Humanistic psychology

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Humanistic psychology emerged in the early to mid-20th century as a direct challenge to two dominant schools of thought: Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory and B. F. Skinner's behaviorism. Abraham Maslow, who became the movement's most recognizable architect, put it plainly when he said that Freud had supplied psychology with the sick half, and that the healthy half still needed to be written. The movement he helped build would call itself the third force. What made it radical was not just what it studied, but who it believed people could become. Where Freud looked to unconscious drives and Skinner to observable behavior, humanistic psychologists looked to something else entirely: the capacity of ordinary people to grow, choose, and find meaning. How that conviction took shape, who shaped it, and where it spread beyond the therapist's office are the questions this documentary will explore.

• 2. Three Forces

  ›

  Ivan Pavlov's work with the conditioned reflex gave rise to what Maslow called the first force: behaviorism. Pavlov's legacy passed through John B. Watson and then B. F. Skinner, whose frameworks became the bedrock of academic psychology in the United States. Maslow believed this tradition systematically excluded the subjective data of consciousness and much of what makes human personality complex. Behavioral theory did continue developing through later figures such as Arthur Staats, Steven Hayes, and other post-Skinnerian researchers, and clinical behavioral analysis remains widely used today in treating anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and personality disorders.

  Freud's psychoanalysis formed the second force. It gathered around itself a formidable circle: Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Carl Jung, Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, Melanie Klein, and Harry Stack Sullivan, among others. Maslow's quarrel with this tradition was specific. He argued that Freudian theory was deterministic, attributing behavior to unconscious desires, and that both Freud and Skinner had built their frameworks around individuals with mental conflicts rather than the full range of human experience.

  Carl Rogers, who was strongly influenced by Otto Rank after Rank broke with Freud in the mid-1920s, became one of the earliest sources of the third force. Rogers coined the term "actualizing tendency," a concept that eventually led Maslow to study self-actualization as a fundamental human need. Together, Rogers and Maslow framed this new psychology as an answer to what they saw as the overly pessimistic view of psychoanalysis.

• 3. Roots and Influences

  ›

  Humanistic psychology drew from a wide philosophical ancestry. Its modern form has roots in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Sartre, while the broader tradition of humanism stretches back to classical civilizations in China, Greece, and Rome, values renewed again during the European Renaissance. Eastern philosophy and psychology contributed to its shape alongside Judeo-Christian philosophies of personalism, each sharing concerns about the nature of human existence and consciousness.

  Personalism brought its own set of thinkers into the humanistic orbit. Figures such as Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev, Emmanuel Mounier, Gabriel Marcel, Denis de Rougemont, Jacques Maritain, Martin Buber, Emmanuel Levinas, Max Scheler, and Pope John Paul II all engaged with questions about the individual that resonated with humanistic psychology's concerns.

  The practical pressures of World War II also left their mark. Military psychologists faced more patients than time or resources could support, and the origins of group therapy trace back to that period. Eric Berne's progression of books charts the shift from what might be called the pragmatic psychology of WWII into his later innovation, transactional analysis, one of the most influential forms of humanistic popular psychology in the late 1960s and into 1970. Though transactional analysis was eventually challenged after Berne's death, it illustrated how the movement's ideas moved out of clinics and into wider culture.

• 4. The Saybrook Moment

  ›

  In November 1964, key figures in the movement gathered at Old Saybrook, Connecticut for the First Invitational Conference on Humanistic Psychology. The Association for Humanistic Psychology sponsored the gathering, the Hazen Foundation provided financing, and Wesleyan University served as host. The meeting drew the founding figures of the movement, including Maslow, Rollo May, James Bugental, and Rogers, alongside humanists such as Gordon Allport, George Kelly, Clark Moustakas, Gardner Murphy, Henry Murray, Robert W. White, Charlotte Buhler, Floyd Matson, Jacques Barzun, and Rene Dubos. Robert Knapp chaired the conference, and Henry Murray delivered the keynote address.

  The participants intended to formulate a new vision for psychology that took a more complete image of the person into account. According to Aanstoos, Serlin, and Greening, the group pushed back against the positivistic trend dominant in mainstream psychology at the time. That conference has since been described as a historic event important for the academic standing of humanistic psychology and its future direction.

  The five core principles of the field had been articulated just months earlier in an article written by James Bugental in 1964, later adapted by Tom Greening, a psychologist who served as long-time editor of the Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Those principles held that human beings cannot be reduced to components, that they exist in a uniquely human context within a larger cosmic ecology, that they are conscious and aware of their own awareness, that they have the ability to make choices and bear responsibility, and that they are intentional beings who seek meaning, value, and creativity.

• 5. The Theorists

  ›

  Maslow's most enduring contribution was the hierarchy of needs, a pyramid-shaped framework placing physiological needs at the base, followed by safety, love, self-esteem, and finally self-actualization at the peak. People who reached self-actualization, he theorized, were self-aware, caring, wise, and focused on problems beyond their own. He also believed that only one percent of people actually achieved self-actualization, a figure that underscores how demanding he thought full human flourishing really was. His 1968 book, Toward a Psychology of Being, gathered many of his key arguments.

