Lawsuit
A lawsuit begins with a single document and a single accusation: one party claims it was harmed, and it asks a court to do something about it. The party who brings the claim is the plaintiff, sometimes called the claimant. The party answering is the defendant. Between them sits a civil court of law, and the whole machinery that follows is called litigation. The people fighting are litigants. The lawyers who represent them are litigators. From this plain setup spins out something far more tangled than two sides and a verdict. Most lawsuits never reach a trial at all. A defendant who ignores the complaint can lose by default. A winner can still appeal because the award felt too small. A case that looks lost in an internet search may have quietly settled in the plaintiff's favor. What turns a grievance into a judgment, and why do so few of them ever see a courtroom? Where do the words plaintiff, sue, and suit even come from? And what happens when the person who loses simply has nothing to pay with? Those questions run underneath every claim filed.
Latin built the vocabulary of the courtroom long before any English-speaking judge sat down. The word lawsuit joins two parts, law and suit. Suit traces back through the Old French suite or sieute, meaning to pursue or follow, which itself came from the Latin secutus, the past participle of sequi, meaning to attend or follow. The verb sue walks the same path. It descends from the Old French suir or sivre, again meaning to pursue or follow after, and again rooted in sequi. The archaic phrase suit in law survives in only a small number of laws still in force today. So a lawsuit is, at its linguistic root, an act of following. The plaintiff pursues the defendant through a court. That older sense still echoes when lawyers distinguish a suit from an action, a distinction that would later collapse entirely.
A complaint or petition, called a pleading, opens the case the moment it is filed with the court. The complaint must state plainly that one or more plaintiffs seek damages or equitable relief from named defendants, and it must lay out the factual allegations behind the legal claims. It is the most important step in a civil case because it sets the factual and legal foundation for everything that follows. Choosing the proper venue with the proper jurisdiction matters just as much as the words inside the complaint. The clerk of a court then signs or stamps the court seal upon a summons or citation, which the plaintiff serves on the defendant along with a copy of the complaint. This service tells defendants they are being sued and that they have only a limited window to reply. A handful of jurisdictions work differently. In the U.S. state of New York, a lawsuit begins when the plaintiff properly serves a summons and complaint, and nothing must be filed with the court until a dispute actually requires a judge.
Service of process is the formal delivery of judicial documents, often simply called process, to a party in a lawsuit. It gives that party notice of the action and establishes the court's jurisdiction over them. The summons, typically issued by the court clerk at filing, is the first document served, warning the defendant to appear and answer or face default. The job can be done by any non-party adult over age 18, by a court official such as a sheriff, marshal, or constable, or by a private process server. The methods range from personal service, handed directly to the defendant, to substituted service left with a competent adult at the residence or place of business, to service by mail with proof of receipt, to service by publication when a defendant cannot be located after diligent effort, to digital delivery where statute or court order allows it. In federal court, Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires service within 90 days of filing the complaint. Miss that window without good cause, and the action against the unserved defendant may be dismissed without prejudice. A defendant who answers must address each allegation, choosing to admit it, deny it, or plead a lack of sufficient information. Some jurisdictions, like California and Florida, still allow a general denial of every allegation at once. A defendant who would rather attack the complaint itself can file a demurrer, where that is still permitted, or a pre-answer motion such as a motion to dismiss.
Pretrial discovery is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they will present at trial. It is built to eliminate surprises, clarify what the lawsuit is actually about, and push the parties to decide whether to settle or drop frivolous claims and defenses. A deposition lets a party give an under-oath statement before trial, and it can be written or oral, used at trial or only during the pretrial. Most lawsuits never get past this stage. An empirical analysis found that less than 2 percent of cases end with a trial, and about 98 percent of civil cases in United States federal courts are resolved without one. The settlement rate itself varies by type of lawsuit. Torts settle around 90 percent of the time, while overall civil cases settle about 50 percent of the time, with other cases ending through default judgment or the lack of a valid claim. At the close of discovery, the parties may pick a jury or proceed as a bench trial, heard by the judge alone when a jury is waived or not guaranteed for that claim, such as matters in equity in the U.S.
A single lawsuit is rarely as single as it sounds. Within one suit there can be any number of claims and defenses between any number of plaintiffs and defendants. Each participant can file cross-claims and counterclaims, and even drag additional parties into the case after it is underway, a process known as joinder. Courts hold some power to sever claims and parties into separate actions when there is not enough overlap in the factual issues to keep them together. Complications multiply across borders and systems. A federal court may apply state law under the Erie doctrine in the United States, or one state may apply the law of another, and it may not be clear which court holds jurisdiction or whether the plaintiff even has standing. The official ruling of a lawsuit can mislead, because post-ruling outcomes are often not listed online. In William J. Ralph Jr. v. Lind-Waldock & Company, decided in September 1999, a casual reader would assume Ralph lost. In fact the evidence showed improper activity on the part of Lind-Waldock, and Ralph settled. Cases like that one show why a mere internet search is not always enough when researching legal decisions.
