Skip to content
— CH. 1 · ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION —

Orion (spacecraft)

~7 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • The idea for a Crew Exploration Vehicle arrived on the 14th of January 2004. It emerged as part of the Vision for Space Exploration following the Space Shuttle Columbia accident. A design competition followed, and Lockheed Martin won with their proposal. The agency later named it Orion after the stellar constellation and mythical hunter. This version became part of the Constellation program under NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe. The original plan intended to land on solid ground using airbags before switching to ocean splashdown. The service module was originally planned to use liquid methane fuel but switched to hypergolic propellants due to technology limitations. The goal was to launch by 2012. On the 7th of May 2009, the Obama administration enlisted the Augustine Commission to review the ongoing space exploration program. The commission found the Constellation Program woefully under-budgeted and behind schedule by four years or more. As a consequence, the commission recommended significant re-allocation of goals and resources. On the 11th of October 2010, the Constellation program was canceled, ending development of the Altair, Ares I, and Ares V rockets. The Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle survived the cancellation and transferred to be launched on the Space Launch System. The development program restructured from three different versions into the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle as a single version capable of performing multiple tasks.

  • The Orion crew module is a reusable transportation capsule that provides habitat for the crew. It contains storage for consumables and research instruments plus a docking port for crew transfers. This module is the only part of the spacecraft returning to Earth after each mission. Its shape measures 57.5 degrees frustum with a blunt spherical aft end. The diameter spans roughly five meters while length reaches about seven meters. Mass totals approximately nine tons. Lockheed Martin Corporation manufactures it at Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana. The module holds fifty percent more volume than the Apollo capsule and carries four astronauts. NASA selected the Avcoat ablator system to provide heat protection during reentry. This material consists of silica fibers with resin inside fiberglass honeycomb cells. The CM uses Glass cockpit digital control systems derived from Boeing 787 aircraft. An autodock feature allows flight crews to take over operations in emergencies. Waste management facilities include a miniature camping-style toilet and unisex relief tube used on the Space Shuttle. A nitrogen-oxygen mixed atmosphere maintains either sea level or reduced pressure conditions. Construction utilizes aluminium-lithium alloy for durability. Recovery parachutes use Nomex cloth based on designs from both Apollo and Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters. Water landing remains the exclusive means of recovery for the Orion Crew Module. The European Service Module propels and powers the spacecraft while storing oxygen and water for astronauts. Solar energy replaces fuel cells allowing longer missions. The Launch Abort System separates the crew module from the launch vehicle using three solid rocket motors.

  • The first uncrewed test flight launched without the upper stage atop a Delta IV Heavy rocket on the 5th of December 2014. It lasted four hours and twenty-four minutes before landing at its target in the Pacific Ocean. Exploration Flight Test-1 recovered the capsule by ship and brought it to San Diego, California. Before that mission, several preparatory vehicle recovery tests continued the crawl-walk-run approach established by PORT. Stationary Recovery Test ran August 12 through 16, 2013, demonstrating hardware techniques in protected waters of Naval Station Norfolk. Underway Recovery Test occurred off the coast of California in early 2014 to prepare teams for realistic sea conditions. Testing of the Drop Test Article began in 2007 at US Army's Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. Drogue chutes deploy around ten thousand feet altitude. Partial opening and complete failure of one main parachute resulted in touchdown speeds reaching twelve meters per second with only two chutes deployed. A third test vehicle named PCDTV3 successfully tested drop on the 17th of April 2012. ATK Aerospace completed the first Launch Abort System test on the 20th of November 2008. The LAS motor could provide three million pounds thrust during emergencies. Pad Abort-1 flight test executed the 10th of May 2010, launching a boilerplate mock-up to approximately five thousand feet altitude. Ascent Abort-2 test took place the 9th of July 2019, using an Orion Abort Test Booster. This test verified full functionality of the Launch Abort System before discarding the boilerplate. Environmental testing of Orion ran from 2007 to 2011 at Glenn Research Center Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. The Space Power Facility there serves as world largest thermal vacuum chamber.

  • The first completed unit CM-002 launched on the 16th of November 2022, aboard Artemis I. It performed uncrewed lunar orbit and return lasting twenty-five days ten hours fifty-five minutes fifty seconds. The capsule flew to the Moon and back without human crew members. Three flight-worthy spacecraft were under construction with two completed units by late 2024. One of those two had flown while another remained ordered for future missions. The second crewed flight Artemis II will be a lunar flyby expected no earlier than April 2026. Flights aim to achieve yearly cadence starting from Artemis IV onward in 2028. Artemis III targets mid-2027 for first human landing mission on Moon since 1972. A proposal curated by William H. Gerstenmaier suggests four launches of crewed Orion spacecraft plus logistical modules aboard SLS Block 1B to Gateway. Crewed Artemis four through seven would launch yearly testing in situ resource utilization and nuclear power on lunar surface. Artemis seven delivers crew of four astronauts to surface lunar outpost known as Lunar Surface Asset. Another repair mission to Hubble Space Telescope remains possible. Commercial flights to individuals and other space agencies announced December 2025 by Lockheed Martin plan reuse capsules after Artemis three to drive down operational costs.

