On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences

• 1. Background To The Speech

  ›

  Nikita Khrushchev stood before the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on the 25th of February 1956. He was about to deliver a report that would shake the foundations of the Soviet state. This moment did not happen in isolation. It followed years of silence and fear under Joseph Stalin, who died in March 1953. After his death, thousands of political prisoners returned to the USSR. Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin's influential police chief, was arrested and executed. His downfall expanded knowledge of Stalin's crimes among Soviet leaders.

  The Pospelov Commission had been created by Khrushchev on the 31st of December 1955. Pytor Pospelov chaired this commission alongside P.T. Komarov, Averky Aristov, and Nikolai Shvernik. They investigated repressions against delegates of the 17th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) from 1934. The commission met in early 1956 and presented shocking evidence. In 1937 and 1938, during the Great Purge, Stalin had over one-and-a-half million individuals arrested for anti-Soviet activities. More than 680,500 were executed. Most victims were long-time members of the Communist Party.

  Khrushchev decided he had an obligation to expose these crimes after hearing the commission's report. On February 13th, the Secret Speech was authorized. In the days that followed, Khrushchev, Pospelov, Aristov, and other party members worked together to create and edit the speech. This preparation laid the groundwork for what would become a defining moment in Cold War history.

  15

• 2. The Closed Session Delivery

  ›

  The public session of the 20th Congress ended on the 24th of February 1956. Delegates received word to return to the Great Hall of the Kremlin for an additional closed session. Journalists, guests, and foreign delegates were excluded from this gathering. Special passes were issued to eligible participants. One hundred former party members recently released from Soviet prison camps joined the assembly to add moral effect.

  Premier Nikolai Bulganin called the session to order and immediately yielded the floor to Khrushchev. He began his speech shortly after midnight on the 25th of February. For four hours, Khrushchev delivered his address before stunned delegates. Several people became ill during the tense report and had to be removed from the hall. The atmosphere grew increasingly heavy as accusations mounted against the late leader.

  Khrushchev read from a prepared report without any stenographic record being kept. No questions or debate followed his presentation. Delegates left the hall in acute disorientation. That same evening, foreign communist party delegates were summoned to the Kremlin. They received copies of the text, which was treated as top secret state document. The silence that followed the delivery would echo across decades.

  7

• 3. Systematic Denunciations Of Stalin

  ›

  Khrushchev denounced Stalin while exalting Lenin throughout his speech. He recounted conflicts between Stalin and Lenin, presenting evidence from the Pospelov report about mass repression. Accusations covered errors committed before and during World War II. Entire peoples were exiled during the war, according to the speech. Foreign policy failures and agricultural policy mistakes also came under fire.

  The speech did not mention deportations from Poland or the Baltic states. It omitted references to the Katyn Massacre, Holodomor, and Dekulakization. These events were not attributed directly to Stalin's singular action. Nonparty members who suffered under Stalin remained unmentioned. Khrushchev lauded Leninism and communist ideology even as he condemned Stalin's actions. He argued that Stalin became a victim of the cult of personality himself.

  Stalin transformed from a crucial part of Lenin's victories into a paranoiac man easily influenced by Lavrentiy Beria. The basic structure included quotations from Marxism-Leninism classics denouncing individual cults. Karl Marx wrote to a German worker expressing antipathy toward such practices. Lenin's Testament and remarks by Nadezhda Krupskaya highlighted Stalin's character flaws. Recommendations existed to remove Stalin from his position as Secretary General.

  69

• 4. Global Circulation And Leaks

  ›

  On the 1st of March, the text of Khrushchev's speech was distributed in printed form to senior Central Committee functionaries. By the 5th of March, secrecy classification dropped from Top Secret to Not for Publication. The Party Central Committee ordered readings at all Communist and Komsomol local unit gatherings. Non-party activists attended these proceedings. More than 25 million people heard the contents through this process.

