Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Newton's laws of motion

13 min listen · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Newton's laws of motion are three physical laws describing how an object moves in relation to the forces acting on it. A body left alone stays at rest or glides in a straight line at constant speed. Push or pull it, and its acceleration follows the force divided by its mass. Press on another body, and that body presses back with equal strength in the opposite direction. Isaac Newton first stated these three laws in his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687. With them, he explained the motion of countless physical objects and systems. But how does a single rule connect a falling apple to the Moon's orbit? Why does the third law confuse generations of students who think the support of a table is gravity's reaction? And what happens when the laws meet light, or the very small, where they begin to break down? The answers stretch from a Byzantine thinker mocking armies with bellows to a proverb about spacetime.

  • Every body continues in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it. That is Newton's first law, and it expresses the principle of inertia. The natural behavior of a body is to keep moving in a straight line at constant speed, preserving the status quo until an external force perturbs it.

    By "motion" in the second law, Newton meant the quantity now called momentum, which depends on the amount of matter in a body, its speed, and its direction. The change of motion of an object is proportional to the force impressed, and made in the direction of the straight line in which the force is impressed. In modern notation momentum is the product of mass and velocity, and the second law states that the time derivative of momentum equals the force. When the net force on a body is zero, the body does not accelerate and is said to be in mechanical equilibrium.

    "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction," Newton wrote of the third law, "or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts." If one body pushes a second, the second pushes back with equal magnitude in the opposite direction. The brief paraphrase "action equals reaction" has caused confusion: the two forces apply to different bodies. Consider a book resting on a table. The Earth's gravity pulls the book down, and the reaction to that pull is not the table's support but the book's own gravity tugging on the Earth. This relation connects to a deeper principle, the conservation of momentum, which holds even where Newton's statement does not.

  • Kinematics, the mathematical description of motion, begins with specifying position using numerical coordinates. A body's trajectory becomes a function assigning position values to each moment of time. In the simplest one-dimensional case, a body slides along a track, its location given by distance from a chosen origin, with negative numbers to the left and positive numbers to the right.

    The Greek letter delta, used by tradition to mean "change in," defines average velocity over a time interval. Calculus sharpens this into instantaneous velocity, the derivative of position with respect to time, the speed and direction at a single moment. Acceleration is to velocity as velocity is to position: the derivative of velocity, and so the second derivative of position.

    Position, velocity, and acceleration are vector quantities, each carrying both magnitude and direction. A velocity vector of 3 metres per second along the horizontal axis and 4 metres per second along the vertical describes the same motion that a different coordinate system would record with different numbers. Force, too, is a vector. The study of mechanics is complicated because household words carry technical meanings: force is not power or pressure, and mass differs from weight. These distinctions matter once forces from strings, friction, muscle, and gravity enter the equations.

  • A person standing on the ground watching a train pass is an inertial observer, feeling no effects of motion. The modern reading of Newton's first law is that no inertial observer is privileged over any other. If the train moves smoothly in a straight line at constant speed, the passenger seated inside is equally an inertial observer, feeling no motion at all.

    There is no way to say which observer is "really" moving and which is "really" standing still. One observer's state of rest is another's state of uniform motion, and no experiment can declare either point of view correct. There is no absolute standard of rest. Newton himself believed absolute space and time existed, yet he held that only relative measures of space and time are accessible to experiment. That tension would return when light entered the picture.

  • A body falling from rest near the Earth's surface, with no air resistance, accelerates at a constant rate called free fall. The speed grows in proportion to the elapsed time, and the distance falls in proportion to the square of the elapsed time. The acceleration is the same for all bodies regardless of mass, because combining the second law with the law of universal gravitation makes the falling body's mass cancel from both sides. Launch the body upward or sideways instead, and free fall becomes projectile motion, tracing a parabola because gravity affects vertical motion but not horizontal. At the peak the vertical velocity is zero, yet the acceleration still points downward, and setting the wrong vector to zero is a common student error.

    Uniform circular motion changes a body's direction but not its speed, with acceleration pointing toward the center of the circle. The centripetal force that sustains it points inward too. Many orbits, such as the Moon around the Earth, can be approximated this way, with gravity supplying the centripetal force. This lets the mass of a body be calculated from observations of another body orbiting it.