  • NASA spent twenty-four point one billion dollars on Orion development from 2006 through 2024 in nominal dollars. This equals thirty-one point four billion dollars adjusted to 2025 values using NASA New Start Inflation Indices. Funding began with eight hundred thirty-nine point two million dollars allocated in 2006 for Crew Exploration Vehicle. Annual budgets fluctuated between one point one billion and one point four billion dollars over subsequent years. Costs exclude production operations or sustainment of additional crew capsules despite plans to enhance capsule after 2021. Production and operations contracts awarded going into fiscal year 2020 excluded first service module spare parts provided by ESA costing about one billion US dollars. Assembly integration preparation launch funding totals roughly six hundred million dollars annually under Ground Operations Project. SLS launcher costs remain separate from spacecraft expenses. In 2016, NASA manager William H. Gerstenmaier stated total program including supporting ground systems should cost two billion dollars or less annually. No estimates existed for recurring yearly costs once operational as of 2020. A production contract awarded to Lockheed Martin in 2019 indicated payment of nine hundred million dollars for first three capsules plus six hundred thirty-three million for following three units. Yearly budgets estimated from 2021 to 2025 ranged from 1.4 billion down to 1.1 billion dollars. On the 2nd of May 2025, Trump administration released fiscal year 2026 budget proposal calling termination of Orion and SLS programs after Artemis III. Congress rejected this proposal July 2025 favoring continuation alongside Lunar Gateway.

  • The Orion capsule designed support future missions sending astronauts to Mars likely taking place during 2030s. Since capsule provides only five cubic meters living space per crew member additional Deep Space Habitat module featuring propulsion needed for long-duration missions. Complete spacecraft stack known as Deep Space Transport includes habitat providing approximately fifteen cubic meters living space per crew member. Mission may launch mid-2030s or late-2030s depending on final configuration choices. Habitat module facilitates spacecraft maintenance mission communications exercise training personal recreation activities. Some concepts vary slightly depending on crew and mission needs. Plans outline using spacecraft as transport vehicle for eventual human expeditions beyond lunar orbit. Commercial flights announced December 2025 aim reuse capsules after Artemis three drive down operational costs for individuals other space agencies. Future iterations include Block 1B variants supporting yearly launches testing nuclear power surface operations. Proposed Artemis nine through twelve extend timeline into 2034 through 2036 with sixty-day durations each. These missions test technologies required for sustained presence deep within solar system environment.

Common questions

When was the Orion spacecraft program officially announced?

The idea for a Crew Exploration Vehicle arrived on the 14th of January 2004. It emerged as part of the Vision for Space Exploration following the Space Shuttle Columbia accident.

Who manufactures the Orion crew module and where is it built?

Lockheed Martin Corporation manufactures the Orion crew module at Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana. The module holds fifty percent more volume than the Apollo capsule and carries four astronauts.

What happened to the Constellation Program that originally included Orion?

On the 11th of October 2010, the Constellation program was canceled, ending development of the Altair, Ares I, and Ares V rockets. The Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle survived the cancellation and transferred to be launched on the Space Launch System.

How much did NASA spend developing the Orion spacecraft from 2006 through 2024?

NASA spent twenty-four point one billion dollars on Orion development from 2006 through 2024 in nominal dollars. This equals thirty-one point four billion dollars adjusted to 2025 values using NASA New Start Inflation Indices.

When will the first human landing mission on the Moon occur with Orion?

Artemis III targets mid-2027 for first human landing mission on Moon since 1972. Flights aim to achieve yearly cadence starting from Artemis IV onward in 2028.

