Heimskringla

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Heimskringla opens with a phrase that means "the orb of the Earth" in Old Norse, kringla heimsins, and from those two words the entire compilation takes its name. It is the most celebrated of the Old Norwegian kings' sagas, composed in Iceland around 1230, most likely by the Icelandic knight, poet, and historian Snorri Sturluson, who lived from 1178 or 1179 until 1241. Yet no surviving manuscript ever names its author. The title itself was not used until the 17th century, when printed editions began circulating across Scandinavia. What lies between those covers is vast: a sweep from mythological prehistory all the way to the death of the pretender Eystein Meyla in 1177, threading Norse gods, Viking fleets, crusading kings, and Arab Muslim pirates into a single prose epic. How did a medieval Icelander assemble such a work? How reliable is it? And why did a nation that did not write it claim it as its own?

• 2. The Question of Authorship

  ›

  No known manuscript attributes Heimskringla to anyone. The scholar Anthony Faulkes put the matter plainly: the authorship of Heimskringla is not referred to within the text or in any surviving manuscript, and its attribution to Snorri has been questioned. The earliest surviving sources that credit Snorri are 16th-century Danish translations made by two Norwegians, Peder Claussøn Friis and Laurents Hanssøn. Scholars believe those translators had access to at least one now-lost manuscript that identified Snorri by name. That manuscript no longer exists. The case for Snorri rests on inference and tradition rather than a signed page. He was, by most accounts, an extraordinary figure: a chieftain, a historian, and a poet working in Iceland at a time when the Old Norse literary tradition was at its height. Whether or not his hand held the quill, the work bears the marks of a single organizing intelligence, weaving mythological genealogy and near-contemporary chronicle into a coherent shape.

• 3. Shape of the Work

  ›

  Scholars often describe Heimskringla as falling into three broad groups of sagas, giving the whole work the character of a triptych. The opening saga, Ynglinga saga, traces the royal dynasty's lineage back to Freyr, known as Yngve, of the Vanaland people, who arrived in Scandinavia with Odin from the legendary Asgard. From that mythological foundation the collection moves toward historical ground, following individual rulers with the saga of Halfdan the Black. At the center of the entire work stands a version of the saga of Olaf II of Norway, the saint known as Olaf the Holy. His 15-year reign occupies roughly one third of Heimskringla's total length. After Olaf, the collection shifts to the saga of Harald Hardrada, narrating his service in Constantinople, his campaigns in Syria and Sicily, and his death at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066, only a few days before Harold Godwinson fell at the Battle of Hastings. The saga of Sigurd the Crusader reaches as far as Palestine, where the Norwegian fleet is attacked by Arab Muslim pirates referred to as Vikings. The entire collection closes with Magnus V of Norway.

• 4. Sources and Their Limits

  ›

  Heimskringla names some of its sources explicitly, and they include works that are now entirely lost. The text cites Hryggjarstykki, meaning roughly "spine pieces", by Eiríkr Oddsson, as the source for events of the mid-12th century. The author drew heavily on Morkinskinna, which served as the main source for the years 1030-1177, copied almost verbatim in places, though the author stripped out many of the short anecdotal episodes known as thattir. Ágrip af Nóregs konunga sogum was used so closely that the account of Harald Fairhair's wife Snæfríðr was reproduced nearly unchanged. The author also incorporated his own earlier Separate saga of St Óláfr, which itself drew on a saga of Olaf composed around 1220 by Styrmir Kárason, a work now mostly lost. Oddr Snorrason's Life of Óláfr Tryggvason provided further material. Beyond written sources, the author relied extensively on skaldic verse, which he treated as oral testimony preserved from the time of the events described. The role of other oral traditions in shaping the final text remains uncertain.

• 5. The Reliability Debate

  ›

  Until the mid-19th century, historians placed great trust in Heimskringla as factual record. That confidence began to erode in the early 20th century with the rise of saga criticism, pioneered by the Swedish historians Lauritz and Curt Weibull. Their central objection was simple: Snorri was writing several centuries after the events he described. The Norwegian historian Edvard Bull put the skeptical position starkly, declaring that readers must give up all illusions that Snorri's mighty epic bears any deeper resemblance to what actually happened. One influential school of thought holds that the motivations attributed to characters in the sagas reflect the political conditions of 13th-century Iceland more than those of earlier Norse society. Scholars today tend to place little or no historical trust in the earliest mythological sagas, while treating the later portions with more confidence. The reasoning is straightforward: as the distance in time between events and composition shortens, oral traditions have less opportunity to drift, and by the 12th century Norway had begun producing its own contemporary written records.

• 6. Manuscripts and Survival

  ›

  The oldest surviving parchment fragment of Heimskringla is a single vellum leaf, catalogued as Lbs fragm 82, held at the National and University Library of Iceland. It dates from around 1260 and comes from the Saga of St. Olaf. The remainder of that manuscript was destroyed by fire in 1728. The Stockholm manuscript was translated into Swedish and Latin by Johan Peringskiöld, working by order of Charles XI, and published in Stockholm in 1697. That 1697 edition carried the title Heimskringla for the first time in print and included the first printing of the text in Old Norse. A new Danish edition with Old Norse text and a Latin translation appeared in 1777-83, produced by order of Frederick VI while he was still crown prince. The first English translation, by Samuel Laing, was published in 1844 and reissued in 1889. Starting in the 1960s, revised and fresh English translations began to appear, with the most recent rendered by Alison Finlay and Anthony Faulkes and made available open-access.

• 7. National Symbol and Legacy

  ›

  In the 19th century, as Norway moved toward independence after centuries of union with Denmark and Sweden, Heimskringla became something unexpected for a text written by an Icelander: a Norwegian national symbol. The stories of the independent medieval Norwegian kingdom resonated deeply with a population shaped by romantic nationalism. In 1900 the Norwegian parliament, the Storting, subsidized new translations into both Norwegian written forms, landsmål and riksmål, explicitly so the work could achieve wide distribution at a low price. Flateyjarbók, compiled at the end of the 14th century, shows the earlier literary influence: it interweaves Heimskringla text with many thattir and complete sagas, including Orkneyinga saga, Færeyinga saga, and Fóstbrœðra saga. A different kind of legacy appears in Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth, where Heimskringla is the book in which Professor Liedenbrock discovers Arne Saknussem's note. From a single surviving vellum leaf dated around 1260, to open-access translations available today, the circle of the world that Heimskringla promised in its opening words has proven remarkably wide.