Indian Rebellion of 1857
The Indian Rebellion of 1857 began not with a grand proclamation but with a parade-ground refusal. On the 10th of May 1857, sepoys of the British East India Company's garrison at Meerut, a cantonment town 40 miles northeast of Delhi, broke from their barracks, freed 85 imprisoned comrades, and turned their weapons on their officers. Within hours, the violence had spread into the city itself. Within days, it had reached Delhi, upending the order of an entire subcontinent.
What followed was 14 months of rebellion that would stretch across the upper Gangetic plain and central India, consume the ancient cities of Delhi and Lucknow, and draw in nobles, peasants, landlords, and rulers who had their own reasons for fighting or staying loyal. The uprising carried many names: the Sepoy Mutiny, the Great Rebellion, the Revolt of 1857, the First War of Independence. Each name reflects a different understanding of what it was.
The rebellion was not simply a military mutiny. It was fed by resentments over land taxes, social reforms, religious fears, and the relentless expansion of a trading company that had made itself the government of much of India. It ended only with the rebels' final defeat at Gwalior on the 20th of June 1858. And its consequences outlasted every battle: the East India Company was dissolved, the British Crown took direct rule, and Queen Victoria issued a proclamation of rights that Indians would invoke for decades as the promises of empire went unfulfilled.
The British East India Company had established a presence in India as far back as 1612, but its transformation into a territorial power began with its victory at the Battle of Plassey in 1757. A consolidating victory at the Battle of Buxar in 1764 brought the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II to terms, and he granted the company the right to collect revenue across Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha, a concession known as the Diwani.
From those eastern footholds, the company's appetite expanded steadily. The Anglo-Mysore Wars between 1766 and 1799 and the Anglo-Maratha Wars between 1772 and 1818 brought vast new territories under company control. After the Second Anglo-Sikh War in 1849, Punjab, the North-West Frontier Province, and Kashmir were annexed, though Kashmir was immediately sold to the Dogra Dynasty of Jammu under the Treaty of Amritsar and became a princely state.
By the mid-19th century, the company had mastered two methods of expansion: subsidiary alliances, which bound local rulers to the company while preserving their nominal authority, and outright annexation. The Doctrine of Lapse, which denied recognition to adopted heirs of rulers who died without a biological male successor, was a particularly sharp instrument. It was under this doctrine that Jhansi was seized in 1853 after the Raja died without a biological heir. Berar was annexed in 1854, and the prosperous state of Oudh followed two years later. Each annexation carried consequences that would feed directly into the rebellion.
Just before the rebellion, the East India Company's forces numbered over 300,000 sepoys against roughly 50,000 British soldiers. The three presidency armies, Bengal, Bombay, and Madras, were organized differently, and those differences mattered enormously.
The Bengal Army was the largest and the most socially stratified. Since the 1770s, when Governor-General Warren Hastings began recruiting further west to replace sepoys from Bengal who were now considered suspect, the army had drawn heavily from high-caste Rajput and Brahmin communities in Awadh and Bihar. These men were collectively known as Purbiyas. The army officially recognised Hindu festivals, allowed soldiers to dine in separate facilities, and exempted them from overseas service, which high-caste Hindus considered ritually polluting. The Madras and Bombay Armies, by contrast, were described as more localized and caste-neutral, not favouring high-caste recruits.
For decades, this arrangement held. But from the 1840s onward, administrative changes in Calcutta began eroding long-standing privileges. After the annexation of Oudh and Punjab, soldiers no longer received extra allowances, called batta, for service in those regions, because they were no longer classified as foreign missions. Relations between British junior officers and their sepoys deteriorated as many officers increasingly treated their men as racial inferiors. The General Service Enlistment Act of the 25th of July 1856 then required new Bengal Army recruits to accept overseas service if called upon. Serving sepoys feared the obligation would eventually be extended to them, and that the tradition of sons following fathers into the same regiments would be broken. There were also grievances about promotions tied to seniority, with many Indian officers not reaching commissioned rank until they were, in the source's phrase, too old to be effective.
