— Ch. 1 · Medieval Crisis And Feudal Breakdown —
History of capitalism.
~6 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
The year 1348 brought the Black Death to England, killing roughly one-third of the population and shattering the economic foundations of feudalism. Before this demographic collapse, lords relied on military force to extract food from serfs who worked small strips of land within large manors. Agricultural productivity had reached its technological limits, and bad weather caused the Great Famine between 1315 and 1317. This crisis forced surviving peasants into a position where they could demand higher wages or better contracts because labor was scarce. Some serfs moved to towns while others bought land or rented estates from desperate landlords. The traditional system of obligations broke down as the aristocracy lost the coercive power to maintain the old order. Robert Brenner described this period as a conflict between land-owning aristocrats and agricultural producers that created new conditions for capitalism. The shift did not happen overnight but emerged from the struggle over how to organize production after the plague.
Enclosure And Land Dispossession
England in the 16th century saw the widespread enclosure of common lands previously held by peasants under the open field system. These enclosed areas became restricted to private owners, ending traditional rights like mowing meadows for hay or grazing livestock. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons were largely limited to rough pasture in mountainous regions. Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used state processes to appropriate public land for private benefit, creating a landless working class. This process provided the labor force required for new industries developing in northern England. Between 1760 and 1820, wholesale enclosure occurred in village after village, causing common rights to be lost. Anthropologist Jason Hickel notes that peasant revolts such as Kett's Rebellion and the Midland Revolt culminated in violent repression and executions. Other scholars suggest that better-off members of the European peasantry actively participated in enclosure to end subsistence farming poverty. Land rents shifted away from stagnant systems of custom toward direct economic market forces. The weakened coercive power of aristocracy encouraged landlords to try better methods while tenants gained incentives to improve productivity.