Nostalgia for the Soviet Union

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Nostalgia for the Soviet Union has its own dark joke, repeated across the former USSR. What did capitalism manage to do in one year that communism could not do in seventy? Made communism look good.

  That joke points to a mood shared by millions of people across nations that once made up a single superpower. For some the pull is economic. For others it is a longing for order, for status, or simply for the look of a vanished era. Governments in several of those countries have noticed the pull too, and some have put it to work for purposes that have little to do with sentiment. What actually drives this longing? Who feels it most, and how far can it be stretched before nostalgia turns into propaganda?

• 2. The Weight of Numbers

  ›

  The Levada Center polled Russians in 2016 about why they missed the Soviet Union. Fifty-three percent named the loss of the shared economic union between Soviet republics as the top reason. Forty-three percent pointed instead to the loss of the country's global superpower status. Thirty-one percent cited a decline in social trust. The rest gave a mix of answers, from practical travel difficulties to a general sense of national displacement.

  A later Levada poll, taken in 2019, found that 59% of Russians believed the Soviet government had taken care of ordinary people. In 2020, the center asked what people associated positively with the Soviet Union. Sixteen percent pointed to future stability and confidence. Fifteen percent described a good life in the country. Eleven percent cited personal memories from their own childhood or youth.

  Levada sociologist Karina Pipiya concluded that economic factors, rather than lost prestige or national identity, drove most of the rise in nostalgia. She pointed to a second factor too: most Russians she studied regretted that, in her words, there used to be more social justice and the government worked for the people. These figures describe what people say they miss. They say far less about which people are doing the missing, and that question has drawn its own research.

• 3. Who Longs for the Past

  ›

  In 2022, Oxford professors Paul Chaisty and Stephen Whitefield analyzed polling data on Russians who still identified with the Soviet Union. They found that people who identified most strongly tended to be elderly and less affluent. Contributing factors included nostalgia for Soviet-era economic and welfare policies. A second factor was cultural nostalgia for a particular Soviet "way of life" and traditional values. Chaisty and Whitefield also found that many respondents cited hostility toward Western countries and toward capitalism. Others wanted Russia to reassert its old military and political standing over the former Soviet space.

  British journalist Anatol Lieven reached a similar conclusion in 1998, tying Soviet nostalgia directly to the age of a population. Lieven put it this way: "a deep yearning for stability and order, which is exactly what one would expect from an elderly population." He argued that this was about security, not a desire for conquest or glory. He predicted that Soviet nostalgia would fade "as the older generation dies off and the age structure of society assumes a less top-heavy form." Lieven also found that in the late 1990s, young people showed little enthusiasm for the Soviet past. Instead, he wrote, they were drawn toward various strains of post-Soviet nationalism.

  Ekaterina Kalinina, who researches post-Soviet culture and media at the University of Copenhagen, arrived at a related finding. She wrote that Soviet nostalgia appeals most to people who find themselves in more vulnerable economic and social positions. Per Kalinina, these are people longing specifically for economic security and social welfare, the very things the Soviet state had once guaranteed. That guarantee, and its disappearance, is where the sharpest version of this story begins.

• 4. The Cost of the Collapse

  ›

  Gallup's review of its own polling data offers a stark summary. Life has not been easy since the Soviet Union dissolved in December 1991. Gallup noted that residents of former Soviet states have lived through wars, revolutions, coups, territorial disputes, and multiple economic collapses. Older residents in particular saw their safety nets disappear, including guaranteed pensions and free healthcare. Gallup found that this group was more likely to say the breakup harmed their countries.

  The Harvard Political Review offered its own economic analysis of the fifteen newly independent post-Soviet states. It described the shift from a Soviet-style planned economy to neoliberal capitalism as a heavy financial burden on the population. Living standards fell sharply. Social benefits shrank. Unemployment and poverty both rose. Ordinary citizens, the analysis noted, watched an oligarchic elite grow richer while everyone else grew poorer.

  Between 1991 and 1994, a third of Russia's population fell into poverty. Between 1994 and 1998, that figure passed half the population. Most Soviet state enterprises were bought up and liquidated by Russian business oligarchs during a wave of privatization. That process left large parts of the workforce unemployed. Western economic advisers, including Lawrence Summers, urged reforms alongside the International Monetary Fund. The public often blamed them for making the collapse worse.