The Pattern 1853 Enfield rifle-musket required a paper cartridge that soldiers tore open with their teeth before loading. In early 1857, rumours circulated among sepoys that the grease on these cartridges was made from cow tallow, offensive to Hindus, and pig lard, offensive to Muslims. Historian Kim Wagner has argued that there is little direct evidence that large numbers of greased cartridges were actually issued to Indian troops before the revolt. What mattered was the belief.
British officials learned of the rumours through reports of disputes at military depots including Dum Dum and Barrackpore. The company ordered that future cartridges be supplied without grease and allowed sepoys to apply their own lubricant. The concession backfired: it reinforced the suspicion that the authorities had been concealing the truth. The greased cartridge affair became a symbol of British cultural insensitivity, not because it was necessarily the truth but because it crystallised every other anxiety that had been accumulating for years.
The tensions produced their first violent incident on the 29th of March 1857 at the Barrackpore parade ground near Calcutta. Mangal Pandey, a 29-year-old soldier of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry, declared that he would rebel against his commanders and opened fire on his superiors. He shot at Sergeant-Major James Hewson and then fired at Lieutenant Henry Baugh, hitting Baugh's horse. When General John Hearsey ordered the commander of the quarter guard, Jemadar Ishwari Prasad, to arrest Pandey, the Jemadar refused. The other sepoys present drew back, with one exception, a soldier named Shaikh Paltu who physically restrained Pandey from continuing his attack. Pandey then tried to take his own life, wounding but not killing himself. He was court-martialled on the 6th of April and hanged two days later. Ishwari Prasad was hanged on the 21st of April. Shaikh Paltu was promoted to havildar but was murdered shortly before the regiment was formally disbanded. Sepoys across other regiments regarded the punishments as excessive, and the spectacle of the formal disbanding helped, in the view of some historians, to foment the wider rebellion.
At Meerut the garrison held 2,357 Indian sepoys alongside 2,038 British soldiers and 12 British-manned guns. On the 24th of April, Lieutenant Colonel George Carmichael-Smyth ordered 90 men of the 3rd Bengal Light Cavalry to perform firing drills. All but five refused their cartridges. On the 9th of May, the 85 men who had refused were court-martialled, most sentenced to ten years' hard labour, eleven younger soldiers to five years. The entire garrison watched as the condemned were stripped of their uniforms and shackled. As they were marched to jail, the condemned soldiers berated their comrades for failing to support them.
The next evening, the Indian troops broke into revolt. British officers who tried to stop the first outbreaks were killed. Four civilian men, eight women, and eight children were killed in attacks on British quarters. About 50 Indian civilians, some of them officers' servants who had tried to defend their employers, were also killed by the sepoys. The rebels freed their imprisoned comrades and, as the British historian Philip Mason observed, it was almost inevitable they would make for Delhi: a strong walled city 40 miles away, the ancient capital, the seat of the nominal Mughal Emperor, and containing no British troops.
Early on the 11th of May, the first parties of the 3rd Cavalry reached Delhi. From beneath the windows of the 81-year-old Emperor Bahadur Shah II's apartments, they called on him to lead them. He initially treated the sepoys as ordinary petitioners, but the revolt spread rapidly through the city. On the 16th of May, up to 50 British prisoners who had been held in the palace or discovered hiding in the city were killed in a courtyard by some of the emperor's servants. Bahadur Shah eventually accepted the sepoys' allegiance and was proclaimed Emperor of Hindustan, a proclamation that carried enormous symbolic weight across northern India but immediately turned the Sikhs of the Punjab against the rebellion, as they had no wish to see Mughal rule restored.
In June 1857, sepoys under General Wheeler in Cawnpore besieged the British entrenchment. Wheeler was a respected veteran married to an Indian woman, and he had relied on his personal relationships with the local hereditary prime minister Nana Sahib to forestall rebellion rather than strengthen his fortifications. The besieged endured three weeks with little water or food, suffering continuous casualties.
