Meaning-making

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Meaning-making began, for one grieving couple, with a wheelchair. After their daughter, who lived with a disability, died, the couple started Nora's Project, supplying wheelchairs to children with disabilities worldwide. The mother said, "With Nora's Project, I am also healing. I am able to turn something that was horrific, the way she died, into something that will do good in the world." In psychology, this instinct has a name. Meaning-making is how people construe, understand, or make sense of life events, relationships, and the self. The term surfaces in constructivist counseling and psychotherapy, in classrooms, and in the study of signs and symbols known as semiotics. Where did this idea come from, and how far does it reach? Does it only apply to grief, or does it also shape how people learn, believe, and heal from illness?

• 2. A Concept Takes Shape

  ›

  Viktor Frankl survived the Holocaust and founded logotherapy in the 1940s. In his 1946 book Man's Search for Meaning, he argued that discovering meaning is a person's primary motivation. Frankl insisted meaning could be found under any circumstance, even in loss and tragedy, through doing a deed, experiencing value, or experiencing suffering. He never used the phrase "meaning-making" himself, but his ideas shaped the psychologists who later coined it.

  Educational critics Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner picked up that exact phrase. Their 1969 book Teaching as a Subversive Activity included a chapter titled "Meaning Making," explaining why they preferred it to other metaphors for teaching and learning, such as a garden to be cultivated or clay to be molded. Those images implied every learner would turn out the same, they wrote, while the "meaning maker" has no such limit and "continues to create new meanings."

  By the end of the 1970s, the term was spreading, feeding into constructivist learning theory, which treats knowledge as something people actively build rather than absorb. Developmental psychologist Robert Kegan made "meaning-making" central to several influential texts published in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Kegan wrote, "Human being is meaning making," describing personal growth as the evolving of systems of meaning. Psychologists working from George Kelly's personal construct theory used the same language.

  By 2010, psychologist Crystal L. Park was surveying a field that had grown lopsided. Her review found a rich body of theory on meaning-making, but noted that empirical research had not kept pace with it. Four years later, the International Network on Personal Meaning convened the First Congress on the Construction of Personal Meaning, held in 2014 as part of its Eighth Biennial International Meaning Conference. That gathering marked meaning-making's shift from a philosopher's postwar idea into a subject researchers wanted to test directly, in classrooms, therapy rooms, and hospital wards.

• 3. Meaning-Making In Learning

  ›

  Psychologist Robert Kegan built on Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development to describe five distinct levels of meaning-making, developed around 1980. Each level marks a more advanced way of understanding experience, and people can grow through them as they mature psychologically. In his book In Over Our Heads, Kegan applied the framework to five arenas of life: parenting, partnering, working, healing, and learning.

  Sociologist and educator Jack Mezirow took a different route to a similar idea in the 1980s and 1990s. His transformative learning theory holds that adults interpret experience through deeply held assumptions, and when something contradicts those assumptions, people must re-examine how they make meaning. Mezirow called these jarring experiences "disorienting dilemmas," moments that can push a person toward personal growth and a wider perspective.

  Behavioral psychologist Richard DeGrandpre applied the same lens to operant conditioning, the theory that behavior is shaped by its consequences. He argued that consequences do not simply reinforce behavior, they shape the meaning of the stimulus that surrounds it. In his framing, reinforcers are "experiential consequences with acquired, ecologically derived meanings," turning a stimulus-response model into a meaning-making one. That reframing suggests meaning-making operates well beyond therapy rooms and classrooms, reaching even into how simple stimulus-response habits form.

• 4. Grief And Family Bonds

  ›

  A tool called the "Meaning of Loss Codebook" sorts the ways grieving people search for meaning into 30 categories, described in the book Techniques of Grief Therapy. The most common categories include personal growth, family bonds, spirituality, valuing life, negative affect, impermanence, lifestyle changes, compassion, and release from suffering. Meaning-focused interventions have been shown to improve both mental and physical health for some grievers.

  According to some researchers, "efforts after meaning might not be psychologically healthy" for certain individuals from challenging backgrounds, when those efforts look more like rumination than resolution. Other researchers report the reverse for most grievers: meaning-making eases distress and builds resilience after loss. Failing to find meaning at all, several studies suggest, predicts longer-term distress.

  Among those strategies, family bonds show up as a "change in outlook and/or behavior towards family members." People using this approach make more effort to spend time with relatives, discussing the legacy of the person who died or talking to non-family members about the loss. Open expression of attitudes and beliefs within a family leads to better well-being and less disagreement, and can raise marital satisfaction by easing family tension, especially if the deceased was a relative. That shift in family relationships opens the door to other meaning-making paths, ones rooted in belief rather than blood.

• 5. Faith, Purpose, And Giving Back

  ›

  Spirituality and religiosity give grieving people a way to think about a transcendental reality, share their worldview, and feel they belong to a community of shared belief. For those with a "divinity worldview," researchers say the divine is often seen as "involved in a major stressful life event," giving the loss a religious frame.

  Theistic grievers create meaning through religion along three main paths, researchers have found. Benevolent religious reappraisals cast God in a positive light, framing a death as part of God's plan. Punishing God reappraisals cast God in a darker light, with grievers blaming God for the loss or feeling punished by it. Reappraisals of God's power instead question whether God was able to intervene in the situation at all.

  Valuing life is its own strategy, whether that means cherishing what remains, searching for personal purpose, or changing a lifestyle altogether. Philanthropy offers a further outlet: grievers channel loss into charities, foundations, and organizations that provide financial, social, and emotional support to others facing similar grief. That kind of giving turns a negative experience into something constructive, letting people honor a life while helping others through comparable loss. The same instinct to turn a private loss into public purpose resurfaces when the threat to a person's life comes not from someone else's death, but from a diagnosis of their own.

• 6. Meaning-Making And Cancer

  ›

  A cancer diagnosis can threaten a person's identity, safety, security, bodily integrity, and sense of self all at once. Faced with that, patients, survivors, and caregivers often search for meaning in one of two ways: assimilating the experience into their current worldview, or accommodating it by changing that worldview altogether. Patients who manage to make meaning of the diagnosis tend to report better psychosocial outcomes, including less anxiety and depression, while those who cannot find meaning report more distress, including depression and a wish for a faster death.

  Caregivers face their own version of the same search, questioning the meaning of the experience or of life altogether. The role can be demanding, both physically and emotionally, requiring caregivers to manage pain, medications, and daily activities while contending with their own fears, anxiety, and grief. Many still find caregiving meaningful in itself, describing it as a source of connection, purpose, and growth; interventions such as MCP-C and EBT are designed to help caregivers manage distress while finding that meaning.

  For patients themselves, dignity therapy, meaning-centered psychotherapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy have all shown promise as meaning-focused treatments. A 2019 meta-analysis pooling 29 randomized controlled trials found that psychosocial interventions targeting meaning and purpose produced small to medium improvements in those areas. That tally of 29 trials marks meaning-making's shift from a philosopher's postwar idea into a measurable outcome doctors can now test at a patient's bedside.