After a final decision, either party may appeal if they believe the trial court made a procedural error. Appeal is not automatic. It requires a legal basis, and even a prevailing party may appeal, for instance to seek a larger award than the one granted. The appellate court can affirm the judgment, decline to hear it, which effectively affirms it, reverse it, or vacate and remand by sending the case back to the lower court. An appeal is a review for errors, not a fresh trial, so the appellate court defers to the original trial court's discretion when an error is not clear. The petitioner files a notice of appeal and then a brief stating the reasons. Many jurisdictions, notably the United States, bar parties from relitigating the facts on appeal, a rule born from the invited error problem of lawyers reserving issues to ambush each other later. Once the matter is finally resolved or the time to appeal expires, it becomes res judicata, meaning the plaintiff cannot bring the same claim again, and others who try to relitigate it will be estopped. Some lawsuits ride up and down the appeals ladder repeatedly before they are finished.
A judgment is typically a monetary award, and the trouble often starts after the gavel falls. When a defendant fails to pay, the court can reach the defendant's assets within its jurisdiction through a writ of execution, bank account garnishment, liens, or wage garnishment. If the assets sit elsewhere, the plaintiff must file another suit in the appropriate court to enforce the first court's judgment, a hard task when crossing from one state or nation to another. A defendant with no assets in any jurisdiction is called judgment-proof, a colloquial label for an impecunious defendant. Indigent judgment-proof defendants are no longer jailed, because debtor's prisons have been outlawed across the vast majority of common law jurisdictions. Money also shapes who can fight in the first place. In the United States, litigants short on resources may turn to legal financing, where a company gives a cash advance in return for a share of the eventual settlement or award. Lose the case, and the litigant repays nothing. The financing company reviews the merits of the case rather than credit or employment history. A study in the Supreme Court Economic Review concluded that newer litigation financing rules produced more settlements, while older, conservative rules produced fewer but larger ones on average.
Common questions
What is a lawsuit in civil law?
A lawsuit is a proceeding by one or more parties, the plaintiff or claimant, against one or more parties, the defendant, in a civil court of law. The plaintiff claims to have suffered loss from the defendant's actions and asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.
What is the difference between a plaintiff and a defendant in a lawsuit?
The plaintiff is the party who brings the lawsuit, claiming loss from the defendant's actions and requesting a remedy. The defendant is the party being sued, who must respond to the complaint or risk a default judgment.
How does a lawsuit begin?
A lawsuit begins when a complaint or petition, known as a pleading, is filed with the court. In a handful of jurisdictions such as the U.S. state of New York, it begins instead when the plaintiff properly serves a summons and complaint on the defendant.
How many lawsuits actually go to trial?
Most lawsuits do not reach trial. An empirical analysis found that less than 2 percent of cases end with a trial, and about 98 percent of civil cases in United States federal courts are resolved without one. Torts settle around 90 percent of the time and overall civil cases settle about 50 percent of the time.
What is service of process in a lawsuit?
Service of process is the formal delivery of judicial documents to a party in a lawsuit, giving notice of the action and establishing the court's jurisdiction. In federal court, Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires service within 90 days of filing the complaint.
What does it mean to be judgment-proof in a lawsuit?
A defendant who has no assets in any jurisdiction is called judgment-proof, a colloquial term for an impecunious defendant. Indigent judgment-proof defendants are no longer imprisoned, because debtor's prisons have been outlawed in the vast majority of common law jurisdictions.
Where does the word lawsuit come from?
The word lawsuit combines law and suit. Suit derives from the Old French suite or sieute, meaning to pursue or follow, which came from the Latin secutus, the past participle of sequi, meaning to attend or follow.
All sources
21 references cited across the entry
- 1BookBlack's Law DictionaryWest — 2014
- 2BookThe Official Guide to Legal SpecialtiesLisa L. Abram — National Association for Law Placement, Harcourt Legal & Professional Publications — 2000
- 3lawsuit (n.)Online Etymology Dictionary — Douglas Harper
- 4sue (v.)Online Etymology Dictionary — Douglas Harper
- 5JournalMost Cases Settle: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of SettlementsMarc Galanter et al. — 1993
- 8Pleading: AxonHCSNew York State Unified Court System
- 10summons
- 12Proof of Service Explained: Everything You Need To KnowTodd Harrison
- 13How Courts Work: Steps in a Trial – DiscoveryAmerican Bar Association
- 14Glossary D: DepositionAmerican Bar Association
- 15JournalLet's Stop Spreading Rumors About Settlement and Litigation: A Comparative Study of Settlement and Litigation in Hawaii CourtsJohn Barkai et al. — Social Science Research Network — 2014-01-01
- 16BookFoundations of Insurance Economics: Readings in Economics and FinanceGeorges Dionne — Springer — 1992
- 17JournalLitigation and settlement under imperfect informationLucian Bebchuk — 1984
- 18JournalFirms, courts, and reputation mechanisms: Toward a positive theory of private orderingBarak Richman — 2004
- 19BookDrafting Legal Documents in Plain EnglishJean Steadman — Giuffrè Editore — 2013
- 20BookDrafting Legal Documents in Plain EnglishJean Steadman — Giuffrè Editore — 2013
- 21JournalThe Effects of Litigation Financing Rules on Settlement RatesLaura Inglis et al. — University of California, Santa Barbara — 2010