Korean language
Korean is the native language of about 81 million people, most of them of Korean descent. It carries two names that map to a divided peninsula. In the south it is Hangugeo, written 한국어. In the north it is Chosŏnŏ, written 조선어. The same speech, the same script, yet the words for the language itself diverge along a political fault line.
Its written form was the work of one king. In the 15th century King Sejong the Great personally built an alphabet to lift literacy among ordinary people. The aristocracy mocked it for being too easy to learn. How does a script invented to be simple end up ranked among the hardest languages on earth for English speakers? And why does a single tongue need two national dictionaries? The answers run through honorifics, borrowed words, and a border that splits even the alphabet's spelling rules.
King Sejong the Great introduced his alphabet in a document called the Hunminjeongeum. The script he created was called eonmun, meaning colloquial script. It spread quickly across the country and pushed literacy upward among people who had never been able to read.
The yangban aristocracy denounced the new letters, looking down on them precisely because they were so easy to learn. Classical Chinese had been the medium of formal writing and government since Chinese characters arrived in the 1st century BC, accessible only to the educated while most of the population stayed illiterate. Scholars had tried to bend Chinese characters to fit Korean, building cumbersome systems called idu, hyangchal, gugyeol, and gakpil, all defeated by the gap between the two languages.
Despite elite scorn, the common class embraced the alphabet and used it to print popular novels. Korean kings sometimes issued public notices written entirely in Hangul as early as the 16th century, reaching uneducated peasants and slaves. By the 17th century, the yangban themselves were exchanging Hangul letters with slaves, a sign of how widely the script had taken hold during the Joseon era.
The shift to Hangul as the main script came late. The Kabo Reform of 1894 abolished the Confucian examinations and ordered government documents issued in Hangul rather than literary Chinese. Hanja and mixed script remained primary until the mid 20th century, when the alphabet King Sejong designed finally became the everyday writing of Korea.
North Korea abolished Hanja in writing in 1949, though it still teaches the characters in schools. In South Korea, Hanja survives mainly in newspapers, scholarly papers, and disambiguation, largely absent from daily life but still vital for historical and linguistic study.
The two states even name the language by different roots. The English word Korean derives from Goryeo, thought to be the first Korean dynasty known to Western nations. In South Korea the language goes by hangugeo, hangungmal, and urimal, meaning our language, with han drawn from Samhan and the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In the north and in China it is most often Joseonmal or Joseoneo, taken from Joseon, the name kept until the proclamation of the Korean Empire. In mainland China, after diplomatic relations with South Korea began in 1992, Cháoxiǎnyǔ came to mean the northern standard while Hánguóyǔ meant the southern.
Separate governments produced separate norms. South Korea sets its vocabulary through the Standard Korean Language Dictionary, North Korea through the Korean Language Dictionary. Both standards rest on the Seoul dialect, the speech of the area that, as Hanyang, served as the Joseon capital for 500 years. Yet since 1966 North Korea officially declares its standard based on Pyongyang speech.
The divergence reaches into spelling and even avoidance. The north writes the word for mortal enemy as wonssu rather than wonsu, possibly to avoid ever referring to Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, or Kim Jong Un as the enemy, since enemy and field marshal are homophones in the south. The word dongmu once meant friend across the whole peninsula. After the north adopted it as the equivalent of the Communist comrade, southerners abandoned it for chingu and beot. Despite all this, regional dialects within each country differ more from one another than the two national standards do, and they remain largely mutually intelligible.
The relationship between a speaker and their audience sits at the center of Korean grammar. Honorifics reflect the bond between speaker and the person spoken of. Speech levels reflect the bond between speaker and the person spoken to. Korean has seven verb paradigms, or speech levels, each with its own endings to mark how formal a situation is.
Those seven levels carry names built from the non-honorific imperative of the verb hada, meaning do, plus the suffix che, meaning style. Three highly polite levels group together as jondaenmal, two low-politeness levels as banmal, and two remaining levels are neither polite nor impolite. A speaker raises the register for an older relative, a stranger of equal or greater age, or an employer, teacher, or customer, and lowers it for a younger stranger, student, or employee.
Honorifics in traditional Korea were strictly hierarchical, shaped by caste and estate systems far more stratified than anything used today. In contemporary Korea they apply to people who are psychologically distant as well as those superior in status. Younger speakers have loosened the old rules. It is now common to hear young people use banmal with older relatives, not out of disrespect but to signal intimacy and closeness, as social structures and attitudes shift in a fast-changing society.
