NASA lunar outpost concepts

• 1. Military Moonbase Proposals

  ›

  The United States Air Force unveiled the Lunex Project in 1958. This plan envisioned a twenty-one-person underground base on the lunar surface by 1968. The total cost for this military operation reached seven point five billion dollars. Heinz-Hermann Koelle led the Army's Project Horizon study in 1959. He proposed that two soldier-astronauts would land on the Moon in 1965. Subsequent launches of Saturn rockets would transport cargo to the outpost. By 1966, these missions could deliver two hundred forty-five tons of supplies. The Ballistic Missile Agency organized a task force on the 8th of June 1959 to assess feasibility. These early plans predated the Apollo Program and focused on establishing a fort rather than scientific research.

  45

• 2. Shuttle Era Feasibility Studies

  ›

  A team at the Johnson Space Center began a feasibility study in 1984. They utilized the Space Shuttle infrastructure to build a permanent eighteen-crew moon base between 2005 and 2015. The shuttle transported an empty twenty-one-thousand-kilogram lunar lander to a space station. A one-hundred-ton propellant module waited there for rendezvous. The first objective was creating a small semipermanently crewed camp during 2005 or 2006. NASA planned to launch a lunar orbiting space station from 2008 to 2009. This orbital facility supported the creation of a permanently crewed moonbase by 2009 or 2010. An advanced base with five habitation modules emerged in 2013 or 2014. Three power units derived ninety percent from lunar materials formed part of this complex structure. The ultimate goal aimed for a self-sustaining moonbase by 2017 or 2018.

  6

• 3. International Resource Exploration Concepts

  ›

  Kent Joosten, an engineer at Johnson Space Center, proposed the International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept under President George H.W. Bush. This plan intended to use international partners, mainly the Soviet Union, to assemble a lunar base. It also sought to create a sustainable lunar transportation service. The program failed to gain momentum due to the short lifespan of the Space Exploration Initiative. Only Space Station Freedom survived as a project from that era. The initiative concluded before any physical construction could begin on the Moon. No actual missions launched under this specific architecture despite its ambitious scope.

  1314

• 4. Polar Location Selection Strategy

  ›

  NASA announced a basic plan for a lunar outpost near one of the poles on the 4th of December 2006. The selected location sat on the rim of Shackleton crater within the South Pole-Aitken basin. Doug Cooke described this area as sunlit seventy-five to eighty percent of the time. A permanently dark region adjacent to it held potentially extractable volatiles. This sunlit area measured approximately one point two five square kilometers. Water ice content in polar craters ranged between five point six and twenty-nine percent by mass. The Indian Chandrayaan-1 orbiter helped determine the precise location during 2008 or 2009. Other locations considered included the rim of Peary crater near the north pole. Malapert Mountain region on the rim of Malapert crater also received attention. These studies occurred before the discovery of significant water ice deposits in those regions.

  810

• 5. Artemis Program Base Camp Architecture

  ›

  The Artemis program aims to land humans at the lunar south pole region by 2027. NASA plans to launch the Lunar Surface Asset in 2028 as a small habitat. This vehicle will arrive via an SLS Block 1B or through an Artemis Support Mission. Five temporary base camps with Human Landing Systems will precede the fixed Foundational Surface Habitat. The US-led program schedules several crewed landings starting with Artemis III in mid-2027. International partners include the European Space Agency, JAXA, and the Canadian Space Agency. A station named Lunar Gateway serves as a communications hub and holding area for rovers. Congress provided four hundred fifty million dollars for preliminary studies in March 2018. The final funding amount enacted was slightly lower than the initial request.

  71115

• 6. Funding Debates And Scientific Criticism

  ›

  Jeff Foust wrote for The Space Review that six themes released by NASA were too broad. He argued that science can be done for far less money by robotic missions. The Los Angeles Times editorial stated manned moon flight makes little scientific sense today. Robots can perform most tasks people would do at a moon station. Columnist Gregg Easterbrook called the base nonsense and a poor use of resources. He claimed billions should instead explore the Solar System with space probes. Buzz Aldrin disagreed with NASA's current goals and priorities regarding lunar outposts. He suggested concentrating on a human mission to Mars instead. Aldrin described the lunar surface as a lifeless, barren world hostile to all living things. He believed replaying Apollo glory days would not advance American space leadership.

  23242526