Military
In the year 1274 BC, the Battle of Kadesh unfolded under the reign of Ramses II, and its scenes were carved into bas-relief monuments so that the power of military leaders would outlast the men themselves. A military is a heavily armed, highly organized force, intended above all for warfare. It is typically authorized and maintained by a sovereign state, its members marked apart by a distinct uniform. But the word covers far more than soldiers in a line. The profession of soldiering is older than recorded history. The questions that follow ask what a military actually is, how it turns ordinary people into combatants, how it thinks before it fights, and how the tools of war have reshaped war itself. The first answer hides in plain sight, inside a single English word first written down in 1582.
Spelled militarie, the word entered English in 1582, carried from the Latin militaris, by way of French, with an uncertain root. One suggestion traces it to a sense of going in a body or a mass. As a noun phrase, "the military" usually means a country's armed forces, and sometimes the senior officers who command them. It points to the physical reality of those forces, their personnel, their equipment, the ground they occupy. The adjective once referred only to soldiers and soldiering. Then it widened to cover land forces in general, a shift visible in the names of the Royal Military Academy of 1741 and the United States Military Academy of 1802. Around the time of the Napoleonic Wars, the word stretched again. It began to describe armed forces as a whole, giving us phrases like military service, military intelligence, and military history. The terms armed forces and military are often treated as synonyms. Yet in technical use a country's armed forces may include paramilitary bodies such as armed police, a distinction that quietly widens who counts as part of the whole.
In 2000, the British Army made a striking declaration: "Man is still the first weapon of war." Despite the growing weight of technology, military activity depends above all on people, organized by a command hierarchy split by rank. Those ranks fall in descending order of authority, from officers such as a colonel, to non-commissioned officers such as a sergeant, down to the lowest rank, the private. Senior officers make strategic decisions; soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen carry them out. Alongside rank, each person holds a trade role, grouped as combat, combat support, or combat service support. Who fills these roles is shaped by recruitment and conscription. Most military personnel are male, and the share of women varies widely, roughly 3 percent in India, 10 percent in the UK, 13 percent in Sweden, 16 percent in the US, and 27 percent in South Africa. Two-thirds of states now take only adults, yet as of 2017-50 states still relied partly on children under 18, usually aged 16 or 17. After the US suspended conscription in 1973, the force drew disproportionately on African American men and men from lower-status backgrounds. A study released in 2020 told a more complicated story, placing US personnel at parity or slightly above the civilian population on income, wealth, and cognitive ability, and finding the most disadvantaged groups now less likely to meet the modern military's requirements.
Shaving the head of a new recruit is one of the first acts of basic training, a small ritual that says individuality will be suppressed. Initial training conditions recruits for the demands of military life, including readiness to injure and to kill, and to face mortal danger without fleeing. Uniforms are issued, privacy is denied, first names are prohibited. The daily routine is tightly controlled, with beds to make, boots to polish, and clothes stacked a certain way, and mistakes drawing punishment. Continuous stressors wear down resistance, depriving recruits of sleep, food, or shelter, while instructors shout insults and orders meant to humiliate. The disciplined drill instructor stands as the role model of the ideal soldier. The obligations that follow are long. Full-time service usually runs several years, with two to six years typical in Australia, the UK, and the US, depending on role, branch, and rank. Part-time reserve service lets a recruit keep a civilian job while training at weekends, ready to be called out on operations. Even after leaving, recruits may remain liable for compulsory return to full-time service. Military law also creates offences civilian courts do not recognize, such as absence without leave, desertion, and malingering, with penalties from a summary reprimand to imprisonment after a court martial. Some countries grant a right of conscientious objection when an order is judged immoral or unlawful.
"China and India maintain the largest armed forces in the World." Statements like that, and the claim that the US military is the world's strongest, come from military analysis, which assesses the capability of potential aggressors and builds combat modelling to compare forces. The work begins with intelligence, an organization, a system, and a process at once, called military intelligence, or MI. Its difficulty lies in the secrecy of what it seeks and the clandestine way operatives obtain plans for escalation, the start of combat, or an invasion. Groups such as militants or resistance movements may call themselves an Army or a Front, yet none has the structure of a national military, and they often lean on outside national militaries for support. From intelligence flows resource allocation. Defense economics is the effort to fund and sustain militaries, set through a military budget administered by a finance organization, with procurement authorized to buy goods and services. Capability development, the so-called strength, is described here as one of the most complex activities known to humanity. It runs from strategic, operational, and tactical requirements through doctrine, design specifications, force structure, and logistics, all the way to post-conflict demobilization. Among these, the development of military doctrine is called perhaps the most important, because it determines how forces are actually used.
