James Prescott Joule

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  James Prescott Joule was born on the 24th of December 1818, the son of a wealthy brewer, in Salford. The unit of energy that powers every calculation in modern physics, every kilowatt-hour on an electricity bill, and every equation in engineering bears his name. Yet the man who established the relationship between heat, work, and energy spent much of his life running a brewery and conducting science as a serious hobby. How did a brewer from the north of England overturn a theory that had dominated the science of heat since Antoine Lavoisier introduced it in 1783? What drove Joule to keep measuring, keep refining, and keep publishing when the Royal Society rejected his papers and the scientific establishment met his announcements with silence? And what does it say about science that Hermann Helmholtz, writing from Germany in 1847, had to tell the world what the British had been slow to accept?

• 2. Brewer and Experimenter

  ›

  Benjamin Joule's brewery on New Bailey Street in Salford was the setting for his son's earliest scientific instincts. James Joule and his brother gave electric shocks to each other and to the family's servants, a boyhood pastime that foreshadowed a lifetime of hands-on investigation. His formal tutor was John Dalton, the celebrated chemist whose atomic theory would later underpin Joule's own ideas about the nature of heat. William Henry the chemist, and Manchester engineers Peter Ewart and Eaton Hodgkinson, also shaped the young Joule's thinking.

  As an adult Joule managed the brewery while science remained his secondary calling. Around 1840 he began investigating whether the newly invented electric motor could replace the brewery's steam engines. His early papers on the subject appeared in William Sturgeon's Annals of Electricity, and he joined the London Electrical Society that Sturgeon had helped establish.

  The practical question of which prime mover was cheaper to run sharpened into a deeper question. Joule set out to compare the two systems by capturing their output in a single standard: the ability to raise one pound to a height of one foot, which he called the foot-pound. Burning a pound of coal in a steam engine, he found, was more economical than consuming a costly pound of zinc in an electric battery. That conclusion, rooted in a businessman's ledger, set him on a path that would end with one of the foundational laws of physics.

• 3. Challenging Caloric Theory

  ›

  In 1841 Joule discovered what became known as Joule's first law: the heat produced by a voltaic current is proportional to the square of the current's intensity, multiplied by the resistance of the conductor. Two years later, in 1843, he published experiments showing that this heating came from generation of heat within the conductor itself, not from a transfer of heat already present elsewhere in the apparatus.

  That finding directly challenged caloric theory, the dominant model since Lavoisier's 1783 formulation, which held that heat was an indestructible fluid that could neither be created nor destroyed. Sadi Carnot had built a successful theory of the heat engine on caloric assumptions in 1824, and Carnot's practical triumphs gave the theory considerable authority. Supporters pointed to the Peltier-Seebeck effect as evidence that heat and current could convert reversibly, which seemed to defend the caloric view.

  Joule was working entirely outside academia and outside the engineering profession. When he announced his estimate of the mechanical equivalent of heat at a meeting of the chemical section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Cork in August 1843, the room met him with silence. His rejection of caloric reasoning was partly theological. In a paper he read to the Royal Society on the 20th of June 1844, and which the Society refused to publish, he argued that any theory requiring the annihilation of force was necessarily wrong because the power to destroy belonged to the Creator alone. The paper eventually appeared in the Philosophical Magazine in 1845.

• 4. The Paddle Wheel and Precision

  ›

  Joule's most celebrated experiment, reported at the British Association meeting in Cambridge in June 1845, used a falling weight to spin a paddle wheel inside an insulated barrel of water. Gravity did the mechanical work; the temperature of the water recorded the heat produced. From this apparatus he estimated a mechanical equivalent of 819 ftlbf/BTU. The description was published in a letter to the Philosophical Magazine in September 1845.

  Before that, Joule had pursued two other routes to the same number. Forcing water through a perforated cylinder allowed him to measure the slight viscous heating of the fluid, yielding a value of 770 ftlbf/BTU. A third approach measured the heat produced by compressing a gas against the work done in compressing it, giving 798 ftlbf/BTU. The agreement between results obtained by electrical and purely mechanical means, each reaching the same order of magnitude, was to Joule compelling evidence that work and heat were genuinely convertible.

  Critics doubted his precision. Joule claimed to measure temperatures to within a fraction of a degree Fahrenheit. Such accuracy was uncommon in the experimental physics of his day, and sceptics may have underestimated his background: years of practical work in brewing had given him skills in measurement and access to precision instruments. He was also supported by scientific instrument-maker John Benjamin Dancer. By 1850 Joule published a refined value of 772.692 ftlbf/BTU, closer to twentieth-century estimates than any of his earlier figures.

