Narrative

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Narrative is among the oldest things human beings do. Before the first written word was scratched into clay, before cities rose along the Nile or the Indus, people were telling each other stories. At the Indus Valley Civilization site of Lothal, archaeologists have found a large vessel depicting birds with fish in their beaks resting in a tree, while a fox-like animal stands below. The image closely resembles a tale from the Panchatantra. On a separate miniature jar from the same site, the scene of a thirsty crow dropping stones into a narrow jar to raise the water level is unmistakably rendered. These images are among our earliest physical evidence that human beings were not merely surviving but narrating, finding meaning by connecting one event to the next.

  What is a narrative, exactly? What makes it different from a simple description of a color, a smell, or a state of being? Who decides what counts as a story, and why do scholars argue so fiercely about whether a symphony or a painting can be called one? And what does the way we tell stories reveal about who we are, individually and as cultures? Those are the questions this documentary sets out to answer.

• 2. What Makes a Story

  ›

  Owen Flanagan of Duke University, a leading consciousness researcher, has written that evidence strongly suggests humans in all cultures cast their own identity in some sort of narrative form. His conclusion: "We are inveterate storytellers." That observation points toward something fundamental. A narrative is not just any string of words or images; it is an account of a series of related events or experiences, and that relationship between events is everything.

  Scholars draw a sharp line between narrative and mere description. A description of a landscape, a color, or a feeling has no forward movement. A narrative requires events that connect, and characters whose choices and behaviors propel those events forward. Characters are typically named individuals whose actions and speech carry important motives. They may be entirely imaginary, based on real people, or real people themselves. And crucially, the audience's first impression of a character shapes everything that follows: whether a listener empathizes with that character, and what they expect the character to do next.

  The conflict a protagonist encounters sits at the heart of most narratives. Scholars classify conflict into several broad types: character versus character, character versus nature, character versus society, character versus unavoidable circumstances, and character versus self. When a conflict reaches its end, that is a resolution. Alongside conflict, the plot carries the story forward through cause and effect, moving through what academics call plot points, moments of change that shift characters' understandings and decisions. The audience's anxious anticipation during high-stakes moments has a name: suspense.

  Setting is where and when all of this unfolds. Time, place, and social or cultural context form the environment characters inhabit, and a setting can at times function almost like a character itself, with traits that develop over the course of a story. Theme, the most abstract element, remains open to the audience's interpretation long after a story ends, and different listeners may arrive at different conclusions about what a work meant, or what its creator intended.

• 3. The Craft of Telling

  ›

  Narrative mode is the full set of choices a creator makes in framing how a story is told. It covers the scope of information revealed or withheld, the language style, the medium through which the story reaches its audience, and the overall point of view. In a first-person narrative, a character refers openly to themselves using pronouns like "I" and "me." In a third-person narrative, those pronouns are avoided, often because the teller is an impersonal commentary rather than a character within the story.

  The formal process of constructing a narrative, called narration, is one of the four traditional rhetorical modes of discourse, alongside argumentation, description, and exposition. Narration is required in all written narratives, though in other forms it is optional. The word narration itself arrived in English from French in the 15th century, and narrative became usable as a noun in the following century. Both words trace back to the Latin narrare, meaning "to tell," itself drawn from the Latin adjective gnarus, meaning "knowing or skilled."

  Scholars in the formal academic field called narratology have worked to identify what they term narrativity: the quality or set of properties that separates narrative from non-narrative writing. Among the techniques identified are the nested narrative, in which characters inside one story tell another story, and the unreliable narrator, a viewpoint character whose account is presented as doubtful or unbelievable, a device common in noir fiction.

  Victor Shklovsky's analysis of the relationship between composition and style, developed through the Russian Formalism movement, was among the first sustained efforts to treat literary narrative as a distinct object of study. Vladimir Propp took this further by analyzing the plots of traditional folk-tales and identifying 31 distinct functional components within them. The Prague School and French scholars including Claude Levi-Strauss and Roland Barthes continued this line of inquiry, building an increasingly influential body of work on structural analysis of narrative.

• 4. Myth, Legend, and Folktale

  ›

  Anthropologist Sir James Frazer argued that understanding mythological narrative requires distinguishing carefully between its three primary categories: myths, legends, and folktales. Each genre, he contended, draws its narrative from a different source and carries different implications within a civilization.

  Janet Bacon, writing in her 1921 publication The Voyage of the Argonauts, expanded Frazer's categories. Bacon defined myth as narrative with explanatory intention: it addresses natural phenomena whose causes are not obvious, or rituals whose origins have been forgotten. Myths tackle astronomical events, environmental phenomena, and a full range of human experiences including love, anger, greed, and isolation. Bacon defined legend differently: "Legend is true tradition founded on the fortunes of real people or on adventures at real places." She named Agamemnon, Lycurgus, Coriolanus, King Arthur, and Saladin as examples. In American folklore, Davy Crockett and, more debatably, Paul Bunyan fit this category: real people whose stories accumulated a mythological quality through years of retelling. Bacon's folktale, by contrast, calls for no belief at all. Its primary purpose is to entertain, and while it may possess some element of truth at its origin, it lacks the credibility found in legend.

  Because mythologies were transmitted orally, there is no reliable method to trace exactly when or where a tale originated. Myths are told from what scholars describe as a cosmological perspective, a voice with no physical embodiment that is passed down and modified across generations. This quality is precisely what gives mythological narratives their durability: they help solidify the cultural identity of a civilization and contribute to a shared human consciousness.

