Skip to content
— CH. 1 · DEFINING NET ZERO CONCEPTS —

Net-zero emissions

~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • Global net-zero emissions are reached when greenhouse gas emissions and removals due to human activities are in balance. This state stops further global warming once achieved. People often use the terms net-zero emissions, carbon neutrality, and climate neutrality with the same meaning. However, some standards for carbon neutral certification allow a lot of carbon offsetting. Net zero standards require reducing emissions to more than 90% before offsetting the remaining 10%. Organizations often offset their residual emissions by buying carbon credits. Reaching net zero is necessary to stop further global warming. It requires deep cuts in emissions, such as shifting from fossil fuels to sustainable energy.

  • The idea of net-zero came out of research in the late 2000s into how the atmosphere reacted to CO2 emissions. This research found that global warming will only stop if CO2 emissions are reduced to net zero. The term gained popularity after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C in October of 2018. That report stated that reaching net zero would halt anthropogenic global warming on multi-decadal timescales. An influential scientific review on net-zero emissions energy systems was also published in June of 2018. This document assessed the special challenges of actually reaching net-zero targets rather than just reducing emissions.

  • As of November 2023, around 145 countries had announced or were considering net zero targets. These targets cover close to 90% of global emissions and include some countries resistant to climate action in previous decades. Country-level net zero targets now cover 92% of global GDP and 89% of the world population. 65% of the largest 2,000 publicly traded companies by annual revenue have net zero targets. Among Fortune 500 companies, the percentage is 63%. To date, 27 countries have enacted domestic net zero legislation. There is currently no national regulation in place that legally requires companies based in those countries to achieve net zero.

  • The Greenhouse Gas Protocol divides emissions into three scopes for corporate accounting. Scope 1 covers all direct greenhouse gas emissions within a corporate boundary like fuel burned by company vehicles. Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from consumption of purchased electricity, heat, cooling, or steam. As of 2010, at least one third of global greenhouse gas emissions are Scope 2. Scope 3 emission sources include emissions from suppliers and product users known as the value chain. Scope 3 emissions were estimated to represent 75% of all emissions reported to the Carbon Disclosure Project. Some oil companies claim their operations produce net-zero emissions but do not cover emissions produced when customers burn the oil.

  • To balance residual emissions, actors may take direct action to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Alternatively they can buy carbon credits that offset emissions. Carbon credits can fund projects such as reforestation. Strong standards only allow removal-based offsets that have the same permanence as the greenhouse gases they balance. For example, methane has a lifetime of around 12 years while carbon dioxide lasts between 300 and 1,000 years. Accordingly, removals that balance carbon dioxide must last much longer than those balancing methane. Most carbon credits on the voluntary market today do not meet UN or ISO standards for permanent carbon dioxide removals.

  • The credibility of net-zero targets remains low because there is no binding regulation requiring a transition to net zero. While 61% of global carbon dioxide emissions are covered by some sort of target, credible targets cover only 7%. Tzeporah Berman, chair of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, has criticized net zero claims by fossil fuel companies as delusional and based on bad science. A consortium of climate scientists tracked commitments and found pledges grew from 7% of countries in 2020 to 75% in 2023. However very few met minimum requirements for a decent pledge. The UN Race to Zero campaign calls them starting line criteria requiring evidence of action taken towards reaching the target.

  • In the mid-2020s net zero became more politically divisive in places like the USA, EU, and UK. Some politicians have described net zero targets as harmful or too expensive while media says it will increase prices. The International Monetary Fund estimates that shifting policies to bring emissions to net zero by 2050 would result in global gross domestic product being 7 percent higher. In its estimates, the cost of emissions reductions in 2050 is less than 2% of world GDP. There are also implications for the workforce with some industries and regions more at risk than others. In the UK heavy industry concentrated in the Midlands and the North faces different risks compared to service sector jobs in London.

Common questions

When did the term net-zero emissions gain popularity?

The term gained popularity after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C in October of 2018.

