Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

• 1. Origins And Creation

  ›

  The 1973 oil crisis sent shockwaves through the American energy landscape, exposing vulnerabilities in a fragmented regulatory system. Congress responded by passing the Department of Energy Organization Act in 1977, which consolidated various energy agencies into a new Department of Energy. Within this reorganization, the Federal Power Commission was renamed to become the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. This change preserved the agency's independent status while placing it under the umbrella of the newly formed department. The primary mandate given to FERC at its inception was to determine whether wholesale electricity prices were unjust and unreasonable. If prices were found to be unfair, the commission had the authority to regulate pricing and order refunds for overcharges paid by ratepayers. FERC also inherited responsibilities for hearing appeals regarding Department of Energy oil price control determinations. It conducted all on-the-record hearings that previously belonged to other bodies. As part of this transition, the regulation of interstate oil pipelines moved from the Interstate Commerce Commission to FERC. However, the agency lost some jurisdiction over gas and electricity imports and exports during this restructuring.

  13

• 2. Regulatory Mandates

  ›

  FERC regulates approximately 1,600 hydroelectric projects across the United States today. Its authority extends to reviewing proposals for building interstate natural gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas terminals. The agency works closely with the United States Coast Guard to review safety and environmental impacts of these proposed LNG facilities. A core responsibility involves ensuring the reliability of the high voltage interstate transmission system. FERC monitors and investigates energy markets to prevent manipulation and ensure fair competition. The agency uses civil penalties and other enforcement tools against organizations or individuals who violate rules in the energy markets. It administers accounting and financial reporting regulations for businesses under its regulatory purview. FERC is self-funding, meaning Congress sets its budget through annual appropriations while the agency raises revenue to reimburse the Treasury. This revenue comes from annual charges levied on the natural gas, oil, and electric industries it regulates. Despite being part of the Department of Energy, FERC activities are not subject to further view by the Secretary of Energy or any employee of that department. The Department can participate in proceedings as a third party but cannot direct outcomes.

  789

• 3. Commission Structure

  ›

  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is composed of up to five commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. These commissioners serve staggered five-year terms to maintain continuity and independence. No more than three commissioners may belong to the same political party at any given time, ensuring a bipartisan body. The President appoints one commissioner to serve as chairman, who acts as the administrative head of the agency. Commissioners may continue serving past their term expiration if a successor has not yet been confirmed. They remain in office until the end of the current session of Congress under these circumstances. Historical records show names like Charles B. Curtis served from the 10th of August 1977 to the 31st of December 1980. Georgiana Sheldon took office on the 11th of August 1977 and served until the 19th of July 1985. Matthew Holden Jr. began his tenure on the 28th of October 1977 and left office on the 31st of August 1981. George R. Hall served from the 28th of October 1977 to the 8th of May 1981. J. David Hughes joined on the 8th of September 1980 and departed on the 13th of July 1984.

  56

• 4. Key Orders And Reforms

  ›

  In 1996, FERC issued Order No. 888 which spurred the creation of regional transmission organizations across the United States. This order impacted existing electric power pools by rebranding them as independent transmission operators. Electric utilities in some regions spun off generation units as separate companies competing in wholesale markets administered by these new entities. PJM (Pennsylvania, Jersey, Maryland) became an early adopter alongside the New York Independent System Operator. The California Independent System Operator was approved without changes after state officials warned they would reject any modifications. Enron exploited flawed rules within this market structure to conduct fraudulent transactions. Order No. 888 mandated that transmission operators open market access to all power generators including qualifying facilities. Order No. 889 required these generators to tie into transmission markets via data portals called Open Access Same-Time Information Systems. In February 2018, FERC issued Order No. 841 requiring wholesale markets to open up to individual storage installations regardless of interconnection point. A United States Court of Appeals court upheld Order 841 in July 2020 dismissing complaints from state public utility commissions. On the 17th of September 2020, FERC issued Order No. 2222 enabling distributed energy resources like batteries to participate in regional wholesale electricity markets.

  910152122

• 5. Enforcement Actions

  ›

  FERC investigated alleged manipulation of the electricity market by Enron and other energy companies during the California electricity crisis. The agency collected more than $6.3 billion from California electric market participants through settlements following these investigations. Since passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC has imposed over $1 billion in civil penalties and disgorgement of unjust profits. These enforcement actions address violations of anti-market manipulation rules and other regulations governing energy markets. The agency uses civil penalties as a tool against organizations or individuals who violate established rules within the energy sectors it oversees. Investigations often target entities engaging in fraudulent transactions that distort market prices for consumers. Settlements reached with major players have resulted in billions being returned to affected ratepayers. This financial recovery demonstrates the scale of potential harm caused by market manipulation schemes. The Energy Policy Act significantly expanded FERC's authority to impose such penalties on entities manipulating electricity and natural gas markets.

  438

• 6. Legal Challenges

  ›

  In the 1st of July 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on pipeline certification cases involving FERC decisions. The court stated that pipeline applicants generally succeed because they choose to expend resources only on applications serving their own financial interests. A case filed the 22nd of March 2017 challenged structural bias claims regarding how FERC funds its operations through proportional charges on regulated entities. The court dismissed allegations that this funding mechanism created inherent bias favoring industry approval. In another decision dated the 10th of July 2018, the D.C. Circuit rejected challenges from the Delaware Riverkeeper Network claiming FERC had incentives to award certificates due to its budget structure. However, the same appellate court provided guidance noting instances where FERC failed to consider cumulative environmental impacts of four separately proposed projects. The court held these projects were financially interdependent and should be treated as a single linear pipeline requiring concurrent environmental review. This ruling clarified requirements for assessing combined environmental effects when multiple segments form one continuous infrastructure project.

  2435

• 7. Federal State Conflicts

  ›

  Regions exist where state public utility commissions and federally regulated Regional Transmission Organizations operate within identical geographic footprints. New York State exemplifies this overlap between NYISO planning processes and state siting authority under the Board on Electric Siting and Environment. Any large generation facility exceeding 20 MW must proceed through both federal and state planning procedures simultaneously. Prior to NYISO formation in 1999, wholesale energy prices were set entirely within state rate case proceedings. Controversies arise when state policy makers assert retail ratepayer impacts from decisions made at the federal level regarding wholesale markets. Examples include capacity market price floors developed by NYISO and zero-emissions credits granted to nuclear power plants participating in wholesale markets. The dual planning process creates opportunities for market participants to legally extend timelines while awaiting resolution of conflicting jurisdictional requirements. In New Jersey, approval of the PennEast Pipeline faced widespread criticism from environmental groups calling it highly partisan. Critics argued FERC demonstrated bias toward the pipeline industry rather than serving broader public interests. Despite such tensions, courts have consistently upheld FERC's authority to issue certificates even when states deny local siting responsibility within designated corridors.

  1437