• 5. Thomson and the Turn of the Tide

  ›

  The British Association meeting in Oxford in 1847 brought together George Gabriel Stokes, Michael Faraday, and the young William Thomson, who had just been appointed professor of natural philosophy at the University of Glasgow. Stokes was inclined to support Joule; Faraday was struck by the work, though he harboured doubts; Thomson was intrigued but sceptical.

  Later that same year, Joule married Amelia Grimes on the 18th of August and the couple honeymooned in Chamonix. An unplanned encounter with Thomson there led the two men to arrange an experiment measuring the temperature difference between the top and bottom of the Cascade de Sallanches waterfall, though the attempt proved impractical. The contact, however, was made.

  Thomson's 1848 account of absolute temperature still described the conversion of heat into mechanical work as probably impossible, yet a footnote acknowledged Joule's discoveries as very remarkable. Joule read the paper and wrote to Thomson on the 6th of October. Thomson replied on the 27th, and a sustained exchange of letters followed. Over two years Thomson grew increasingly dissatisfied with Carnot's framework and increasingly convinced by Joule's. His 1851 paper declared that the whole theory of the motive power of heat rested on two propositions: one due to Joule, and one due to Carnot and Clausius.

  Formal collaboration ran from 1852 to 1856. Joule conducted experiments; Thomson analysed the results and proposed further tests. Their joint work produced the Joule-Thomson effect and brought about wide acceptance of both Joule's measurements and the kinetic theory of heat. Hermann Helmholtz, writing in 1847, had already credited Joule alongside Julius Robert von Mayer for establishing the conservation of energy, acknowledging work that the British scientific establishment had been slow to recognize.

• 6. Kinetic Theory and Wider Thought

  ›

  Joule's laboratory notebooks record a belief that heat was a form of rotational, rather than translational, kinetic energy in molecules. That distinction mattered: if heat was molecular motion, one had to explain why the motion did not gradually die out. Joule's answer required perfectly elastic collisions between molecules, an assumption that placed him at the edge of what the science of his day could accept. The very existence of atoms and molecules remained disputed for another fifty years after his key papers, though work on that question progressed through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries from Dalton through to Ernest Rutherford.

  Joule drew intellectual ancestry for his ideas from Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton, John Locke, Benjamin Thompson (Count Rumford), and Humphry Davy. He estimated a mechanical equivalent of 1,034 foot-pound from Rumford's publications, though later writers have pointed out that Rumford's experiments did not amount to systematic quantitative measurements. In a personal note, Joule suggested that Julius Robert von Mayer's measurement was no more accurate than Rumford's.

  He also had interests that strayed into natural observation. In 1869 he wrote to the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society noting the last glimpse of the setting sun as bluish green. He did not try to explain the phenomenon, and later writers attributed to him an explanation of the green flash that the letter does not actually contain. Peter Ewart's 1813 paper On the measure of moving force, which Hodgkinson had read to the Literary and Philosophical Society in April 1844, remained a deep influence on how Joule framed the concept of energy throughout his career.

• 7. Honours and Legacy

  ›

  Joule was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1850, the same year he published his refined measurement of the mechanical equivalent of heat. The Royal Medal followed in 1852 for that paper, and the Copley Medal came in 1870 for his experimental researches on the dynamical theory of heat. He served as President of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society from 1860, and twice as President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1872 and again in 1887.

  Honorary degrees arrived from Trinity College Dublin in 1857, the University of Oxford in 1860, and the University of Edinburgh in 1871. In 1878 he received a civil list pension of two hundred pounds per annum for services to science. The Albert Medal of the Royal Society of Arts, awarded in 1880, cited him for establishing the true relation between heat, electricity, and mechanical work and for giving the engineer a sure guide in applying science to industrial pursuits.

  Joule died at his home in Sale and is buried at Brooklands cemetery there. A memorial stands in the north choir aisle of Westminster Abbey, though he is not interred there. A statue by Alfred Gilbert stands in Manchester Town Hall. The Wetherspoons pub in Sale is named The J. P. Joule after him. His son Benjamin Arthur Joule lived from 1850 to 1922; his daughter Alice Amelia from 1852 to 1899. Amelia Grimes, his wife, died in 1854, seven years after their marriage. The SI unit of energy, which carries his name into every branch of physics, engineering, and everyday measurement, is the most enduring mark of a man who worked at a brewery while reshaping the foundations of thermodynamics.