How many countries had announced or were considering net zero targets as of November 2023?

As of November 2023, around 145 countries had announced or were considering net zero targets.

What percentage of global greenhouse gas emissions are Scope 2 emissions as of 2010?

As of 2010, at least one third of global greenhouse gas emissions are Scope 2.

Why does methane require different offset standards than carbon dioxide?

Methane has a lifetime of around 12 years while carbon dioxide lasts between 300 and 1,000 years so removals that balance carbon dioxide must last much longer than those balancing methane.

What is the credibility status of net zero targets according to recent data from 2023?

While 61% of global carbon dioxide emissions are covered by some sort of target credible targets cover only 7%.

All sources

92 references cited across the entry

  1. 1journalThe meaning of net zero and how to get it rightSam Fankhauser et al. — 2022
  2. 11journalNet Zero: Science, Origins, and ImplicationsMyles R. Allen et al. — 17 October 2022
  3. 13journalNet-zero emissions energy systemsSteven J. Davis et al. — 29 June 2018
  4. 15journalIrreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissionsSusan Solomon et al. — 2009-02-10
  5. 17journalShort-Lived Climate PollutionR.T. Pierrehumbert — 2014-05-30
  6. 21bookIntegrity Matters: Net Zero Commitments by Businesses, Financial Institutions, Cities and RegionsUnited Nations' High‑Level Expert Group on the Net Zero Emissions Commitments of Non-State Entities — United Nations — 2022
  7. 22journalNet-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fixJoeri Rogelj et al. — 16 March 2021
  8. 25reportUnderstanding countries' net-zero emissions targetsSirini Jeudy-Hugo et al. — OECD — 2021-10-27
  9. 26journalThe carbon neutral free for allJoy Murray et al. — 2009-03-01
  10. 28journalWhy residual emissions matter right nowHolly Jean Buck et al. — April 2023
  11. 29journalReinventing energy efficiency for net zeroJan Rosenow et al. — 2022-08-01
  12. 38bookVoluntary Carbon Markets and OffsettingClimate Change Committee — UK Government — 2022
  13. 39bookThe carbon neutral myth: offset indulgences for your climate sinsKevin Smith — Transnational Institute — 2007
  14. 43journalThe biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approachesFangyuan Hua et al. — 20 May 2022
  15. 49bookGHG Protocol Scope 2 GuidanceMary Sotos — World Resources Institute — 2015
  16. 51reportCDP Technical Note: Relevance of Scope 3 Categories by SectorCarbon Disclosure Project — 2022
  17. 54bookInterpretation GuideRace to Zero Expert Peer Review Group — June 2022
  18. 55webCarbon neutral verification13 January 2020
  19. 57webNet Zero by 2050Andrew Stanley — September 2021
  20. 59journalDeterminants of firms' initiative and inertia in pursuing climate neutrality strategies—Theoretical explanations and empirical evidenceBenedikt Unger et al. — 2024-01-26
  21. 70webNet zero tax to push up price of wineJoe Pinkstone — 26 June 2025
  22. 77journalThe public health co-benefits of strategies consistent with net-zero emissions: a systematic reviewLéo Moutet et al. — Elsevier BV — 2025
  23. 82newsNet-zero pledges are growing — how serious are they?Katharine Sanderson — Nature — 20 June 2023
  24. 83newsCOP27 - Corporate climate pledges rife with greenwashing - U.N. expert groupGloria Dickie et al. — Thomson Reuters — 8 November 2022
  25. 86newsCOP27: Cities with net zero promises falling short on tracking, report saysGloria Dickie — Thomson Reuters — 15 November 2022
  26. 87reportRecommendations and current realitiesNewClimate Institute/Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit/University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/University of Oxford
  27. 88webClimate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trapJames Dyke et al. — 22 April 2021
  28. 89webCarbon offset definitionCollins English Dictionary
  29. 90journalBottom Line on OffsetsJenna Goodward et al. — 1 August 2010