  Researcher Kristen Ghodsee, who studies post-communist Eastern Europe, wrote that "nobody wants to revive 20th century totalitarianism." She argued instead that nostalgia for communism has become a shared language. People use it to voice disappointment with parliamentary democracy and neoliberal capitalism today. Those shortcomings were not evenly felt. Some groups absorbed the disappearance of the Soviet safety net more directly than others, and their own accounts tell a more granular story.

• 5. Voices from the Ground

  ›

  Historian Catherine Wanner, studying identities in post-Soviet Ukraine, interviewed elderly female pensioners who described their own nostalgia for the Soviet era. She found that the loss of social benefits weighed most heavily on this group. Wanner described how these women had relied all their lives on the Communist Party's structure and hierarchy. Without it, she wrote, "they have no recourse of their own...to stave off hardship." She added that meager pensions and salaries became indispensable once they were the only income these women had. Lacking the connections needed to find new work, Wanner wrote, they were "left highly vulnerable to poverty" in a "new social Darwinian post-Soviet world." Even so, Wanner noted, these women recognized that recreating the Soviet Union existed only "in their dreams," even as that dream held "tremendous nostalgic appeal."

  As the Soviet industrial complex collapsed, as much as half of the former USSR's working class lost their jobs during the 1990s. This loss of guaranteed work hit ordinary families hardest. A study of rural Georgians in the early 2000s found that most wanted a return to the security of public sector jobs. This held true even among those who did not want the planned economy itself back. They blamed their own poverty on the collapse of the Soviet state. A related study looked at working class women in Kyrgyzstan during the same period. It found that most remembered the Soviet era mainly for its low unemployment.

  Security historian Matthew Sussex described the 1990s as a period of "social and economic malaise experienced across the former USSR." He wrote that rampant inflation quickly became linked to the rise of financial oligarchs. Sussex added that uneven transitions to democracy allowed organized crime to become institutionalized as the norm. He argued that the collapse of Soviet military and security structures left a vacuum. That vacuum, Sussex wrote, was filled by extremist political and religious factions, organized crime, and disputes between post-Soviet states over the USSR's old energy infrastructure. In Armenia, dissolution was followed by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict with neighboring Azerbaijan. There, nostalgia for the Soviet era became closely tied to a longing for peace and public order.

  Anthropologist Alexei Yurchak offered a different kind of explanation, describing Soviet nostalgia as "a complex post-Soviet construct." He tied it to a longing for real human values, ethics, friendships, and creative possibilities that existed under socialism, alongside its dullness and alienation. Yurchak observed that local community bonds and social capital were far stronger during the Soviet era, for practical reasons rooted in everyday life. That closeness, he argued, was an inseparable part of how the last Soviet generation experienced nostalgia. None of this longing, though, stayed locked in memory or scholarship. It resurfaced in arcades, on television, and in holidays still celebrated across the region.

• 6. Symbols, Holidays, and Screens

  ›

  Ukrainian journalist Oksana Forostyna traced positive cultural depictions of Soviet life, emphasizing its modernization and progressivism, up until the late 1980s. That narrative was largely dropped during perestroika. Forostyna observed that it returned to the post-Soviet space in the late 2000s, producing what she called a new "glamorization of Soviet aesthetics." Among young Russians too young to remember the USSR themselves, this took the shape of a fresh interest in Soviet art, clothing, design, and memorabilia. Imagery from the Soviet Space Age saw a particular resurgence, driven by nostalgia for that era's sense of optimism and utopian ambition.

  In 2007, the Museum of Soviet Arcade Machines opened, recreating the experience of Soviet arcades and early gaming culture for visitors. In 2019, developers began offering virtual reality tours of Moscow, recreating the aesthetics and architecture of the city during the Soviet era.

  Most Soviet-era holidays tied to the state's national and ideological identity were eliminated during the 1990s. Victory Day, which marks the Soviet Union's win over Nazi Germany in what is still called the Great Patriotic War, survived that purge. Its commemorations have changed little across most of the post-Soviet space since 1991. Historian Catherine Wanner argues that Victory Day serves as a vehicle for Soviet nostalgia. It keeps alive, in her words, "a mythology of Soviet grandeur" and a sense of belonging to a superpower state. Russia holds Victory Day parades annually in most cities, with the main military parade in Moscow, just as it did in Soviet times. The Immortal Regiment march was introduced more recently. Held each year on the 9th of May, it draws millions of Russians who carry portraits of relatives who fought in the war. Russia also still marks other Soviet holidays. These include Defender of the Fatherland Day on the 23rd of February, International Women's Day on the 8th of March, and International Workers' Day.