    Newton's cannonball is a thought experiment bridging projectile motion and orbit. A cannonball lobbed weakly off a tall cliff hits the ground in the same time as one dropped from rest, because gravity acts only downward. Fire it faster and it travels farther but lands in the same time. Fire it faster still and the curvature of the Earth matters: the ground curves away beneath it. A very fast cannonball falls away from a straight line at the same rate the Earth curves, and so it is in orbit. The harmonic oscillator offers another key example, approximating any system near a stable equilibrium, such as a pendulum that swings back and forth when nudged from vertical.

  • A rigid body keeps its shape and is too large to treat as a point. Its motion separates into the movement of its center of mass and movement around that center. The center of mass behaves as if all the body's mass were concentrated at one location, and in the absence of a net external force it moves at constant speed in a straight line. When two bodies collide, their internal forces occur in balanced pairs by the third law, so the center of mass holds its course.

    Apply Newton's laws to rotation and new quantities appear. The analogue of mass is the moment of inertia, the counterpart of momentum is angular momentum, and the counterpart of force is torque. When the torque is zero, angular momentum stays constant, just as zero force keeps momentum constant. Torque can vanish even with a nonzero force if the force and the displacement vector lie along the same line.

    Matter that enters or leaves a body raises the problem of variable mass. A rocket of mass moving at some velocity ejects matter at a velocity relative to the rocket, and the laws apply by tracking which pieces of matter belong to the object over time. The fan and sail example tests the third law: a fan attached to a cart blows on its own sail. Naively the forces would cancel and leave the vessel still, yet because the system is not enclosed, a sail that redirects most of the airflow back toward the fan can drive the vessel forward.

  • Chaos lives inside Newton's laws. Physical systems obeying them can show sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a slight change in position or velocity makes the whole system behave radically differently within a short time. The three-body problem, the double pendulum, dynamical billiards, and the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou problem are noteworthy examples. Adding a third mass to the Kepler problem yields the three-body problem, which in general has no exact closed-form solution and must be approximated by numerical methods looped over short time intervals.

    The Euler momentum equation carries the second law into fluid dynamics, treating a fluid as infinitesimal pieces pushing on their neighbors. Add viscosity and the Euler equation becomes the Navier-Stokes equation. Whether initially smooth solutions of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations can "blow up" in finite time is not yet known, and the existence and smoothness of Navier-Stokes solutions is one of the Millennium Prize Problems. Point masses can even fling some of themselves to infinity in a finite time, an unphysical "noncollision singularity" that relies on the absence of a relativistic speed limit.

    That missing speed limit points to the deeper limits. Maxwell's theory predicts that electromagnetic waves travel through empty space at a constant, definite speed, seeming to grant a privileged status to observers who measure that speed. Light provides an absolute standard for speed, clashing with the principle of inertia that says no such standard exists. Special relativity resolves the tension by revising space and time so all inertial observers agree on the speed of light in vacuum. In relativity the mass of a composite object is no longer the sum of its parts, no force can push a body to the speed of light, and the third law must be modified because simultaneity is relative. General relativity goes further, reimagining gravity as curvature of spacetime, captured in John Archibald Wheeler's proverb: "Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve." At the scale of atoms, quantum mechanics takes over, where the Ehrenfest theorem links quantum expectation values to the second law in a connection that is necessarily inexact.

  • Aristotle divided motion into "natural" and "violent," the natural motion of solid matter being to fall downward while a violent motion pushed a body sideways. A violent motion required an immediate cause, yet a javelin keeps flying after it leaves the hand. Aristotle concluded the air around the javelin must be given the power to push it forward. John Philoponus, a Byzantine Greek thinker of the sixth century, found this absurd, saying that if it were true, armies would launch weapons by blowing on them with bellows. He argued instead that setting a body in motion imparts a quality, impetus, carried within the body itself, a forerunner of momentum later developed by Avicenna, John Buridan, Albert of Saxony, and others.