On the 25th of June, Nana Sahib offered safe passage to Allahabad. With barely three days' rations remaining, the British agreed. On the morning of the 27th, the British party made their way to the river, where boats provided by Nana Sahib were waiting. Firing broke out as the party reached the dock, the boats were abandoned by their crews, and most of them caught fire. Rebel cavalry rode into the water to finish off survivors. After the firing, the men were shot. Only four men escaped alive on one of the boats: two private soldiers, a lieutenant, and Captain Mowbray Thomson, who later wrote a first-hand account titled The Story of Cawnpore, published in London in 1859.
The surviving women and children, some 206 in total along with five men, were confined first at the Savada Kothi and then at a building called the Bibighar. By the 15th of July it was clear a Company relief force would reach Cawnpore, and a decision was made that the hostages must be killed. When the sepoys refused the order, two Muslim butchers, two Hindu peasants, and one of Nana's bodyguards carried out the killings with knives and hatchets. The bodies were thrown into a nearby well 50 feet deep; when the well was filled within 6 feet of the top, the remainder were thrown into the Ganges. Cawnpore became a rallying cry for the British for the remainder of the conflict, hardening attitudes against the sepoys and extinguishing most anti-imperial sentiment in Britain. Nana Sahib vanished near the end of the rebellion and his fate was never established.
Rani Lakshmi Bai of Jhansi became the rebellion's most enduring figure. Her state had been annexed in 1853 under the Doctrine of Lapse after her husband died without a biological heir, and British authorities refused to recognise her adopted son as his successor. When war broke out, a small group of Company officials took refuge in Jhansi Fort. The Rani negotiated their evacuation, but when they left the fort they were massacred by rebels over whom she had no control. The British suspected her of complicity despite her denials.
In March 1858, the Central India Field Force under Sir Hugh Rose laid siege to Jhansi. The Rani fled in disguise after the city fell. On the 1st of June 1858, she and a group of Maratha rebels captured the fortress city of Gwalior from the Scindia rulers, who were British allies. The Central India Field Force advanced rapidly, and the Rani died on the 17th of June, the second day of the Battle of Gwalior, apparently killed by a carbine shot from the 8th King's Royal Irish Hussars according to three independent Indian accounts. Some commentators compared her to Joan of Arc.
Across the rebellion, the pattern of who fought and who held back was complicated. Fifty-four of the Bengal Army's 74 regular Native Infantry regiments mutinied, but the Bombay Army had only three mutinies in its 29 regiments, and the Madras Army had none at all. The large princely states of Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, and Kashmir did not join the rebellion. Governor-General Lord Canning described these states as breakwaters in a storm. The Sikhs of the Punjab actively helped the British, fearing the restoration of Mughal authority and holding longstanding grievances against the Purbiya sepoys they had faced in the Anglo-Sikh Wars. Even within the rebellion, Islamic scholars were divided: Maulana Sayyid Nazir Husain Dehlvi, one of the most influential ulema in Delhi, refused calls to declare a jihad and declared in favour of British rule, framing the Muslim-British relationship as a legal contract.
The rebels' defeat at Gwalior on the 20th of June 1858 effectively ended the military contest, though Britain did not formally declare the hostilities over until the 8th of July 1859. On the 1st of November 1858, the British granted amnesty to all rebels not involved in murder.
The institutional consequences were sweeping. The East India Company, which had governed much of India for two centuries, was dissolved. The British Crown assumed direct authority through the Government of India Act 1858, creating the new British Raj. The army was reorganized, and the financial and administrative systems overhauled. The proportion of British to Indian troops was substantially increased as a deliberate policy.
