Laozi

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Laozi has no birth certificate, no agreed-upon grave, and possibly no single body at all. Yet Chinese tradition credits this figure with writing the Tao Te Ching, one of the foundational texts of Taoism. The name itself, written 老子, is not a personal name. It is an honorific meaning 'old teacher' or 'venerable master'. Traditional accounts call him Li Er, born in the 6th century BC in the southern state of Chu. They say he kept the archives for the Zhou court, met Confucius, and wrote his book before vanishing into the western wilderness. By the mid-twentieth century, Western scholars had reached a different conclusion. They doubted that any such man ever lived. So who was the venerable master, and why does a text with no central character carry a single old man's name? What does it mean to found a philosophy you may never have written, and how did a doubtful sage become a worshipped god and the claimed ancestor of emperors?

• 2. The Many Names

  ›

  Zǐ, the second syllable of Laozi, is the same ending found in Kongzi, Mengzi, and Zhuangzi. It marks a teacher rather than a man, which is why 老子 reads as an epithet and not a given name. The same word has reached English in several spellings, including Lao Tzu, Lao-tse, and Laou-tsze, each with its own pronunciation.

  The personal name handed down by tradition is Li Er, written 李耳. Li is a common Chinese surname that also means 'plum' or 'plum tree' as a common noun, and a legend ties Laozi's birth to a plum tree. The second character, 耳, is the Chinese word for 'ear'. That detail connects to another persona long identified with him, Lao Dan, written 老聃, where Dan means 'Long-Ear' or 'the Long-Eared One'.

  Laozi also carries the courtesy name Boyang, written 伯陽. The character 伯 served as a title for the eldest son of a primary wife, for an elder uncle, and as a noble mark of an aristocratic lineage head ruling a small or medium domain. The character 陽 is yang, the solar and masculine life force of Taoist belief. The name Lao Dan, by contrast, traveled widely, used by Sima Qian in his Shiji, in the Zhuangzi, and by some modern scholars.

• 3. A Compilation Of Many Hands

  ›

  By the mid-twentieth century, the consensus among Western scholars described the Tao Te Ching as a compilation of Taoist sayings by many hands, with an author invented afterward. Multiple authorship over time is typical for early Chinese texts. What sets this book apart is its conspicuous absence of a central Master figure, which puts it in marked contrast with nearly all other early Chinese philosophical works.

  The physical evidence pushes in the same direction. The oldest manuscript containing text from the Tao Te Ching dates to the late 4th century BC, written on bamboo slips excavated as part of the Guodian Chu Slips. Those passages match roughly one third of the received text, some in the same order, but they are mixed with passages the transmitted version does not carry. That mixture suggests the book was still being revised and modified.

  The oldest complete manuscripts of the work on their own come from a tomb at Mawangdui and date to the early 2nd century BC. Analysis of early commentary on passages found in the received text supports an accretionary evolution rather than a single moment of authorship. The picture is a text that grew, not one that was written in an afternoon at a western gate.

• 4. Three Lives In One Biography

  ›

  Sima Qian, writing the Records of the Grand Historian in the 1st century BC, gives the earliest biographical reference to Laozi, and he hedges. He sets down multiple accounts of the man's life while voicing various levels of doubt in his own sources.

  In one version, Laozi was a contemporary of Confucius, born in the village of Quren in the state of Chu, in present-day Luyi in Henan. He was the son of the Censor-in-Chief of the Zhou dynasty and Lady Yishou, and he worked as Keeper of the Archives for the royal Zhou court. That post gave him access to the works of the Yellow Emperor and other classics, and he wrote a book in two parts before departing to the west.

  In a second version, Laozi was a different man called Lao Laizi, one of the Twenty-four Filial Exemplars, who wrote a book in 15 parts. His story features Zong the Warrior, who defeats an enemy and then leaves the enemy corpses for vultures. Laozi arrives while teaching the way of the Tao, is revealed to be Zong's long-lost father, and persuades his son that a beaten enemy should be treated with respect. Zong has the dead buried, both sides mourn, and a lasting peace is made.

  In a third version, he was the court astrologer Lao Dan, who lived during the 4th century BC reign of Duke Xian of Qin. Weary of the moral decay of Chengzhou, he ventured west to live as a hermit at the age of 80. At the western gate the guard Yinxi recognized him and asked him to record his wisdom before passing. The text he wrote was said to be the Tao Te Ching. In some tellings the sentry became a disciple and left with him, never to be seen again. In later interpretations the Old Master reached India and taught Siddartha Gautama, the Buddha, or was the Buddha himself.

• 5. The Way And Non-Action

  ›

  Cosmogony is the study of how the universe came to be, and the Tao Te Ching stands as one of the most significant treatises on it in Chinese thought. The book is often called simply the Laozi. It explains its ideas through paradox, analogy, old sayings, repetition, symmetry, rhyme, and rhythm, and unlike most works of its genre it lacks a central master character and rarely names historical people or events. That silence gives it an air of timelessness.