    Rene Descartes introduced inertia through his "laws of nature" in The World, written between 1629 and 1633, but withheld it after Galileo's 1633 conflict with the Roman Catholic Inquisition, and it was published only in 1664. The modern concept of inertia is credited to Galileo, who wrote in Two New Sciences in 1638 that a particle projected along a frictionless horizontal plane "will move along this same plane with a motion which is uniform and perpetual." Galileo thought such a body would follow the curve of the Earth, an idea corrected toward straight-line motion by Isaac Beeckman, Descartes, and Pierre Gassendi. Descartes published the corrected laws in Principles of Philosophy in 1644, and Christiaan Huygens worked out his own concise version in 1656, printed only in 1703.

    Newton built his three laws incrementally. In a 1684 manuscript to Huygens he listed four laws, later adding a law of action and reaction, and he probably settled on the Principia's three primary laws during 1685. Though he had already developed calculus, which he called "the science of fluxions," he made no explicit use of it in the Principia, preferring geometric arguments in the tradition of Euclid. He cited Huygens, Christopher Wren, and John Wallis to support his third law, and on gravity he declared, "I feign no hypotheses." The work continued after him: Leonhard Euler pioneered the study of rigid bodies and fluid dynamics, Pierre-Simon Laplace's five-volume Traite de mecanique celeste of 1798 to 1825 rebuilt mechanics through algebra, and Emilie du Chatelet wrote in 1742 of "dead force" and "living force," the terms we now call potential and kinetic energy. The vector mathematics of every modern textbook came last, pioneered by Josiah Willard Gibbs and Oliver Heaviside out of the quaternions of William Rowan Hamilton.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What are Newton's laws of motion?

Newton's laws of motion are three physical laws describing the relationship between the motion of an object and the forces acting on it. The first law states a body stays at rest or in uniform straight-line motion unless acted on by a force. The second law states net force equals mass times acceleration, or the rate of change of momentum, and the third law states that two bodies exert equal and opposite forces on each other.

Who created Newton's laws of motion and when?

Isaac Newton first stated the three laws of motion in his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687. He probably settled on the Principia's presentation of three primary laws during 1685, having arrived at the set incrementally from a 1684 manuscript that listed four laws.

What is Newton's third law of motion with an example?

Newton's third law states that to every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction, meaning the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are equal and directed to contrary parts. For a book resting on a table, the Earth's gravity pulls the book down, and the reaction to that action is the book's own gravitational pull on the Earth, not the table's support force.

Why do all objects fall at the same rate under Newton's laws?

All bodies fall with the same acceleration regardless of mass because combining Newton's second law with his law of universal gravitation makes the falling body's mass cancel from both sides of the equation. In free fall near the Earth without air resistance, speed grows in proportion to elapsed time and distance falls in proportion to the square of elapsed time.

What are the limitations of Newton's laws of motion?

Newton's laws break down in extreme cases, prompting new theories such as quantum mechanics and relativity. Special relativity modifies the definition of momentum and the third law because simultaneity is relative, general relativity reimagines gravity as curvature of spacetime, and quantum mechanics connects to the second law only inexactly through the Ehrenfest theorem.

How did thinkers before Newton explain motion?

Aristotle divided motion into natural and violent and claimed air pushed a javelin forward after it left the hand. John Philoponus, a sixth-century Byzantine Greek thinker, rejected this and proposed impetus, a quality carried within a moving body that was a forerunner of momentum, while Galileo developed the modern concept of inertia in Two New Sciences in 1638.