Native Korean words form the core of the vocabulary, but a large share of words, especially those naming abstract ideas, are Sino-Korean. The exact proportion is disputed. Sohn estimated 50 to 60 percent in 2001, then raised it to 65 percent in 2006. Jeong Jae-do, a compiler of the dictionary Urimal Keun Sajeon, argues it could be as low as 30 percent, noting that dictionaries compiled during the colonial period included many unused Sino-Korean words.
Korean carries two complete sets of numbers because of this layering. One is Sino-Korean, like il, i, and sam for one, two, and three. The other is native Korean, like hana, dul, and set. English does something similar with native words and Latinate equivalents such as water and aqua or two and dual. But Korean and Chinese are genetically unrelated, so the two sets differ completely, and every Sino-Korean morpheme is monosyllabic while native ones can be polysyllabic.
Modern loanwords beyond Sino-Korean come overwhelmingly from English, roughly 90 percent of them. Some arrived indirectly through Japanese, including German-rooted terms like areubaiteu for part-time job and allereugi for allergy. English-derived speech, called Konglish and written 콩글리시, keeps growing in South Korea, where loanwords excluding Sino-Korean make up about 5 percent of vocabulary. North Korea's isolation has spared its speech that influence.
The assumption that the north purges foreign words turns out to be too simple. According to researchers like Jeon Soo-tae, who has seen first-hand North Korean data, the country trimmed difficult foreign words much as the south did. In 2021 Moon Sung-guk of Kim Il Sung University wrote that Kim Jong Il insisted vernacularized Sino-Korean vocabulary be kept as is. Kim argued that terms like k'omp'yut'ŏ for computer and hadŭdisŭk'ŭ for hard disk should keep the names of their inventors, and that ch'ok'ollet'ŭ, chocolate, should not be replaced because it had been used for so long.
Korean generally lacks grammatical gender, setting it apart from most European languages. One of the few exceptions is the third-person singular pronoun, which splits into geu for male and geunyeo for female. Before geunyeo was coined to translate she into Korean, geu stood alone with no gender. Because of that origin, geunyeo never appears in spoken Korean, surfacing only in writing.
Three models try to explain gender and language here: the deficit model, the dominance model, and the cultural difference model. The deficit model treats male speech as the default and female speech as lesser. The dominance model sees women as lacking power within a patriarchal society. The cultural difference model points to differing upbringing. Korean society long placed women in disadvantaged positions within a patriarchally dominated family system built to maintain family lines.
Vocabulary itself encodes that history. A husband is bakkannyangban, outside nobleman, while he introduces his wife as ansaram, inside person. Maternal grandparents take the prefix oe, meaning outside, producing oeharabeoji and oehalmeoni. A female company president is yeosajang against the plain sajang, and a male nurse is namja ganhosa against the plain ganhosa.
Differences also live in tone. Men learn an authoritative falling tone, and in Korean culture a deeper voice reads as more polite, impartial, and professional. Women using a rising tone with the ending -yo are perceived as less polite, since -yo carries prefixes signaling uncertainty while the deferential -hamnida, the most polite and formal form, does not. Cho and Whitman in 2019 noted how context reshapes words: jagi usually works as a reflexive pronoun, yet middle-aged women use it to address someone close, and young Koreans use it for lovers or spouses regardless of gender.
Korean syllable structure follows the pattern of an optional onset consonant, a glide, a core vowel, and an optional final coda. The codas are limited to a small set, and sounds change constantly depending on their neighbors. The consonant /s/ is aspirated and becomes an alveolo-palatal sound before certain vowels, and at the end of a syllable it shifts to /t/, as in beoseot, meaning mushroom.
The consonant /h/ is a chameleon. It can become a bilabial sound before o or u, a palatal one before j or i, a velar one before the high back unrounded vowel, a voiced one between voiced sounds, and a plain h elsewhere. The plosives /p, t, t͡ɕ, k/ turn voiced between voiced sounds, and they become nasals before nasal sounds.
The liquid /l/ has its own rules. It becomes a flap between vowels and stays a lateral at a syllable's end or beside another /l/. Word-initial /l/ was traditionally forbidden, disappearing before certain glides and otherwise turning into /n/, until the inflow of western loanwords reversed the trend. That old prohibition became a codified initial law in South Korean pronunciation standards, applied to Sino-Korean words, while the north keeps the initial sound. So labor is rodong in the north and nodong in the south, and history is ryeoksa against yeoksa.