Carl von Clausewitz, the Prussian Major-General, defined military strategy in his book On War as "the employment of battles to gain the end of war." Strategy is the management of forces by a commander-in-chief, a long-term projection of policy whose planning can span weeks but more often months or years. Clausewitz placed political aims above military goals, ensuring civilian control of the military. Beneath strategy sits the operational level, also called operational art, coordinating the details of tactics with the goals of strategy. This concept was pioneered by the German army before and during the Second World War, with planning that runs from one week to a month, executed by Field Armies and Army Corps. Tactics, the third level, concerns engaging and defeating the enemy in direct combat, used by units over hours or days. The written record reaches far back. The Art of War by the Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu, written in the 6th century BCE in 13 chapters, shaped Asian military doctrine and, from the late 19th century, European and United States planning. Julius Caesar wrote commentaries on the Gallic Wars and the Roman Civil war around 50 BC. From the late Roman period came Taktike Theoria by Aelianus Tacticus and De Re Militari by Vegetius, the latter the basis of European tactics until the late 17th century. Its most enduring maxim still echoes: let he who desires peace prepare for war. The grim limit of tactics appeared in the trench warfare of World War I, at Gallipoli and on the Western Front, where attackers had to cross an exposed no man's land under heavy fire.
When Stone Age humans first took flint to tip a spear, it was the first example of applying technology to improve a weapon. From there, stone gave way to Bronze Age and Iron Age swords and shields, and ranged weapons arrived with the sling, then the bow and arrow. The domestication of the horse created cavalry, and the wheel brought the chariot and eventually siege engines. Bows grew into composite bows, recurve bows, longbows, and crossbows, while full plate armour encased its wearer in steel built to keep the joints moving. In medieval China, gunpowder was invented and increasingly used in combat. Early vase-like mortars in Europe, alongside armour-piercing arrowheads, ended the dominance of the armoured knight, and gunpowder produced the musket, usable with little training. Industrialization accelerated everything. The machine gun and repeating rifle help explain the high casualty rates of the American Civil War and the decline of melee combat. Breech-loading guns with recoiling barrels allowed quicker aimed fire, and smokeless propellant powders from the 1880s extended artillery ranges. At sea, the internal combustion engine freed naval tactics from sails, and the submarine and torpedo followed. World War I drove the rapid development of tanks; World War II became the most frantic period of weapons development in history. Between 1939 and 1945 came radar, penicillin in military medicine, the guided missile, the jet aircraft, the helicopter, and the nuclear weapon, whose radiation effects were unknown until the early 1950s. After the war, the Cold War institutionalized a constant arms race that continues today, now shaped by guided missiles, space-based reconnaissance, information warfare, and robotic systems such as unmanned combat aerial vehicles. The US military has committed to drawing 50 percent of its energy consumption from alternative sources.
Hugo Grotius wrote On the Law of War and Peace in 1625, an early effort to bring a humanitarian approach to warfare, a theme later echoed by Gustavus Adolphus. The relationship between a military and its society is complicated and ever-evolving, swinging between a force seen as vital in time of threat and a burdensome expense met with defence cuts in peace. Militaries often function as societies within societies, with their own communities, economies, education, and medicine, and their reach extends beyond nations through private military companies, or PMCs, hired where police or militaries are absent or distrusted. Control and transparency remain a difficult matter. In some countries only limited information on operations and budgeting reaches the public, yet transparency is crucial to fight corruption, a point made by the Government Defence Anti-corruption Index that Transparency International UK published in 2013. Since 1945, the ethics of warfare have grown to constrain the treatment of prisoners and civilians, primarily through the Geneva Conventions, though these rarely apply when forces act as internal security during political conflict. International conventions define war crimes and provide for their prosecution, and individual countries keep their own codes, such as the United States' Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sometimes military action is justified by a humanitarian cause, such as defending refugees in disaster relief, an idea named military humanism, which leaves the oldest profession in human history still arguing over when force is right.
Common questions
What is a military and what is it used for?
