Lucius Varius Rufus

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Lucius Varius Rufus stood at the center of Roman literary life during one of history's most celebrated creative moments. Born around 74 BC and dying around 14 BC, he moved in a circle that included Virgil and Horace, two poets whose work would define Western literature for millennia. Yet Varius himself has nearly vanished from memory. His tragedy Thyestes was praised as worthy of the ancient Greeks. His epic poetry was admired by the poets who outlasted him. And when Virgil died leaving his masterwork unfinished, it was Varius who stepped in to prepare the Aeneid for the world. How did a poet of such stature leave so little behind? And what survives to tell us what we lost?

• 2. The Inner Circle

  ›

  Horace, writing in his Satires, placed Varius among the finest poets of his day. The praise was not casual. Horace described Varius as a master of epic, and in the first book of his Odes, declared him the only poet capable of celebrating the military achievements of Vipsanius Agrippa. That is a striking claim: in an age crowded with talent, one name stood out for that specific glory.

  Virgil, too, measured himself against Varius. In the ninth Eclogue, writing under the pastoral name of Lycidas, Virgil lamented that his own work had so far produced nothing comparable to the poetry of Varius or of Helvius Cinna. These were not polite gestures between friends. They were public admissions of a standard that Varius had set.

  The friendship between Varius, Virgil, and Horace was also practical. When Horace sought access to Maecenas, the great literary patron of the age, it was Varius and Virgil together who arranged the introduction. Varius was a connector as much as a creator, and his position in that network shaped which voices would be heard in Augustan Rome.

• 3. Thyestes and Its Reception

  ›

  A didascalia, a kind of production note preserved in a Paris manuscript, records the occasion when Thyestes was first performed. The games were held in 29 BC by Octavian to mark the victory at Actium, and Varius received a gift of a million sesterces from the Roman ruler for the work. The scale of that payment signals how the play was regarded by those in power.

  The critic Quintilian, writing in his Institutio Oratoria, went further than any patron. He declared Thyestes fit to rank alongside any of the Greek tragedies. That is a precise and demanding benchmark. Greek tragedy was the gold standard of literary culture in Rome, and Quintilian was not a writer who distributed such comparisons loosely.

  None of the play survives. The million sesterces, the Actium games, the Quintilian verdict: all that remains is the frame around a work that has been lost. What the Thyestes actually contained, how it handled the horrific myth of Atreus serving his brother the flesh of his own sons, is something no reader can now know.

• 4. Epic Works and Borrowings

  ›

  Macrobius, in his Saturnalia, records that Varius composed an epic poem called De Morte, meaning On Death, and quotes several lines from it. His point in quoting them is pointed: he argues that Virgil imitated or directly appropriated those lines in his own work. The accusation, or observation, lands differently depending on how one reads ancient literary culture, where borrowing from admired predecessors was common practice.

  Horace, in his Satires, appears to allude to a separate epic by Varius, one distinct from De Morte. A scholiast, a later ancient commentator on Horace's Epistles, adds another layer: three lines that Horace cited were taken wholesale from a panegyric that Varius wrote in praise of Augustus. If accurate, that means Varius wrote in at least three different large-scale forms: the De Morte epic, another epic work, and a formal panegyric addressed to the emperor himself.

  Fragments of these works were collected by E. Bahrens in his Fragmenta Poetarum Romanorum, published in 1886. Monographs by A. Weichert in 1836 and by R. Unger in editions of 1870, 1878, and 1898 attempted to reconstruct what could be known. Martin Schanz addressed Varius in his Geschichte der römischen Litteratur in 1899, and Teuffel's History of Roman Literature in its English translation of 1900 covered him at section 223.

• 5. Guardian of the Aeneid

  ›

  Virgil died without finishing the Aeneid. The poem he left behind was, by his own account, not ready for the world. He had reportedly wanted it destroyed. Instead, the task of preparing it for publication fell to Varius and Plotius Tucca, two men Virgil trusted enough to be named for this responsibility.

  What that editing work involved in practice is not precisely known. Ancient sources suggest the two men completed what they could and left other passages in a state Virgil had not finished rather than inventing endings he had not written. The Aeneid that has survived, and that has been read continuously for more than two thousand years, passed through the hands of Varius before it reached any other reader.

  That act of preservation is, in a quiet way, the most consequential thing Varius did. His own tragedy and his epics are gone. The poem he shepherded into the world is not.