbors at Civitavecchia, Ostia, Portus, Leptis Magna, and Caesarea Maritima stood as substantial remains of this commercial infrastructure. Monte Testaccio served as a physical tribute to the scale of this maritime commerce within the city itself.

What evidence exists for long-distance trade between Rome and India during the 1st and 2nd centuries AD?

Gold coins of Claudius excavated in South India provide tangible evidence of this long-distance exchange alongside hoards of Roman currency found throughout southern India since the history of Roman-India trade began. Ports on the Red Sea coast of Roman Egypt connected directly to destinations on the Malabar Coast of southern India using monsoon winds.

Who were the negotiatores and argentarii in the Roman financial system before circa 200 AD?

Negotiatores acted partly as bankers who lent money on interest or bought staples in bulk quantities while Argentarii served as agents in public or private auctions who kept deposits and cashed cheques called prescriptiones. These figures functioned as moneychangers and kept strict books called tabulae which courts treated as legal proof.

All sources

11 references cited across the entry

  1. 2bookThe Economy of Roman PalestineZe'ev Safrai — Routledge — 1994
  2. 3bookGalen on Food and DietMark Grant — Routledge — 2000
  3. 4bookFoodprints at Berenike: Archaeobotanical evidence of subsistence and trade in the Eastern desert of EgyptR. T. J. Cappers — Cotsen Institute of Archaeology UCLA — 2006
  4. 5bookSociological Studies in Roman HistoryKeith Hopkins — Cambridge University Press — 2017
  5. 8bookHistorical atlas of the classical world, 500 BC–AD 600John Haywood — Barnes & Noble Books — 2000
  6. 11webWeilue: The Peoples of the WestDepts.washington.edu — 2004-05-23