Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Proboscidea

10 min listen · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • Proboscidea is the taxonomic order that gave the world its elephants, and it stretches back roughly 60 million years to a small creature called Eritherium, known from Paleocene rocks in Africa. That humble ancestor would eventually give rise to the largest land mammals ever to walk the earth. Palaeoloxodon namadicus and the mastodont known as "Mammut" borsoni are each thought to have carried body masses surpassing 16 tonnes, rivalling the giant paraceratheres that had previously held that record. Three species of elephant are alive today: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant. But the living members represent only a narrow branch of a group that once included deinotheres, mastodons, gomphotheres, amebelodonts, and stegodonts. How did Proboscidea spread from Africa to every continent except Antarctica and Australia? What shaped the trunk, the tusks, and those famously horizontal teeth? And why, after tens of millions of years of success, did so many lineages vanish in a geological eyeblink during the Late Pleistocene?

  • Eritherium, the earliest known proboscidean, had a body mass that was modest by any measure, far removed from the multi-tonne giants its descendants would become. By the late Eocene, the group had already produced Barytherium, which weighed an estimated 2 tonnes, and the semi-aquatic Moeritherium, suggesting early diversity of lifestyle as well as form.

    The pivotal moment came during the Early Miocene, around 18-19 million years ago, when the Afro-Arabian tectonic plate collided with Eurasia. That collision opened a land corridor, and proboscideans poured through it. From Eurasia, some lineages pushed further east and west. Around 16-15 million years ago, the Bering Land Bridge connected Asia and North America, and proboscideans crossed into the New World for the first time.

    The Miocene saw an explosion of proboscidean diversity across these new territories. Deinotheres appeared alongside the elephantimorphs, a group that included the mammutids (mastodons), gomphotheres, amebelodontids, choerolophodontids, and stegodontids. Around 10 million years ago, the family Elephantidae itself emerged in Africa, tracing its roots back to the gomphotheres. Climatic upheaval in the Late Miocene then culled many of those earlier lineages, including the amebelodontids and choerolophodontids.

    The earliest members of the modern elephant genera appeared around 6-5 million years ago. Elephas, which includes today's Asian elephant, and Mammuthus, the mammoths, left Africa during the late Pliocene, roughly 3.6 to 3.2 million years ago. Mammoths later moved into North America around 1.5 million years ago, and gomphotheres dispersed into South America as part of the Great American interchange.

  • "Mammut" borsoni, a mammutid, carried an estimated average body mass of 16 tonnes for fully grown males, placing it among the largest land mammals ever documented. A fragmentary femur attributed to Palaeoloxodon namadicus has led some researchers to speculate that species may have reached 22 tonnes, though the estimate rests on a single partial specimen. The largest living proboscidean, the African bush elephant, reaches a recorded maximum of 4 metres at the shoulder and 10.4 tonnes.

    Size at that scale drove cascading anatomical changes. Limbs lengthened and feet grew shorter and broader. The feet shifted from a flat-footed plantigrade posture toward a digitigrade stance supported by cushion pads and a sesamoid bone, a transition traceable to the common ancestor of Deinotheriidae and Elephantiformes. The skull expanded, particularly the cranium, while the neck shortened to bear the increasing load.

    That growing skull pulled the nasal region further back, a feature visible in both Elephantiformes and Deinotheriidae, and it signals the gradual development of the trunk. The trunk itself was the body's answer to a basic problem: with a heavy skull and shortened neck, the animal could no longer reach the ground with its mouth. The mobile trunk solved that problem. Researchers suggest that large body size developed, as with the extinct sauropod dinosaurs, to allow survival on vegetation with low nutritional value.

    The cheek teeth became larger and more specialised over time. In Elephantiformes, the upper and lower second incisors were transformed into ever-growing tusks on both jaws, while Deinotheriidae carried tusks only on the lower jaw. The tusks are composed mainly of dentine. Early proboscideans had a band of enamel on part of the tusk surface, but many later groups, including living elephants, lost that band entirely, retaining enamel only on the tusk tips of juveniles.

  • The longest tusk ever recorded belonged to "Mammut" borsoni, a mammutid specimen found in Greece, measuring 5.02 metres. Some mammoth tusks are thought to have weighed over 200 kilograms. Upper tusks started out modest and grew increasingly elaborate from the Late Miocene onward, but the lower tusks tell an equally varied story.