Also on the 1st of November 1858, Queen Victoria issued a proclamation to the people of India, promising rights comparable to those of other British subjects. The proclamation lacked the force of a constitutional provision, and in the following decades, as admission to those rights proved elusive, Indians began citing the Queen's words in growing assertions of a new nationalism. The rebellion had not produced any articles of faith pointing toward a new political system, as the source observes, but the gap between Victoria's promises and the realities of colonial rule gave the next generation of Indian political leaders a potent and official text to hold against the empire. Kunwar Singh, the 80-year-old Rajput zamindar of Jagdishpur who had led the Bihar rebellion, fought on until his death in 1858, but the cause for which he fought would take nearly another century to reach its conclusion.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
When and where did the Indian Rebellion of 1857 begin?
The Indian Rebellion of 1857 began on the 10th of May 1857 as a mutiny of sepoys at the British East India Company's garrison in Meerut, a town 40 miles northeast of Delhi. It then spread into other mutinies and civilian rebellions across the upper Gangetic plain and central India.
What caused the Indian Rebellion of 1857?
The rebellion resulted from an accumulation of causes including resentment over invasive social reforms, harsh land taxes, the annexation of princely states under the Doctrine of Lapse, changes to soldiers' pay and service conditions, and fears that the company was encouraging mass conversions to Christianity. The immediate flashpoint was the introduction of the Pattern 1853 Enfield rifle, whose cartridges were rumoured to be greased with cow tallow and pig lard, violating Hindu and Muslim religious practice.
Who was Mangal Pandey and what role did he play in the Indian Rebellion of 1857?
Mangal Pandey was a 29-year-old soldier of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry who, on the 29th of March 1857 at the Barrackpore parade ground near Calcutta, declared he would rebel against his commanders and opened fire on his superiors. He was court-martialled on the 6th of April 1857 and hanged two days later. His punishment and the formal disbanding of his regiment helped foment the wider rebellion.
What happened to Bahadur Shah Zafar during the Indian Rebellion of 1857?
Bahadur Shah II, the 81-year-old Mughal ruler, was declared Emperor of Hindustan by rebel sepoys who reached Delhi on the 11th of May 1857. Most accounts suggest he was coerced into accepting their allegiance. After the British retook Delhi in September 1857, Zafar fled to Humayun's tomb and was arrested. The day after his capture, British Major William Hodson had Zafar's sons Mirza Mughal and Mirza Khizr Sultan and grandson Mirza Abu Bakr shot at the Khooni Darwaza near Delhi Gate.
What happened at the Bibighar massacre during the Indian Rebellion of 1857?
Around 206 women and children, along with five men, were held in a building called the Bibighar in Cawnpore after surviving an initial river massacre on the 27th of June 1857. When a British relief force approached in mid-July, rebel leaders ordered the hostages killed. After sepoys refused the order, five individuals carried out the killings with knives and hatchets. The bodies were thrown into a well 50 feet deep and the remainder into the Ganges.
How did the Indian Rebellion of 1857 end and what were its consequences?
The rebellion was militarily contained with the rebels' defeat at Gwalior on the 20th of June 1858, though Britain did not declare hostilities formally ended until the 8th of July 1859. The consequences were transformative: the East India Company was dissolved, Britain assumed direct rule through the Government of India Act 1858, and the British Raj was established. On the 1st of November 1858, Queen Victoria issued a proclamation promising Indians rights comparable to other British subjects, a text Indians would invoke in the decades of growing nationalist sentiment that followed.
