Eurocommunism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Eurocommunism was a political current that fractured the communist world from within. In the 1970s and 1980s, Western European communist parties began insisting they had developed a theory of social transformation more suited to their own societies than anything Moscow had to offer. The trend was most powerful in Italy, Spain, and France, three countries where communist parties commanded real mass support. What made this remarkable was the timing: these were parties that had long looked eastward for guidance, yet they were now openly rejecting the influence of the Soviet Union and its Communist Party during the height of the Cold War. The questions that will emerge from this story are not simply about ideology. They are about the price of independence, the difficulty of defining yourself against two opposing poles at once, and what happens to a movement when the external force holding it together finally collapses.

• 2. A Name in Dispute

  ›

  Jean-Francois Revel once wrote that "one of the favourite amusements of 'political scientists' is to search for the author of the term Eurocommunism." That wry observation captured how contested the very word was from the start. In the mid-1970s, the term's origins were hotly debated, with attribution floating between figures including Zbigniew Brzezinski and Arrigo Levi. It took a West German journal to settle the matter, at least provisionally. In April 1977, Deutschland Archiv concluded that the word had first appeared in the summer of 1975, coined by a Croatian journalist named Frane Barbieri, who had previously served as editor of the Belgrade news magazine NIN. Outside Western Europe, the same ideas were sometimes called neocommunism, a label that stressed greater independence from Moscow rather than any geographic framing. The fight over the label mirrored the deeper fight over the substance: what exactly was this thing, and who got to define it?

• 3. Gramsci's Long Shadow

  ›

  Antonio Gramsci's writings on Marxist theory supplied Eurocommunism with its most important intellectual foundation, according to the scholar Perry Anderson. Gramsci had questioned the sectarianism of the left and urged communist parties to build broad social alliances in pursuit of what he called hegemonic support for social reforms. That framework gave Eurocommunists a theoretical language for doing something their predecessors had rarely attempted openly: embracing democratic institutions, courting public-sector middle-class workers, and engaging with new social movements like feminism and gay liberation. Early inspiration also came from Austro-Marxism and the broader democratic road to socialism. Yet Eurocommunism did not go as far as the New Left, which had borrowed from the French nouvelle gauche and eventually moved past academic Marxist theory, largely abandoning historical materialism and class struggle altogether. Gramsci's influence thus marked a middle path, a position that would later become one of the movement's most criticised features.

• 4. Prague, 1968

  ›

  Soviet tanks entering Czechoslovakia in 1968 forced every communist party in the world to declare itself. Romania's leader Nicolae Ceausescu publicly condemned the invasion, explicitly backing the Czechoslovak leadership under Alexander Dubcek. The Italian Communist Party and the Communist Party of Spain firmly denounced the occupation. Meanwhile, the Portuguese Communist Party, the South African Communist Party, and the Communist Party USA backed Moscow's position. The French Communist Party, the Finnish SKP, and the Swedish VPK had tried to advocate for conciliation but ultimately expressed disapproval; for the PCF, it was the first time in the party's history it had publicly criticised a Soviet action. Inside Greece, the KKE fractured: the pro-Dubcek faction broke with the Soviet leadership entirely and founded a separate body, the KKE Interior. That moment of rupture made the alignment of forces visible in a way that years of theoretical debate had not. The crushing of the Prague Spring is widely considered to have been the trigger for Eurocommunism, though the source also notes that framing fails to account for the complex realignment between European communist parties and Moscow that continued through the early 1970s.

• 5. Parties in Motion

  ›

  In Finland, the transformation began as early as 1965. The Finnish SKP replaced its Stalinist leader Aimo Aaltonen, who had kept a picture of secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria on his office wall, with the revisionist trade unionist Aarne Saarinen. Around the same time, the Finnish People's Democratic League installed the reformist Ele Alenius at its helm. By 1968, these two organisations were the only parties to directly oppose Soviet military action in Prague, and the rupture split each de facto into a reformist wing and a hard-line Soviet wing. The hard-line tendency took the name Taistoism, after its leader Taisto Sinisalo. For years, the Taistoist minority retained equal rights of power within the SKP despite representing a fraction of membership. The stand-off ended in 1984 when a strong Eurocommunist majority expelled the hard-liners in large numbers. The Taistoists then founded the Communist Party of Finland (Unity), and their most committed members formed a cover organisation called Democratic Alternative. In 1990, the new Left Alliance brought the parties together, though Alenius declined to join because the alliance also admitted former Taistoists. In Spain, the trajectory was different in character but equally decisive. The PCE's leader Santiago Carrillo wrote what became the defining text of the entire movement, Eurocomunismo y estado, published in 1977, and participated directly in drafting the liberal democratic constitution as Spain transitioned out of Francisco Franco's dictatorship. In Italy, the PCI had been quietly building its own independent line from Moscow for years before 1968. In 1976, the PCI's leader Enrico Berlinguer spoke of a "pluralistic system" before five thousand communist delegates in Moscow, describing his party's intention to build "a socialism that we believe necessary and possible only in Italy." The so-called Historic Compromise with the Christian Democracy was a direct consequence of that new approach, though it was cut short by the kidnapping and murder of Aldo Moro in 1978.