    Deinotherium, which lacks upper tusks entirely, could grow lower tusks exceeding 1.5 metres. The amebelodontid Konobelodon had lower tusks 1.61 metres long. The record for lower tusks belongs to the primitive elephantid Stegotetrabelodon, with lower tusks measuring around 2.2 metres. The amebelodontid group also produced the "shovel tuskers" such as Platybelodon, whose lower tusks formed a broad, flattened structure quite unlike anything in living elephants.

    Molar teeth underwent an equally dramatic transformation. In most mammals, teeth are replaced vertically, one generation pushing up to displace the last. The clade Elephantimorpha abandoned that system in favour of horizontal replacement, where new teeth move forward from the back of the jaw as worn ones fall away at the front. Early Elephantimorpha had elongated lower jaws with developed lower tusks, but from the Late Miocene onward many lineages independently evolved shortened lower jaws with vestigial or no lower tusks.

    Elephantids went further still. Their molars shifted to a parallel loph pattern rather than the cusps of earlier groups, allowing teeth to grow taller (hypsodont) and more efficient at processing grass. That dietary shift, from browsing to mixed feeding and eventually grazing, tracks a broader ecological trend visible in various Elephantida lineages across the Neogene and Pleistocene.

  • Elephas falconeri of Malta and Sicily stood just 1 metre tall, probably descended from the straight-tusked elephant, shrunk by the pressures of island life. Dwarf proboscideans are documented across Indonesia, the Channel Islands of California, and several Mediterranean islands, with most cases dating to the Pleistocene, when fluctuating sea levels repeatedly isolated coastal populations.

    The mechanism behind the shrinkage is thought to involve two factors working together: limited food resources and the absence of large predators. Without predators, the selective advantage of being large diminishes, and with food scarce, smaller individuals survive better. Small mammals such as rodents, facing similar conditions, show the opposite trend and develop gigantism.

    Elephas celebensis of Sulawesi is considered a descendant of Elephas planifrons. The straight-tusked elephant also left descendants in Cyprus. Dwarf elephants of uncertain lineage inhabited Crete, the Cyclades, and the Dodecanese. Dwarf mammoths are recorded in Sardinia. The Columbian mammoth that colonised the Channel Islands evolved into the pygmy mammoth, which reached a height of 1.2-1.8 metres and a weight of 200-2,000 kilograms.

    The woolly mammoths of Wrangel Island, near the Bering Strait, survived until around 4,000 years ago. After their discovery in 1993, they were initially classified as dwarf mammoths. That interpretation was revisited, and since the Second International Mammoth Conference in 1999, the Wrangel Island animals are no longer counted among true dwarf mammoths, a reclassification that underscores how island populations can mislead even careful taxonomists.

  • Analysis of American mastodon remains, Mammut americanum, points toward a social structure strikingly similar to modern elephants: herds of females and juveniles, with adult males living solitarily or in small groups. Evidence from those remains also suggests that adult males periodically engaged in fights during periods resembling musth, the hormonally driven state of heightened aggression seen in living elephant bulls.

    Researchers believe this pattern was inherited from the last common ancestor of the elephantimorphs, meaning musth-like behaviour probably appeared far earlier than the mastodons alone. Musth-like behaviour is also inferred for gomphotheres. All elephantimorphs are thought to have been capable of infrasound communication, the low-frequency calls that living elephants use to coordinate across distances. Even the deinotheres may have lived in herds; fossil tracks found in Late Miocene deposits in Romania point in that direction.

    Over the Neogene and into the Pleistocene, various Elephantida lineages shifted their diets from a browse-dominated regime toward mixed feeding or outright grazing. That shift mirrors the spread of grasslands during the same period and shows how proboscidean ecology tracked the changing landscapes they moved through.

    By the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, around 23 species of proboscidean shared the planet. Then the Late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions arrived, and the group's diversity collapsed. Stegodon, the mastodons, and the American gomphotheres Cuvieronius and Notiomastodon all disappeared. Palaeoloxodon, which had spread widely across Eurasia after dispersing from Africa around 800,000 years ago, vanished too. Only the three living elephant species remain, each the product of a lineage J. Illiger formally named Proboscidea in 1811, a name anchoring more than 180 described extinct members across 60 million years of evolutionary history.

Common questions

What is Proboscidea and how many living species does it include?

Proboscidea is the taxonomic order of mammals that includes the elephants and their extinct relatives, formally described by J. Illiger in 1811. Three living species are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant.

When did Proboscidea first appear and where did they originate?

The earliest known proboscideans, such as Eritherium, are found in Paleocene rocks in Africa dating to around 60 million years ago. These early members were much smaller than modern elephants.

What is the largest proboscidean ever recorded?