All sources
145 references cited across the entry
- 1Problematic spaces, problematic races: defining 'Europeans' in late colonial IndiaElizabeth Buettner — 2000
- 2Marshall (2007) p. 197Marshall — 2007
- 3David (2003) p. 9David — 2003
- 4Bose, Jalal (2004) p. 72–73Bose, Jalal — 2004
- 5The other empire: Metropolis, India and progress in the colonial imaginationJohn Marriott — Manchester University Press — 2013
- 6The 1857 Indian Uprising and the British EmpireJill C. Bender — Cambridge University Press — 2016
- 7Bayly (1987) p. 170Bayly — 1987
- 8Bandyopadhyay (2004) p. 169–172Bandyopadhyay — 2004
- 9A Companion to 19th-Century BritainDouglas M. Peers — John Wiley & Sons — 2006
- 10The Cambridge Illustrated History of the British EmpireP. J. Marshall — Cambridge University Press — 2001
- 11Spear (1990) p. 147–148Spear — 1990
- 12Bandyopadhyay (2004) p. 177Bandyopadhyay — 2004
- 13Brown (1994) p. 94Brown — 1994
- 14Bandyopadhyay (2004) p. 179Bandyopadhyay — 2004
- 15Bayly (1987) p. 194–197Bayly — 1987
- 16The Limits of Tolerance: Indian Secularism and the Politics of Religious FreedomC.S. Adcock — Oxford University Press — 2013
- 17Crowns and Colonies: European Monarchies and Overseas EmpiresMiles Taylor — Manchester University Press — 2016
- 18Sources of Indian Tradition: Modern India and PakistanAinslie Thomas Embree et al. — Columbia University Press — 1988
- 20BookThe Honourable Company: A History of the English East India CompanyJohn Keay — Scribner — 1994
- 21BookA History of Modern India, 1480–1950Claude Markovitz — Anthem Press
- 22NewsWhen the Vellore sepoys rebelled6 August 2006
- 23Ludden (2002) p. 133Ludden — 2002
- 24BookThe Skull of Alum Bheg: The Life and Death of a Rebel of 1857Kim A Wagner — Oxford University Press — 2018
- 25The Indian Army and the Making of the PunjabRajit K. Mazumder — Permanent Black — 2003
- 26Metcalf, Metcalf (2006) p. 61Metcalf, Metcalf — 2006
- 27JournalThe first century of British colonial rule in India: social revolution or social stagnation?Eric Stokes — Oxford University Press — February 1973
- 28Brown (1994) p. 88Brown — 1994
- 29Metcalf (1964) p. 48Metcalf — 1964
- 30Bandyopadhyay (2004) p. 171Bandyopadhyay — 2004
- 31BookBritain's Imperial Century, 1815–1914Ronald Hyam — Palgrave Macmillan — 2002
- 32BookThe Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth CenturyDaniel R. Headrick — Oxford University Press — 1981
- 33BookThe Great Fear of 1857: Rumours, Conspiracies and the Making of the Indian UprisingKim A. Wagner — Peter Lang — 2010
- 34BookIndian Society and the Making of the British EmpireC. A. Bayly — Cambridge University Press — 1988
- 35BookPlots of Opportunity: Representing Conspiracy in Victorian EnglandAlbert D. Pionke — Ohio State University Press — 2004
- 36JournalLiving with Difference in IndiaSusanne Hoeber Rudolph et al. — 2000
- 37BookReligion and Irreligion in Victorian Society: Essays in Honor of R. K. WebbAinslie Embree — Routledge — 1992
- 38BookEmpire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870C. A. Bayly — Cambridge University Press — 1996
- 39BookThe Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914C. A. Bayly — Wiley-Blackwell — 2012
- 40BookThe Sepoy Mutiny and the Revolt of 1857R. C. Majumdar — Firma KLM — 1957
- 41Sepoy Mutiny of 1857Emory University
- 42BookThe Indian ArmyBoris Mollo — Littlehampton Book Services Ltd — 1981
