Marcus Furius Camillus

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Marcus Furius Camillus was hailed as the second founder of Rome, a man credited with saving the city from Gallic invaders, capturing a legendary Etruscan stronghold, and holding the office of dictator five times. His name was so thoroughly woven into the fabric of Roman memory that by the late republic, citizens believed he had single-handedly pulled Rome back from the edge of annihilation. There is just one problem. As the historian Mary Beard wrote in her book SPQR, Camillus is probably not much less fictional than Romulus himself. Tim Cornell called him the most artificially contrived of all Rome's heroes. Theodor Mommsen, writing in Römisches Strafrecht, went even further, calling Camillus' legend the most dishonest of all Roman legends. So who exactly was Marcus Furius Camillus? Was he a real man, a convenient myth, or something in between? The answers sit at the crossroads of Roman politics, Greek-inspired storytelling, and centuries of deliberate historical invention.

• 2. The Problem of Sources

  ›

  Livy built the fifth and sixth books of his great history around Camillus' career. Camillus enters public office at the very opening of Book Five and exits it at the close of Book Six. That structural choice tells us something important: the annalistic tradition Livy drew on had already placed Camillus at the center of an entire era. Plutarch wrote a full biography in his Lives series. But the underlying record those authors relied upon was already saturated with, as one characterization puts it, plenty of myth, embellishment, and fantasy. Fragments of the historian Quintus Claudius Quadrigarius suggest the Camillus myth was firmly established as early as the 80s and 70s BC, meaning it had hardened into received wisdom long before our main literary sources set pen to papyrus. The strongest piece of physical evidence comes from the Etruscan Francois Tomb, built around 300 BC near the town of Vulci. One of its wall paintings names a figure called Marce Camitlnas killing or being associated with the killing of Gneve Tarchunies Rumach, likely Gnaeus Tarquinius the Roman. Some scholars propose this Camitlnas is our Camillus, but that attribution remains contested, and the specific legend the tomb depicts is not known.

• 3. The Siege of Veii

  ›

  In 401 BC, Camillus is first firmly recorded entering public office, serving as consular tribune against the Falisci and the Capenates. By 396 BC, the tradition has him completing a decade-long campaign against Rome's powerful Etruscan neighbor Veii, a siege Livy explicitly modelled on the Greek legend of the Trojan War. The supernatural elements are stark. The Alban Lake supposedly rises on its own after a prophecy about Veii's destruction appears in the city's Books of Fate. The Romans are then instructed by the oracle at Delphi to drain the lake by tunnel to avert the omen. Camillus, as commanding dictator, then performs a remarkable religious act: he personally persuades Veii's goddess, Juno Regina, to abandon the city and relocate to Rome. Where myth ends and reality begins is not fully clear, but archaeologists have found blocked drainage tunnels from the fifth century near Veii, which may reflect an actual Roman military breakthrough through subterranean channels. After the city fell, its free population was sold into slavery. Roman colonists received land allotments of seven jugera each. A material shift in construction is also traceable: after the capture, Roman builders switched largely to stone quarried from Veii's superior quarries, a pattern that may point to enslaved Veientine workers serving the new Roman building program.

• 4. Exile and the Gallic Sack

  ›

  After taking Veii, Camillus is supposed to have faced trial, though the accounts disagree on the charge. One version accuses him of misappropriating the spoils of war; another claims he spent extravagantly on four white horses for his triumphal procession. Convicted, he was reportedly sent into exile. Historians believe this trial story was modelled on the fates of Achilles and Scipio Africanus and was designed to draw comparisons with the Greek statesman Themistocles and the Roman Gnaeus Marcius Coriolanus. Its more practical narrative purpose was to get Camillus away from Rome before the Gauls arrived, ensuring he bore no responsibility for the city's fall. That fall came in 390 BC by the Varronian calendar, though modern scholars favor 387 BC. A large Gallic force crossed the Apennines into northern Etruria, defeated Rome's army at the Battle of the Allia, entered the city, and then induced the surrender of Roman holdouts on the Capitoline Hill before accepting a large ransom of gold and withdrawing north. Greek sources from as early as the fourth century BC corroborate the sack; Polybius synchronizes it with the Peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium. What Polybius does not corroborate is Camillus' climactic intervention: in Livy's account, Camillus is recalled from exile at Ardea, appointed dictator, and at the very moment that a thousand pounds of gold is being weighed out as ransom, he returns at the head of a hastily assembled army and drives the Gauls away. R. M. Ogilvie, writing in his Commentary on Livy, called this story one of the most daring fabrications in Roman history. Polybius tells a different story entirely: the Gauls occupied Rome for some seven months and then departed of their own accord to deal with a Veneti invasion of their own territory.

• 5. Myth as Political Instrument

  ›

  Camillus' legendary opposition to relocating Rome to Veii after the sack is one of the most telling episodes for scholars who study how Roman history was manufactured. The story has Camillus delivering a rousing speech against the proposal, which was circulating among the plebs. Scholars believe it was actually invented around 122 BC specifically to oppose, through historical precedent, the proposal by Gaius Gracchus to plant a Roman colony at Carthage. Its anti-Italian themes were then sharpened further during the Social War. The speech does not appear in Polybius at all. A similar pattern emerges around the Licinio-Sextian rogations, the landmark laws that opened the consulship to plebeians and imposed a five-hundred-jugera cap on public land possession. Livy credits Camillus with first obstructing, then brokering the compromise in 367 BC, and with building a temple to Concordia to mark the peace. A fragment of the writer Numerius Fabius Pictor, preserved in Aulus Gellius' Attic Nights, shows that the alleged years of total political blockade by the tribunes were a late annalistic invention, probably created to align Greek and Roman chronological systems. Gary Forsythe, writing in Critical History of Early Rome, accepts that the first rogation is consistent with genuine debt-relief anxieties of the period, but the entire narrative around Camillus' role as reconciler appears to be a later confection added to give the reforms a heroic face.

• 6. Exemplar and Imperial Blueprint

  ›

  Livy cites Camillus as an example to be followed eight times in his Ab Urbe Condita, a frequency described as unusually high. He appears as a model of military success, of moderation among hot-headed colleagues, and of dignified return from unjust exile. One of the most often retold episodes concerns a schoolmaster from Falerii Veteres, the modern Civita Castellana, who defected to the Roman camp during the 394 BC campaign against the Falisci, bringing with him the children of Faliscan nobles as a kind of unauthorized offering. Camillus refused the hostages, had the schoolmaster punished by his own pupils, and sent them home. The Faliscans, moved by this display of Roman good faith, surrendered the city. The episode was designed as a textbook exemplum on the Roman virtue of fides. Even a story about Camillus resigning a dictatorship because of faulty procedural appointment, an event Livy himself acknowledged almost certainly never took place, was included because it illustrated Roman legal scruple. By the late republic and into the reign of Augustus, the Camillus legend had been woven into a grand cyclical view of Roman history. Livy's narrative may have been structured around a cycle of 360-365 years beginning with Romulus, peaking under king Servius Tullius, then reaching a second founding under Camillus. The next cycle peaks with Scipio Africanus before Augustus arrives as the figure to re-found Rome once more. In this framing, Romulus, Camillus, and Augustus are presented as coequal heroic figures, each responsible for a new beginning. A bronze statue of Camillus stood on the rostra in the Forum, giving the mythologized general a permanent physical presence at the center of Roman public life.