The mammutid "Mammut" borsoni is estimated to have had an average adult male body mass of 16 tonnes, making it one of the largest land mammals ever documented. A fragmentary femur of Palaeoloxodon namadicus has led to speculative estimates as high as 22 tonnes, though that figure rests on a single partial specimen.

What is the longest tusk ever recorded from a proboscidean?

The longest tusk ever recorded was 5.02 metres long and belonged to the mammutid "Mammut" borsoni, found in Greece. Some mammoth tusks are thought to have weighed over 200 kilograms.

Why did some proboscideans become dwarf species on islands?

Island dwarfism in proboscideans is attributed to limited food resources and the absence of large predators, which reduced the survival advantage of large body size. Most dwarf proboscidean cases date to the Pleistocene, when fluctuating sea levels isolated elephant populations on islands across the Mediterranean, Indonesia, and the Channel Islands of California.

How did proboscideans spread from Africa to the rest of the world?

The collision of the Afro-Arabian plate with Eurasia during the Early Miocene, around 18-19 million years ago, opened a land corridor that allowed proboscideans to disperse out of Africa. They later crossed into North America via the Bering Land Bridge around 16-15 million years ago, and gomphotheres reached South America as part of the Great American interchange.

All sources

36 references cited across the entry

  1. 2BookMammals of AfricaJonathan Kingdon — Bloomsbury — 2013
  2. 3JournalPaleocene emergence of elephant relatives and the rapid radiation of African ungulatesGheerbrant, E. — 2009
  3. 4JournalStable isotope evidence for an amphibious phase in early proboscidean evolutionAlexander G. S. C. Liu et al. — 2008-04-15
  4. 5JournalThe rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversityJuan L. Cantalapiedra et al. — 2021-07-01
  5. 7JournalWhat Does the "Elephant-Equus" Event Mean Today? Reflections on Mammal Dispersal Events around the Pliocene-Pleistocene Boundary and the Flexible Ambiguity of BiochronologyAlessio Iannucci et al. — 2023-02-28
  6. 9JournalEvolution and dispersal of mammoths across the Northern HemisphereA. M. Lister et al. — 2015-11-13
  7. 10Ecological Interactions of Elephantids in Pleistocene EurasiaAdrian M. Lister — Oxbow Books — 2004
  8. 11JournalExcess of genomic defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel islandRebekah L. Rogers et al. — 2017-03-02
  9. 13JournalShoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideansLarramendi A — 2015
  10. 14BookPaleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison FormationCarpenter, K. — New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science — 2006
  11. 15JournalUnderstanding proboscidean evolution: a formidable taskShoshani, J. — 1998
  12. 17BookEvolution and Fossil Record of African ProboscideaWilliam J. Sanders — CRC Press — 2023-07-07
  13. 23JournalThe Dance of Tusks: Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan-American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in ElephantimorphaDimila Mothé et al. — 12 January 2016
  14. 24JournalThe trunk replaces the longer mandible as the main feeding organ in elephant evolutionChunxiao Li et al. — 2024
  15. 25JournalThe role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideansAdrian M. Lister — 2013-06-26
  16. 26JournalHolocene dwarf mammoths from Wrangel Island in the Siberian ArcticVartanyan, S. L., Garutt, V. E., Sher, A. V. — 1993
  17. 27JournalComparative analysis of the mammoth populations on Wrangel Island and the Channel IslandsTikhonov, A.; Agenbroad, L.; Vartanyan, S. — 2003
  18. 28JournalMale mastodon landscape use changed with maturation (late Pleistocene, North America)Joshua H. Miller et al. — 2022-06-21
  19. 29JournalPopulation structure of the gomphothere Stegomastodon waringi (Mammalia: Proboscidea: Gomphotheriidae) from the Pleistocene of BrazilDimila Mothé et al. — December 2010
  20. 30JournalReview of Japanese Cenozoic (Miocene–Modern) Vertebrate TracksMasaki Matsukawa et al. — 2015-10-02
  21. 32JournalFirst tracks of newborn straight-tusked elephants (Palaeoloxodon antiquus)Carlos Neto de Carvalho et al. — 2021-09-16
  22. 33JournalFluctuating climate and dietary innovation drove ratcheted evolution of proboscidean dental traitsJuha Saarinen et al. — 2023-08-14
  23. 34JournalAdvances in proboscidean taxonomy & classification, anatomy & physiology, and ecology & behaviorJeheskel Shoshani — 2005
  24. 35JournalMorphological and ecological diversity of Amebelodontidae (Proboscidea, Mammalia) revealed by a Miocene fossil accumulation of an upper-tuskless proboscideanShi-Qi Wang et al. — 2017