  The Tao itself is described as the source and ideal of all existence. It is unseen but not transcendent, immensely powerful yet supremely humble, the root of all things. People have desires and free will, and so they can alter their own nature. Many act unnaturally and upset the natural balance of the Tao, and the book aims to lead students back to their natural state in harmony with it. Language and conventional wisdom are treated as inherently biased and artificial, which is why paradoxes do so much of the work.

  Wu wei, literally 'non-action' or 'not acting', sits at the center of the text. The phrase carries many meanings at once, from 'not forcing' to 'acting spontaneously' to 'flowing with the moment'. It explains ziran, harmony with the Tao, and treats value distinctions as ideological and ambition of all sorts as springing from a single source. Simplicity and humility become key virtues, set against selfish action. On a political level wu wei means avoiding war, harsh laws, and heavy taxes.

  Alan Chan offers an example of the approach. Technology may bring a false sense of progress, and Laozi's answer is not to reject it but to seek the calm of wu wei, free from desires. That reading connects to passages urging rulers to keep their people in 'ignorance' or 'simple-minded'. Some scholars say this ignores the religious context, and others note that terms like 'valley spirit', written 谷神, and 'soul', written 魄, carry a metaphysical weight that resists a purely ethical reading.

• 6. From Sage To God

  ›

  Since the Han dynasty, the story of Laozi has carried strong religious overtones. As Taoism took root he was worshipped as a god. Belief in the revelation of the Tao from the divine Laozi led to the Way of the Celestial Masters, the first organized religious Taoist sect. In later tradition he became a personification of the Tao, said to have undergone numerous transformations and taken on guises across history to initiate the faithful.

  The myths grew vivid. Taoist accounts hold that Laozi was a virgin birth, conceived when his mother gazed upon a falling star, and that he remained in her womb for 62 years before being born as she leaned against a plum tree. He supposedly emerged as a grown man with a full grey beard and long earlobes, both symbols of wisdom and long life. Other myths say he was reborn 13 times after a first life in the days of Fuxi, and that in his last incarnation he lived 990 years while traveling to reveal the Tao.

  Religious Taoism elevated him into the pantheon as Taishang Laojun, one of the Three Pure Ones. His birthday is popularly held to fall on the 15th day of the second month of the Chinese calendar.

• 7. Ancestor Of Emperors

  ›

  Li Er, the traditional personal name, made Laozi the claimed forefather of countless later Lis. Many clans of the Li family trace their descent to him, including the emperors of the Tang dynasty, in a line known as the Longxi Li lineage. According to the Simpkinses, many or all of these lineages are questionable, yet they testify to his impact on Chinese culture.

  Under the Tang the honors stacked up. In the year 666, Emperor Gaozong named Laozi the 'Supremely Mysterious and Primordial Emperor'. In 743, Emperor Xuanzong declared him the 'Sage Ancestor' of the dynasty with the title 'Mysterious and Primordial Emperor', and elevated Laozi's parents to 'Innately Supreme Emperor' and 'Innate Empress'. In 749 came the title 'Sage Ancestor and Mysterious and Primordial Emperor of the Great Way', and in 754 a still grander one, the 'Great Sage Ancestor and Mysterious and Primordial Heavenly Emperor and Great Sovereign of the Golden Palace of the High and Supreme Great Way'.

  The role of disciple was idealized too. A seventh-century work, the Sandong Zhunang, or 'Pearly Bag of the Three Caverns', presents Laozi as the perfect Taoist master and the character Yinxi as the ideal student, moving through a formal sequence of preparation, testing, training, and attainment.

• 8. The First Libertarian

  ›

  Murray Rothbard, a right-libertarian economist, suggested that Laozi was the first libertarian, likening his ideas on government to Friedrich Hayek's theory of spontaneous order. Many contemporary philosophers read him as a proponent of limited government, drawing on the book's counsel of humility in leadership and a restrained approach to statecraft. Throughout Chinese history, potential officials had already invoked the authority of non-Confucian sages, especially Laozi and Zhuangzi, to justify refusing to serve any ruler at any time.

  The modern readings spread across the political map. James A. Dorn wrote that Laozi, like many 18th-century liberals, argued that minimizing government and letting individuals develop spontaneously would best achieve social and economic harmony. The Cato Institute's David Boaz included passages from the Tao Te Ching in his 1997 book The Libertarian Reader and noted that Laozi urged rulers to 'do nothing' because 'without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony'. The philosopher Roderick Long pushes back, arguing that the libertarian themes were borrowed from earlier Confucian writers.

  Anarchists found a friend in him as well. Rudolf Rocker praised Laozi's 'gentle wisdom' in his 1937 book Nationalism and Culture, and Peter Kropotkin, in a 1910 article for the Encyclopædia Britannica, counted him among the earliest proponents of anarchist concepts. Ursula K. Le Guin, in her own rendition of the Tao Te Ching, wrote that Laozi 'does not see political power as magic' and that 'no wonder anarchists and Taoists make good friends'. The figure modern scholars doubt ever lived keeps gathering new disciples across the centuries.