All sources

139 references cited across the entry

  1. 1BookClassical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsStephen T. Thornton et al. — Brooke Cole — 2004
  2. 2BookThe Principia, The Mathematical Principles of Natural PhilosophyI. Newton — University of California Press — 1999
  3. 3BookNewton's Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural PhilosophyIsaac Newton et al. — Daniel Adee — 1846
  4. 4BookTechniques of Classical Mechanics: from Lagrangian to Newtonian mechanicsSamya Zain — Institute of Physics — 2019
  5. 6BookCalculus Made EasySilvanus P. Thompson et al. — Macmillan — 1998
  6. 7BookCalculus: Single and MultivariableDeborah Hughes-Hallett et al. — Wiley — 2013
  7. 10JournalIf the Sun burns you is that a force? Some definitional prerequisites for understanding Newton's lawsChristina Hart — May 2002
  8. 11Journal"Force," ontology, and languageDavid T. Brookes et al. — 2009-06-25
  9. 12BookCollege PhysicsPaul Peter Urone et al. — OpenStax — 2021
  10. 13BookThe Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and HeatSteven C. Frautschi et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  11. 14BookThe Nature of the Physical WorldArthur Eddington — Macmillan — 1929
  12. 15JournalForced Changes Only: A New Take on InertiaD. Hoek — 2023
  13. 17BookIntroduction to Special RelativityRobert Resnick — Wiley — 1968
  14. 18JournalA note on rods and clocks in Newton's PrincipiaKatherine Brading — August 2019
  15. 19BookAn Introduction to the Physics of Mass, Length, and TimeNorman Feather — University Press — 1959
  16. 20BookPhysicsRobert Resnick et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 1966
  17. 21JournalOn the use and abuse of Newton's second law for variable mass problemsA. R. Plastino et al. — 1992
  18. 22BookMechanicsArnold Sommerfeld — Academic Press — 1952
  19. 23JournalDo students use and understand free-body diagrams?David Rosengrant et al. — 2009-06-01
  20. 24JournalOn the Classical Laws of MotionLeonard Eisenbud — 1958
  21. 25BookThe Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 1Richard P. Feynman et al. — Addison-Wesley — 1989
  22. 27BookUniversity PhysicsWilliam Moebs — OpenStax — 2023
  23. 28BookThe Cartoon Guide to PhysicsLarry Gonick et al. — HarperPerennial — 1991
  24. 31JournalNewton's third law revisitedC. Hellingman — March 1992
  25. 32Third Law of MotionCarol Hodanbosi — August 1996
  26. 33The Origin of MassFrank Wilczek — 2003
  27. 34JournalNewton's Zeroth Law: Learning from Listening to Our StudentsRachel E. Scherr et al. — 2005-01-01
  28. 35BookClassical Mechanics: Point Particles and RelativityWalter Greiner — Springer — 2003
  29. 36BookCompendium of theoretical physicsArmin Wachter et al. — Springer — 2006
  30. 37BookEncyclopædia BritannicaPeter Guthrie Tait — 1889
  31. 38JournalThe Transverse Momentum of an ElectronOliver Heaviside — August 1905
  32. 39JournalGalileo and Oresme: Who Is Modern? Who Is Medieval?Olympia Nicodemi — 2010-02-01
  33. 41JournalTesting students ability to use derivatives, integrals, and vectors in a purely mathematical context and in a physical contextMarta Carli et al. — 2020-03-19
  34. 42BookMathematical Methods in the Physical SciencesMary L. Boas — Wiley — 2006
  35. 43BookHow I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It ComingMike Brown — Spiegel & Grau — 2010
  36. 44JournalAn analysis of Newton's projectile diagramD. Topper et al. — 1999-01-01
  37. 45BookAnalytical MechanicsLouis N. Hand et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1998
  38. 46BookAn introduction to mechanicsDaniel Kleppner et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2014
  39. 48JournalLETTERS: Newton's SailboatJerry D. Wilson — 1972-09-01
  40. 49JournalThe answer is obvious, Isn't it?Robert Beck Clark — 1986-01-01
  41. 50JournalA unified, contemporary approach to teaching energy in introductory physicsRuth Chabay et al. — July 2019
  42. 51JournalCentral collisions—The general caseIrina E. Lyublinskaya — January 1998
  43. 52JournalStudent understanding of the angular momentum of classical particlesHunter G. Close et al. — October 2011
