Geomorphology

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Geomorphology is the scientific study of how Earth's surface came to look the way it does. In the 5th century BC, the Greek historian Herodotus stood at the edge of the Nile delta and noticed something remarkable. He observed the soils beneath his feet and concluded that the delta was actively growing into the Mediterranean Sea. He even estimated its age. That single act of careful observation planted the seed of a science that would not fully bloom for another two thousand years.

  Why does a valley cut a V-shape through rock while a glacier carves a U? Why do some mountains rise while others erode to plains? Why can a river shift its course across an entire landscape over centuries, while an earthquake reshapes a coastline in minutes? Geomorphology sits at the intersection of climate, water, ice, biology, and the slow grinding of tectonic plates. It is a field wide enough to include the soils beneath a hillside farm, the dunes of a desert, the seafloor beyond a continental shelf, and the surface of Mars. The questions it asks are ancient. The tools it uses are strikingly modern.

• 2. Ancient Observers

  ›

  In the 4th century BC, Aristotle reasoned that if sediment kept washing into the sea, the seas would eventually fill and land would sink in its place. He imagined an endless cycle where land and water perpetually swapped positions. Centuries later, the Encyclopedia of the Brethren of Purity, published in Arabic at Basra during the 10th century, described much the same idea. Rocks would break down, wash into the sea, and their sediment would one day rise again as new continents.

  The medieval Persian Muslim scholar Abu Rayhan al-Biruni, who lived from 973 to 1048, observed rock formations at the mouths of rivers and hypothesized that the Indian Ocean once covered all of India. In 1546, the German metallurgist and mineralogist Georgius Agricola, born in 1494 and died in 1555, wrote about erosion and natural weathering in his work De Natura Fossilium.

  One of the most precise early thinkers was the Song dynasty Chinese scientist and statesman Shen Kuo, who lived from 1031 to 1095. He observed marine fossil shells embedded in a geological stratum of a mountain hundreds of miles from the Pacific Ocean. Rows of bivalve shells ran horizontally along a cut cliffside. From this, Shen Kuo concluded that the cliff had once been a prehistoric seashore that shifted hundreds of miles over the centuries. He went further, observing the Taihang Mountains and the Yandang Mountain near Wenzhou, and concluded that landscapes reshape themselves through soil erosion and the deposition of silt. When petrified bamboo was discovered underground in the dry northern climate zone of Yanzhou, in what is now Yan'an, Shaanxi province, he used this as evidence for gradual climate change over centuries.

• 3. The Science Takes Shape

  ›

  The term geomorphology appears to have first entered written form in a work by Laumann in 1858, written in German. John Wesley Powell and W. J. McGee brought it into broader use in English, German, and French when they used the word at the International Geological Conference of 1891. John Edward Marr described his book The Scientific Study of Scenery as an introductory treatise on geomorphology, a subject he said sprang from the union of geology and geography.

  The single most influential early model came from William Morris Davis, who developed his geographical cycle, or cycle of erosion, between 1884 and 1899. Davis built on uniformitarianism, a theory first proposed by James Hutton, who lived from 1726 to 1797. The core idea was that a river begins by running through flat terrain, cuts progressively deeper valleys, and eventually erodes those valleys flat again, though at a lower elevation. Tectonic uplift could then restart the cycle. For decades, geomorphologists measured their findings against this Davisian framework. Davis's ideas carry historical weight, but have been largely superseded, mainly because they lack predictive power and rest on qualitative rather than quantitative foundations.

  In the 1920s, the German scientist Walther Penck proposed a rival model. Penck argued that landscapes evolve through an ongoing alternation between uplift and denudation, not through Davis's single uplift followed by slow decay. He also argued that slopes in many landscapes erode by backwearing, not by the surface lowering that Davis described. Penck died young, and his at-times-confusing writing style, combined with Davis's open dislike of his work, meant that the English-speaking geomorphology community often rejected his ideas vigorously during his lifetime.

• 4. Climatic Geomorphology

  ›

  During the age of New Imperialism in the late 19th century, European explorers and scientists carried back descriptions of landscapes from across the globe. The sheer variety of what they described pushed researchers to search for regional patterns. Climate emerged as the prime organizing factor. The groundwork was laid by figures including Wladimir Koppen, Vasily Dokuchaev, and Andreas Schimper.

  William Morris Davis recognized climate's role himself, adding arid and glacial erosion cycles to his original temperate model. But climatic geomorphology also grew partly as a reaction against Davis. By the mid-20th century, his framework was considered both un-innovative and dubious in many quarters. In the English-speaking world, explicit interest in climate-driven geomorphology arrived relatively late, with L. C. Peltier's 1950 publication on a periglacial cycle of erosion marking a turning point.