Hangul spelling does not chase these assimilations. It keeps the underlying, partly historical morphology, which can make it hard to tell which phonemes a written word actually contains. Some scholars argue the modern Seoul dialect is now undergoing tonogenesis, as the distinction between lenis, aspirated, and fortis consonants shifts away from voice onset time toward pitch.
Korean travels well beyond the peninsula. It is recognized as a minority language in parts of China, in Jilin, specifically Yanbian Prefecture and Changbai County. The Sakhalin Koreans speak it on that Russian island just north of Japan, and the Koryo-saram carry it through parts of Central Asia, where they call it Koryo-mar. Korean, the Jeju language, and a few extinct relatives form the compact Koreanic family, though Jejuan and Korean are not mutually intelligible.
Demand to learn the language has surged for reasons both old and new. In the United States, heritage students were estimated to form over 80 percent of learners at non-military universities in 2007. Then Sejong Institutes reported a sharp rise in students of other backgrounds between 2009 and 2011, which they tied to South Korean music and television. By 2018, the rise of K-Pop was credited with driving more people into Korean classes at US universities.
That appetite is measured by exams. The Test of Proficiency in Korean, the TOPIK, was first administered in 1997 and taken by 2,274 people. The total who have since sat it has passed 1 million, with more than 150,000 candidates in 2012. It now runs in 45 regions inside South Korea and 72 nations outside it.
Institutions back the spread. The Seoul-based National Institute of Korean Language was created by presidential decree on the 23rd of January 1991, while the north relies on the Language Institute of the Academy of Social Sciences. The King Sejong Institute, named for the king who built the alphabet, counts 59 branches in Europe, 15 in Africa, 146 in Asia, 34 in the Americas, and 4 in Oceania, carrying his easy-to-learn letters to learners his critics never imagined.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
How many people speak Korean and where is it the national language?
Korean is the native language of about 81 million people, mostly of Korean descent. It is the national language of both North Korea and South Korea, and it is also one of the two official languages of China's Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture.
Who created the Korean alphabet Hangul?
King Sejong the Great personally developed the alphabetic featural writing system known today as Hangul in the 15th century to promote literacy among common people. He introduced it in a document called the Hunminjeongeum, where it was called eonmun, meaning colloquial script.
Why is the Korean language called Hangugeo in the south and Chosŏnŏ in the north?
In South Korea the language is called Hangugeo, with han drawn from Samhan and the Three Kingdoms of Korea, while in North Korea and China it is most often Joseonmal or Joseoneo, taken from Joseon. The names reflect different names used for Korea in the two states.
Why is Korean considered difficult to learn for English speakers?
The United States Defense Language Institute places Korean in Category IV alongside Japanese, Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese, and Arabic, requiring 64 weeks of instruction compared with 26 weeks for Category I languages like Italian, French, and Spanish. The Foreign Service Institute also places Korean in Category IV, its highest level of difficulty.
What is the difference between honorifics and speech levels in Korean?
Honorifics show respect toward the referent, the person being spoken about, while speech levels show respect toward the audience, the person being spoken to. Korean has seven speech levels, each with its own verb endings to indicate the formality of a situation.
How much of Korean vocabulary is Sino-Korean?
The exact proportion is debated. Sohn estimated 50 to 60 percent in 2001 and 65 percent in 2006, while Jeong Jae-do estimated it could be as low as 30 percent, noting that colonial-era dictionaries included many unused Sino-Korean words.