  44. 53JournalAnother comment on "Eccentricity as a vector"Carl E. Mungan — 2005-03-01
  45. 55BookPoincaré and the Three Body ProblemJune Barrow-Green — American Mathematical Society — 1997
  46. 56BookThe Princeton Companion to MathematicsJune Barrow-Green — Princeton University Press — 2008
  47. 57JournalInvitation to embarrassingly parallel computingBarbara J. Breen et al. — April 2008
  48. 58JournalSolutions to the Three-Body Problem by ComputerDavid McCandlish — July 1973
  49. 59JournalIntegrability and chaos: the classical uncertaintyJaume Masoliver et al. — 2011-03-01
  50. 61BookFly by Night PhysicsAnthony Zee — Princeton University Press — 2020
  51. 62JournalFrom Newton's second law to Euler's equations of perfect fluidsDaniel Han-Kwan et al. — 2021-04-07
  52. 63JournalOff to infinity in finite timeDonald G. Saari et al. — May 1995
  53. 64BookNew Spaces in Physics: Formal and Conceptual ReflectionsJohn C. Baez — Cambridge University Press — 2021
  54. 65BookThe Millennium Prize ProblemsCharles L. Fefferman — American Mathematical Society and Clay Mathematics Institute — 2006
  55. 66BookThe Conceptual Foundations of the Statistical Approach in MechanicsPaul Ehrenfest et al. — Dover Publications — 1990
  56. 67BookStatistical Physics of ParticlesMehran Kardar — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  57. 68BookClassical dynamics: A Contemporary ApproachJorge V. José et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1998
  58. 69BookMathematical Methods for Optical Physics and EngineeringGreg Gbur — Cambridge University Press — 2011
  59. 70BookMechanicsPergamon Press — 1969
  60. 71BookOut of the Shadows: Contributions of 20th Century Women to PhysicsNina Byers — Cambridge University Press — 2006
  61. 72JournalCalculus-enhanced energy-first curriculum for introductory physics improves student performance locally and in downstream coursesSarah E. LeGresley et al. — 2019-09-13
  62. 73JournalTeaching Energy Before ForcesPhilip Ball — 2019-09-13
  63. 74JournalThe Hamilton–Jacobi equation: An alternative approachBahram Houchmandzadeh — May 2020
  64. 75JournalMixed States in Classical MechanicsNathan Rosen — February 1965
  65. 76JournalHydrodynamic Analogy to the Hamilton–Jacobi EquationJ. H. Weiner — November 1974
  66. 77JournalTwo Models of Brownian MotionN. David Mermin — August 1961
  67. 78JournalBreaking Newton's third law: electromagnetic instancesFabiana B. Kneubil — 2016-11-01
  68. 79BookThe principles of electromagnetic theory and of relativity.Marie-Antoinette Tonnelat — D. Reidel — 1966
  69. 80BookA Modern Course in Statistical PhysicsLinda E. Reichl — Wiley-VCH — 2016
  70. 81BookBiomedical Applications of BiophysicsCaroline S. Chu et al. — Humana Press — 2010
  71. 82JournalSelf-torque and angular momentum balance for a spinning charged sphereBéatrice Bonga et al. — November 2018
  72. 83BookClassical Electricity and MagnetismWolfgang K. H. Panofsky et al. — Dover Publications — 2005
  73. 84BookClassical MechanicsHerbert Goldstein et al. — Addison Wesley — 2002
  74. 85JournalComment on "What Bell did"Reinhard F. Werner — 2014-10-09
  75. 86BookGeneral Relativity and the Einstein EquationsYvonne Choquet-Bruhat — Oxford University Press — 2009
  76. 87BookFlat and Curved Space-timesGeorge F. R. Ellis et al. — Oxford University Press — 2000
  77. 88BookSpecial RelativityA. P. French — W. W. Norton and Company — 1968
  78. 90BookCurvature of Space and Time, with an Introduction to Geometric AnalysisIva Stavrov — American Mathematical Society — 2020
  79. 91BookGeons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in PhysicsJohn Archibald Wheeler — W. W. Norton & Company — 2010-06-18
  80. 92JournalFree fall in curved spacetime—how to visualise gravity in general relativityMagdalena Kersting — May 2019
  81. 93BookThe Disordered Cosmos: A Journey into Dark Matter, Spacetime, and Dreams DeferredChanda Prescod-Weinstein — Bold Type Books — 2021
  82. 94BookEinstein's Italian Mathematicians: Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General RelativityJudith R. Goodstein — American Mathematical Society — 2018
