Paleontology

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Paleontology spends most of its time reading the dead, and it does so through fossils. The field can classify organisms, measure geologic time, and reconstruct how prehistoric creatures interacted with their environments. Scattered observations about fossils reach back to at least the 6th century BC. Yet as a science, paleontology only began in 1796, when Georges Cuvier demonstrated evidence for extinction and argued that the life of the past was not necessarily the life of the present. Why did it take more than two thousand years to accept that creatures could vanish forever? Why were marine shells turning up on mountainsides far above the sea? And how did a discipline once dismissed as undemanding become one of the most public sciences alive, rivaled in press attention only by astrophysics and global health? The answers run through dragons and giants, through notebooks Leonardo da Vinci never published, and through a young woman digging skeletons out of the cliffs at Lyme Regis.

• 2. The Trouble With Fossils

  ›

  Before the 19th century, a fossil was anything dug out of the ground. The word covered bones, stones, and gems alike. Early books described these objects beside minerals and crystals, mixing true organic remains with inorganic concretions and lookalike structures. Many writers assumed fossils simply grew the way crystals grow, and some attributed them to the work of God while others proposed uses in construction or medicine.

  Support for an organic origin built slowly in the 17th century, and it stayed contentious. Different quarries and strata yielded different fossils, and the scientists of the time had no framework to explain why. The most troubling clue was that marine animals kept appearing far above sea level. Some suggested these creatures had settled in horizontal layers under the sea, then been displaced upward by later tectonic activity.

  Most fossils are made from the hard parts of an organism, recrystallized by minerals into something that can be harder than the original bone, wood, or shell. Soft tissues can leave impressions in sediment before they decompose, and in rare cases a whole organism is encased before it rots. Not every fossil is a body, though. Burrows, footprints, and coprolites are grouped together as trace fossils, the preserved record of behavior rather than anatomy.

  Only a tiny minority of dead organisms ever fossilize at all. Scavengers, decomposers, and natural disasters destroy remains before burial, and weathering destroys them after exposure. Habitat tilts the odds: seafloors fossilize more readily than land, rivers and lakes more readily than mountains or deserts. Fossilized teeth turn up constantly but often go uncollected. Even collected specimens may sit unstudied for years, boxed in museum storage and out of reach of scientists.

• 3. Reading Deep Time

  ›

  In the early 19th century, the favored explanation for geological change was the Biblical Flood, not slow processes drawn over millions of years. Georges Cuvier and his contemporaries broke with that in one direction. They held that Earth was neither recently created nor eternal, but carried a vast prehuman history. Cuvier was not the first to imagine a long but finite age for the planet. He was the first to fuse that idea with fossil study, arguing that prehistoric events could be read from geology and the fossil record.

  Charles Lyell, an English geologist, was among the first to propose that no great flood had occurred. Overlapping terrestrial and marine sediment layers backed him up. He watched geological features twist, uplift, and carve, and concluded that the crust was moving continuously while sea level adjusted over time. The same fossils appeared in his strata across large distances and at different heights above the sea. From this he argued that geological history changes continuously, through periods of calm and chaos, driven by causes still at work in the present.

  Out of this work came the geologic time scale, defined and standardized by the International Commission on Stratigraphy. The current standard recognizes four eons, ten eras, 22 periods, 37 epochs, and 96 ages. Today sits in the Meghalayan age, of the Holocene epoch, of the Quaternary period, of the Cenozoic era, of the Phanerozoic eon. These units are correlated worldwide through assigned times, index fossils, paleomagnetism, and related methods. Tying taxa to time this way is called biochronology, and it lets paleontologists pin events like mass extinctions to a point in the past.

• 4. Accepting The Vanished

  ›

  Plato and Aristotle taught that whatever existed had always existed and always would, arranged along a continuum of perfection without gaps. That belief led naturalists to ignore or explain away evidence of extinction for most of recorded history. The break came with Cuvier's Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, or Investigations on fossil bones, which made extinction the founding basis of paleontology as a science.

  Cuvier denied any direct continuity between his fossils and living organisms, concluding that all of them were extinct. He also rejected the idea that any living organism had existed in the past. Instead he proposed great revolutions in which all living things died and new ones arose, a view that fit comfortably with the Biblical Flood. He treated extinction and evolution as conflicting explanations and chose extinction.

  Charles Darwin supplied what Cuvier would not. By arguing that extinction and evolution occurred together, Darwin offered a full account of how life changed over time. The fossil record showed no predetermined lifespan for any group of organisms, and it preserved intervals where a large share of life disappeared at once. At least five mass extinction events are recognized across Earth's history, and a sixth may be underway through human activity. Even so, mass extinctions account for only a small fraction of total species loss. Most extinctions happen at scattered times through what is called the background extinction rate, and for most fossils the cause can never be determined.