All sources
69 references cited across the entry
- 2BookLehrbuch der Modernen Koreanischen SpracheWinfred Hermann — Buske — 1994
- 3국가상징Naenara
- 4The Korean Language: Key Differences Between North and South - Bloglegaltranslations — 2020-03-16
- 5BookA typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspectiveAndreas Hölzl — Language Science Press — 2018-08-29
- 6JournalMixed Script and Literacy in KoreaYoung-Key Kim-Renaud — 1 January 2004
- 7JournalReconstructing the Language Map of Prehistorical Northeast AsiaJuha Janhunen — 2010
- 8JournalFrom Koguryo to Tamna: Slowly riding to the South with speakers of Proto-KoreanAlexander Vovin — 2013
- 9JournalNortheast Asian Linguistic Ecology and the Advent of Rice Agriculture in Korea and JapanJohn Whitman — 2011-12-01
- 10BookAsia's Orthographic DilemmaWm C. Hannas — University of Hawaii Press — 1997
- 11BookConcise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the CognitivistsE. F. K. Koerner et al. — Elsevier — 2014-06-28
- 12BookThe Korean Alphabet: Its History and StructureYoung-Key Kim-Renaud — University of Hawaii Press — 1997
- 14Korean Literature in Translation – Chapter Four: It All Changes! The Creation of HangulCharles Montgomery — KTLit — 19 January 2016
- 15BookOne into Many: Translation and the Dissemination of Classical Chinese LiteratureTak-hung Leo Chan — Rodopi — 2003
- 16MagazineKorea NewsreviewKorea Herald, Incorporated — 1 January 1994
- 17BookKorea and East Asia: The Story of a PhoenixKenneth B. Lee — Greenwood Publishing Group — 1997
- 19Korean HistoryKorea.assembly.go.kr
- 21Kyunghyang Shinmun이기환 — 30 August 2017
- 22조선닷컴이덕일 — The Chosun Ilbo
- 24JournalKoreanic loanwords in Khitan and their importance in the decipherment of the latterAlexander Vovin — June 2017
- 25Martin (1966)Martin — 1966
- 26Miller (1971)Miller — 1971
- 27BookAltaiskaya problema i proishozhdeniye yaponskogo yazikaSergei Starostin — Nauka — 1991
- 28Whitman (1985) p. 232Whitman — 1985
- 29JournalArchaeolinguistic Evidence for the Farming/Language Dispersal of KoreanicMark J. Hudson et al. — 2020
- 30한국어 어문 규범National Institute of Korean Language
- 32BookUsing Korean: A Guide to Contemporary UsageMiho Choo — Cambridge University Press — 2008
- 33Sohn (2001) p. Section 1.5.3 "Korean vocabulary", pp. 12–13Sohn — 2001
- 34NewsRadio Free Asia이장균 — 17 April 2004
- 36NewsJin-su Kim2009-09-11
- 37JournalThe use of Hanja (Chinese characters) in Korean toponyms: Practices and issuesSungjae Choo — 2016
- 38JournalCross Adoption of language between different genders: The case of the Korean kinship terms hyeng and enniMinju Kim — Berkeley Women and Language Group — 1999
- 39JournalWomen's Status in South Korea: Tradition and ChangeMarian Lief Palley — December 1990
- 40JournalAnalysis of Gender Pronoun Errors in Korean Speakers' English SpeechSooho Song — 2022
- 42영선 전
- 43BookThe handbook of Korean linguisticsLucien Brown et al. — Wiley-Blackwell — 2015
- 44BookHandbook of the Changing World Language MapChangyong Yang et al. — Springer International Publishing — 2019
- 45JournalOsaka Ikuno-ku jiyeok jaeil Jejuinui Jeju bangeon sayong siltaee gwanhan yeongu김보향 (Kim Bo-hyang) — August 2014
- 46JournalTonogenesis in early Contemporary Seoul Korean: A longitudinal case studyKang Yoonjung et al. — September 2013
- 47JournalTonogenesis in contemporary Korean with special reference to the onset-tone interaction and the loss of a consonant oppositionKim Mi-Ryoung — 2013
- 48ThesisDevelopment of pitch contrast and Seoul Korean intonationCho Sunghye — University of Pennsylvania — 2017
- 49JournalAn apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic accountChoi Jiyoun et al. — October 22, 2020
- 50The Kookje Daily News상도(Sangdo) 정(Jeong) — 31 March 2017
- 51Book『朝鮮語を学ぼう』Sanshūsha — 1987
- 52Sohn (2006) p. 38Sohn — 2006
- 54NewsKoreas: Divided by a common languageSang-hun Choe — 2006-08-30
- 55NewsBeliefs that bind2007-10-23
- 58TOPIKiSeodang Korean Language Center
- 59JournalThe Origins of the Transformation of the Defense Language ProgramHarold E. Raugh
- 60DLI's language guidelines2010-08-01
- 61LanguagesUnited States Department of State
- 62JournalIssues of Validity of SAT Subject Test Korea with ListeningSaekyun H. Lee
- 63NewsGlobal popularity of Korean language surges2012-07-22
- 64NewsK-pop drives boom in Korean language lessonsMatt Pickles — 2018-07-11
- 65NewsKorea Marks 558th Hangul Day2004-10-10
- 66NewsKorean language test-takers pass 1 mil.Yun Suh-young — 2013-01-20
- 69Universal Declaration of Human RightsUnited Nations