  20th-century philologist Georges Dumezil proposed that Indo-European mythologies were structured around three distinct societal functions. The first function was sovereignty, divided into magical and juridical aspects, associated with kings. The second was the heroic or warrior function. The third covered gods connected to healing, prosperity, fertility, wealth, and everyday life. In Norse mythology, Dumezil found Odin representing magical sovereignty, Tyr representing juridical sovereignty, Thor representing the warrior function, and Freyr representing the third function. Dumezil further proposed that the pairing of Odin, Thor, and Freyr in Norse depictions may have contributed to the foundations of what became the Christian concept of the Trinity.

• 5. Stories Across Cultures

  ›

  Alaskan Indigenous Natives have stated explicitly that narratives teach children where they fit in, what their society expects of them, how to create a peaceful living environment, and how to be responsible members of their communities. That pedagogical function is not unique to one culture; it runs across virtually every human society, though the specific content of the stories and the values they transmit vary enormously.

  In the Western Apache tribe, stories serve as warnings. One tale describes a mother who intervenes in her married son's life during an attack by the neighboring Pima tribe. She hears a scream, assumes it is her son's wife, and yells to intervene. The yell alerts the Pima tribe to her location, and she is killed. The story teaches the cost of a specific transgression: a mother's interference in her adult son's household.

  The Canadian Metis community shares what is called the "Humorous Horse Story" with children to convey that horses stumble through life just as humans do. Navajo stories use dead animals as metaphors to show that all things have purpose. American Indian elders emphasize that narratives invite listeners, especially children, to draw their own conclusions and to self-reflect, rather than delivering a single fixed lesson.

  In the Mexican tradition, adult figures tell stories to children to teach individuality, obedience, honesty, trust, and compassion. One version of La Llorona, for example, is used to teach children to make safe decisions at night and to uphold community morals. These are not decorative additions to childhood; they function as primary vehicles of education in communities where oral tradition remains central.

  The ethics of who gets to tell these stories, and under what conditions, has its own name: storytelling rights. Amy Shuman, in her work Storytelling Rights: The Uses of Oral and Written Texts by Urban Adolescents, defined storytelling rights as the important and precarious relationship between narrative and event, and specifically between the participants in an event and the reporters who claim the right to describe what happened. Questions of consent, accurate representation, and whose benefit a story serves are all folded into this concept.

• 6. The Psychological Thread

  ›

  Narrative therapy is a recognized form of psychotherapy, built on the premise that the breakdown of a coherent or positive personal narrative has been implicated in the development of psychosis and mental disorders, and that its repair plays an important role in recovery. This clinical application reflects how deeply scholars across philosophy of mind, the social sciences, and medicine have come to regard narrative as central to human psychology.

  Illness narratives represent one of the most studied areas. When a person is affected by illness, researchers have found they tend to construct accounts that follow one of several recurring patterns. In the restitution narrative, the person treats the illness as a temporary detour, with a return to normal life as the primary goal. In the chaos narrative, the person sees the illness as a permanent state that will inexorably worsen, with no hope of return to health. This pattern is described as typical of conditions like Alzheimer's disease. The third major type, the quest narrative, frames the illness as an opportunity for transformation. Physical outcome becomes less important than spiritual and psychological growth. This framing is described as typical of the triumphant view of survivorship found in breast cancer culture, where survivors may be expected to articulate what is called a wisdom narrative, explaining a new and better view of the meaning of life to others.

  Personality traits, specifically the Big Five, appear to be associated with characteristic patterns of word use in self-narratives. Extraversion correlates positively with words referring to humans, social processes, and family. Agreeableness correlates with family, inclusiveness, and certainty, and negatively with anger. Conscientiousness correlates with achievement and work, and negatively with references to body, death, and anger. Neuroticism correlates with sadness, negative emotion, and anxiety, and negatively with work. Openness correlates with perceptual processes and hearing. Language in self-narratives, scholars have argued, is not merely expressive; it is diagnostic.

• 7. Narrative Beyond Words

  ›

  American musicologist Edward Cone observed that narrative terms are already embedded in the analytical language used to describe music. The components of a fugue, subject, answer, exposition, discussion, and summary, read like chapters in a story. Whether that resemblance reflects genuine narrative structure or only metaphorical borrowing is a question scholars have not settled.

  Theodore Adorno suggested that music recites itself, is its own context, and narrates without narrative. Carolyn Abbate proposed a different view: that certain gestures in music constitute a narrating voice. French musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez argued that the narrative is not in the music itself but in the plot imagined and constructed by listeners, and that this imagined plot is often shaped by a work's title or other information provided by the composer. Abbate further specified that music's capacity to narrate is concentrated in rare moments identifiable by their bizarre and disruptive effect rather than in its normal flow.

  Film presents a different set of challenges. Unlike literary narratives, which rely on a textual narrator to guide the reader, and unlike literature's ability to allow each reader to visually manifest a story in their own unique way, film substitutes visual and auditory devices. Cinematography, editing, sound design, and the arrangement of subjects within the frame, known as mise-en-scene, replace the literary narrator. Jose Landa has described the result as a "visual narrative instance." Film narratives also escape constraints that bind theatrical performance: they are not limited to a fixed place and time, and they are not restricted by scene transitions tied to set design.

  In the social sciences, Lawrence Stone noted in 1979 that narrative had long been the main rhetorical device used by historians. At a time when social-science approaches were demanding statistical and structural analysis, Stone detected a move back toward narrative, driven by historians trying to understand what it was like to live in the past, questions that naturally return to storytelling as their primary instrument.