• 5. The Quarrel Over Origins

  ›

  Empedocles, the Greek philosopher, stands out as an early exception, suggesting fossils might come from organic life that had changed. Most thinkers disagreed. Religious doctrines including Christianity and Judaism taught that God had created the world as it stands, leaving no room for life to progress. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, a French naturalist, used the inheritance of traits to argue for evolution, while critics such as Cuvier insisted that the required intermediate forms could not have survived.

  Charles Darwin studied similarities among organisms during his voyage aboard the HMS Beagle, work that became On the Origin of Species. There he proposed natural selection, the idea that would anchor later evolutionary theory. Darwin also explained the gaps in the fossil record as the product of incomplete fossilization, and predicted that transitional fossils would eventually surface to confirm the theory.

  Working with fossils rather than living organisms, paleontologists cannot apply the species concepts of modern biology. They turn instead to morphology, using differences in fossil form to separate phenotypes. Once such differences accumulate in a population, the groups should become genetically isolated and split into separate species. Phenotypes preserved in fossils thus act as a proxy for inferring species boundaries across deep time. Change may have crept along slowly, as phyletic gradualism holds, or arrived in short bursts, as punctuated equilibrium proposes. The fossil record carries evidence for both, and each new find fills another gap.

• 6. Naming The Science

  ›

  Cuvier is generally regarded as the first paleontologist, but he was far from the first to write about objects found in rock. Xenophanes, in the 6th century BCE, believed fossil shells represented past life, while Aristotle explained fossils as vaporous exhalations. That idea was later refined into a theory of petrifying liquid by the Arabic philosopher Avicenna and the German philosopher Albert of Saxony. Around the same era, the Chinese naturalist Shen Kuo proposed a theory of climate change after finding petrified bamboo in regions too dry to grow it.

  Leonardo da Vinci, in unpublished notebooks, argued for an organic origin of the fossil shells he could examine. He compared living mollusks and their ecology to the fossils, noting similar growth stages and similar pathologies. His grasp of sedimentation explained why fossils sat embedded in rock, and he rejected both the Aristotelian vapors and the Flood as their primary cause. Da Vinci is also credited as the founder of ichnology, the study of trace fossils.

  The foundational paper arrived in 1796, when Cuvier published On the species of living and fossil elephants. He named the fossil taxon Megatherium from bones found in Paraguay, whose size made an undiscovered living source unlikely. He reached the same verdict for the mastodon, and proved that mammoths from Siberia and Europe were distinct from their living relatives. In 1822, Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville, a former student of Cuvier, introduced the name paleontology for the study of these ancient beings. Soon after, Mary Anning and her family uncovered marine reptile skeletons in the Lyme Regis region, including Ichthyosaurus and Plesiosaurus, animals geologically older than the mammals Cuvier had described.

• 7. Many Sciences In One

  ›

  Paleontology overlaps most with geology and biology, but it also reaches into ecology, chemistry, physics, and mathematics. Invertebrate paleontology has traditionally tied to geology, biostratigraphy, and historical geology, carrying both commercial and academic drivers. Vertebrate paleontology has leaned toward biology with limited commercial use. Across both, the classical demands of fieldwork, laboratory preparation, and comparative anatomy remain core.

  Paleoanthropology focuses on human evolution and took its modern form only after World War II. Ardipithecus, one of the oldest known members of the human branch, lived 4.4 million years ago and was found in 1994. Fossils of Australopithecus and Ardipithecus show that humans never passed through an ape-like stage, instead standing bipedal with adaptations for arboreal movement. The earliest known stone tools date to around 3.3 million years ago. Homo ergaster, from around 1.6 million years ago, first shows the slender modern body form, after which humans spread beyond Africa.

  Taphonomy studies what happens to remains between burial and discovery. Ivan Yefremov introduced the term in 1940, though the question predated him, and the field rose to prominence in the 1960s. Paleopathology, the study of ancient disease, was named by Robert Schufeldt in 1892, with animal paleopathology emerging as a distinct field in 1999. Paleohistology examines fossil hard tissues; Richard Owen made the first use of thin sections to study them in a set of volumes in the 1840s. Paleoichnology reads trace fossils, and Adolf Seilacher's work in the 1960s built ichnotaxonomy to classify them by the behavior that produced them rather than the animal.

• 8. Dragons, Toys, And Press

  ›

  Public fascination with fossils predates the science by far, reaching back to the mythologies of indigenous peoples on many continents who read discovered bones as the remains of dragons or giants. Today prehistoric life drives toys, television and film, computer games, and tourism. The budgets for these public projects often exceed the funding within the field of paleontology itself.

  Familiar figures dominate that public imagination. The dinosaurs Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, and Brontosaurus, early humans like the Neanderthal and Homo floresiensis, extinct megafauna such as mammoths and sabre-toothed cats, and invertebrates including trilobites and ammonites are among the most recognized concepts drawn from modern science. Discoveries about dinosaurs or human evolution routinely reach the mass media, with only astrophysics and global health drawing comparable press.

  That visibility has never matched the money. Paleontology is not a particularly well-financed field, a gap thrown into relief by the operational budget of the American Museum of Natural History dwarfing the resources of the research it helps showcase.