  83. 95JournalHidden variables and the two theorems of John BellN. David Mermin — 1993
  84. 96JournalObliterating Thingness: An Introduction to the "What" and the "So What" of Quantum PhysicsKathryn Schaffer et al. — 24 May 2019
  85. 97JournalInvestigating and improving student understanding of the probability distributions for measuring physical observables in quantum mechanicsEmily Marshman et al. — 2017-03-01
  86. 98BookQuantum MechanicsClaude Cohen-Tannoudji et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 2005
  87. 99BookQuantum Theory: Concepts and MethodsAsher Peres — Kluwer — 1993
  88. 100BookNewton and Modern PhysicsPeter Rowlands — World Scientific Publishing — 2017
  89. 101JournalAristotle's Hydrostatical PhysicsMonica Ugaglia — 2015
  90. 102JournalExperiments on buoyancy and surface tension following Galileo GalileiS. Straulino et al. — January 2011
  91. 103BookPhiloponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian ScienceRichard Sorabji — Institute of Classical Studies, University of London — 2010
  92. 104BookOn the Threshold of Exact ScienceAnneliese Maier — University of Pennsylvania Press — 1982
  93. 105JournalExploring the preinstruction and postinstruction non-Newtonian world views as measured by the Force Concept InventoryPhilip Eaton et al. — 2019-04-25
  94. 106JournalDescartes' Laws of MotionRichard J. Blackwell — 1966
  95. 107BookDialogues Concerning Two New SciencesG. Galilei — Dover Publications Inc — 1954
  96. 108BookTwo new sciences, including centers of gravity & force of percussionG. Galilei — University of Wisconsin Press — 1974
  97. 109JournalScience in the Renaissance: A SurveyC. Doris Hellman — 1955
  98. 110BookPierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern PhilosophyAntonia LoLordo — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  99. 111BookPrinciples of philosophyR. Descartes — 2008
  100. 112JournalChristiaan Huygens' The Motion of Colliding BodiesRichard J. Blackwell et al. — 1977
  101. 113JournalIs Newton's second law really Newton's?Bruce Pourciau — October 2011
  102. 114JournalWas Newton a Newtonian?Patricia Fara — 2003-08-15
  103. 115BookScience and Culture in the Nineteenth Century: Recreating NewtonRebekah Higgitt — Taylor & Francis — 2015
  104. 116BookThe Foundations of Newton's Alchemy: Or, "the Hunting of the Greene Lyon"Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs — Cambridge University Press — 1975
  105. 117BookNever at RestRichard West — Cambridge University Press — 1980
  106. 118BookThe Cambridge Companion to NewtonWilliam R. Newman — Cambridge University Press — 2016
  107. 120BookDutch Light: Christiaan Huygens and the Making of Science in EuropeHugh Aldersey-Williams — Picador — 2020
  108. 121JournalThe First English Version of Newton's Hypotheses non fingoI. Bernard Cohen — 1962
  109. 122BookConcepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of DynamicsMax Jammer — Dover Publications — 1999
  110. 123Descartes' PhysicsEdward Slowik — 2021-10-15
  111. 124JournalThe young Huygens solves the problem of elastic collisionsHerman Erlichson — February 1997
  112. 125JournalThe vis viva dispute: A controversy at the dawn of dynamicsGeorge E. Smith — October 2006
  113. 126JournalSome Reflections on Newton's 'Principia'E. B. Davies — 2009
  114. 127BookThe Oxford Handbook of NewtonGeorge E. Smith — Oxford University Press — December 2020
  115. 128JournalMary SomervilleElizabeth C. Patterson — December 1969
  116. 129BookThe Origins of Infinitesimal CalculusMargaret E. Baron — Pergamon Press — 1969
  117. 132JournalLeonhard Euler and the mechanics of rigid bodiesJ. E. Marquina et al. — 2017-01-01
  118. 133BookForces and Fields: The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of PhysicsMary B. Hesse — Dover Publications — 2005
  119. 134Isaac NewtonGeorge Smith — 2007-12-19
  120. 136JournalHistory of physical terms: 'energy'Clara Frontali — September 2014
  121. 138JournalPolar and axial vectors versus quaternionsCibelle Celestino Silva et al. — September 2002
  122. 139BookHermann Günther Graßmann (1809–1877): Visionary Mathematician, Scientist and Neohumanist ScholarKarin Reich — Kluwer — 1996