  The Soviet press officially published the full text only in 1989 during the waning years of the USSR. Yet circulation began immediately despite official restrictions. A Soviet acquaintance urgently briefed Reuters journalist John Rettie about the speech shortly after its conclusion. He consulted with his boss before deciding the leaked information was credible. He subsequently published a story requesting anonymity for himself and Moscow byline.

  In mid-March, Rettie confirmed rumors spreading concerning the Secret Speech to western media outlets. The Polish government played a crucial role in dissemination. They made thousands of copies and contacted news outlets. Full-length versions were broadcast on Polish radio. Multiple copies likely reached the CIA and Western intelligence agencies. The New York Times published the report in its entirety on the 5th of June 1956.

  34

• 5. Violent Protests In Georgia

  ›

  The most direct impact occurred in Tbilisi, Georgia between 4-the 10th of March 1956. This period marked the third anniversary of Stalin's death. No official recognition or celebration existed that year. The spread of the speech particularly impacted Georgians since it was Stalin's homeland. Protesters organized around the Stalin monument on the Kura river at first unofficially and largely peacefully.

  Many crowds commemorated Stalin's memory as demonstrations grew. The Georgian government approved an official demonstration on the ninth day. On the tenth, police and army deployed against protesters. Some accounts claim protesters turned violent causing chaos and destruction across the city. Official records state fifteen people were killed and fifty-four injured or wounded. These figures remain highly suspect according to historians.

  It is thought much more likely that hundreds were killed and wounded during these events. The press did not publish any mention of the Georgian Demonstrations. This silence reflected broader attempts to suppress information about unrest following the speech. The violence represented the lone major incident defending Stalin publicly within the Soviet Union.

  411

• 6. Eastern Bloc Uprisings

  ›

  Major political changes ignited throughout the Eastern Bloc after the speech. Two notable uprisings emerged: Polish October and Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Both governments faced unpopular Stalinist leadership when de-Stalinization policies spread through the Secret Speech. Bolesław Bierut, president of Poland, fell ill with pneumonia while hearing the report. Rumors suggested he died from a heart attack upon receiving the news.

  His death left gaps in already vulnerable political landscapes. Violent protests began in June and continued into October as Poles sought greater autonomy from Soviets. Khrushchev threatened invasion but eventually conceded to demands. Polish October marked the end of Stalinism there though communism remained dominant. Meanwhile Hungary experienced similar crisis becoming far more violent than Poland's experience.

  On the 23rd of October 1956 students organized massive demonstrations in Budapest listening to Imre Nagy. He became leader of anti-Soviet Hungarian Revolution before storming radio stations. Rebels ripped down statues of Stalin during these events. Hungarian security forces fired into crowds attempting suppression efforts. Tanks and troops arrived in Budapest on the 24th of October 1956 following Khrushchev's call for intervention.

  11

• 7. Historical Criticism And Legacy

  ›

  Polish philosopher Leszek Kołakowski criticized Khrushchev in 1978 for failing to analyze the system Stalin presided over. He stated Stalin was simply a criminal personally responsible for all nation defeats. The speech offered no explanation regarding how a bloodthirsty paranoiac could exercise unlimited despotic power over two hundred million inhabitants for twenty-five years. All that seemed certain was Soviet system purity despite tyrant atrocities.

  Bangladeshi historian A.M. Amzad described the speech as undesirable, uncalled for, and irresponsible ideologically. It appeared designed to determine Khrushchev's political fate rather than address systemic issues. Arrangements existed even before Twentieth Congress to resolve ills of Stalin's dictatorship. Western historians often took critical views toward the speech's motivations. J. Arch Getty commented in 1985 that revelations were almost entirely self-serving.

  Geoffrey Roberts noted many western historians remained skeptical about laying all blame for past communist crimes solely on Stalin. Yet the speech became one of key texts of western historiography concerning the Stalin era. Mikhail Gorbachev later claimed it struck a blow at totalitarian systems globally. The legacy remains complex with debates continuing about motives versus consequences.

  610