  The field's decline came swiftly after a 1969 review article by process geomorphologist D. R. Stoddart. His criticism was described as devastating. Stoddart argued that climatic geomorphology applied trivial methodologies when establishing differences between morphoclimatic zones, that it was too closely tied to the Davisian framework, and that it neglected the fact that the same physical laws govern surface processes across the entire globe. One specific assumption also proved faulty: the idea that chemical weathering is more rapid in tropical climates than in cold climates turned out not to be straightforwardly true. More recently, concern over global warming has produced a renewed interest in climate's role in shaping landscapes.

• 5. The Quantitative Turn

  ›

  Grove Karl Gilbert's early work around the turn of the 20th century planted the seed. What followed was a wave of mainly American natural scientists, geologists, and hydraulic engineers who pushed geomorphology toward hard numbers. The group included William Walden Rubey, Ralph Alger Bagnold, Hans Albert Einstein, Frank Ahnert, John Hack, Luna Leopold, A. Shields, Thomas Maddock, Arthur Strahler, Stanley Schumm, and Ronald Shreve. Together they took systematic, direct, quantitative measurements of rivers, hillslopes, and other landscape elements, and investigated how these measurements scaled. Many of their groundbreaking early studies appeared in the Bulletin of the Geological Society of America. Unusually, these papers received very few citations before 2000, making them classic examples of what researchers call sleeping beauties: influential work that lay largely unrecognized for decades before a marked increase in quantitative geomorphology research brought them renewed attention.

  In Sweden, Filip Hjulstrom's doctoral thesis, The River Fyris, published in 1935, stands as one of the first quantitative studies of geomorphological processes ever published. The tradition he started grew into the Uppsala School of Physical Geography. His students pursued quantitative studies across several fronts: Anders Rapp investigated mass transport, Ake Sundborg studied fluvial transport, Valter Axelsson examined delta deposition, and John O. Norrman worked on coastal processes.

• 6. Processes That Sculpt the Land

  ›

  Geomorphic processes generally work in three stages: producing loose material through weathering and erosion, transporting that material, and depositing it somewhere else. Primary surface processes responsible for most topographic features include wind, waves, chemical dissolution, mass wasting, groundwater movement, surface water flow, glacial action, tectonism, and volcanism. More unusual processes include periglacial freeze-thaw action, salt-mediated change, and shifts to the seafloor driven by marine currents.

  Wind shapes surfaces most powerfully in arid environments such as deserts, where vegetation is sparse and fine, unconsolidated sediment is abundant. Rivers are not merely conduits of water but of sediment as well. They carry material as bed load, suspended load, or dissolved load, depending on the river's discharge. Rivers are considered the base-level controls for large-scale landscape evolution in nonglacial environments, setting the conditions to which surrounding hillslopes must adjust. The most common drainage pattern is dendritic, which forms when the underlying stratum is stable and unfaulted.

  Glaciers move slowly but carry enormous erosive power. Abrasion beneath moving ice produces a fine sediment known as glacial flour. Glacial erosion carves the characteristic U-shaped valley, as opposed to the V-shaped form cut by rivers. Landscapes that were glaciated in the past but are no longer may still show elevated rates of landscape change compared to landscapes that have never been glaciated. These processes driven by prior but not current glaciation are termed paraglacial.

  Tectonic effects span timescales from minutes to millions of years. An earthquake can submerge large areas of land in minutes, forming new wetlands. Isostatic rebound can reshape surfaces over hundreds to thousands of years. Long-term plate dynamics build orogenic belts, the large mountain chains whose typical lifetimes run into many tens of millions of years, which then drive high rates of fluvial and hillslope activity and long-term sediment production.

• 7. Contemporary and Planetary Reach

  ›

  Modern researchers aim to extract quantitative laws that govern Earth surface processes. At the same time, they recognize the uniqueness of each landscape. Two ideas now shape how the field thinks about landscapes. First, not every landscape should be described as either stable or perturbed. Dynamic change is seen as intrinsic to a landscape's nature, not a temporary deviation from some ideal form. Second, many geomorphic systems are best understood through the probability distributions of process magnitudes and return times. The same processes in the same landscapes do not always produce the same outcomes. Karna Lidmar-Bergstrom, writing in the 1990s, observed that regional geography is no longer accepted by mainstream scholarship as a basis for geomorphological studies.

  The cycle of erosion has never been proven, but it has never been disproved either. Its inherent difficulties have pushed research along other lines. In historical geology, however, the model remains a common tool for establishing denudation chronologies. Modern geomorphologists Andrew Goudie and Karna Lidmar-Bergstrom have each praised it, Goudie for its elegance and Lidmar-Bergstrom for its pedagogical value.

  Beyond Earth, planetary geomorphology studies landforms on Mars and other terrestrial planets. Signs of wind, fluvial activity, glacial action, mass wasting, meteor impact, tectonics, and volcanism have all been identified on planetary surfaces. Because Mars lacks biology, geomorphologists use its landscapes to isolate and study surface processes free from biological influence, a line of inquiry that also deepens understanding of Earth itself. Practical applications back on Earth include hazard assessment such as landslide prediction, river control, stream restoration, and coastal protection, all of which depend directly on the field's ability to measure and model how landscapes change.