Geosynchronous orbit
Geosynchronous orbit is a band of space so precisely tuned to Earth's rotation that a satellite placed there appears to freeze in the sky. At an altitude of 35,786 km, an object moving through this orbit takes exactly 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds to circle the planet. That is one sidereal day, the true measure of how long Earth takes to spin once relative to the stars rather than the Sun. The match is so exact that, from the ground, the satellite returns to the same point in the sky every single day without fail. For a certain class of orbit, the circular equatorial case, the satellite does not just return to that point. It never leaves it. It hangs there, motionless against the heavens, while the Sun, the Moon, and the stars wheel behind it. How did engineers first grasp that such an orbit was even possible? And how did they convince a skeptical industry to build and launch the satellites that now number in the hundreds above our heads?
Herman Potocnik described both geosynchronous orbits and the special geostationary case in 1929, proposing them as useful positions for space stations. His writing reached only a narrow audience. The first appearance of a geosynchronous orbit in popular literature came in October 1942, in the first Venus Equilateral story by George O. Smith, though Smith offered little technical detail. It was British science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke who brought the concept into wider view. In 1945 Clarke published a paper titled Extra-Terrestrial Relays: Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?, in the magazine Wireless World. He argued the orbit was ideal for broadcast and relay communications. Clarke himself later acknowledged the earlier Venus Equilateral connection in his introduction to The Complete Venus Equilateral. In recognition of Clarke's advocacy, the orbit is sometimes called the Clarke Orbit, and the ring of artificial satellites occupying it is known as the Clarke Belt.
Harold Rosen began designing the first geosynchronous satellite in 1959, while working at Hughes Aircraft. His inspiration was Sputnik 1, which had shown the world what an orbiting object could do. At that moment, telecommunications between the United States and Europe could handle just 136 simultaneous conversations, routed through high-frequency radios and a single undersea cable. Rosen believed a geostationary satellite could change that entirely. The problem was that conventional wisdom held the idea to be impractical. Engineers of the era believed placing a satellite into geosynchronous orbit would demand too much rocket power, and that the satellite would not survive long enough to justify the cost. Early investment instead went toward constellations of satellites in low or medium Earth orbit. The passive Echo balloon satellites launched in 1960, followed by Telstar 1 in 1962. Both projects struggled with signal strength and tracking difficulties that geosynchronous satellites could have solved. Hughes frequently withheld funds and support from Rosen's team despite those clear limitations in the alternative approach.
By 1961, Rosen and his team had built a working cylindrical prototype with a diameter of 76 cm and a height of 38 cm. It weighed 11.3 kg. The design was deliberately compact so that available rockets could actually carry it to orbit. Spin stabilization kept it oriented correctly, and dipole antennas produced a pancake-shaped waveform suited to broadcasting from that altitude. In August 1961, Hughes contracted the team to build the operational satellite. The first attempt, Syncom 1, was lost to an electronics failure. Syncom 2 succeeded. It reached geosynchronous orbit in 1963, though its inclined orbit meant ground antennas still needed to move to track it. That inclined orbit did not prevent it from relaying television transmissions. On the 23rd of August 1963, US President John F. Kennedy used Syncom 2 to telephone Nigerian prime minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa from a ship at sea, marking one of the earliest live intercontinental calls carried by satellite.
Not every geosynchronous satellite sits in the neat circular equatorial band. Objects in eccentric or inclined geosynchronous orbits trace a figure-eight path across the sky, a shape known as an analemma. The Tundra orbit is one deliberate variation: an eccentric geosynchronous orbit inclined at 63.4 degrees, a configuration that causes a satellite to spend most of its time dwelling over a single high-latitude location. That specific inclination is a frozen orbit, which reduces the fuel needed for station-keeping. At least two Tundra satellites are required to maintain continuous coverage over a given area. Sirius XM Satellite Radio used Tundra orbits to improve signal strength across the northern United States and Canada. Japan's Quasi-Zenith Satellite System takes a different approach: four satellites operating at an inclination of 42 degrees and an eccentricity of 0.075, each dwelling over Japan long enough to deliver signals into urban canyons before passing quickly over Australia. Engineers have also proposed more exotic variants. A statite would use solar radiation pressure against a sail to hold position over Earth's dark side at roughly 30 degrees latitude without the orbital mechanics of a geosynchronous orbit at all. A space elevator would use a tether anchored to the surface and a counterweight above the geostationary belt, with the tension in the cable replacing the need for onboard propulsion entirely.