  During the 2019 Channel One Cup, part of the Euro Hockey Tour, the Russian men's national ice hockey team made a striking choice. They wore the uniforms of the old Soviet national team. A team spokesperson said the choice marked the 75th anniversary of organized ice hockey in Russia. Spectators at the tournament responded by waving Soviet national flags in the stands.

  In 2004, a Russian cable channel called Nostalgiya launched, devoted to the music, culture, and arts of the Soviet Union. Alongside Soviet-era television shows and films, it broadcasts a panel show called "Before and After," where guests discuss events from Soviet history. These cultural revivals sell a feeling. Elsewhere, the same symbols have been picked up for a much harder purpose.

• 7. Politics of the Past

  ›

  Writing in the Harvard Political Review, analyst Mihaela Esanu linked Soviet nostalgia to a revival of neo-Soviet politics across the region. Esanu argued that this yearning has fed the rise of political factions favoring closer ties with Russia over the West. These factions push for stronger economic, military, and political links with Moscow. She found this appeal especially strong among pro-Russian parties in Belarus and Moldova.

  Journalist Pamela Druckerman identified a related strand of neo-Sovietism. It favors a strong, central role for the state in civil society, political life, and the media. Druckerman argued that neo-Soviet policies have pushed the Russian government back toward a statist philosophy.

  Gennady Zyuganov, who leads the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, is a sharp critic of President Vladimir Putin. Even so, Zyuganov describes his own plans for Russia's future as true to his Soviet roots. He hopes to renationalize all of the country's major industries. Zyuganov has said he believes the USSR was "the most humane state in human history." That belief, held by a leader with a national platform, is a mild version of something Russia would later put to far more forceful use.

• 8. Nostalgia as a Weapon

  ›

  After Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, many Russian tanks were photographed flying the old Soviet flag alongside the pro-war Z military symbol. American political scientist Mark Beissinger told France 24 that the symbols were not really about communist ideology. Instead, he said, they signaled a desire to reestablish "Russian domination over Ukraine." Beissinger noted that using Soviet symbols in most other post-Soviet states, aside from Russia and Belarus, is usually read as a deliberate provocation. Other observers saw the symbols differently, as propaganda gesturing toward the possible return of Soviet power.

  Names created by the Bolsheviks in the 1920s and 1930s, often honoring communist leaders, once labeled a number of Ukrainian towns. Ukraine replaced them with their older, historic names during its decommunization process. Russian occupying forces have since reimposed the Soviet names. Artemivsk replaced Bakhmut, Krasny Liman replaced Lyman, Volodarske replaced Nikolske, and Stakhanov replaced Kadiivka. Some see this toponymic policy as a form of nostalgia, though other researchers argue it is really about Russification rather than nostalgia itself.

  In April 2022, a video went viral showing a Ukrainian woman named Anna Ivanovna greeting soldiers near Dvorichna with a Soviet flag. She believed them to be Russian soldiers. Anna said that she and her husband had "waited, prayed for them, for Putin and all the people." The soldiers turned out to be Ukrainian. They gave her food, then mocked her and trampled her flag. She responded, "my parents died for that flag in World War Two." Russian propagandists used the footage to claim popular support for the invasion, despite most Ukrainians opposing it. Murals, postcards, billboards, and a statue in Russian-controlled Mariupol have since depicted her, and Russians have nicknamed her "Grandmother Z." Senior Russian politician Sergey Kiriyenko called her "Grandma Anya." Anna later told Ukrayinska Pravda that she met the soldiers with the flag only to protect her village, not out of sympathy. She said she now feels like a "traitor." She and her son fled to Kharkiv after their house was shelled.

  On the 9th of May 2022, Vladimir Putin used Victory Day festivities to justify the invasion. He called it "a preemptive response to aggression" that was "forced, timely and the only correct decision." He avoided saying the word "Ukraine" during his remarks. Putin also compared Ukraine's government to Nazi Germany. He praised troops "fighting for the motherland, for her future, and so that nobody forgets the lessons of World War II."

  On the 26th of August 2022, Russian forces hoisted the Soviet Victory banner over Pisky, a fortified area near Donetsk. Its capture helped push Ukrainian forces further from Donbas. In areas under Russian control, occupiers have re-erected Lenin statues that Ukrainian activists had previously taken down.