All sources

134 references cited across the entry

  1. 1webOrion Reference GuideNASA Johnson Space Center
  2. 3webOrion Quick factsNASA — August 4, 2014
  3. 4webOne Big Beautiful Bill Act119th United States Congress — July 4, 2025
  4. 5journalEnvironmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS)L. Peterson — NASA — 2009
  5. 7press releaseNASA – Orion Crew Exploration VehicleNASA — February 7, 2009
  6. 9webMichoud Tenants: Lockheed MartinShannon LaNasa — NASA — 2021
  7. 10webBehind the scenes at NASA Michoud: Assembly of the Orion Crew ModulesVictoria Cristina — Nexstar Media Group — April 26, 2021
  8. 11tweetTechnicians at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility completed the welding on Orion's pressure vessel which will carry @NASA_Astronauts to the Moon on #Artemis III.NASA Orion public relations — September 10, 2021
  9. 12press releaseNASA Selects Material for Orion Spacecraft Heat ShieldNASA Ames Research Center — April 7, 2009
  10. 13newsNASA Orion crew vehicle will use voice controls in Boeing 787-style Honeywell smart cockpitRob Coppinger — Flight International — October 6, 2006
  11. 15webCrew SystemsMarch 5, 2025
  12. 16webS.A.M. Goes to Work Aboard ISSDenise Hill — July 23, 2019
  13. 18webArtemis II crew space moon missionMike Hanson — WESH — 2026-04-03
  14. 22webMeet Orion, NASA's New Deep Space ExplorerMika McKinnon — Space.io9.com — December 4, 2014
  15. 26webJettison Motor Readied For Integration Into Orion's LASJason Rhian — Spaceflight Insider — July 17, 2018
  16. 28conferenceFeasibility of Orion Crew Module Entry on Half of Available Propellant Due to Tank Isolation FaultMarina M. Moen — American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics — August 8, 2011
  17. 34webOrion Exploration Flight Test-1January 11, 2014
  18. 35magazineAn Aerospace Titan Rooted in the MidwestAlan Cesar — December 15, 2023
  19. 38webFY 2008 Budget EstimatesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  20. 39webFiscal Year 2009 Budget EstimatesNational Aeronautics and space Administration
  21. 40webFiscal Year 2010 Budget EstimatesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  22. 41webFY 2013 President's Budget Request SummaryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  23. 42webFY 2014 President's Budget Request SummaryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  24. 43webFY 2015 President's Budget Request SummaryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  25. 44webFY 2016 President's Budget Request SummaryNational Aeronautics and space Administration
  26. 45webFY 2017 Budget EstimatesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  27. 46webFY 2018 Budget EstimatesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  28. 49webFY 2021 President's Budget Request SummaryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  29. 57webMikulski "Deeply Troubled" by NASA's Budget Request; SLS Won't Use 70 Percent JCLMarcia Smith — spacepolicyonline.com — May 1, 2014
  30. 62press releasePresident Trump's FY26 Budget Revitalizes Human Space ExplorationJennifer M. Dooren et al. — 2 May 2025
  31. 64press releasePresident Bush Announces New Vision for Space Exploration ProgramWhite House Office of the Press Secretary — January 14, 2004
  32. 67press releaseNASA Names New Crew Exploration Vehicle OrionNASA — August 22, 2006
  33. 68webNASA sets Orion 13 for Moon ReturnDaniel Handlin et al. — NASAspaceflight.com — October 11, 2006
  34. 69webNASA makes major design changes to CEVDaniel Handlin et al. — NASAspaceflight.com — July 22, 2006
  35. 70webNASA Names Orion ContractorNASA — August 31, 2006
  36. 72webNASA: Constellation Abort Test November 2008Nasa.gov — December 11, 2008
  37. 74webNASA Completes Test of Orion Crew CapsuleFox News — May 6, 2010
  38. 75webNASA Orion PORT TestNasa.gov — March 25, 2009
  39. 80webOrion Spacecraft CompleteNASA — October 30, 2014
  40. 83newsCompany pitches 'lite' spaceship to NASAAmy Klamper — 14 August 2009
  41. 85newsBoeing's Starliner spacecraft: A guidePaul Rincon — 2021-08-03
  42. 97webOrion Pad Abort 1 Test a Spectacular SuccessDryden Flight Research Center — May 6, 2010
  43. 104web3 Welds to Go for 1st Orion Pathfinder VehicleKen Kremer — March 30, 2010
  44. 106webNASA launches new Orion spacecraft and new era (w/ video)Marcia Dunn — December 6, 2014
  45. 107webOrion Returns to Earth after Successful Test FlightJason Davis — December 5, 2014
  46. 110tweetDe-servicing of Artemis I Crew Module complete! Teams in the Multi-Payload Processing Facility completed cleaning cycles & removal of avionics to be reused on @NASA_Orion for Artemis II. The capsule will be used as an environmental test article on future Artemis missions.April 25, 2023
  47. 111webNext Generation of Orion Spacecraft in ProductionKristyn Damadeo — September 9, 2021
  48. 128webFirst Crewed Orion Mission May Slip to 2023J. Foust — 2015-09-16
  49. 129webNASA closing out Asteroid Redirect MissionJ. Foust — 2017-06-14
  50. 131webNASA delays Artemis 2 and 3 missionsJ. Foust — 2024-01-09