A perfectly stable geostationary orbit exists only in theory. In practice, solar wind, radiation pressure, variations in Earth's gravitational field, and the gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun all push satellites off their ideal positions. Station-keeping thruster burns correct those drifts continuously throughout a satellite's working life. Without them, a satellite's inclination gradually grows, oscillating between 0 and 15 degrees over a cycle of 55 years. Geostationary satellites also tend to drift toward one of two stable longitudes, at 75 degrees and 255 degrees, if not actively corrected. When a satellite's fuel runs low at end of life, operators sometimes stop correcting inclination and focus only on eccentricity control. The satellite remains partially usable, but only by ground antennas capable of following its north-south movement. Eventually the satellite is retired into a graveyard orbit more than 200 km above the geostationary belt. International regulations now require satellites to have a 90% chance of reaching that graveyard altitude at end of life, reflecting how long debris persists: with negligible atmospheric drag at that altitude, geosynchronous objects can remain in orbit for thousands of years.
Space debris at geosynchronous altitude tends to travel at lower relative speeds than debris in low Earth orbit, because most satellites at that height share the same plane, altitude, and velocity. Eccentric-orbit objects can still generate collisions at up to 4 km/s. Debris smaller than 10 cm in diameter cannot be detected from Earth, making the true population difficult to measure. Several known incidents have already forced satellites into graveyard orbits. The European Space Agency's Olympus-1 telecom satellite was struck by a meteoroid on the 11th of August 1993 and subsequently moved to a graveyard orbit. In 2006 the Russian Express-AM11 communications satellite was struck by an unknown object and rendered inoperable; engineers retained enough contact time to command it to a graveyard orbit before losing it entirely. In 2017, both AMC-9 and Telkom-1 broke apart from causes that were never identified. Because atmospheric drag at geosynchronous altitude is negligible and deorbiting requires far more fuel than a simple graveyard maneuver, the debris those breakups created will remain in that band of space not for decades but for millennia.
Up Next
Common questions
What is a geosynchronous orbit and how high is it?
A geosynchronous orbit is an Earth-centered orbit whose period matches Earth's rotation: 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds. A circular geosynchronous orbit sits at an altitude of 35,786 km above mean sea level, with a semi-major axis of 42,164 km from Earth's center.
What is the difference between geosynchronous orbit and geostationary orbit?
Geostationary orbit is a special case of geosynchronous orbit. It is circular, lies exactly in Earth's equatorial plane with zero inclination and zero eccentricity, and keeps a satellite fixed over a single point on the equator. A general geosynchronous orbit can have any inclination or eccentricity, causing the satellite to trace a figure-eight path in the sky over the course of a day.
Who first proposed geosynchronous orbit for communications satellites?
Herman Potocnik described geosynchronous orbits as useful for space stations in 1929. Arthur C. Clarke popularized their use for broadcast and relay communications satellites in a 1945 paper titled Extra-Terrestrial Relays: Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?, published in Wireless World magazine. The orbit is sometimes called the Clarke Orbit in his honor.
Who designed the first geosynchronous satellite and when was it launched?
Harold Rosen designed the first geosynchronous satellite while working at Hughes Aircraft, beginning in 1959. The first successful satellite in the series, Syncom 2, reached geosynchronous orbit in 1963. On the 23rd of August 1963, it relayed a phone call between US President John F. Kennedy and Nigerian prime minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa.
What is a Tundra orbit and who uses it?
A Tundra orbit is an eccentric geosynchronous orbit inclined at 63.4 degrees that keeps a satellite dwelling over a single high-latitude location for most of its orbital period. Sirius XM Satellite Radio used Tundra orbits to improve signal strength across the northern United States and Canada. At least two satellites are needed to maintain continuous coverage over an area.
What happens to geosynchronous satellites at the end of their lives?