  Rogers built on Maslow's framework by arguing that self-actualization is nurtured within what he called a growth promoting climate. Two conditions were required: the individual must be able to express their genuine self, and as they do, they must be accepted by others. His therapeutic practice was non-directive. The therapist listened without judgment, allowing the client to arrive at insights independently, and maintained what Rogers described as unconditional positive regard.

  Rollo May added a different strand, acknowledging human choice alongside what he called the tragic aspects of human existence. May argued that people in the modern world had lost their values, and that health depends on the courage to forge new values appropriate to present challenges. Otto Rank, whose break with Freud in the mid-1920s had influenced Rogers so deeply, is also counted among the movement's preparatory figures.

• 6. Therapy in Practice

  ›

  Empathy sits at the center of humanistic therapy's clinical practice. Without it, therapists risk applying what practitioners call an external frame of reference, understanding the client not as the client would understand themselves, but as an outside observer. Marshall Rosenberg, one of Rogers' students, built his concept of Nonviolent Communication around empathy in relationships.

  Client-centered therapy places the therapist in an active listening role during sessions. The therapist does not suggest topics, guide conversation, or interpret the client's behavior. The goal is a relationship with unconditional positive regard, warmth, and acceptance, conditions that Rogers believed were essential for any genuine therapeutic encounter. Rogers held that only when a therapist was capable of congruence, matching their expressed feelings to their actual inner state, could a real therapeutic relationship form.

  Humanistic therapy also incorporates several other approaches. Gestalt therapy focuses on the here and now, using role-playing and attention to non-verbal cues to help clients express feelings they might not surface otherwise. Existential psychotherapy asks clients to explore the meaning and purpose of their lives and to work through the conflict between human freedom and the limitations imposed by factors like genetics and culture. Medard Boss defined the goal of existential work as an openness to the world, naming anything that blocked that openness as a form of unhealth.

  The concept of ideal and real selves runs through much of the clinical work. The ideal self is what a person believes they should be; the real self is what is actually lived. Humanistic therapy aims to bring these two closer together. Self-help is also part of this tradition: Sheila Ernst and Lucy Goodison described using humanistic approaches in self-help groups, and co-counselling, based purely on self-help principles, traces back to the same roots. Harvey Jackins' Re-evaluation Counselling and Eugene Gendlin's Focusing also carry the movement's influence, as does the humanistic psychodrama developed by Hans-Werner Gessmann beginning in the 1980s.

• 7. Beyond the Clinic

  ›

  By 1978, members of the Association for Humanistic Psychology had launched a three-year effort to explore how the movement's principles could serve positive social and political change. That effort included a gathering called the 12-Hour Political Party, held in San Francisco in 1980, where nearly 1,400 attendees discussed presentations by thinkers including Ernest Callenbach, author of Ecotopia; Marilyn Ferguson, author of Aquarian Conspiracy; Theodore Roszak, author of Person/Planet; and Mark Satin, author of New Age Politics. AHP President George Leonard summarized the emergent perspective in a manifesto that proposed ideas including moving to a slow-growth or no-growth economy, decentralizing society, and teaching social and emotional competencies.

  Several of the movement's core thinkers had already pushed into social territory. Alfred Adler argued that achieving community feeling is essential to human development. Erich Fromm traced the totalitarian impulse to the fear of freedom's uncertainties. Carl Rogers came to believe political life could consist of ongoing dialogue rather than winner-take-all contests, with compassionate understanding as an achievable outcome. Virginia Satir believed her approach to family therapy could bring communities, cultures, and nations together.

  In 1979, psychologist Kenneth Lux and economist Mark A. Lutz called for an economics grounded in humanistic psychology rather than utilitarianism. That same year, California state legislator John Vasconcellos published a book calling for the integration of liberal politics with humanistic-psychological insight. From 1979 to 1983, the New World Alliance, based in Washington, D.C., attempted to bring humanistic-psychology ideas into political thinking, with Vasconcellos and Carl Rogers among the sponsors of its newsletter.

  In social work, the influence was equally direct. Malcolm Payne's book Humanistic Social Work: Core Principles in Practice described how humanistic values, including self-actualization, empowerment, holistic approach, and client-centered intervention, had reformed modern social work practice. In 1989, Maureen O'Hara, who had worked with both Rogers and Paulo Freire, identified a convergence between the two thinkers in their shared focus on developing critical consciousness of situations that oppress and dehumanize. In the workplace, Ned Herrmann's corporate creativity training at G.E. in the late 1970s carried the movement's emphasis on wholeness and creativity into the world of business. And in foreign language education, educators such as Earl Stevick and Gertrude Moskowitz applied student-centered methods emphasizing interaction, personal motivation, and self-evaluation, influencing generations of teachers drawn to humanistic methods.