• 6. The Madrid Convergence

  ›

  Eurocommunism crystallised as a pan-European force in 1977, when three party leaders met in Madrid. Enrico Berlinguer of the PCI, Santiago Carrillo of the PCE, and Georges Marchais of the PCF laid out what they called the fundamental lines of the "new way." The meeting gave visible shape to what had until then been a loose and contested tendency. Beyond Western Europe, several parties took up Eurocommunist ideas to varying degrees: the Israeli Communist Party, the Communist Party of Australia, the Japanese Communist Party, the Mexican Communist Party and its successor the Unified Socialist Party of Mexico, and the Venezuelan Movement for Socialism were all identified as influenced by the current. The reach extended even into Soviet leadership. In his memoirs, Mikhail Gorbachev cited Eurocommunism as a key influence on his own ideas of glasnost and perestroika, a remarkable acknowledgment that the movement's reformist impulse had travelled back east. The Danish Socialist People's Party, which had already broken from the Communist Party of Denmark after the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, was also sometimes described as Eurocommunist, tracing a longer reform lineage than 1968 alone.

• 7. The Weight of Criticism

  ›

  Critics from multiple directions found fault with Eurocommunism on its own terms. One charge was simply insufficient courage: the Italian Communist Party did not formally take the step of breaking with the Soviet Union until 1981, a decision prompted by the Soviet-backed repression of the Solidarnosc movement in Poland. Opponents argued this hesitation reflected the fear of losing old members who retained genuine admiration for the USSR, combined with a pragmatic reluctance to alienate a powerful state. A second charge was strategic incoherence. Critics observed that Eurocommunist parties insisted they were distinct from both Soviet communism and social democracy, yet in practice they consistently resembled one or the other. Ernest Mandel, writing from a Trotskyist perspective in his book From Stalinism to Eurocommunism: The Bitter Fruits of 'Socialism in One Country', argued that Eurocommunism was in fact a downstream consequence of the Soviet decision in 1924 to abandon the goal of world revolution and prioritise building socialism within a single country. From an anti-revisionist position, Enver Hoxha argued in Eurocommunism is Anti-Communism that the movement traced back to Nikita Khrushchev's policy of peaceful coexistence and his tolerance of Palmiro Togliatti's theory of polycentrism, which had encouraged communist parties to moderate their views in exchange for cabinet positions. Henry Kissinger framed the concern geopolitically, warning that a Western European communist government independent of Moscow would not necessarily be safe for American interests, noting that Tito was not under Soviet control yet his influence was felt globally, and suggesting that a communist-ruled Western European country could lead to what Kissinger called a "total redefinition" of the post-World War II order.

• 8. After the Wall

  ›

  The Soviet Union's dissolution forced every surviving Eurocommunist party to reckon with a world in which the thing they had defined themselves against no longer existed. Many parties split along a right-left axis. On the right, organisations like the Democrats of the Left and the Initiative for Catalonia Greens moved toward social democracy. On the left, parties like the Communist Refoundation Party and the Living Unified Socialist Party of Catalonia worked to preserve identifiably communist positions. In Greece, the successors of KKE Interior, including the Renewing Communist Ecological Left (AKOA) and the Greek Left (EAR), joined with other left-wing figures, among them Manolis Glezos, the last leader of EDA, to form Synaspismos. The French PCF, which had already drifted back toward a pro-Soviet stance during the 1980s, was among those most clearly demonstrating that Eurocommunism had always been a staging ground rather than a destination. In 2017, the Communist Party of Spain formally returned to Marxism-Leninism, closing a chapter that Santiago Carrillo had opened with Eurocomunismo y estado four decades earlier.