When a geosynchronous satellite's thruster fuel is nearly exhausted, operators move it into a graveyard orbit more than 200 km above the geostationary belt. International regulations now require a 90% chance of reaching that altitude at end of life. Deorbiting is not feasible because atmospheric drag is negligible at that altitude and re-entry would consume far more fuel than a simple graveyard maneuver.
All sources
44 references cited across the entry
- 1NewsWhat Is a Geosynchronous Orbit?Elizabeth Howell
- 3BookThe Complete Venus EquilateralGeorge O. Smith — Ballantine Books — 1976
- 4BookArthur C. ClarkeNeil McAleer — Contemporary Books — 1992
- 5MagazineExtra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?Arthur C. Clarke — October 1945
- 7MagazineOrbit Wars: Arthur C. Clarke and the Global Communications SatelliteMike Mills — August 3, 1997
- 8BookEncyclopedia of Atmospheric SciencesS.Q. Kidder — Elsiver — 2015
- 9BookSpacecraft Mission DesignC.D. Brown — AIAA Education Series — 1998
- 10Ariane 5 User's Manual Issue 5 Revision 1Ariane Space — July 2011
- 11MagazineCommunications: Harold Rosen – The Seer of Geostationary SatellitesJack McClintock — November 9, 2003
- 12BookHarold Rosen, 1926–2017Robert Perkins — Caltech — January 31, 2017
- 13BookBeyond The Ionosphere: Fifty Years of Satellite CommunicationDaniel R. Glover — NASA — 1997
- 14NewsHow a satellite called Syncom changed the worldRalph Vartabedian — July 26, 2013
- 15Syncom 2NASA
- 16World's First Geosynchronous Satellite LaunchedFoxtel — June 19, 2016
- 17ITU releases 2018 global and regional ICT estimatesInternational Telecommunication Union — December 7, 2018
- 18NewsAustralia was promised superfast broadband with the NBN. This is what we gotGeoff Thompson — ABC — April 24, 2019
- 19NewsIn farm country, forget broadband. You might not have internet at all. 5G is around the corner, yet pockets of America still can't get basic internet access.Shara Tibken — CNET — October 22, 2018
- 20OrbitsESA — October 4, 2018
- 21BookSpace Mission Analysis and DesignJames Richard Wertz et al. — Microcosm Press and Kluwer Academic Publishers — 1999
- 22BookSatellite Communications Systems: Systems, Techniques and TechnologyGerard Maral et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 2011-08-24
- 23Tundra Disposal Orbit StudyESA Space Debris Office — 2017
- 25Interface Specifications for QZSSJapan Aerospace Exploration Agency — 2016-07-14
- 28A general approach to the geostationary transfer orbit mission recoveryNicholas Farber et al. — September 2007
- 29How to get a satellite to geostationary orbitJason Davis — The Planetary Society — January 17, 2014
- 30Repositioning geostationary satellites22 February 2022
- 31Statite: Spacecraft That Utilizes Sight Pressure and Method of Use
- 32MagazineScience: Polar 'satellite' could revolutionise communicationsMarch 9, 1991
- 33The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final ReportBradley C. Edwards — NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts — 1 March 2003
- 34Frequently Asked Questions: Orbital DebrisNASA — September 2, 2011
- 35Where old satellites go to dieEUMETSAT — April 3, 2017
- 36Space debris threat to geosynchronous satellites has been drastically underestimatedMarric Stephens — December 12, 2017
- 37ExoAnalytic video shows Telkom-1 satellite erupting debrisCaleb Henry — August 30, 2017
- 38JournalDebrisWatch I: A survey of faint geosynchronous debris2021-01-01
- 39Press releaseN° 40–1993: OLYMPUS: End of missionESA — 26 August 1993
- 40Notification for Express-AM11 satellite users in connection with the spacecraft failureRussian Satellite Communications Company — April 19, 2006
- 41Do we care about orbital debris at all?James E. Dunstan — January 30, 2018
- 43BookOrbital MechanicsAIAA Education Series — 1996
- 44BookFundamentals of Astrodynamics and ApplicationsDavid A. Vallado — Microcosm Press — 2007
- 45What is orbit?NASA — October 25, 2001