- 43BookUprising of 1857: Some Facts about Failure of Indian war of IndependenceAijaz Ahmad — K.K. Publications — 2021
- 45David (2003) p. 69David — 2003
- 46BookThe Great Fear of 1857. Rumours, Conspiracies and the Making of the Indian UprisingKim A. Wagner — Dev Publishers & Distributors — 2014
- 47Hibbert (1980) p. 73–75Hibbert — 1980
- 48BookDefence Journal: Volume 5, Issues 9–12Ikram ul-Majeed Sehgal — University of Michigan — 2002
- 49David (2003) p. 93David — 2003
- 50Hibbert (1980) p. 80–85Hibbert — 1980
- 51BookEighteen Fifty-SevenSurendra Nath Sen — Ministry of Information — 1957
- 52Hibbert (1980) p. 98–101Hibbert — 1980
- 53Hibbert (1980) p. 93–95Hibbert — 1980
- 54Hibbert (1980) p. 152–163Hibbert — 1980
- 55Harris (2001)Harris — 2001
- 60David (2003) p. 19David — 2003
- 61Dalrymple (2006) p. 23Dalrymple — 2006
- 62BookPartisans of AllahAyesha Jalal — Harvard University Press — 2008
- 64The Land of Five Rivers: An Economic History of the Punjab from Earliest Times to the Year of Grace 1890Hugh Kennedy Trevaskis — Oxford University Press — 1928
- 65Harris (2001) p. 57Harris — 2001
- 66The peasant armed: the Indian revolt of 1857Eric Stokes et al. — Clarendon Press — 1986
- 67Imperial Gazetteer of India, vol. 9Digital South Asia Library
- 68Hayat Karam HusainHakim Syed Zillur Rahman — Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine and Sciences — 2008
- 70Dalrymple (2006) p. 400Dalrymple — 2006
- 71BookRevenge and ReconciliationRajmohan Gandhi — Penguin Books India — 1999
- 72Hibbert (1980) p. 191Hibbert — 1980
- 73David (2003) p. 250David — 2003
- 74Harris (2001) p. 95Harris — 2001
- 75Harris (2001) p. 92Harris — 2001
- 76BookBattles of the Indian MutinyMichael Edwardes — Pan — 1970
- 77The Victorians at War, 1815–1914: An Encyclopaedia of British MilitaryHarold E. Raugh — ABC-CLIO — 2004
- 78Hibbert (1980) p. 358, 428Hibbert — 1980
- 79BookIndo-Nepalese Relations: (1858–1914)Sushila Tyagi — Concept Publishing Company — 1974
- 80BookIndo-Nepal trade relations: a historical analysis of Nepal's trade with the British IndiaShreeram Prasad Upadhyay — Nirala Publications — 1992
- 81BookHistory of the Corps of Royal Engineers Vol IMaj Gen Whitworth Porter — The Institution of Royal Engineers — 1889
- 82A history of the Sepoy war in India, 1857–1858Sir John William Kaye — 1876
- 83JournalGaya in 1857–58S. B. Singh — 1966
- 84The revolt in Hindustan 1857–59Sir Evelyn Wood — 1908
- 85JournalKunwar Singh's Failure in 1857S. Purushottam Kumar — 1983
- 86BookIndian Mutiny. Brief Narrative of the Defence of the Arrah Garrison.Robert Vicars Boyle — W. Thacker & Co. — 1858
- 87BookTwo months in Arrah in 1857John James Halls — Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts — 1860
- 88NewsSupplement to The London Gazette, October 13, 185713 October 1857
- 89BookA turning point in the Indian mutinyIsabel Giberne Sieveking — David Nutt — 1910
- 91John Cassell's Illustrated history of England – William Howitt, John CassellJohn Frederick Smith — 1864
- 92JournalThe Revolt of 1857: 'Real Heroes of Bihar Who Have Been Dropped From MemorySarvesh Kumar — 2007
- 93JournalThe Role of Bishwanath Sahi of Lohardaga district, During the Revolt of 1857 in BiharMathur Das Ustad — 1997
- 94BookSoldier Sahibs: The Men Who Made the North-West FrontierCharles Allen — Abacus — 2001
- 95BookThe Skull of Alum Beg. The Life and Death of a Rebel of 1857Kim A. Wagner — Oxford University Press — 2018