A military, also known as armed forces, is a heavily armed, highly organized force primarily intended for warfare. It is typically authorized and maintained by a sovereign state, and its main task is usually defined as defence of the state and its interests against external armed threats. Beyond warfare it may be used for internal security, crowd control, emergency services, reconstruction, and national honour guards.
When was the word military first used in English?
The first recorded use of the word military in English, spelled militarie, was in 1582. It comes from the Latin militaris, from miles, by way of French, though its deeper etymology is uncertain, with one suggestion linking it to a sense of going in a body or mass.
What are the main branches and ranks in a military?
A military may consist of one or more branches such as an army, navy, air force, space force, marines, or coast guard. Its command hierarchy is divided by rank, grouped in descending order of authority as officers such as a colonel, non-commissioned officers such as a sergeant, and the lowest rank, the private.
How does a military train and recruit its personnel?
Personnel may be recruited or conscripted depending on the state, and initial training resocializes recruits for military life, including readiness to injure, kill, and face mortal danger. Individuality is suppressed through shaved heads, issued uniforms, and denied privacy, while full-time service typically lasts between two and six years in Australia, the UK, and the US.
What are the three levels of military victory?
Militaries study victory on three levels: strategic, operational, and tactical. Military strategy is managed by a commander-in-chief over months or years, the operational level coordinates tactics with strategy and was pioneered by the German army before and during the Second World War, and tactics concern engaging the enemy in direct combat over hours or days.
What are the oldest writings on military tactics and strategy?
One of the oldest military publications is The Art of War by the Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu, a 13-chapter book written in the 6th century BCE. Two major works from the late Roman period are Taktike Theoria by Aelianus Tacticus and De Re Militari by Vegetius, and Carl von Clausewitz later defined strategy in his book On War as the employment of battles to gain the end of war.
All sources
37 references cited across the entry
- 1BookUnderstanding Modern WarfareDavid Jordan et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2016
- 2War in Ancient TimesJoshua J. Mark — 2 September 2009
- 4BookWhat is Military History?Stephen Morillo et al. — Polity Press — 2006
- 5Soldiering: The military covenantBritish Army — 2000
- 6NewsIndia's Military to Allow Women in Combat RolesFranz-Stefan Gady
- 8HistorikFörsvarsmakten
- 9Support Army RecruitingUS Army — 2013
- 10Fact file: SANDF regular force levels by race & gender: April 30, 2011 defenceWebLeon Engelbrecht — 29 June 2011
- 12JournalThe all-volunteer force in the 1970sSegal, D R — 1998
- 13JournalWho chooses military service? Correlates of propensity and enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces.Jerald G. Bachman et al. — 2000
- 15JournalInfluence of childhood adversity on health among male UK military personnelAmy C. Iversen et al. — 2007-12-01
- 16JournalA mercenary army of the poor? Technological change and the demographic composition of the post-9/11 U.S. militaryAndrea Asoni et al. — 2020-01-30
- 18JournalIs it Counterproductive to Enlist Minors into the Army?David Gee et al. — 2016-11-01
- 21Queen's Regulations for the Army (1975, as amended)UK, Ministry of Defence — 2017
- 22BookMilitary life: The psychology of serving in peace and combatDennis McGurk et al. — Praeger Security International — 2006
- 23BookSquaddies : portrait of a subcultureJohn Hockey — University of Exeter — 1986
- 24JournalSome Observations on the Psychosocial Phenomena Seen in Basic TrainingPeter G. Bourne — 1967-05-01
- 25BookOn killing : the psychological cost of learning to kill in war and societyDave Grossman — Little, Brown and Co — 2009
- 26JournalThe Impact of Basic Combat Training: The Role of the Drill Sergeant in the All-Volunteer ArmyJohn H. Faris — 2016-09-16
- 27University Catalog 2011/2012, Master Courses: pp.99, size: 17MBUS National Intelligence University
- 29JournalMind on the battlefield: what can cognitive science add to the military lessons-learned process?Dalit Milshtein et al. — 2024
- 31The Art of War11 June 2011
- 33JournalThe New Encyclopædia BritannicaRobert MacHenry — 1993
- 34BookOn War by General Carl von Clausewitz2006-02-26
- 35BookThe Medieval Fighting Man: Costume and Equipment 800-1500Jens Hill and Jonas Freiberg — Crowood — 2015
- 36Ray Mabus greening the militaryCraig Hooper
- 37Transparency is feasiblePyman, Mark — D+C Development and Cooperation, Engagement GlobalGmbH — 5 March 2013