- 96JournalRai Ahmad Khan Kharral (Myth or Reality)Saeed Ahmed Butt — Punjab University, Lahore — July–December 2015
- 97NewsRare 1857 reports on Bengal uprisings – Times of India10 June 2009
- 99Revisiting the Great Rebellion of 185713 July 2014
- 100BookGujarat in 1857Ramanlal Kakalbhai Dharaiya — Gujarat University — 1970
- 101BookShaping Of Modern GujaratAchyut Yagnik — Penguin Books Limited — 2005
- 102BookHistory of GujarátThe Government Central Press — 1896
- 103BookSambalpurOmalley L. S. S. — The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta — 1909
- 104JournalIndian Resistance to the Early East India Company's Forces at ShamliKuldeep Kumar Tyagi et al. — Ignited Minds Pvt. Ltd. — 7 November 2024
- 107ABP Newsपंकज प्रजापति — 13 August 2022
- 108JournalConvicts in the Straits Settlements 1826–1827C. M. Turnbull — 1970
- 109JournalWhite colonization and labour in nineteenth-century IndiaD Arnold — 1983
- 110BookA Comprehensive History of IndiaChopra, P. N. — Sterling Publishers — 2003
- 111BookMartial Races: The Military, Race and Masculinity in British Imperial Culture, 1857–1914Heather Streets — Manchester University Press — 2004
- 112BookBritain: losing and gaining an empire, 1763–1914Nikki Christie, Brendan Christie and Adam Kidson
- 113BookSpectre of Violence: The 1857 Kanpur MassacreRudrangshu Mukherjee — Penguin Books — 1998
- 114BookTerrorism, Insurgency and Indian-English Literature, 1830–1947Alex Tickell — Routledge — 2013
- 115Dalrymple (2006)Dalrymple — 2006
- 116The Indian Mutiny and the British ImaginationChakravarty, G. — Cambridge University Press — 2004
- 117War of No Pity: The Indian Mutiny and Victorian TraumaHerbert, C. — Princeton University Press — 2008
- 118The Lion and the Tiger: The Rise and Fall of the British Raj, 1600–1947Denis Judd — Oxford University Press — 2004
- 119Vanishing Women: Magic, Film, and FeminismKaren Redrobe Beckman — Duke University Press — 2003
- 120David (2003) p. 220–222David — 2003
- 121Newspapers and empire in Ireland and BritainJ. C. Bender — Four Courts Press
- 122BookFiction as History: The Novel and the City in Modern North IndiaVasudha Dalmia — State University of New York Press — 2019
- 123Metcalf, Metcalf (2006) p. 103Metcalf, Metcalf — 2006
- 124The Boxers, China, and the WorldRobert A. Bickers — Rowman & Littlefield — 2007
- 125NewsCalcutta Monthly Journal and General Register 1837
- 127Hasan, Roy (1998) p. 149Hasan, Roy — 1998
- 128Nanda (1965) p. 701Nanda — 1965
- 131Il y a cent cinquante ans, la révolte des cipayes1 August 2007
- 132National Geographic Deutschland3 May 2005
- 133The 1857 RebellionBiswamoy Pati — Oxford University Press — 2010
- 134BookThe Great Fear of 1857: Rumours, Conspiracies and the Making of the Indian UprisingKim A. Wagner — Peter Lang — 2010
- 135JournalThe Marginal Mutiny: The New Historiography of the Indian Uprising of 1857Kim A. Wagner — 2011
- 138BookThe Indian MutinyJulian Spilsbury — Weidenfeld & Nicolson — 2007
- 140NewsUK India Mutiny ceremony blocked24 September 2007
- 141NewsBriton visits India Mutiny graveRam Dutt Tripathi — 26 September 2007
- 143NewsAli Fazal goes from Bollywood to Hollywood with 'Victoria & Abdul'Amy Kaufman — 28 September 2017
- 144NewsA little peek into historyRomesh Chander — 2 May 2008
- 145BookThe Great Train RobberyBallantine Books — 1975
- 146BookWriting the West, 1750–1947: Representations from Indian LanguagesC. Vijayasree et al. — Sahitya Akademi — 2004